Anyone else here used to be right wing but started to get more and left wing over time?

Anyone else here used to be right wing but started to get more and left wing over time?

Attached: 1502859568758.jpg (1000x1250, 118K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=tFFOUkipI4U
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I started to become more third-position over time, I suppose.

No.
People start out young and intimidated by having to deal with life, and they want socialism.
Then they grow older and find out it's not hard at all, and they get more conservative.
You must be a loser from a conservative family if you are going more to the left, commie.

>even being right or left anymore

There is only one path.

Attached: totenkopf.png (280x292, 101K)

After reading Jow Forums for several years now, it has definitely moved me more left.

sauce?

Faggot.

>Essential is not what we are fighting for, but how we fight. Onward toward the goal, until we triumph or are left behind. The warriors' spirit, the exposure of oneself to risk, even for the tiniest idea, weighs more heavily in the scale than all the brooding about good and evil.
- Ernst Jünger

>Eternal peace is a dream --and not even a beautiful one. War is part of God's world-order. Within it unfold the noblest virtues of men, courage and renunciation, loyalty to duty and readiness for sacrifice--at the hazard of one's life. Without war the world would sink into a swamp of materialism.
- Helmuth von Moltke

>War alone keys up all human energies to their maximum tension and sets the seal of nobility on those peoples who have the courage to face it. All other tests are substitutes which never place a man face to face with himself before the alternative of life or death. Therefore all doctrines which postulate peace at all costs are incompatible with Fascism.
- Benito Mussolini

>Fascism appears to us as a reconstructive revolution, in that it affirms an aristocratic and spiritual concept of the nation, as against both socialist and internationalist collectivism, and the democratic and demagogic notion of the nation. In addition, its scorn for the economic myth and its elevation of the nation in practice to the degree of ‘warrior nation’, marks positively the first degree of this reconstruction, which is to re-subordinate the values of the ancient castes of the ‘merchants’ and ‘slaves’ to the values of the immediately higher caste. The next step would be the spiritualisation of the warrior principle itself.
- Julius Evola

Attached: ouxrc8KxvW1uaxri9o1_500.jpg (500x316, 52K)

Used to be. I switched at about 2pm today. Started off right wing when I woke up. I expect tomorrow I'll be liberatarian until about 4pm at which point I'll switch to being an hindu left-wing conservative.

No.

hahahahaha

no

Same

Yep, takes the most basic research to put a lot of the pseudo science down. Everything comes down to "its ugly" or "they're niggers". You need more than that

Yes, I used to be a libertarian but I'm a fascist now.

Attached: 1511142246433.png (1378x568, 919K)

Attached: 1501285555107.jpg (800x820, 257K)

Yes. I started out as a Fundamentalist Christian Conservative, then I became a right-wing libertarian. Then I became a left-leaning liberal. Then I became an MRA neckbeard. Not sure where that last one fits on the left-right spectrum.

>
>Everything comes down to "they're niggers". You need more than that

not really, no.
> (OP)
>Yes, I used to be a libertarian but I'm a fascist now.

this is typical pol.

once you achieve disbelief in the enlightenment and accept biological essentialism, there's no reasonable way back. the left is vestigial religion at this point, you can't return except as an act of faith.

Attached: 1510635570010.jpg (658x960, 84K)

looks like a faggot draft dodger

youtube.com/watch?v=tFFOUkipI4U

True, I used to change my beliefs constantly between libertarian, conservative and centre right but I've been a fascist for almost a year now. It's the only way.

Attached: 1512884061531.png (622x367, 505K)

This makes sense.

The left/right divide in American politics is largely a managed dialectic. Both 'sides' have a fundamentally classical liberal worldview. There are some real distinctions but on the whole both operate out of the same presuppositional wheelhouse of medieval nominalism and later enlightenment empiricism; both reject the existence of universals.

Hence the reason that the 'differences' between most religious and non-religious persons in the US are superficial. Neither really believes in a profound sense.

You'll fluidly fuck around all over the spectrum until you begin to do some real work and reject these false enlightenment ideals you've been taught from a very young age.

same

I was a centrist libertarian, or something like that, but the left has pushed me farther right over the past few years.