Three children are fighting over a flute. Who would you give it to?

>shoot the poor one, already a lost cause,
>tell one who made it ill give them money a and materials to make many more, which I'll sell
>give current flute to one who can play and let her use it to earn me money

Child B. Child A didn't buy it therefore doesn't have the rights to it and Child C can go fuck himself.

B.
The other two did not have any part in creating it, so they have no right to it. Ownership defaults to the creator.
Unless they relinquished ownership of it for some reason, the only just thing is that it remain with its owner until they agree to relinquish it.

Child A will get the flute through natural bartering. In a perfect market economy goods will flow to the actor that is most capable of exploiting them. The only scenario where Child C gets the flute is if he is allowed to beat up the girls.

Attached: sauna_1024-1024x768.jpg (1024x768, 136K)

>attempt to commie post
>accidentally is capitalist

child c, women don’t deserve property

if child B made the flute
why do i have it?

A pays B for the flute or A doesn't get it. C can fuck right off.

the flute is worthless if it is made by a blue haired girl

Am I teaching music, woodworking, economics or history?

Woke

Its not my flute to give what the fuck is wrong with this image. the only one capable of the fluture is b.

Attached: cat213.jpg (567x567, 129K)

fuck, marry, kill

Child B to sell to Child A's parents. Child C can earn his flute in the coal mines.

Obviously B's

Child A. Child A repays the labor of Child B by performing on the flute. Child C can go get fucked.

Attached: 56CFE07E-7129-4953-9E47-4A45D881ED4F.jpg (500x624, 78K)

B has the right to it, but she should sell it for aomething she can eat/use
A can buy it if she wants

Fuck C

I wouldn't get involved. Saw some kids bullying another kid and he was on the floor, I thought I should break it up but I didn't. I just walked away.

Attached: something-karl-pilkington-actually-said_o_2177487.jpg (1280x732, 191K)

A = nat soc
B = capitalist
C = brain dead commie

kek

B. There is no other sensible choice. C is a communist and deserves to be thrown off a helicopter whereas A can use her lunch money to buy the flute from B.

Attached: 1505958156072.jpg (720x918, 52K)

Keep it for myself as they lack the power to protect their right to own it.

Child B is a misrepresentation of the capitalist class.

She extracted the materials herself by hand and made the flute herself. She did not offer Child C a fraction of the flute's value for him to craft it then sell it to Child A at a tremendous markup.

I wish people could see past Ben Shapiro and Stefan Molyneux capitalist memes for half a second and actually analyze the world around them.

Attached: 4ab.jpg (600x647, 21K)

Child B, if A want's the flute she can attempt to negation a rent, sale or trade. C can fuck off and get a job.

Attached: Thinking Sun.gif (480x264, 1.54M)

Commie B doesn't have to sell anything even if A can play it. A has to buy it or have a signed contract to ownership and if not then A can take a walk. C should be beaten for acting like a beggar.

I'm keeping that shit

Child B. but then again it's a chick, child c. it is

Attached: 1522427661452.jpg (923x866, 138K)

and if child B doesn't give a shit about some ear rape and doesn't think it's even remotely equal in value to the days he spent making it?

It's my flute now.

A if you believe beauty can save the world

Again B can give to someone else. A has no right to it.

This. Until proven otherwise, the best indication is that it belongs to B.

Then child b can be stuck with a useless flute. If child b doesn’t like the music of the flute, she should have made something else.

People don't just play the flute this is a dumb ass analogy. Suppose child C can do something else like write music for A to play on the flute. Then A commissions works from C to play for money to pay B for the flute on the trust that A can actually play what C writes and that people are willing to pay to hear

It's B's flute, not mine.

B made the flute, B decides what will happen to it.

Fuck you. kek.

Does child C get the flute in any of those 4 options?

Commie!

child B can learn to play the flute, but I guess making something doesnt entitle you to it huh?

A has the right of actually being able to use it. What will B do with the flute? Will B produce flutes that no one ever uses?

No because he is a poor beggar who deserves a smack for stooping so low.

Anyone who says "B" is a brainlet. He "provided the materials for it"? Where? On what land? Guaranteed that the materials were never really his to begin with. If, for instance, he collected wood from the forest, it was not his wood to take without democratic approval.

No she can give it to her parents, etc.

Not if you're a goy.

Attached: 1521423121532.png (461x583, 2K)

B has the right to give the flute away to those who can use it if she wishes. But also has the right to retain her property if she chooses to.

Child B, no brainer.

fpbp
/thread

Now you’re adding in people not under consideration in the original dilemma.

No one should get this fucking flute.

B, in a closed group of similar ethnic people in nationalist state , if there is a surlpus of resources you could give it for free (while paying B)to a few exceptionaly talented in flute A children to benefit the nation.

>I made the flute
Child B get's the flute, and I have no right to take it from her and give it to someone else.

Attached: coexist1.jpg (1160x451, 106K)

Exactly. People who disagree are Commies.

>Child B made the flute

but who provided the materials? who contracted / hired the girl to make the flute in the first place?

commies the whole lot of you

/thread
Child B created the flute, therefore it is child B's.

B can loan A the flute but the flute doesn't belong to A. If A can produce value with the flute then maybe they can pay B for it. What if I give B some compensation on A's behalf and then tell A that they have to pay me back.

Child B, if you say C you are a commie.

flutes are for faggots, so I give it to OP

No, B doesn’t have the right to keep an object of value from being used to produce that value. However B has the right of being the recipient of the value produced by that object.

I take the flute, I remind A that asking nicely, and promising to return B's flute after playing it would have been appropriate, and put all three of them on time out for the remainder of playtime because they were fighting.

I then give it back to B at the end of class because it belongs to her, and hold C after class to find out why he felt he needed to fight over the flute even though he could not use it, or even really wanted it.

>Child B: Authority figure, do not take my flute.

>Child A: Authority figure, take Child B's flute and give it to me.

>Child C: Authority figure, take Child B's flute and give it to me.

Child B should keep the flute and should also build a gun to shoot the authority figure with.

Attached: dootdoot.gif (250x227, 139K)

She owns it automatically, she also has the right not to give it away.

Child b should have the flute, then child a should useing the fruits of their labour to pay for child b’s flute.

Attached: 5A59A998-70B1-428F-BA36-1FBB31A83FE5.jpg (1890x1417, 454K)

Wat

>I can use your money better than you.
>Give me your money

That's a really esoteric merchant isn't it?

B produces flutes to sell / rent to A.
I B can keep making revenue she will eventually be able to give C a job making flutes,
which C will refuse because he'd rather keep begging for gibs and blame the system for being poor.

Correct

Attached: abstract merchant mst.jpg (1024x630, 73K)

B made it, A and C can go fuck themselves.
Sometimes the point of the flute isn't just for playing, the purpose of the flute for a flute builder is the use of her craft to make a living.
B can sell it, donate it, or keep it and learn the play the flute on her own. She can sponsor A.
B can make a mansion out of flutes and fuck her own butthole with them, NEVER using them for their intended purpose, until the day she dies if she feels like it. They aren't anybody elses to take and give to someone else.

If A wants a flute so bad and B won't give it to her, then she should make her own damn flute.

B made the flute B decides the fate of the flute. Sweat of your brow and all that jaz.

Based solely on the info provided, my answer stands. If your adding into the equation other means of compensation, then the consideration changes.

I forgot to mention that child c should be frown off the highest point where the helicopter can get to.

Unless there is a contract B isn't obliged to sell or rent.

If this was money, you’d make sense.

/thread

Exactly, A and C are thieves and should be shot immediately, as should all robbers found in flagrante delicto

Who owned the raw materials to make the flute and was it a voluntary transaction to child B?

B created it. But as the King of these children I decree that B will share. Because otherwise this little nigger generated something it cannot use so it will likely rot away in a forgotten corner somewhere. B has the potential to learn, however, and A can barter use of the flute for lessons. C can tag along because he'll be grateful for the experience. B needs to learn what to do when they have a valuable resource. If B doesn't want to do anything with it then that's their call but I'll be disappointed with their lack of drive.

hard mode

Attached: hard mode.png (1152x720, 139K)

This Brit is correct, but forgot to mention that child c should then be pushed off the helicopter after refusing the job.

Is there money involved? There is no mention of money in the dilemma, only the flute. My answer was given solely considering the information provided in the dilemma.

grab the flute and break it
then give each kid equal amount of shards
>tard communists think like this

I worded it improperly.
B produces flutes and may choose to sell / rent them to A.

Commies are fucking joke

if child c is poor why does he have that gay rich soy haircut

Anyway, im giving it to A because children B and C are whore sjws

Literally why the fuck would you make a flute if you cant play it and why would you grab a flute just because you're poor?

>towels in sauna
the fuck you doing nigger?

Child B.
Who says she has to play it? She could sell it too.

No, the communist would run off with it saying “I represent the people therefor I the people, must have this flute!”

Then absolutely.

kys commie

I don't understand how similarities between money earned by a person, and an object a person made cannot be drawn.