>Oh no I forgot about human nature! My lifes work is ruined!
Oh no I forgot about human nature! My lifes work is ruined!
Julian Sanchez
Other urls found in this thread:
marxists.org
twitter.com
Caleb Bailey
sage
Zachary Parker
Not understanding dialectical materialism
Adrian Nelson
Okay, this is epic.
Andrew Rivera
go back to mu where i saw u
Jaxon Ross
Why do some communists try to argue that early man didn't have personal property?
Noah Murphy
The way the frame it, is that there is personal property and private property. They think private property should be outlawed. Personal property is ok though. They don't have a good metric to differentiate the two beyond you can put personal property in a bag and carry it with you like a hobo with a stick.
Brayden Reed
Ian Flores
The communists are welcome to my cum rag.
Wyatt Bennett
I need to buy a Marx-broom to sweep my floors
Benjamin Morris
Easton Perry
No, the Commies have a good metric they use. If it's *your* property, it should be taken away from you and given to everyone else. If it's *their* property, then it shouldn't be touched.
See? Quite simple, like most of Communism. Communism is a pathetic attempt to slap a new coat of paint on a Feudal Theocracy and most college kids are too stupid to tell the difference.
Jayden Smith
Wait, are you implying that people don't owe me things for existing?
Owen Rivera
There's nothing to understand. It's factually wrong, just look at how badly Marx predicted the future.
Aiden Cox
>They don't have a good metric to differentiate the two
yeah they do
private property is what's owned exclusively, by an individual, rather than mutually by a society.
personal property is anything that wouldn't logically make sense to be owned mutually by the society, or would be impossible to
you're left with private property basically just being the means of production (work equipment, farm land, etc)
at least try to understand the basic entry level bullshit if you want to oppose it instead of giving them credibility by making us look ignorant
Charles Turner
>private property is what's owned exclusively, by an individual,
Bullshit. Private property is defined as exclusive ownership by one or more non-government entities.
Leo Evans
not in Marxist terms
Austin Evans
I don't give a shit about their made-up dictionary. Redefining words is not an argument.
Jason Collins
i don't give a shit what you give a shit about
the context was about marxists defining personal and private property
and i don't feel like spending a hundred posts debating commiefaggots and capitalistfaggots when i've got things to do.
if anyone wants a nicely structured reference for picking apart communist doctrine have this, from the horse's mouth,
the principles of communism
marxists.org
Bentley Collins
the argument is that the institution of private property is something with a historical basis. Nothing like a Weaving mill had existed before the 18th centuary.
For example, nothing like facbook has existed before our time. There is some debate on what Zuck should be allowed to do with it. Therefore you cannot simply call it "human nature" or imply it must be regulated by natural laws.
There is a human nature, its heavily about dominance hierarchies and the need to signal status. That does not imply that the insitution of private capital is "natural". Arguably some system where Bezos had to fight hand to hand for control of amazon every 5 years would be more in line with our chimp ancestors.
Hudson Rivera
>the context was about marxists defining personal and private property
The context is you claiming that private property is defined as ownership by a single individual. I don't think even retarded marxists make that claim.
Ethan Nelson
>makes life's work
>considers it so shit he won't follow it himself
Landon Hall
please explain
David Smith
"I am not a Marxist."
- Karl Marx