Migrant crisis and multiculturalism

What are peoples theories for cause and continuation of the migrant crisis and the persistence of egalitarian multicultural ideas through the upheaval it is causing both from the effect of the migrants themselves and the reaction by the governments by repressing social and political freedoms?

I am confused by the theories I have heard that it is (roughly) a deception by the governments on the native population by encouraging an egalitarian narrative to the population to willingly accept the migrants through all the violence and suffering, even welcome it, so that they can then use the new generation of migrants as a surplus of cheap labour to be easily manipulated politically.

But the idea that the governments truly believe the bullshit they dish out is even more bizarre as it seems meaningless for a government to welcome its own destruction.

Do they believe they can control what they have brought or are they their own patsies?

Attached: DY1my8rXcAE6Pk4.jpg (1024x679, 189K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=hKV-DUZKOlo
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>the idea that the governments truly believe the bullshit they dish out

not all goves need to be this naive and vapid only the one how has most power which is germany and merkel already proved she is a naive old hag. Germany doing it is enough ot pressure others in europe into it.

youtube.com/watch?v=hKV-DUZKOlo

police states as a result of increaced crime
i really dont see any reason appart from
1. exagerated empathy
2. a goal of getting rid of whites
it just doesnt make sense to me, im not convinced of either

You can control a democracy by controlling the demographics.

true and it is further complicated by powerful political elements outside of Soros. When getting into conspiracy territory it can be hard to keep a handle on reality.

That makes sense and I see what you are getting at it is more what I said about the seeming absurdity of a government welcome the destruction of its own society. Why is it that whites need to be removed?

>Why is it that whites need to be removed?
dont know, im jewish so im not too worried but i still dont understand it

That is complicated by bringing in a populace that doesnt want to integrate and doesnt particularly like democracy because they are forced to live in a society with other groups who are alien or hostile to them and in a state whose native culture is self-abnegating so there is no common core for the disparate groups to relate to. Sure there are attempts to redefine Germaness or Britishness but these are ineffective. Given these two issues it is hard to see why they would want a democracy when they dont even like each other and likely dont want reconciliation in the first place.

I think it's less malevolence and more greed. The politicians think they are importing their voter base, and they all have friends who own motel chains etc who are now guaranteed to have full bookings forever, paid for by the taxpayer, and are willing to pay kickbacks for it

This and also they very well assume that this new voter's base will be strongly dependent on the state . That is the logic. What they fail to understand is that if this 'voters base' increases beyond a certain threshold their heads will be on a pike in no time ... deluded fools, all of them. They are ideologically so blinded they frankly believe they could control what they are creating right now...

The elites want the world destroyed so that they can rebuild it in their own sick image. The governments don't care because they're in on the plan.

The problem with migrant crisis is the two points I mentioned in namely the grievances and differences between the various groups. It seems very short sighted for not just one government but all of the rich and influential members of the EU to accept their own destruction for a hotel scheme on the assumption that these people will vote, let alone care for democracy, not just come for the welfare.

Why I say this is hard to understand is because if we all on Pol can see so clearly why is it that a government whose vision is meant to be long term in regards to organising society and at the very least concerned with winning the next election cycle.

It seems to me like its looking halfway, they keep up the facade but they no longer believe their own bullshit and they need to keep up a semblance of authority or all hell will break loose while they are inching towards a global geo-political crisis with Russia. Because its much easier to repress hate speech on twitter than it is to actively arrest Muslims in the UK because of the societal turmoil it will cause.

Jews are promoting cultural marxism and mass immigration in europe and america. They are not the only factor but Jews like George Soros, Peter Sutherland, Wisley Clark, David Schwarz, Robert Aschberg, Peter Wolodarski, Barbara Lerner Spectre, Anthony Lester, Barbara Roche, Peter Mandelson, Jack Straw,
David Miliband, Laurence Fabius, Harlem Desir, Bernard-Henry Levy, Josef Schuster, Gregor Gysi, Anetta Kahane, Alan Schatter, Ronit Lentin, Franco Eckert Coen, Jacob Cohen and Ervin Kohn are jews who are supporting mass immigration(these are only the prominent in Europe, i could post more for america)

Who are the elite, what is their plan and how exactly is it that you know about it?

Sure, that is a lot of names and they are all of a particular religious and ethnic group. Are they all united in their single cause? George Soros is a globalist who is even actively undermining Israel, does everyone on that list agree with him, if so why are they pushing it? Why does George Soros push cultural marxism when the philosophy of Karl Popper is a direct criticism of Marxism?

gorge sorros is based, he is a right wing actor to make mass immigration look bad

They already told us their plans 38 years ago:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones

>Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
Unite humanity with a living new language.
Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
Balance personal rights with social duties.
Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.

The western nations are going against almost all of those laws except for parts of 6 and 3.

Actually your 'loss of control' scenario males sense ... maybe it slowly dawns on them that they have gloriously fucked up. They're afraid

>Starship Troopers meme.jpg

user, what you posted is their end goal. They want to destroy the present through mass extinctions events ("under 500,000,000"). They want to practice eugenics ("guide reproduction wisely") to create a raceless, genderless global culture ("new language") ruled by a global government ("world court").

When you understand this what guides their plans, then all of the self-destructive government actions and cultural Marxism in the West start to make perfect sense.

thats not at all what the post said, the post said sub 500 million people is ideal not jews want to kill people to reach 500million.

that post is a guide to a good society, not to a plan to destory the west

They're not going to sit around hoping that the population magically drops from billions to 500 million. Are you a shill or simply obtuse?

nigger his post was about rules for a good society, he claimed that sub 500 million population is good, read that list, does that sound like a end times thing or more like a conservative dogma?

I'd recommend Pentti Linkolas ideas on ecofascism bit drop the aversion to technology and combine it with a concept of racial Indoeuropean identity as the only true stewards of the planet ... everything else of humanity would be considered dead weight, road blocks for our manifest destiny which may only drag is down into species wide extinction.

Attached: Pentti_Linkola.jpg (1920x1281, 97K)

>continuation
Nothing will happen, you will slowly turn into Brazil

i like the natural approach, but sadly those people think so dogmatic, just lisen to varg talk about vegans

Eugenics.
One world government.
One world language.
Massive population decrease.

>does that sound like a end times thing

Yup, this is some Revelation shit.

Where did you find that picture of my kids...

but it does not to him, he portrays that as good, and you completely missed that point

Dogmaticism will always be a problem. You have to be able to adapt your ideas if the situation requires it. As long as you may still adhere to a set of core principles this is ok. If you stay too dogmatic reality will fuck you in the arse rather quickly.

not if you only daydream and use those strange principles to argue online

Haha, you got me there! Mea culpa for not getting shit done... ;)

I think the time for this shit is not ready yet. There might be a window of opportu ity in the future but then again I do not know whether I would then be in the position to 'grab fate by the balls' and actually participate in the realization of these ideas. Until then I mostly see this place as a theoretical test bed to present, discuss and refine these ideas. There are sure still many flaws in my line of reasoning.

I don't believe the migrant crisis is used as a tool to replace populations, instead the crisis will conveniently stop when most major western countries will be at a roughly 50/50 split between native populations and migrants of various backgrounds.
This demographical shift will be (and in many cases: is) utilized in various ways, including: cheapening the cost of labor, a voting bloc, but ultimately it will be used to hold the populace in a simmering state of perpetual conflict. When people feel threatened they are naturally inclined to vote against their interests and give up personal liberties to increase their immediate security, the logical end result of this is a population with little to no rights and a government that holds absolute power. I think modern UK and Germany are both excellent examples of this process in action.

hey fuck head

being an Anglo-Saxon conquerer living in the Canadian Arctic, not fucking cool to use Inuit picture of eating a traditional meal

You gotta be tough to be Inuk, and you wouldnt last a day in places that they can live

dumb fucking queer