Aryan Migration Theory Confirmed

What the fucking fuck is this jibberish?

Attached: 1522716006193.jpg (513x558, 131K)

It's a known fact. But facts don't matter these days.

We knew it archeologically, not with DNA confirmation, which we have now, apparently. People have been watching for the results of this for a while now.

>The genetic formation of Central and South Asian populations has been unclear because of an absence of ancient DNA. To address this gap, we generated genome-wide data from 362 ancient individuals, including the first from eastern Iran, Turan (Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, and Tajikistan), Bronze Age Kazakhstan, and South Asia. Our data reveal a complex set of genetic sources that ultimately combined to form the ancestry of South Asians today. We document a southward spread of genetic ancestry from the Eurasian Steppe, correlating with the archaeologically known expansion of pastoralist sites from the Steppe to Turan in the Middle Bronze Age (2300-1500 BCE).

>What the fucking fuck is this jibberish?
Evidence that phoneposting niggers like you should be aborted, not allowed on the Internet.

>immediate post war
>Aryan stuff get's guilt by association with Nazis
>science eventually becomes to overwhelming that it's a generally accepted hypothosis
This genetic study is new though, just confirming what most of us have already accepted.

>We knew it archeologically, not with DNA confirmation
but this is wrong R1a has been detected in northern india literally the moment anthropologists started doing genetic sequencing some 15 years ago

oh i see

Bump because fuck all those tranny worshipping threads

Basically. Science is just now catching up with what "conspiracy white supremacist virgins" have known for many years.

but archeogenetics literally confirmed this almost 20 years agp

Its interesting how much the DNA confirms the archaeological model; well done archeologists. I was kind of hoping to see some information on the origins of the Kalash, but that's not within the scope of this research. Good post though.

Today has been abhorrent. Worst I have seen in quite awhile. Really strange honestly.

True. But that and the numerous white mummies around the world don't matter to (((science))) either.

Posting the phenotypic ranges of likely Aryan derived genetics descendants

Attached: aryan_race.jpg (1140x1392, 198K)

Attached: Non-European Caucasoids.png (1408x1138, 1016K)

And the range of Indo-Aryan languages

Attached: indo_aryan_language_map.png (750x690, 646K)

Attached: Indo_Aryan-migrations.gif (1200x598, 2.28M)

Aryan invasions is gonna be increasingly confirmed every year and there's nothing you can do about it lmao.

Yeah, for now the Kalash remain a mystery. Maybe they were ancient Ayyliums.

Attached: kalash-and-race.jpg (2144x1354, 1.89M)

Bump. Hitler was right.
Fuck all those early 20th century orientalists that said that Aryan invasion theory was false. Looks like they got BTFO. So you’re telling me that the poos already in India didn’t come up with vedic culture?

Attached: FC8A480D-A460-4D96-BD6E-3BB254AD514E.jpg (2127x1196, 571K)

Its like someone crossed bronze age Germans with Himilayan sherpas and some completely unique genetic population unrelated to anyone else in the world.

Attached: kalash.jpg (769x619, 115K)

does anyone have that chart comparing german, celtic iranian and caucasion languages showing their similarity?

I think I might have it let me check...

Attached: aryans_rig_veda.png (1007x1237, 260K)

well to be fair the original Aryan theory postulated corded ware culture in north Europe as the source of the aryan expansion everywhere, it has been somewhat modified, although CW still had an important role

>So you’re telling me that the poos already in India didn’t come up with vedic culture?
Look up George Dumézil if that interests you. He has partially reconstituted the original Aryan mythology. Vedic culture is Aryan but it has a number of changes from common themes found in Aryan civilizations, and a bit of influence from original poos (like Greeks and Celts had much influence from pre-Aryan Europeans).

It proves that the descendants of the aryans are the modern day ANI steepe street shitters while the cultured IVC where ASI.

Aryan deity crashing this thread.

Attached: nism_eostre.jpg (596x388, 121K)

It's still a valid model. When they say the Andronovo are the best fit, it just means "best fit for the existing genome". There will be subsequent research, and it looks likely to further confirm the archeological models.

Yes, but look at the percentages. They're among many other descendants; Europeans having the most direct lines of descent for modern populations.

Attached: yamna-migrations-indo-iranian.png (2115x3042, 1.17M)

Not answering his question though, what would be the relevance of this fact. What politics do you want to push with this fact?

This. Pic related from previous research.

I can't find it, check the archive

Attached: yamnaya.png (1180x987, 260K)

yeah indeed, I recall some study from 2015 saying that CW was in fact a better fit for steppe ancestry in south asia in general than Yamnaya due to the small farmer ancestry in CW
it would actually make more sense for the higher presence of blondism, Yamnaya weren't particularly fair

It validates racial science. It also fuels anyone with a volkish identitarian bent. This essentially proves that Europids, including Slavs, Germanics, Celts, Meds, etc, are essentially a distinct racial family.

This one?

Attached: 6872EAE2-7BE9-41B9-98DC-60DB84AE08E9.png (1262x986, 642K)

I don't think anyone considers the Aryan migrations psuedoscience except for nationalistic pajeets

top kek russian and finnish are the most aryan people

Attached: screenshotAtUploadCC_1522522296147.png (545x456, 385K)

you're misinterpreting my question. I'm not questioning the relevance. I'm questioning why it's considered new information. The point being that aryan invasion/migration myths have been vindicated from the very beginning of archeogenetics as a discipline

Attached: white people land.jpg (2600x390, 150K)

yeah that was the one

leftoids consider it psudoscience because "muh nazis"

hahahahahah what would hitler say now?

Euros so desperate to take credit for any and everything

>what would hitler say now?
He didn't have a problem with Finns or Russians, that's a Jow Forums myth

Attached: Mannerheim-Hitler.jpg (600x400, 71K)

Indogermanism is an american/german and lately ukrainian thing.
You think that french larp as indians?

Nazi school map, claiming all major civilizations originate from Germany

Attached: map indogermanism.jpg (2048x1845, 1.79M)

wow. saved.

>Indogermanism is an american/german and lately ukrainian thing
Evola was too, and as I recall, he was actually Italian, not German or American. Not sure why Meds always bitch about it.

Attached: file.png (1419x1008, 1.37M)

>We Indians are Caucasians and belong in Europe
>Europe is our ancestral land and you have no right to call for deportation of anyone of middle eastern/Indian descent
>We will fight you for our right to live and have kids in Europe. Our forefathers were from Europe

>Indians are genetically identical to southern European people in the ancient Greek i ain't making this up
>Whites are dumb nothing new

>we pass as white we can easily replace whites, so how are we not belonging in Europe? We literally have a claim on it as much as you

>So that means Indians have European ancestry and Europe is our land as well
>Are caucasoid high caste north Indians white/partly white? If yes, they belong in Europe as well

>we are Mediterranean Indians genetically identical to southern European Meds
>I am serious bro We are tanned whites
>I am sure my ancestors sailed the Iberian peninsula until the British arrived
>Gypsy are European people now

>Why are you guys obsessed with racial purity?
>Is this indian kid southern European? Looks Italian
>I am aryan no doubt

>You butchers destroyed me country and now have audacity to lecture me on civilization huh?
>You were in the caves when we were exploring space
>British leech isnt that hard to get rid of
>Are people with black eyes and hair white?

>Explain this racists? There is only one human race
>Are Indians genetically identical to southern European people?

>Are you guys against all immigration or just the illegals?
> Cause all technical advancements have been made by immigrants (mostly Indians) only

>Even Indians are southern European people we ARE The creators of civilization

>Britain, It's 2017 we own you now
>So many racist posts by this id We created civilisation you barbarians (i am pure southern European)
>But I have (100% pure rare Mediterranean violet eyes with dirty blonde hair) Don't be jelly we all be equal in god eye

Yeah, its not like we have linguistic proof that a group of white people from the Caucus conquered virtually all of europe and asia in prehistory.

Attached: indoeuropean.gif (512x256, 40K)

>CHINA, SHANGHAI - JUNE 28: Shanghai Expo 2010, Ukraine pavillion on Expo venue on June 28, 2010 in Shenzhen

Attached: 1446029034648[1].jpg (1023x680, 254K)

>So if we are white, large parts of Europe including Russia belong to us?
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/166661634/#166665698

>If we can pass as some sort of European that means we have European genes in us, and thus Europe belongs to us as well?
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/166661634/#166667172

> I saw lots of people on here say that she could easily pass for white. So that means she has white genes and is European, right?
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/166661634
> Indians are genetically identical to southern European people
>Hey burger i am your typical southern European you realise that all Mediterranean philosopher were actually INDIAN?

>A whitey hate thread a day keeps the ethno nationalist away. Also white "people"
>Because Indians are white Southern European to be precise

>If white people are the master race. Then why do Indians rule the planet?
> We are southern European
>Amit is a Greek name just like Indians are genetically ancient Greeks

>we are the last pure southern European genes
>Tfw southern European

march 2017
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/120608479/#120613593
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/120608479/#120614094
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/123054064/#123059346
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/123162145/#123162450
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/124204303/#124208642
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/124212366
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/124503271
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/125318540/#125322807
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/127411616/#127417978
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/127720573/#127723347
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/127720573
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/128860016/#128860621
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/128564506/#128565513
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/129194127/#129196464
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/166411538/#166416753
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/166563877/#166563991

Fucking speedreaders when they'll learn.

Nope.
"white" Euros are just a subset of a larger cline.
If you truly believe in racial science than you would put arabs, berbers, turks, pershians, pashtos and pajeets in the same race since their is so distinct barrier between these populations

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Passing_of_the_Great_Race#Nordic_theory

>This is the race that gave the world the great civilizations of Egypt, of Crete, of Phoenicia including Carthage, of Etruria and of Mycenean Greece. It gave us, when mixed and invigorated with Nordic elements, the most splendid of all civilizations, that of ancient Hellas, and the most enduring of political organizations, the Roman State.

Attached: 200px-Photo_of_Madison_Grant[1].jpg (200x291, 13K)

don't think it proves that at all, after all even Brits aren't even 50% Yamnaya derived, and this percentage goes well below that in south Europe
I recall hearing how most Europeans except probably NE ones are slightly closer to middle neolithic Europeans than they are to Yamnaya

the peoples who brought IE culture all the way west diluted the steppe ancestry with the locals since the beginning, mostly with locals women it seems

Indians are Australoids with some mestizo influence from arabia, persia, and the east:

1. Australoids - people similar to Andamanese, originating in one of the first OOA migrations. Dumb and ugly and are the main major component in both North and South poos.

2. Dravidians - brown mostly-Australoid with some sandnig-Caucasoid from Kuwait and Southern Iran. These people invaded the great Elamite Indus Valley civilization of Pakistan, with running water and even water toilets(continuous flow, not like modern water toilets that flush on command). Ugly and crafty as fuck. Dravidians still dominate Southern and central India and are the genetic core of northern poos.

3. Indo-Persians - Sandniggy mestizos. The Indo-Persians are Gypsies, North Indians, Brahmins. Ugly and sinister. these are descendants of australoids that got raped by Elamites, Arabs, Moghuls, Persians, Turks. Blonde Scythians exterminated many poos and in the process, they absorbed and assimilated lots of the extant Dravidians, thus browning their own race.

I don't see how we need that to proof that for example Germanics and Meds are distinct European subraces. I would go so far to say that this is almost common sense in Europe. I mean sure, there are the lunatics which say that race is a social construct without any base in biology but in my experience people are pretty much aware of the differences between Europeans.

Wasn't quoting you though.

Not a historybuff by any means, but finding out more about our ancestors farther and farther back in time is extremely interesting.

I am very confident that the very first modern homo sapiens, intelligent humans originated from the middle east, egypt and asia minor in 10,000 BC. They were hunters/gatherers that spread to Europe, Asia and Africa creating many subspecies from 10,000 to 7,000 BCE and then evolving to agriculturalists and building villages around 5,000 which is parallel to Old Bible's story about the sons of Noah.

I was shocked when I learned the Rasna in Italy had Swastikas in their art.

the oldest modern human remains are found in Morocco.

it's from here:
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:World_Köppen_Classification_(with_authors).svg
I cut out all the "non-White" climates and left mostly Continental or Oceanic climates.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humid_continental_climate
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oceanic_climate
White people climate = snow/cold in winter time + a warm summer to gather food.

thats good, as a pakistani i can fuck my white girlfriend and not worry about it being race mixing as we're both aryan

pakis/poos are actually australoid.

Indo-aryans ceased to be aryans 3000 years ago when we mixed with the australoid natives. indians and pakis who have arab/persian blood (like myself) have more australoid dna in them too.

Why is it nonsense my ethnically Swiss friend?

hahahaha pakistan isnt austroloid only dravidans are

This gif is quite outdated

Yamna(R1b-rich) didn't produces Corded Ware(R1a-rich) and Andronovo(R1a-rich) nor did Andronovo produces BMAC(Neolithic Iranian culture)

PUREST WHITEST OLDEST EUROPEAN GENES

no faggot. us pakis are australoid as poos. we got raped by arabs, mongols, and persians to make us le 10% face

well it's accurate

Kek

Bump

of course the fucking Aryan Migration Theory is real.
Have any of you faggots forgotten that in the 90's, Chinese scientists discovered Caucasian Aryan Indo-Iranic Mummies in Western China in the Tarim Basin?
These Caucasian Mummies were all 5,000 years old and 6'0+ with brunette, red, and blonde hair.
These people are the people that conquered India and the Poo's thousands of years ago riding their War Chariots.

Attached: aryanpersiangirl2.jpg (457x636, 39K)

yamna were heavily influeced by chg and maycoop culture and maybe even became the patrilear force of this migrations so iranian have too say about this and the formatio of pie

Turanian is a obsolete psuedo-scientific term[1] that has been used in reference to diverse groups of unrelated people. It has had currency in Turanism, Pan-Turkism, and historic Turkish nationalism.

Turanid race or Ural-Altaic race is a now obsolete term, originally intended to cover populations of Central Asia associated with the spread of the Turanian languages, which are the combination of the Uralic and Altaic families (hence also "Ural–Altaic race").[1]

"Turanid race" that included the Uralic and Altaic speaking peoples more generally.[4] There was also an ideology of Hungarian Turanism in Hungarian fascism.

The whites were slaughtered by east asian mongoloids who raped original Indo European people of central asia/west china.

the mongoloid adoption of scythian ways lef to a rebellion against Whites. the locust swarm invasion resulted in the rape and genocide of Indo-European peoples living throughout all of central asia and the middle east. Central Asia is now full of mixed race Elliot Rodgers thanks to them.

after reading it iranian have been the one who first introduced in india and spread the agriculture then a second migration this time of aryans conquer the land again

Turanians or Turkics happened when Tocharian Caucasian Tribes mixed with local Finno-Ugric or Uralic-Altai Tribes .
what you get is a Caucasoid Race

Attached: tatarturanid.jpg (372x527, 22K)

>tfw The Bhagavad Gita wasn't allegory

Attached: 1506141863019.jpg (460x562, 78K)

>t. Serkhan Chinkgiz Tatar-Mongol Erdokhan

What shared typology? Being agglutinative?

You cant just assemble a list of words that look vaguely similar and call it a proto vocabulary. You have to establish rigid sound correspondences and reconstruct the proto-forms from that, something no one's been able to do. There's a reason "Turanic" or "Altaic" is dead in academia and it's not Indo-Europeanist bias.

altaic on its own is pretty autistic, bur ural-altaic? thats a whole new level of autism user

WE WUZ AGGLUTINATIVE FOLK!

languagesoftheworld.info/bad-linguistics/agglutinative-folk.html

Turanian" and "Altaic" are Pan-Turkist memes.

"But muh Japanese is Altaic!!!"

altaic" is just a large collection of areal related but not genetically related language families.

each family consisting of a series of blown-up mutated versions of single ancient paleo-siberian languages

When was it ever in doubt? They just started referring to the Aryans as Indo-Europeans with an emphasis on language and culture instead of race (not that there is much of a difference but to a modern American retard they might project backwards and believe it)

iranian deserve much more merit that aryan a codename for european
-they introduced agriculture in 6000bc in india
-they influence yamna genetically and cullturally
this is a victory for the iranian people

Bump

Attached: quote-respect-the-man-of-noble-races-other-than-your-own-who-carries-out-in-a-different-place-savitr (850x400, 72K)

(((European hunter gatherers)))

> sperging this fucking hard
i'm not a turk faggot
I'm just saying that the Turkic or Turanid race was created when Tocharian Caucasians mixed with Finno-Ugric and Uralic-Altai tribes.

respect to iranians you were so great
maybe we could fight like in the roman era one more time

Attached: DG9dkMbXkAE6Wha.jpg (675x1200, 116K)

If by "germany" you mean present-day Ukraine, then yeah....

Can you stop posting that Finnish (((nationalist))) kikecunt?

>there is literally nothing wrong with being a descendant of raging mongoloids who stole scythian/tocharian culture and later genocided them

you have no idea of history beyond a few catch phrases.

tocharians descend from afanesovo ( aka yamna of central and east asia)

Mongolids expanded from Yakutia and permafrost areas, their original homeland. Mongols are Paleo-Siberian and originally lived like and are related to Evenks, Chukchi, Eskimos, Yakuts. They were reindeer herders or hunters.
They met horse riding Scythians and Tocharians, and learned the horse-riding steppe culture from them.
With the newly adopted steppe-lifestyle based on the horse (taken originally from Scythians), Mongolids gradually grew and expanded to mongolia. From there they eradicated the original Scythians/Tocharians and continued genociding Scythians/Tocharians who were indigenous to Central Asia.

Today Central Asia is inhabited by the Mongolids who replaced the Scythians.

The Chanyu (Khan) of the Xiongnu took advantage of the chaos caused by Wang Mang (9-24 CE) and destroyed the Western Regions (Tocharia, Bactria)

after the decimation, invasion, and genocide by the turks, mongols, in 1389−1390 Tamerlane ravaged Kashgar, Andijan and the intervening country, adding to the million victims of turk-mongols

here was a very long struggle and the Xiongnu were just one of many turko-mongols to expand and conquer Tocharians/Sogdians

but the Tang campaigns marked the end of Indo-European Xinjiang,[10][23] as Turkic linguistic and cultural influences spread into Central Asia. Tang China was responsible for the influx of Turkic migrants, because of the number of Turks that served in the Tang military as soldiers and generals during the dynasty's military expeditions.[24]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tang_campaigns_against_the_Western_Turks#Historical_significance
you tatar-mongoloids are the same larping tier as australoid poos claiming to be aryan scythians

Attached: 1519164422955.jpg (1600x1120, 412K)

Y'all thinking the Yamnaya were "white" is hilarious. They were the result of admixture of euro hunter gatherers who were closely related to Siberians, and Near Eastern hunter gatherers. smdh.

why resist god's army, the turks? deep down you know that we're the root race talked in your aryan myths

your queen was anzu, a turk and now your new queen is an azeri turk. hitler didn't attack turkey and said that he saw ataturk as a teacher. don't you see the truth?

>Y'all
Get the fuck off my board.

Attached: 1519269064609.jpg (1208x950, 425K)

>mongoloid-australoid psuedoscience
These siberians were caucasoid... not mongoloid
They are remnants from a better time when Indoeuropeans did dominate most of Eurasia...

Comparison with published data from ancient hunter-gatherers and European farmers showed that the Kalash share genetic drift with the Paleolithic Siberian hunter-gatherers and might represent an extremely drifted ancient northern Eurasian population that also contributed to European and Near Eastern ancestry. Since the split from other South Asian populations, the Kalash have maintained a low long-term effective population size (2,319–2,603) and experienced no detectable gene flow from their geographic neighbors in Pakistan or from other extant Eurasian populations. The mean time of divergence between the Kalash and other populations currently residing in this region was estimated to be 11,800 (95% confidence interval = 10,600−12,600) years ago, and thus they represent present-day descendants of some of the earliest migrants into the Indian sub-continent from West Asia.

Human populations show subtle allele-frequency differences that lead to geographical structure, and available methods thus allow individuals to be clustered according to genetic information into groups that correspond to geographical regions. In an early worldwide survey of this kind, division into five clusters unsurprisingly identified (1) Africans, (2) a widespread group including Europeans, Middle Easterners, and South Asians, (3) East Asians, (4) Oceanians, and (5) Native Americans. However, division into six groups led to a more surprising finding: the sixth group consisted of a single population, the Kalash.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4570283/