Why can't we just bring back duels to settle disputes?
Why can't we just bring back duels to settle disputes?
Jaxon Harris
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Nicholas Edwards
BUmp. Completely agree. We need more physical violence in general.
Seriously. Men should be allowed to hit women with an open hand as long as she doesn't end up needing medical care. Fist fights should also be ignored.
Luis Johnson
yes,this 100%
John Sullivan
Dead people cant pay taxes
Ryder Flores
It has to be hand to hand combat or swords. Dueling with pistols the way they did in the 18th century is stupid.
Lucas Diaz
Ethan Bailey
Charles Mitchell
To understand why they cant allow that, you have to understand that modern "man" is enslaved by comfort and safety and it makes him very easily controllable.
When custom of dueling exists in society, it means men may be ready to die to defend their pride and honor. And such readiness will remain even beyond duels itself - man who values some things more than his life will be ready to fuck your shit up when you tread on him, or at least die trying, so you wont be able to tread on anything if majority of men are like that. Now compare that to modern man who will rather have government boot deep up his ass than gives up his comfortable bugman life. This is why (((they))) will be vehemently against introduction of any culture of violence or pride, dueling being probably most prominent example of both.
Dominic Cook
Literally the reason the courts allow libel and slander suits is to keep retards from killing each other over dumb shit.
David Allen
>wah wah someone hold my hand so I can do something
WHO is stopping you?
Owen Gomez
Let’s roll. I’m fit and combat ready, heavily armed, and equipped to dispense some fucking righteous violence.
Aaron Watson
Duelling made sense when it required some skill whether in aiming a pistol or dueling with swords.
Using fists was considered barbaric and low class. There's no point in dueling with semi auto handguns, people would simply die en masse instead of simply defend their honor
Josiah King
Good point. Statists wood never have it
Jacob Hernandez
kek
Thomas Garcia
you retards realize that dueling was specifically for the upper class, right? You wouldn't have anything to do with it if you lived back then.
If anything you'd be involved in what amounts to 18th century bumfights
en.wikipedia.org
of course all of you are fucking pussies and would never dare to take part in such a practice so I don't know why you even bother to come in this thread and larp about it
Zachary Rivera
Nah, pistols are way more fair and better
Camden Foster
T. Elliot rodger
Owen Morris
Speak for yourself user. I'm extremely wealthy.
Benjamin Brown
Because the best of us are those likely to challenge and accept duels.
So the best of us wind up dying before their time.
If they used nonlethal rounds in flintlock pistols that would be acceptable.
Imagine if Steve Jobs accepted a duel in his youth, and lost. The modern world could not possibly be the same without that individual contribution.
Parker Gonzalez
Rubbet bullets out of a hand held sawed off would be acceptable.
Christopher Sanders
But you're still a pussy soooo
Owen Gutierrez
Yea I would not do it.
Kevin Murphy
Never ended here. It's still the normal right if passage.
I attended my nephews first challenge in a park near here not long ago. He's 15 so he's broke his duck very late.
He did okay.
He was worried about the consequences. Thought he'd get in trouble. What he actually got were self defence lessons.
Jack Peterson
Thank you for being the only honest user itt
Luke Powell
>why
jews, no exceptions
Josiah Murphy
I couldn't agree anymore!