Where are you on the moral spectrum?

A grown man who sits in front of a webcam for clicks.

Beyond pathetic. I guess your original post wasn't meant to be satirical.

Get ready for massive amounts of banter in result of you shit thread. From the "left" AND the "right".

Thank you for smearing the already fucked up reputation of this board with shit.

are you cooking for your wife's son?

Damn user are you me? I've been creating a list like this for a while and was gonna post it here eventually. I've come to the exact same conclusion.

nah

thank you

good rebuttal, go back to cooking for your nigglet child

im not ur boytoy

>right
>individualism
American education

>he's playing Ben Shapiro

Attached: ecks_dee_man_by_miyoooh-dbeuyru.jpg (1024x576, 70K)

stop boomerfagging

morality is not absolute, but it is not 100% relative either. both the master and slave are necessary in a functional society. individuals often express themselves by conforming to groups

Attached: captain...kirk.jpg (700x530, 112K)

ive mathematically defined atheism

Attached: Notes_170825_183349_11a_0.jpg (810x1925, 79K)

show boi pucci plz

hate me

Attached: IMG_2434.jpg (1600x1200, 434K)

This. It should be noted that while traditional western thought is not 100% individualist, it isn't 100% collectivist, either. In different times and places, the amount of deviation from the norm or challenge to authority allowed varied. The broad theme, though, is that there is a line that mustn't be crossed if one doesn't wish to suffer exile, ostracism, or the like. There isn't one strict Western answer to this sort of issue.

yep theyre called betacucks

youtube.com/watch?v=76pcYloKFZc&t=20s

the idea of god

Attached: 22119299_10155177738105787_749859753_n.jpg (473x720, 68K)

Replace 'tribe' with 'collective.'

yep that'd work

Fucking hell user. You're either a 15 year old ""skeptic"" or a 50 year old boomertard. Which is it?

If you, as a presumably white american, choose to live by atomistic individualism while blacks and other races conform to their group identity, the value you are living by is not individualism. The standard you're actually living by is that Blacks can group up and get whatever they want from whites, whereas white cannot do the same against blacks. That isn't clever, it's just fucking stupid. If you're fighting in a boxing match and your opponent takes his gloves off, you take yours off too.

Futhermore, by acting so arrogantly and rejecting your instinctive in-group racial preference so you can take the moral high ground, YOU are CONFORMING to SOCIETAL ORTHODOXY because of NORMATIVE INFLUENCE. Who's the fucking betacuck now?

Attached: brainlet.jpg (800x450, 37K)

>master
>individual

Hierarchies need a collective to be able to exist

Attached: E8263926-F1A8-46CE-ACA3-4454F1CD780A.gif (360x345, 2M)

it's the latter, check his videos and periscope.

what if i want to build things in order to be better at destroying?

its more of a metaphor, in your personal life you either create or destroy, its not about material things like bombs, its about relationships and interactions between individual humans

This seems like a child's understanding of politics - it's either one thing in its absolute or its opposite absolute. Those terms are applicable to both the left and right, depending on what the issue is. Do you consider "Triumph of the Will" a moving work of art or propaganda? On the political spectrum, my views are more to the right but your oversimplification is embarrassing.

this is someone who embraces left morality, bitter and hateful, blameful...DESTROYER. archetypal Cain.

i pray for you

master is an external role, individualism in internal.

>left: propaganda
>right: art
>posts right wing propaganda with no semblance of art

Attached: artworks-000230163085-9t2z20-t500x500[1].jpg (500x500, 46K)

>current year
>unironically believing in passé political dogma
Good goy

Attached: 1523288903217.jpg (630x679, 55K)

its not politics, its morality. Do you celebrate anger, resentment, envy? Do you hate the rich? are you anghry at those who have it better than you? Thats leftist ie "slave" morality as neitzsche put it

master of your own life, individual. free will. there is a pattern

nihilism
master
free will
individual
destroyer
relativism
propaganda

me: slave, slave, slave (the other side), slave, slave and slave

Actual politics in a multicultural hellhole:

>Tribe A's interests
>Tribe B's interests
>Tribe C's interests

(((PragerU)))

>;lk;lk;lk;lklk;k.jpg
BWAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
You fucktards are so gullible.

All morals are made by men so both the right and left have relative morals. The righties just pretend their *morals* were inspired by magic fairies so they can get away with atrocities and crimes against humanity.

>the reputation of this board

U wot m8?

>Do you celebrate anger, resentment, envy?
Pic related

Attached: White-supremacist-group-the-Ku-Klux-Klan-assembles-outside-South-Carolina-Statehouse-to-protest-agai (670x446, 54K)

>muh knee chee!
Your retard is showing. Nietzsche didn't celebrate Master morality either. And you misunderstand what he meant by master and slave morality.

As he put it, slave morality was all about intentions and often rationalised weaknesses as strengths. i.e, the failure to have lots of sex was seen as the virtue of chastity. Master morality was about gaining power and riches, and disregarded the intentions and motivations, focusing instead on the outcomes of actions.

What you think is slave morality (Do you celebrate anger, resentment, envy? Do you hate the rich? are you anghry at those who have it better than you?) is actually far closer to master morality. From a Nietzschean perspective, you embody slave morality far more than you do master morality.

Now I'm no scholar of Nietzsche, so if any of you other anons want to correct here please do.

Attached: identifyingautismempty.png (918x1200, 1.52M)

>Do you hate the rich?
No, it's not hate and it's not just "the rich". How stupid is that? It's a justification to repair a deliberately corrupt system. Pic related

Attached: the correct economic enemy.png (600x331, 56K)

Well, I haven't read Nietzsche, so I can't speak in terms of his views. However, even if removed from politics, it is still a simplistic division - you might as well just put it as "good" and "bad" and leave it at that.

So you want to talk morality in respects to art. It may be argued that all art is propaganda as it presents an individual's point-of-view and ideology. There is also the Death of the Author way of looking at art in which an interpretation is assigned by the audience which still politicizes the work of art.

The spaces between