Is it even possible to invade Iran?
Is it even possible to invade Iran?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
why would it not be possible?
Surrounded by a highly montainous terrain, galeries under mountains full of weapons, big army, and armed to the bone
of course a europoor thinks life is a disney movie and everyone bows down to a disgusting annoying harry faggot pooter english accent
SCYTHIAN MILKERS
lol, no way. Lebanon is no joke either, they take Syria real seriously, they can go there for free shit, even cosmetic just for being an arab. PhDs, university, I just hope they storm Israel, they know this is the moment, they all know they will be absorbing some bombs but those people are ready to send Israel to hell.
Many Iranians don't see USA in a good light, they will fight and not surrender. Its going to be a bloodbath. Iranians have like a thing for dying as martyrs. And also - USA is helping sunni muslims, so shia iranian won't allow their country to be ruined so sunnis could proclaim victory and eliminate all shia in the region.
Lol, yes
How
with "modern tech" from gulf of Oman and Persian gulf it should not be too much of a problem to create an "invasion corridor" from either Iraq or Afghanistan or both
it would surely not be as simple as humanitarian bombing in Libya, but with help and perseverance from "international community" it can be done
The US shouldn’t assume it has friends, only countries unable to disagree. Your so-called friends are just those who can’t say no to you.
Everywhere you go, everything you touch, you leave behind only chaos.
Nobody has vested you with the power to act like the world’s policeman, or to act like the prosecutor, judge, and executioner.
>be greek
>be great
The West would beat Iran in a conventional war, albeit with more casualties than the media/neocons/sabre rattlers would like to admit. After then stopping insurrection would be a nightmare that would make Afghanistan and Iraq look like a walk in the park in comparison.
You can get an idea of how insane the political establishment is by how much it supports wars against Iran.
It would be similar to the first gulf war aka 'the one where Saddam still had an army'.
Alexander maintained the old status quo in Iran. He intermarried his soldiers with Persians, allowed old beurocrats to keep their posts and maintained the structure of governance.
The current geopolitical landscape is completely different.
Iran is more organised than Saddam. Remember, Saddam was only able to fight the Iranians with extensive aid from the US. This was just after Iran had a revolution too.
Why is the Iranian flag literally a dick right before getting inserted into an ass
Why is yours basically an enlarged anus?
Dick=Iran
Ass=Israel
:^)
Due to saddam fucking up his generals plans with his lack of knowledge about warfare.
Almost like hitler
why invade when we can destroy their roads , dams , rivers , industry they starve and die from lack of water..
>you're about to find out goy
Lol
yes
there are many big ethnic and religious minorities in iran like azeri turks and kurds.
they make up majority population in some regions of the country.
Over half of Iraqis hated Saddam and Iraqi army was much weaker than Iran`s one.
>Over half of Iraqis hated Saddam
Shias*
Iran>Saudi dogs
and Kurds. Iran is much more unified. Many people despise Mullahs but they would never cooperate with Americans to owerthrow regime.
pls gib iranian gf
In every category except for combat boats/ships Saddam lost more in the Gulf War than Iran even has fielded.
The conventional forces of Iran would be summarily swept aside and an invasion of the country would not be in the US's strategic interest.
So you know, like the Gulf War.
Becaude this has worked so well in Afghanistan already, right?
Note too that Persians actually have rather sophisticated defense tech and double the population compared to Afghans.
How do you expect this to foil out, nigger?
On paper Iraq had one of the largest and most battle hardened in the world in 1990. Against like opponents at least.
Against the Coalition during the First Gulf War, they turned out to be a paper tiger. Outside of a handful of elite Republican Guard units, most of the Iraqi soldiers were conscripts, poorly trained, poorly led and unable to effectively fight back. Many units surrendered to aircraft (the first time that has happened in history) before the ground war even began.
> Alexander post best post
Of course.
You can invade anything, you just can't conquer everything, every empire on earth learns that one way or another.
This guy could tell you.
Yes but hunderds of thousands would die on both sides. The Iranians would probably once again engage in literal suicide missions like they did in the Iran Iraq war
Why doesn't India do more. They should be responsible. A billion people and they don't do anything but shit. Lazy poomen.
Look at a map. We've got them surrounded. Iraq on one side and Afghanistan on the other.
>Be US
>Invades Iran
>Iran activates it's revolutionary guard within the US who lives there posing as refugees
>Israel wins
Just go for it
>Tfw no Persian qt
not by the current year transgender ZOG Forces...
>look at a map
>We've got them surrounded.
What a joke Amerikikes are.
Iraq has a pro iranian shiite government.There maybe some thousand mutts inbetween a gazillion shiite milita men.
In Afghanistan there are not even enough mutts to secure the capital.In a case of war the mutts will be without any supplies and under constant attacks.
In Syria the 2000 mutts are also just nice targets.
Exactly! The two countries that carried out 9/11!
Wait, what?
you have her