No proof in Syria that Assad used chemical weapons. If no convincing proof is put forth within 48 hours of the event, it was a false flag
No Proof = False Flag
Liar.
It is true 100%.
youtube.com
get fucked Jow Forumsacks
>Only brainlet leafs believe corrupt western governments and agencies without verifiable proofs
> If no convincing proof is put forth within 48 hours of the event, it was a false flag
the more extraordinary alternative should require more extraordinary evidence
if no evidence exists then the most likely explanation is most likely
Is it out of the ordinary to think that a man that has committed the same type of atrocity might do it again especially if they have a motive to do so? Come on, stop falling for the /sg/ bait and accept the situation for what it is. We are dealing with another arab dictator on a power trip. Israel has the right idea, just bomb these sand niggers into oblivion, not give them aid or provide intervention...this does not work.
LITERALLY BTFO
>if no evidence exists then the most likely explanation is most likely
This implies the ones who furnish that explanation should be trusted. It’s also just a stupid statement in general
NIGER AND AZERBAIJAN ARE NEXT
>TLDR
Either you have the proof or you don’t. If you don’t, western governments word alone can not be trusted
>area sealed off by Regime forces
>fewer than 1000 people left in the area, just a few NGOs with cell phone cameras
Sometimes not knowing is just not knowing.
posting in a great threat
prove me wrong
Agreed.
>looks at flag
>is a traitor
absolutely disgusting
you are an absolute disgrace
jidf posting is so tiring
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
YOU WERE SAYING?
ONLY A SITH DEALS IN ABSOLUTES
>RU is the same as qualified and sanctioned chemical weapons investigators
What incentives have US and western allies given Assad or Putin to comply with any request of this nature? There is a very obvious agenda behind everything happening involving their countries. The US in particular has a proven track record of fabrication of evidence dating back to the fake WMDs of the Sadaam regime. Give me an honest answer
SO YOU ADMIT THAT THERE IS A CORRIDOR FOR EVACUATION PURPOSES?
AND THEREFORE, YOU ADMIT THAT THE AREA IS NOT "SEALED OFF"
>people are allowed out
>therefore the regime will allow an entourage of UN inspectors in
Do you understand what a siege encirclement means?
Yes, I believe so.
Would you like to explain it to me anyways?
It means the regime forces have absolute control of entry and exit. Unless they invite UN inspectors through, they will not be permitted in.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, but if Assad really wanted to prove that he had nothing to do with it, he'd just invite them in.
are You suggesting to me that the UN has made arrangements to visit this chemical attack site?
What incentives have US and western allies given Assad or Putin to comply with any request of this nature? There is a very obvious agenda behind everything happening involving their countries. The US in particular has a proven track record of fabrication of evidence dating back to the fake WMDs of the Sadaam regime. Give me an honest answer
literally IGNORED
TIME TO NECK YOURSELF
>TRAITOR
They wanted to inspect it without Russia involved (despite them being on the UNSC), hence why Russia vetoed
answer OP's questions before I reply any more
That's literally their job.
I’m OP moron
oh wait...
STOP HURTING MY FEELINGS GUIS
IM NEW HERE EXDEE
so you're saying a member of the UNSC was not allowed to take part in the investigation?
That does seem rather underhanded.
I can understand why Russian Federation has vetoed the requestion.
Does anyone here feel like taking the OSINT pill with me?
First time around, based Paul knew what was up
You don't let a suspected accomplice help investigate a crime. Same reason we don't let Saudis investigate Yemen and why we had impartial third-party bodies investigate Iraq and Afghan misconduct.
This shit isn't Tom Clancy. It's just bureaucrats putting together paperwork while kids suffocate.
see
which leads to
I understand the other side’s argument. No one has given any answer why Russia or Syria have to trust an authentic independent investigation with truthful findings would come out?
We have as much incentive to lie as Assad and Putin do, which is why you allow unaligned parties in. It's how war crime investigations work.
stop replying to me please
you must reply to OP or I will discontinue this thread
inb4 nuremberg trials
STOP REPLYING
If no one can trust anyone it literally makes no difference. If there's no impartial party, then everything is a lie and you may as well just do whatever you want.
Why would anyone trust Syria and Russia more than UN tribunals? They're the closest thing to a metric of honesty we have. If you discount them, it's all worthless.
Bürger in Germanic Dialect means Citizen.
Thank you for not replying.
And most of the Nuremberg convictions were eventually overturned or suspended.
It's an important topic.
>Is it out of the ordinary to think that a man that has committed the same type of atrocity might do it agai
i dont think he's ever used chemical weapons
NO THEY WEREN'T YOU ASSHOLE
THEY WERE 100% PROOF OF GERMAN CRIMES
THE JUDGEMENT PASSED AT THOSE TRIBUNALS WAS 100% CORRECT
ALL GERMANS MUST PAY FOR THEIR COMPLICITY IN NAZI WAR CRIMES
HEY LOOK GUYS ANOTHER SYRIA THREAD!!!
STOP MAKING THESE THREAD YOU FUCKING SHILLS
fuck /sg/
fuck Assad
fuck Russia
Excuse me, bürger, might you calm down?