CHICAGO YES!!!

Amerimutts are so cucked.
>f-from m-my co-old dead ha-hands
>w-what's that? You want my automatik killer 47 bullets per second? A-alright officer. Blue lives m-matter!

Haha! A Chicago suburb?
There will be a crime-rush to Deerfield by nigger-niners, on par with the gold rush to California, the likes of which we have never seen before.

>move to the suburb next door
Problem solved

They will get sued and stopped by an injunction. This won't stand.

tfw this is my god damn home town.

I dont own guns, But im gonna make sure I give the local cops hell. Thank god for unregistered rifles

Unconstitutional. It will be challenged, and Chicago politics always loves to stir the pot.

And how are they meant to enforce that?

nah, all the nigs are in the south side.

Isn't Deerfield that super Muslims zone where the city is like 97% or something like that.

About to be open season on law abiding people. Rip

breitbart.com/london/2018/04/04/78-year-old-homeowner-arrested-stabbing-armed-burglar-screwdriver/#disqus_thread

A nation without 2nd amendment...

Attached: screenshot-www.breitbart.com-2018.04.04-19-52-39.jpg (670x1625, 261K)

Thanks for giving Gorsuch the hammer he needs to put this entire round of bullshit to rest.

>The ordinance does not state whether police will regularly knock on doors and enter homes to check in closets and under beds for “assault weapons” and “high capacity” magazines.
They won’t. Cops have learned since the revolution that the way you do draconian shit like this isn’t all at once in a sweep, it’s by catching people during unrelated criminal searches and sweeps, and charging for violating the ordinance in addition to whatever other crime they’re accused of violating.

They get a little outrage at the beginning, then it dies down, and after a few years they can say, “Look at all the real nasty criminals we’ve busted! Like this guy who was caught with a big bad gun when he was searched for child pornography! And this guy who had a loaded assault rifle when he was pulled over for a DUI!”

We worry about them “coming for our guns,” but the real threat is that we won’t see them coming.

I joined the Illinois State Rifle Association right after the Florida shooting. ISRA does good shit in IL fighting bad law like this, and I anticipate they’ll be filing suit in either state or federal court very soon.

...

isn't this an ex post facto law? are they retarded?

Thats deerborne michigan

wishin a nigga would

>deerfield
>95.88% white
why would you need an assault weapon in deerfield anyways?
it would only make sense to own one if you lived near niggers

Fuck this shit, MANPADS NOW !
>assault weapon not even a term mothfucking win

2nd amendments is to fight the cops not the criminals.

Now that's progressive. Next time the man should cross dress and suck off the burglar.

Attached: 1487001539237.png (253x199, 6K)

>police knocks on door
>"give us your high cap gun mags"
>"I have none officer"
>cop leaves

No it’s not. It’s a taking or a regulatory taking. That’s one of the things that’ll kill it, since Deerfield isn’t paying for the illegalized guns.

It’s a common misconception that the government can’t make possession of something illegal when you obtained it before the effective date of the law. They absolutely can, but they must give fair notice to all who might be affected and time to comply, and since it’s a taking, they must pay fair market value for the property.

>Problem solved
Wrong

>being white & afraid of cops
this is a non-issue.

>Why would you need an assault weapon anyways?
To shoot mongoloids that ask that question.

there are none in deerfield. it's probably the whitest suburb up north

We’ve had this sort of shit in Illinois for a long fucking time, and the very nature of life in the suburbs means these laws need to be killed at the local level. It’s like Aurora’s old bans, or the problem of transporting guns through the suburbs. Illinois sorta fixed shit but has not done so adequately.

Niggers in Chicago gonna start robbing these law abiding citizens.. well more than the usual at least. America doesn't have a gun problem. We have a nigger problem.

Tell that to the Branch Davidians.

Basically. Even Aussies had some standoffs in confiscation. So now it's just make the law and catch violators as you go. People in Deerfield are justified to execute teasoners though.

...

>discreet
Suppressors do not make firearms discreet. They make them less hazardous to sensitive eardrums. You can still hear them just fine.

Don't worry, the UN troops can definitely help Chicago and US with gun problems:
archive.is/2HTEa

Attached: pepelaugh3.png (500x913, 230K)

fauquierfreecitizen.com/seventy-two-killed-resisting-gun-confiscation-in-boston/
They want that civil war so fucking much.

>why would you need an assault weapon
SHALL

Nonbuger here, how is this even possible? What about the 2nd amendment?

Pretty much this. They use the provisions when they come to search your house for violating “hate speech” laws

Kek. I love that story.

Life expectancy of that police chief?

Attached: ashylarry.jpg (555x370, 20K)

Most people didn't make their own and lowers are registered.

Chances are, if you can afford a legal assault weapon, you can afford to move to a new town. This is just dumb.

BE PROGRESSIVE

>Chicago
Oh boy I can't wait for the corruption.

>Police "confiscate" weapons from niggers
>Claim to of destroyed them
>Sell on black market to pad that "pension"
>Niggers rebuy their own guns with white mans welfare they get every month

Sir i fear you miss the point. when somebody asks why anyone anywhere should own a Sporting rifle the answer is always to shoot faggot in the face that ask "why anyone anywhere should own a Sporting rifle"

Also what is a "assault weapon"? can you define it ?!

I can only hope this happens if people bend over and take this.

fpbp

All the gun owners meming about armed resistance will either hide them or give them up without resistance. Pathetic

Ferocious gunfights incoming

Gang leaders & their mastermind sponsors of today are tomorrows urban warlords come time

There really are some gun laws in the US. Shocking, I know.

context
read what i said after that

i'm not saying you shouldn't own one, it just seems pointless when you live in one of the whitest areas of chicago. i live in the south side and don't even own a handgun

because taking guns from niggers gets your cop ass shot.
Far easier to take them from law-abiding white people so you can crow about how you reduced the number of DEADLY ASSAULT WEAPONS on the street.

Doesn't this violate the constitution.
Wasn't the Heller ruling exactly for this type of thing?

>Also what is a "assault weapon"? can you define it ?!
The ordinance defines it. That’s one place where the lawsuit will challenge, that the definition is too vague to give fair notice of what’s banned.

Don't shit where you eat.

>Chicago, the place with the strictest gun control in the midwest, has the highest rate of violent crime and gun crime.
>clearly the problem is their gun control laws werent strict enough
Not to mention most of their gun crime involves handguns, not assault weapons. Leftist logic everyone.

Good read.

Since when do local ordinances and Chief's of Police rank higher than the rights we have been given by the Second Amendment of our Constitution?

The UN troops can be a reminder to liberals and others who want to take our guns it isn't happening. Not even the un can save you

>Swede

>Doesn't this violate the constitution.
Probably.
>Wasn't the Heller ruling exactly for this type of thing?
Heller via McDonald, since it’s not a federal law. Also Caetano will probably take out most of the public policy claims they make at court.

The real problem is whether they get the right district judge and appellate panel, if it’s litigated federally.

>Also what is a "assault weapon"? can you define it ?!
The ones that morons deem to be scary looking.

COLD DEAD HANDS

chicago has a nigger problem, not a gun problem

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAH
AHAHAHAAHAAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA

You realise that youre Swedish, right?

fuck district judges they are all a bunch of cucks. someone needs to cull them all

>Nogunz cuck on Jow Forums
And you consider yourself right wing? Stop being such a fucking faggot and go buy an AR

Nobody needs a reason to own a firearm.

Attached: Understand You're Swede.jpg (420x416, 33K)

:^)
THIS.
Daily reminder that all the big men on the internet talkin' about 'I'LL GO OUT SHOOTIN' TELL YUH WHAT' will roll over and give up their guns when the man in the special hat arrives at the door. SAD!

Attached: 1455996230188.jpg (797x748, 422K)

That’s a fun article.

Deerfield is a KIKE-hole, check out the names of the city council members and the people who testified at the city council meeting.

Can't believe I haven't heard about this. Huge silence on all media outlets big and small. Thanks for the share Pole bro

>Doesn't this violate the constitution.
Of course it does, nobody cares.

>avoiding justified killing

BAKA

>chicongo
inb4 mass retaliation of dindus after a few good boys get shot when 5-0 tries to take their 50 round drum mags for their glocks.

The situation arose from government gibs and a state run by dems.
>Answer: More government

Also, part of the problem with Heller is that it’s *primarily* a handgun case. While it’s obvious the same rationale applies to long guns, it’s just distinct enough, and honestly, does endorse that some restrictions are constitutional, such as bans on unusual and particularly hazardous weapons, but the court never defines this. Heller was a revolution in the gun rights movement in many ways, but jurisprudentially it’s a very incremental, small-step ruling.

All of this is just proof that this 'resistance against tyranny' talk is a meme. No one actually does anything when things like this happen except talk tough.

Attached: 1466883999764.png (2000x2000, 39K)

I really hope fucking Pritzker doesn’t win the governor race. If that fuck is in Springfield I’m gonna seriously look into moving to Indiana or Wisconsin. This shit is too much.

One of the cringing things I've read today

Does such a thing exist?

You did not? I thought that is how your country started. It says right at bottom, that, that is how revolution started.

>implying there is any interest to stop the self imposed population control that is niggerdom

That’s actually one reason I argue the second amendment works. It’s not that nobody would fight back against tyranny, it’s that the tyranny worth resisting doesn’t happen anymore because of the threat of armed resistance (and dead politicians/dead cops).

I hate to draw this comparison, but it’s a bit like blacks bitching about institutional racism everywhere when the real racism (i.e., Jim Crow laws) are dead and buried.

Goyim like you are going to be swept into the dust bin of history. Only G-d's chosen people can own guns.

Attached: Poona II-114.jpg (267x319, 27K)

Attached: swede.jpg (660x648, 184K)

This. Suppressors IRL are nothing like in movies, and any congressman who calls them silencers should have to sit next to a gun shooting full-power rifle rounds through a suppressor for an hour.

>Being such a fag you never beat up someone, sold drugs and stole something in another country
Americans are pussies.

Attached: muttt.png (721x517, 252K)

How is that true though when confiscations like this are happening? Yet another clear violation of the constitution and no one is doing anything. These violations happen inch by inch over a long time.

It's obvious too, I can't expect someone to try to be a revolutionary because they know they'll probably get killed by the police, I'm not arguing that everyone is a coward or anything I'm saying the gravity of actually doing something is so massive that a normal person is not going to 'rise up' like that no matter how many guns the police want to confiscate, unless society entirely crumbles.