>Backed by Russia and Iran
>ISIS is defeated
>"Rebels" are taking their last breath
>Western civil population considers you an evil dictator but ultimately sees you as the lesser evil, having observed that the other former dictatorships have become even worse Sharia shitholes.
>A future, even if not very bright, lies in front of the nation
>THROW CHEMICAL BOMBS DESPITE WESTERN THREATS OF INVASION BECAUSE YOLO
Do the NATO governments think we're THAT stupid?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
youtu.be
twitter.com
>1945
>Nazis literally getting beaten on every front
>Standing inside Germany
>Everybody on earth fighting you
>You are close to collapse
>Still bomb thousands of people into death for no reason
Not everything in war is about strategy.
Why'd the US nuke Japan when they pretty much won?
Why'd England waste Dresden?
Sometimes, you just want to kill the enemy.
So you're saying it was the rebels
You'll believe anything, goy.
>Assad is at total war with the world already
Nah, they don't care if we believe it or not. It's just designed as an excuse for Trump.
>Trump lawyer gets hit, info on Trump stolen
>same week suddenly "assad" uses "chemical bombs"
>Trump blackmailed into invading and told to use the chemical bombs as an excuse
(((they))) just want more money
If the past is any indication, peace, democracy, and stability are just around the corner.
>You'll believe anything, goy.
This is the face of goys and they wonder why we treat them like cattle.
we ARE that stupid
look at non-Jow Forums social media, idiots all over twitter and facebook legitimately believe this shit.
Redpill about Syria
Truer words have never been spoken. The history behind why and who is behind the Syria crisis.
>Why'd the US nuke Japan when they pretty much won?
Who was going to stop it? Japan had no allies left and nobody else had nukes. Same applies to Dresden. Why would Assad want to escalate adversarial foreign involvement after ending an exhausting five year civil war? Even if his country wasn't war torn, he still couldn't stand to Western powers, so why?
>American education
Are you stupid?
The answer to your question: yes, and they are right.
>country torn apart by civil war
>backed by Russia
>Still takes ages to win the war
>Half his population has fled the county
>Turkey now occupying Syrian area's
>Allowed multiple chemical weapon attacks to happen on his population
Honestly, he is just a horrible dictator.
Has any terrorist been killed in this strike? NO, you see a lot of children and women, nothing else.
If couple of field commanders of "jaish al islam" would've died, it would sound at least more believable.
Totally dissimalar circumstances.
The concepts of those events can't be applied to Assad's situation.
Great argument.
Watch and see the Amerikikes getting their legs blown off (Again) for their greatest ally.
>Do the NATO governments think we're THAT stupid?
They don't give a fuck what you think.
R A R E F L A G
A
R
E
F
L
A
G
He wont even answer me because he know he fucked up with his initial statement...
BASED GERMAN THREAD
yes.
But don't you life feeling safe when walking with your outfits, hats, and long beards, on the streets of Palermo, CABA, Buenos Aires? :(
>(((Western civil population))) considers you an evil dictator
the jews do but the jews forget we have the internet so gas the kikes fuck them all to hell for starting pointless wars for their greater israel plan
>>THROW CHEMICAL BOMBS DESPITE WESTERN THREATS OF INVASION BECAUSE YOLO
If it doesn't make sense, maybe he didn't do it.
>pic related
I feel safe here, on British soil.
Remember me?
You are next.
Yes. Have some pictures of dead children as an appeal conscience too.
I also let the thought shoot through my mind that this is a high risk high reward turn by Russia, trying to destroy the little trust the western people have in their governments.
The Russians a brilliant at diplomatic 4D chess.
Thanks for the tip.
It makes perfect sense!
most of peoples here believe in that attack considering we didn't buy the irak hoax 15 years ago it's ironic
oh, I assume you were the ones who sunk our sub right? I just want to know before dying
>Why'd the US nuke Japan when they pretty much won?
Because launching a proper invasion of Japan would have been a total pain.
Considering how burgers do against third worlders, their casualties would have been enormous if they'd invaded Japan itself
They wanted to test the nukes somewhere.
checked
They hadn't won you mong. Japan wasn't capitulating, bombing had no real impact on their morale and an invasion was gonna be immensely costly. The U.S was also afraid of the Soviets invading because they had no scruples when it comes to casualties.
So many idiots in the thread talking about how the gas attack is a obvious false flag.
They gassed heavily entrenched positions to break the will of the defenders in general and to take out mentioned positions. Shelling such a position with artillery or air strikes isn't effective, attacking it with ground forces is suicidal, gas is the by far most effective weapon to use against the target. Which is why it was used. Assad believes Russian support is enough to keep the world at large at bay, that's why he felt comfortable doing it. What's happening now is essentially Trump challenging Putin on Syria. Not a false flag lol
>b-but Assad was winning why would he risk intervention, obvious false flag!
If you waste your gunpowder and manpower just because you're winning you're not going to be winning for long. He didn't believe in the threat of intervention because of Russia. Real life is interesting enough without turning everything into conspiracy theories if you just take a moment to figure out what's really going on.
But I thought gasmad's baby-seeking barrel bombs only gassed civilians, why would he try to gas fortified moderate jihadi-held positions?
>Do the NATO governments think we're THAT stupid?
Millennial here. I remember 9/11, Afghanistan, and Iraq. We are actually that stupid. We cheered for Obama when he did all the evils done by Bush, and then went further. We don't give a single fuck about anything we say we care about, we just follow the money, dildos, and burgers. That's how lemming psychology works. Even "redpilled" people do this. 90% of the people on this board are either willing lemmings for the system, or lemmings for some minor cult that actually works to reinforce the system by selling fake rebellion. So watch us be this fucking gullible, over and over and over until the world ends.
That's just propaganda, dead militants are always displayed as civilians when possible. If the rebel side openly said "50 of our best got reKt" that would be quite demoralizing for their side, "50 dead civilians and children" is enraging and gives their side motivation to fight harder also makes them feel like the 'good' side fighting the 'evil'. Makes them look better internationally, doesn't really matter as far as the retaliation goes tho since gassing militants is just as illegal as gassing children.
But yeah, probably some kids and real civilians died alongside rebels it's urban warfare.
>he doesn't play life on insane mode
Lmaoing at you
Jap was because the estimated casualties of a japanese invasion was 800,000~ americans and not including extending the war by several more months. Also was a text for nukes
I hoped Trump had more integrity than that.
Our leaders are.
That's correct too. Everybody wants to look like a victim when it comes to shellings.
Fuck, in our war I remember there were cases where the bodies were hastily dressed in civilian clothes for propaganda stuff, on both ours and the Russian side, and nobody wondered why the civilians got so close to a military checkpoint.
Of course civilians get killed during shellings, but how it is presented is a matter of who controls information.
Read
Also fog of war, obviously they can't know if the west is just all talk. They can't bend over to every big meanie who talks nasty and make decisions according to their will. Also they've assumed the west was behind the whole civil war right from the get go so from their perspective the west is going to try to take them out no matter what they do.
>implying facebook would even let you post if their AI determines you don't agree with the (((Washington Consensus)))
Thank you for this user
But why would Assad take such a big risk (gas attack) ? I mean he knows the west has already gave him sanctions.
Thanks for the reply, it's nice how you're able to see how it's done on both sides for the same reason rather than just pointing at the other side.
Most people get confused with the 'we' good 'they' bad bullshit.
yes. they know that just enough people are that stupid, so the critical mass for someone actually doing something about it wont be reached
All Assad had to do was wait, he wasn't in a hurry at all in Ghouta. You've been Boniered Sven.
Syrian rapefugee spotted
Why it's always civilians who die from gas attacks and not soldiers?
From his perspective the west is already doing everything but declaring open war against him. He believes Russian support and threats is enough to prevent the west from declaring open war, we're about to find out if it actually is enough to keep the west away.
Exciting times ahead
He is in a hurry, what makes you think he has time to just sit around?
Read
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like you don't think Assad is smart, is it true ?
Victory is not enough. One must strike fear into hearts of enemies. They must know that any issue, no matter how small, will lead to their families dying a horrible death.
>german flag
Yes, you are that stupid.
I could care less if he really did or didn’t do it. We should worry about fixing this shithole instead of being world police
I don't think he's stupid, he's doing a great job considering the circumstances honestly.
hitler was a fraud Kraut.
no one have done more damage to your country than hitler. but sure. it's fault of all those people who didn't surrender to his imperialistic suicidal ambitions
There is one thing about arabs most people probably do not realize: they're indeed sectarian as fuck and for example Assad being an alawite is a valid reason to gas sunnis just because of their (slight) different believes and also because provided a chance they'd do the same (and already did). He realizes those children he killed won't ever become jihadists and every woman won't produce 10-20 kids who shall hate alawites and shall join some vile group in 16-18 years.
IMO arabs should be allowed to slaughter each other until they start to become humans, but it will be hard to isolate them and maintain oil at the same time
he survived where Sadam, Hosni and Muammar failed. No one in middle east achieved more during last 200 years.
Who we??? Piece of shit....use different proxy kike scum
Шииикapнo
He's winning that's why. Any siege is a matter of time.
How is that the same?
>I am winning better gas my own people giving the US a reason to openly engage
vs
>I am losing better take as many guys as possible with me
ASSAD KILLED SO MANY INNOCENT CIVILIANS WITH CHEMICAL WEAPONS!!! STOP HIM NOW!! HE WANTS TO DESTROY OUR HOMELAND ISRAEL!! #BOMBSYRIA !!! SAVE SYRIAN CHILDREN!!!!
Somebody put this best the other day:
"They do not need you to believe it they just need you to believe other people do"
Reason I say "he believes" is because in reality nobody knows. Russia think they're strong enough to keep the US at bay and the US thinks it's strong enough to push the Russians away.
If Russians didn't think they were strong enough they'll back down when/if the US strikes. If the US didn't think it was strong enough they'll stop pushing and back down.
If both think they are strong enough to deal with the other the US will strike Syria, Russia will retaliate and the outcome of the war that follows will determine who actually has the strength to have their way in Syria.
Fourth scenario is some kind of agreement to disagree
honestly we should use the same strategy here in the Balkans
Yes.
god damn i love these memes
theyve done it before theyll keep doing it.
9/11
7/7
etc etc
all lies, all obvious,
>Swedecuck
>projecting about geopolitics
nah
The longer he waits the more the rebels there will dig in and the harder it will be to run them over. Yes it's true that he could wait that stronghold to collapse but that would take years. That's not really a option though. He'd need a ton of troops to defend and fortify the encirclement, troops that would be unavailable for other operations for years.
He needs those troops in operations to end the insurgency at large, the longer it takes the more he'll lose in the end. He can't siege properly before the war is under control
Trust me I got my geopolitical PhD from mehmet at the local kebab stand, he's 100% legit all 48 cousins vouched for him
damn I just noticed Assad has blue eyes... really makes you think
Trump just tweeted
"Russia vows to shoot down any and all missiles fired at Syria. Get ready Russia, because they will be coming, nice and new and “smart!” You shouldn’t be partners with a Gas Killing Animal who kills his people and enjoys it!"
Do we think Russia will back down or make a stand?
Inb4 the schizophreniacs make this about greater Israel. Israel will always strive to be greater and to control their environment, doesn't mean that everything that happens is part of a grand scheme. They will capitalize on this but they're not the ones making the big moves :)