Royalty in the United States of America

How does Jow Forums feel about the concept of American Royalty? Perhaps a Royal bloodline and cleansing of the 56% mutts would result in blood purity in the future, at least for the elites of society.

Attached: 1518624018948.jpg (468x600, 237K)

it isn't a concept, it's reality. one of the signers of the Declaration of Independence was related by blood to the King of England at the time and was a huge part of our founding father's confidence in declaring independence in the first place.

Which one?

Fuck No, the concept of a Monarchy is fucking retarded, we just need to purge leftists out of government. Leftists are not people.

Fuck off.

John Hancock

Not in the "United States." It's too late. But New England joining a Britain renewed? I'd be up for it. Prince Charles or the man after him need to make the first moves, though.

Louis Castaigne is the only King of America.

Celebrities and the ultra rich have been above the law for a good, long while now.

Royalty isn't something that needs to be put in place at this point. It is something we need to admit we have created and need to figure out how to handle.

Attached: 1437954420227.jpg (448x336, 19K)

Our "elites" are not nobility. Nobles are old-blood. They're raied to be rich, tasteful, and smart from birth, and to follow dozens of customs. Celebrities are not an aristocracy. They're so much worse.

the English Civil War was essentially the same political climate as exists today in the United States. Celebrities and Ultra Elites vs the lawful ruling authority. The end result of the whole thing was that no King may rule England without Parliament's consent. They executed their King and after Faggot Cromwell died they forgot the whole thing and King Charles II was coronated. He abdicated and gave the throne to the other royals and his family moved to America with their middle finger extended.

Take your Taylor swift dominatrix fantasies somewhere else.

her "reign" only lasts as long as until the wrinkles set in... in 5..4...3...2...1...

No that's what Canada's for
The thing that always defined Canada from the beginning is that we are the descendants of loyalists to the idea of having a King

Canada is the most likely because on one hand it's absurd to have a royal family that lives in another country and rarely visits and on the other hand it gives Canada a chance to fix everything at once and right away rather than it taking Time

>A King, quickly and swiftly assumes power
>Stops 99% of non-white immigration (Allows 1% non-white for openings for extraordinary minds and to use it as photo ops to keep non-whites happy too wile the change is going back) (You must always remember how to keep the non-white population relaxed wile all of this is turning back around)

>The New Hitler will not wear a swastika
>The New Hitler will not give Roman salutes (Until the de-stigmatization of it is over and it's original roman meaning is restored... This would only occur after taking control and after it is vastly normalized again. Yes, it can be normalized)
>The New Hitler will have a new symbol. One that is easy to replicate, one that is already used in general society. (The swastika was a normal Germanic symbol before Hitler used it)

The New Hitler, who will be a King for many reasons

>Canada is the ONLY high resource rich country per capita that is not a dictatorship Lots of land, lots of resources, 3 people per square km
>Canada can be easily made 99% white without using force. Simply allow immigration from north western Europe to flow and encourage racially pure families at home with incentives. Legalize polygamy, make 95% of immigrants women. Give each man in Canada a dozen wives each of his choice but making sure it's genetically well matched at least for immigration
>Canada has the highest personal debt levels per capita. If Canada writes off ALL debt from the banks and kicks them out, Canada will have an economic rise like no other country before

Get ready
because
Canada will have a King

Attached: 1443178305291.png (764x1025, 72K)

>it's absurd to have a royal family that lives in another country and rarely visits
Maybe in the past, but today? If the Queen would step up, she could rule Canada just as well as Britain, since she could get news just as fast.

hey guys, lets institute the thing our founding fathers fought against and designed a frame work for our govt to prevent

Her Powers Here
>The power to appoint and dismiss the Prime Minister
>The power to appoint and dismiss other ministers.
>The power to summon, prorogue and dissolve Parliament
>The power to make war and peace
>The power to command the armed forces of the United Kingdom
>The power to regulate the Civil Service
>The power to ratify treaties
>The power to issue passports
>The power to appoint bishops and archbishops of the Church of England
>The power to create peers (both life peers and hereditary peers).

Is that Taylor Swift? I accept

Nope.
The royal family just race mixed and haven't done anything so far to help save britian
They're allowing it to become a tyrannical state and simply standing by

A people can only be loyal to a royal who is also loyal to the people
It's really as simple as that

Attached: 1478458915067.png (448x705, 291K)

She needs more, and to use them.
And in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.
He's not in the line of succession, and probably is a bastard.
The Founding Fathers were not rabid Republicans, nor did they hate monarchy. They just wanted either more representation, or less taxation.

What that effectively means is she could dismiss Parliament and use the Military to take over the Country, she won't though Charles on the over hand

Canada, Australia and New Zealand are also Constitutional Monarchies

Yeah it's Tay.

>no tay feets to sniff

Attached: Taylor-Swift-Feet-2387273.jpg (2147x2880, 1.56M)

If there is going to be royalty than I must be king.

But will Charles?
Beyond that, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, at least, need to be fully incorporated as part of the United Kingdom.

Attached: 1523062758079.jpg (649x650, 268K)

I would personally see to it that they wouldn't survive past the first generation

Dunno, with you on that, We were all better off in the Empire

Meritocratic aristocracy like Napoleonic France

US joining is too far-fetched, though I did say "at least."
Of course, the US was never a part of the Empire proper, and much isn't really fit to join our LARPy New Empire, but east of the Mississippi joining would be great. Just remember the representation.

Not making that Mistake again