>Israel literally used chemical weapons in Gaza back in 2009 (white phosphorus) >*cricket sounds* >The Syrian regime ((((supposedly)))) ((((allegedly)))) ((((might have)))) used them >oy vey bomb Syria, kill Assad the animal
>phosphorous burns and the gas produced turns to acid if you inhale it >it burns for days and is near impossible to extinguish
>not a chemical weapon goy, move along
Luis Anderson
any weapons which includes a chemical reaction is a chemical weapon by definition . syria used chemical weapons on people , we never used it on people . we sometimes used it on palestinians .
>REPORT: IRAN ACCUSES RUSSIA OF GIVING ISRAEL CODES FOR SYRIAN AIR DEFENSES
Iran has accused Russia of giving the codes for Syria's anti-aircraft missiles to Israel, a senior official in the engineering department of Iran's Defense Department told the Kuwaiti daily Al-Jarida on Monday.
I think the use of them on a civilian population is terrible, I'm not defending that. They are not chemical weapons as defined by the UN. All weapons contain chemicals, that does not make them chemical weapons. By your definition, a child's water pistol would qualify as a chemical weapon, as it contains the chemical H2O.
Connor Sullivan
you need burn along
Brayden Perez
You would think the Holocaust "survivors" would be more kind knowing the "horrors" they endured. But of course, we know what the Jew truly is.
Jack Cooper
Also, CBRNfag here, the reason the world is so hard on chemical weapons is that they are:
1. Not actually that usefully against standing armies, atropine negates nerve agents aside from direct exposure, also protective equipment isn't super expensive. This makes then mostly useful for suprise, but more often against civilians.
2. Very deadly for how small they are. Look up the Aum Shinrikyo Tokyo subway attack. They had 28% pure sarin and dispersed it by popping ziplock bags with umbrellas. Result, many deaths and thousands injured.
An aersol anthrax of nerve gas attack could kill tens of thousands at the right location.
So, if a weapon has little war fighting utility, but massive abuse potential, it makes sense to try to disincentive countries from making it.
It's amazing 30 odd years or more of land grabbing murder genocide killing of children and use of Chemical wepons.
The most vile imoral sick goverment in world which has hidden behind a word Anti semetic.
It's a disgrace the west has let them get away with it.
Just as British let people get away with rapeing kids while hideing behind the word racist.
Julian Williams
>they acknowledged No they didn't, wtf you on about. They said that ISIS used them and that the fsa was found faking chemical attacks. There were also pictures circulating at that time but they were quote-on-quote "painted veils with animal carcasses (and blood) on them"
Leo Myers
The use of those weapons In a civilian area is quite probably a war crime. But they are not chemical weapons.
Brandon Torres
>An aersol anthrax of nerve gas Wat?
Alexander Collins
>Phosphorus is not a chemical
Now you’re just lying, but I wouldn’t expect anything less.
Kevin Ramirez
>(((British))) let people get away with raping kids
Caleb Evans
The US needs to remove the Israeli lobbys influence over American politics and prevent anyone with dual citizenship holding government office.
You stupid cunt. “H20 is the same as white phosphorus by your definition! Checkmate faggot!” Fuck you jews and your proxies.
Aiden Powell
Actually it's illegal under the international laws of war to deploy WP against personnel. Now aliyah before you get necked by the glorious servents of allah.
Aersol of nerve gas or anthrax sprayed under pressure or let into an HVAC system.
One study found that a small amount of anthrax put in the Grand Central Station HVAC could kill 40k.
Michael Wilson
Holy fuck, the earth is actually flat!
Jose Ortiz
I hope the next regime that is sick of you fucks will actually use gas this time, and I hope it’s painful.
Brandon Evans
Yeah, but their interests align with those of the American elite, so it's all good.
Leo Jackson
>How can they be any more blatant ? idk, they do it openly at this point. then they sic their pets to distract from themselves.
Bentley Price
They did. They then with Russia destroyed their stocks(apparently). That is how Russia first involved themselves as a broker in the civil war. Its no secret.
Jonathan Jenkins
>the American elite user, it's the same people
Xavier Johnson
now you know . its common sense really , anyone who knows what chemistry is should get it .
Anthony Sanchez
That's not what I said. Of course phosphorus is a chemical, high explosive is a chemical too. It is not a chemical weapon, look it up. I'm not defending the use of them, just stating facts.
Adrian Rodriguez
That's not what I said, it's quite clear.
Jack Price
Fuck the rules of war. Are ISIS going to face trial at The Hague for war crimes? Is Israel ever going to submit to international charges of war crimes brought against them? Is the Bush Admin going to waltz into the Hague, lawyered up and ready to face the music? Restrictions placed on what tactics and munitions can and can't be used are only there to limit civilized nation's capacity for waging war. We saw the barbarian hordes of ISIS do whatever the fuck they wanted. They got vaporized by airstrikes. That's the justice of war. I don't give a shit if Israel uses WP to incinerate their neighbors. Just like I don't give a shit when Hamas sends their shit tier rockets into Israel. I don't give a shit about the civilians killed when the US commits it's latest "collateral damage" that it sweeps under the rug to maintain moral supremacy. I give a shit about the hypocrisy of feeling bad about the unavoidable casualties of using superior force, and acknowledging you did something wrong by hiding and denying it happened.
Carter Morris
I bet you have the annoying pompous kings’ english accent you snobby faggot
WP is not a chemical weapon you retard. so much fake news right now jesus christ
Easton Wilson
WP is classified as an incendiary weapon and not a chemical weapon.
Also Israel isn't a signatory of Protocol III of the CCWC which covers incendiary weapons and as such is not bound by the rules put forth in the document.
Anthony Scott
white phosphorus is basically a sparkler, my family uses it every year on the 4th