If diversity is bad/doesn't work/etc...

If diversity is bad/doesn't work/etc., then why does the Los Angeles region have one of the biggest economies in the world? The Los Angeles-Inland Empire metro area has a GDP of over $1.1 TRILLION dollars (for about 17 million people), which puts it slightly below the entire nations of Australia and Spain in economic terms. And the region is only about 35% white - what went RIGHT, Jow Forums?

Attached: Los Angeles.jpg (2835x2259, 1.68M)

Other urls found in this thread:

spectator.org/adios-california/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

I live in LA and it sucks

Attached: 1522900669629.jpg (480x480, 28K)

That GDP includes:

>Jewlywood movie revenues worldwide
>port tariffs and taxes for Longbeach (2nd biggest port in US)
>ridiculuous home sales factored in (try 500$ per sq ft for a 1930s shotgun shack)

California also leads the nation in debt and homelessness

Liberal progress...

>he thinks the people that live and work in LA own part of the 1.1T wealth
KEK

If cancer is bad/doesn't work/etc., then why was Steve jobs one of the most successful men in the world?

There are $1.1 trillion bucks sloshing around your local economy. Just reach out your hand and grab some of it; it can't possibly be that hard with torrents of cash flying back and forth.

this giant open-air prison sure was expensive, goys!!

when you look into you'll quickly find out all that wealth is owned by white people (including kikes). with asians at number 2. whites built the economy in la. the dirty spics and niggers live off the welfare crumbs the elite whites (ironically liberals) / kikes / give them.

You could stuff all those people in a single skyscraper. Blatant waste of space.

If you throw a whole bunch of humans together in a city, it produces a lot of GDP.

This is primarily good for the elites who milk this GDP.

It does not result in physical nor mental health nor wellbeing

It's a giant dystopian shithole. You think Oceania or the World State weren't rich as fuck? pls kys

There is no need - southern California has a lot of land. People can have a comfortable suburban life with their own yard, garage, etc.

Attached: Inland Empire.jpg (1200x1604, 294K)

>tfw you realize California's GDP is grossly overinflated by counting real estate as 'product' and selling way above market value to Chinese investors, not because of innovation, production or labor.

Attached: kurt.jpg (768x513, 30K)

Personally, I find this glorious - the comfy, low-density development which leaves plenty of open space for everyone to enjoy.

Attached: Inland Empire 2.jpg (3648x2736, 1.36M)

Los Angeles is so bad.
-no subway
-no proper bus lines
-everywhere you go you have to take a car
-no sidewalks
-not much place to bicycle or doing everything but driving a car
-you're pretty much trapped in your house and your only way out is your car.
-high crime rate
-lots of latinos

1/10 would not move there.

Attached: OCSDATHOMELESSENCAMPMENT.2017.09.PHOTO_.21.EDIT_.1-1170x658.jpg (1170x658, 165K)

Attached: la-me-ln-san-jose-homeless-camp-20141204.jpg (1150x647, 217K)

Attached: LOC-homeless-encampment-safety.jpg (768x512, 88K)

Attached: image.jpg (1500x1000, 847K)

Attached: skidrow.jpg (1842x1036, 216K)

educate yourself you dumb nigger

spectator.org/adios-california/

Attached: la-174082-me-0905-homeless-1-lkh-jpg-20140407.jpg (1200x713, 318K)

>citing LA as an example of a good city
wew lad. Pollution levels coupled with unsustainable irrigation make this place problematic even for lefties. Not to mention gangs.
LA is a hellhole on par with a Chinese city.

>what went right?

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 311K)

DESIGNATED

Attached: 1519430043148.jpg (500x281, 44K)

everytime some commie fuck thinks his city looks good they always take a pic so far away you can't see what is even going on.
As soon as you take an on-the-street picture of it, it invariably turns out to look like somalia.

LA traffic looks pretty comfy

What an ugly place.

>why does the Los Angeles region have one of the biggest economies in the world?
fertile soil near a sheltered harbor made for the ideal west coast shipping port.
rivaled only by seattle in the north.
this tremendous amount of commerce funds a massive welfare state which itself encouraged the immigration of millions upon millions of people from poor third world countries.
those people happen to be overwhelmingly brown.
unfortunately for them everything has a limit, and california's debt has far exceed incomes.
the truth is that if california did secede from the union it would go bankrupt almost instantly.
as it stands the state is already unable to maintain it's infrastructure, which is it's primary source of income.
within a matter of decades california will be completely unable to maintain it's government and the federal government may be forced to step in and take control

>The US dollar having any value.

are you retarded? a yard in california costs about 5 million dollars you fucking kike

A small minority of the population holds a shit ton of wealth while the rest of the city is a cesspool therefore diversity is successful?

Fuck off with this idea of needing massive wealth all that an area needs is to be self sufficient for its own people. I'd rather live in a small town where nobody is super poor or super rich everyone just has enough money to live a decent life. What the hell happened to just wanting a decent life not a super extravagant over amount of shit

This

Honestly big cities are a cancer. People in smaller places tend to be less shit

The problem with bus lines or a subway in a USA city is you'd have to share that subway and bus lines with all kind of fucking feral niggers

DAHHHHH WHY DO SLAVERY OF DA DUMB BROWN PEOPLE MAKE LOTS OF MONEY??????


R U SAYING GOYIM ARE FARMABLE RESOURCES THAT ARE EXPLOITED FOR MASS AMOUNTS OF MONEY, AT THE EXPENSE OF REAL CITIZENS.

WoAh mY dUdE

A handful of bad areas does not detract from the general wealth and success of the region. Pic related is one of the poorest parts of LA - the notorious "south central" - and even there, you can see relatively spacious homes with yards and cars.

Attached: South Central.jpg (3264x1840, 1.26M)

It’s actually in the middle of collapsing right now

>LA doesn't have a subway

Come on, man.

Attached: LA subway.jpg (2318x3000, 407K)

Nope; GDP has been increasing steadily in the past few years. It is currently at an all-time high.

>even there, you can see relatively spacious homes with yards and cars.
>yards
fucking gas yourself you shitty troll

It's a sign of prosperity, because it means there are enough resources and that there is enough land to build bigger, and give people a suburban lifestyle instead of just apartment commieblock towers or something.

Attached: LA suburbs.jpg (3264x2448, 1.47M)

Does this not look like prosperity to you?

Attached: LA suburb 2.jpg (768x1024, 280K)

implying that baby mode weak subway system is even comparable to other cities
and most of LA's 'subways' are actually above ground light rail

Attached: New-York-Subway-Map.gif (2769x2490, 237K)

Yes but how much earlier were the networks built in NY? Same story in most newly built or developed cities
>t. Ottawa
We're getting our ""light rail""" any year now

sounds like bad planning and a lack of foresight to me.
have fun in traffic
no city in the world wants to pay for a good subway system, but every city wants one.