Well, who should have it?

C would result in the most net happiest.
The first mother fucker can buy one.
The second literally doesn't need one.

what if they don't have money&can't get money because they are invalid?

B made it so its hers and she can do whatever she wants with it.

A can buy it.

C gets gassed.

Take the flute for myself because children are weak. I could beat up like fifty children. It's not even close.

None of them. The flute belongs to the State.

Then they can't buy the flute, too fucking bad

i would rather shove it up my ass rather than give it to any of them

ever heard children playing flute? they sound like elephants getting raped. it's the worst sound imaginable.

shit, i'd rather stick that flute up my dickhole while getting assfucked by a mandingo

The only correct solution.

Child B because they made it obviously.

This, you dumb fucks

It's up to you to decide what to do with it, not B. B works in a flute factory for the state.

>It is basically "which part of Marxism do you agree with the most?"
broken clocks, and it's B

Give it back to B.
A buys it.
B gets motivation to make more flutes.
The friends of A buy the new flutes.
B is now good at making flutes, and is able to diversify. Create cool, expensive flutes on the one hand, and cheap, simple flutes on the other hand.
C can now buy the cheap flutes.
Now everybody has flutes. The pie was made bigger instead of being redistributed.

a refugee~~~!! :D uwu

#LetThemIn

Attached: taeri.jpg (1080x1080, 182K)

B, because they worked for it.

It belongs to me

Attached: FC63F326-FD07-4EAF-8BC5-5DE96CCA7FC3.jpg (300x250, 26K)

secret answer D. whoever buys the fucking flute.
why would i give the flute away if im the one choosing who it goes to? and even if this isnt a commerce problem and its instead a school scenario about breaking up a fight then give it to B since shes the one who made it and probably brought it to school.

B, A if it provides service to B(Play a good song etc.). C eternally btfo

None. Musical instruments are Haram

Only correct answer is "it's not mine to give".

I take the flute, break it into 3 pieces, and teach the children the uselessness of communism.

To who was rightfully it's owner since it's creation

Attached: 1523195202865.jpg (672x672, 35K)

the way everything in this world is handled, whoever wins the fight. they know I the adult would win the fight so I am the chooser so they try to sway me by fighting each other with words but it still all comes down to whoever wins the fight.

It's "from each according to his ability" you brainlet

B because it's her fucking flute is it not?

It's "FROM each according to their ability"

NOT... "TO each according to their ability."

So your theory is false.

Put the flute on a stump. Take out my axe and begin the chopping mottion.

First one to cry and beg gets it. (Pro tip: It's B)

Attached: tmp_12280-1522945848839612775191.png (354x462, 25K)

None. They all get beatings and helicopter rides.

It says that Child B also provided the materials though

If you think that the person providing the materials and doing the labour isn't entitled to the flute then maybe you're the filthy fucking commie

This is honestly a fucking horrible test because the impetus to award the flute to A and C is so fucking skewed. Enabling one to play music nicely pr the other to feel marginally better are, to 99% of people, irrelevant goals with absolutely no worth.

Swap the flute for something like medication for an epidemic. Make A be in urgent need of it immediately, give B the means to acquire more if they don't get it, and make C be too poor to ever afford any even if they can survive for now. Add actual stakes and a reason for why A and C need it for more than just slightly improving their mood.

That's how you make a moral question that can do more than scout out the 1% of autists so invested in music or fucked in the head that they'd pick more than B

I'd keep it for myself

Child B onws the flute, Child A can pay Child B with a good or a service for it. Child C can enjoy the music Child A produces.

kek'd

Hans gets it

Whatever you do, don't give the flute to child C.
That fucker will either break it or sell it for drugs money then he'll be asking for another flute.

The medicine would still be owned by B and it would be B's right to choose if they want to give it to A or C, for how much and when. It's like sayig that Europe belongs to either Chineese (becouse they think they could run it better) or niggers (becouse they want it the most).

"flute" they mean meat whistle don't they? filthy pedos and their propaganda.

Attached: 1518016325479.jpg (1024x588, 299K)

It's B, always B, everytime you post your shit image it's B, now fuck off.

I WOULD GIVE MY FLUTE TO ALL OF THEM

racist af
give it to jaqwuan

Attached: 49.jpg (1254x720, 125K)

I'd be inclined to agree, yes, but the point is that scenario would do a lot more to inspire internal-reflection on the matter and there'd be more than 1% of people picking A or C due to their differing moral stances.

Attached: 1523364435633.png (888x384, 126K)

Ok, C gets conscripted in the military, then enslaves B to work in a gulag to produce flutes for A
BAM, perfect society that values virtue over silly freedom

Attached: Kim-Jong-Un.jpg (615x409, 36K)

A

the state already has it, hence the question.

Nice quads of truth.

B.

so? everyone agrees with one part of marxism the most.

Request for improvement: Change the caption of the niglet to: "Gibs me dats or das rayciss"

B, so B can sell it to A who can actually use it

C will just die listening to the harmonic sounds of the flute.

Child B provided that the material from which she made it from were also hers. Otherwise the owner of the materials must pay her for the labor. Once the owner of the materials has paid the agreed amount the owner ship is transferred to the the owner of the initial materials.

Child A can buy it provided they can afford it.

Child C can fuck off.

based

A, but B should be compensated for their work and effort producing it.

B has a legal ownership over the flute.

The only real answer.

Wow, sounds like they can't afford a flute. Good thing clapping your hands is free (assuming you have two good ones)!

God, this question is so racist. Ask, who should have it, and it's nothing but white people. White people have had everything long enough. It's time for POCs to get their turn and start getting the good stuff. But there's not a POC in the list of choices. That's white supremacy, and the sickest part is that nobody even noticed. That's how systemic racism is in our society.

A should buy it from B.

Attached: the little faggot of ill omen.png (268x268, 145K)

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

That was qick

this

In a capitalist society the state would not have the flute to begin with.

Why do "I" have the flute, and why is it my job to give it to someone?

I didn't make it, I didn't pay for it, who did I take it from? Child B?

I don't understand the question

Attached: 40eae591-f1d5-4ece-9de2-7794ced7bf53.jpg (399x500, 220K)

True, and maybe C should apprentice himself to B and learn how to do something useful.

>Child C can enjoy the music Child A produces
What is this some sort of socialist state? Child A does not play for free.

Jesus Christ, keep replying fucktarded, they post this every 6 hours.

I'd have Child B sell it to Child A, then, using the funds she made, Child B would employ Child C to gather and process raw materials for her flute making.

God I love Capitalism.

A should buy it from B and C should pay to hear A play it

The answer does not matter because it will go to the jew in the end.

Child B

LKY school???

Also can someone tell me how the flute improves child C's life?

She cant play it or maintain it, how is her life improved immeasurably?

>nobody's suggested breaking the flute into three parts yet

Oh Sweetie

DELET

Only legitimate answer

Why does this sound like a pedo thing?

B>A>C
In that order

Attached: 14542341414.png (758x949, 386K)

if they are arguing over it i just break it and throw it away. that's the way i was raised, if i couldn't share without fighting no one gets what was argued over.

A should get it and make his no st afterward he should break it.

Attached: 1522459173523m.jpg (1024x784, 106K)

I looked it up,

"Who gets the flute depends on your philosophy of justice. C, the poorest, will have the immediate support of the economic egalitarian. The libertarian would opt for B. The utilitarian hedonist will bicker a bit but will eventually settle for A because she will get the maximum pleasure, as she can actually play the instrument. While all three decisions are based on rational arguments and correct within their own perspective, they lead to totally different resolutions."

B should give it to C for small increment payments that he can afford with intrest

"Thus justice is not a monolithic ideal but a pluralistic notion with many dimensions. Yet Western philosophers have seen justice largely in singular, utopian terms."

I wouldn't give it away for free. I would sell it to A and give a small percentage of the sale to B. I would tell C to get a job like delivering newspapers so they can save up and buy a flute.

which one will suck my dick if I give it to them?

>The libertarian would opt for B
Anyone sane will say B because she created it with her own materials,you don't have to be a libertaricuck to get that

Belongs to B, but she should let A play it for C since he's a poor, miserable shit and maybe that'll cheer him up.

SPBP

These sorts of bullshit questions get people used to authortianism. The guy who made the flute sells it to the one who can buy it. Poor entitled fag fucks off.

I think if you asked outside of Jow Forums c would win

Child C because he's a boy. Women are objects and objects can't own other objects.

A scenario only a leftist could envision, because they believe it's their right to have the power to choose who should or shouldn't own the flute.