Christians and Jews of Jow Forums, how do you explain Racism in a Biblical context...

Yeah, OP can pick and choose verses out of - or with limited - context that look like they support his predetermined agenda ("I would like to find solid Biblical support for my perspective" rather than "tell me what the Scriptures say, and I'll build my worldview around that"). But the preponderance of the scriptures make a point of being race-neutral. Ephesians is literally "how does the Church, which is the body of Christ, overcome racial differences and unite under one head, which is Christ." The Great Commission talks about "go into all the world and make disciples," i.e., not one ethnic group or another; make them all disciples. In the Revelation, John sees a people gathered together by the Lamb from every "tribe, tongue, and nation." The first half of Isaiah chapter 56 is literally the prophet BTFOing those who say, "nah - our religion is only for Jews." In Galatians, Paul (who called himself "a Hebrew among Hebrews") called out Peter for treating Gentiles and Jews differently and refusing to associate with "another race." This same Peter had the vision of the sheet in the book of Acts, where the Lord made it clear, "Look, all people are to receive the Gospel. There's no 'unclean people'."
tl;dr if you're looking for racism in the Bible, it ain't there.

James 2 English Standard Version (ESV)
The Sin of Partiality
2 My brothers, show no partiality as you hold the faith in our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory. 2 For if a man wearing a gold ring and fine clothing comes into your assembly, and a poor man in shabby clothing also comes in, 3 and if you pay attention to the one who wears the fine clothing and say, “You sit here in a good place,” while you say to the poor man, “You stand over there,” or, “Sit down at my feet,” 4 have you not then made distinctions among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts? 5 Listen, my beloved brothers, has not God chosen those who are poor in the world to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom, which he has promised to those who love him? 6 But you have dishonored the poor man. Are not the rich the ones who oppress you, and the ones who drag you into court? 7 Are they not the ones who blaspheme the honorable name by which you were called?

8 If you really fulfill the royal law according to the Scripture, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself,” you are doing well. 9 But if you show partiality, you are committing sin and are convicted by the law as transgressors. 10 For whoever keeps the whole law but fails in one point has become guilty of all of it. 11 For he who said, “Do not commit adultery,” also said, “Do not murder.” If you do not commit adultery but do murder, you have become a transgressor of the law. 12 So speak and so act as those who are to be judged under the law of liberty. 13 For judgment is without mercy to one who has shown no mercy. Mercy triumphs over judgment.

CONTEXT, CONTEXT, CONTEXT!

But that's simply untrue. The Old Testament is basically race warfare everywhere.

Isaiah 56:9-12 looks like it speaks to my perspective.

I believe Jesus's Purpose was primarily to bring the Lost Sheep of the House of Israel back into the fold. These "Lost Sheep" largely wound up in Europe. This would explain the pressing to halt the discrimination against European/Levantine non-Jews.

not christian but tower of babel

>The Old Testament is basically race warfare everywhere.
By "everywhere" I'm going to assume you mean the books of Deuteronomy and Joshua, since I doubt you're laying the blame for the Babylonian captivity, and the Persian overthrow of the Babylonian empire, at the feet of the Lord and calling it "race warfare" that God approves of.
Deuteronomy 9, bud. YHWH is destroying the other nations for their sin. He could have done it with a plague. He could have done it with an asteroid strike. He chose to have his people do it. Why? We aren't told, but my guess is that with every stroke of the sword, the lesson was to be reinforced in the minds of the Israelites: "This is the payout for sin. The death I am inflicting is what happens to people who forsake the LORD. This could be me if I don't walk carefully and passionately with God." And of course you see how that went: God explicitly says the Israelites were even worse than the nations that were driven out before them.
Look it up sometime. It's in a book called the Bible.
Next I'll look up your Isaiah passage and see what you're on about.

That's my point! Have you not seen the obscene statistics about Black crime, globally? It's crazy!

It's evident God intends for Israel (not just the Jews and not the kenites, the false Jews) to populate the city of Jerusalem, since their names are written on the city gates. So there is still a distinction between the Jews and the Israelites; the city is for the Israelites. The city is the crown of the Earth, so it might follow that Israel will be the leader of the world. But Revelation also mentions the rest of the world sees the light in Jerusalem, so there must be non-Israelites to be there.

Paul also says explicitly that the hidden mystery of God was that all nations would be saved through the Messiah.

Are you wanting to say non-whites won't be saved? That would be hard to argue. Saying whites are actually Israelites is easier, and saying Israel will lead the world is also much easier.

>Isaiah 56:9-12 looks like it speaks to my perspective.
The part where God says, "Israel's watchmen suck, they aren't doing their job, and they're going to be punished"? Yeah, it speaks to your perspective. And it says, "GET FUCKED." The bulk of Isaiah is a long message of "you guys aren't following the Lord the way I've told you to over and over; I will therefore discipline Israel with the harsh punishment of captivity, so she doesn't think she's something special and has the Lord in her back pocket."
Where in the world do you think vv9-12 supports your case?

I believe Whites and Israelites are cousins, both descended from the original Twelve Tribes of Israel. (israelite.info/thebiblestoryfiles/hebrew-celtic-connection.html) I just don't know how to reconcile the obscene crime rates in Black communities and the culture thereof with saveable people. Even MLK was a philandering scumbag.

Romans ch. 10 and 11 deal with the question, "Who is an Israelite, and what does that mean?" It's the central passage that Jow Forumstards are forced to ignore if they want to continue to carry water for racial supremacy/segregation/etc.

Interesting perspective. I hadn't thought of it that way.

What are your thoughts on the Mark of Cain, the Serpent's Seed Theory, and the Curse of Ham and Canaan?

>I just don't know how to reconcile the obscene crime rates in Black communities and the culture thereof with saveable people.
Oh, okay. You think salvation is by works, or you think that "my sin isn't that bad, so I am saveable; that other person is really horrible, and so they are not saveable."
You are utterly blind to the depth of your own depravity, or the infinity of God's holiness (and sin's offense against it), or both. You and I are every bit as bad as the worst murdering Communist in history, in God's sight.
Scripture has a prayer that it sounds like you would pray: "God, I thank you that I am not like other people—robbers, evildoers, adulterers—or even like this tax collector. I fast twice a week and give a tenth of all I get."
Read Luke 18:9-14 and let me know how that works out for you.

You argue a "spiritual Israel" or that the church is Israel, etc. I get it, and don't agree. Not going to spend my night rereading those arguments, they are elsewhere on the web.

The tribes are specifically listed in Revelation, minus Dan who (to make the point of specificity) was removed because of idolatry. If the future kingdom belongs to "spiritual Israel" there would be no need to list specific tribes. The church is never referred to as being from individual tribes. These saints in Revelation are said to come from the tribes of Jacob.

If the text had wanted to mean the non Israelites, it had already established language to do so. But it did not, so I assume that's not what it meant.

I just feel like not being a racist is totally insane and against real life data and situations. I live in the South, and if you're White, you DEFINITELY don't want to live in a Black neighborhood. The Jews of ancient times didn't have the same kind of interactions with Blacks that we have today. It just seems like forcing oneself to ignore real life facts and just brainwash yourself to believe that everyone is the same, when they're not.

>What are your thoughts on the Mark of Cain, the Serpent's Seed Theory, and the Curse of Ham and Canaan?
I think they are utterly irrelevant to the Gospel, and that no one is beyond redemption.
Without getting into a pissing match over the historicity of the Creation account, the first ~12 chapters of Genesis are best seen as the "Prologue." They set the stage, and demonstrate the problem. Three times (Eden, Noah's day, Babel) Man tries to be his own God, and every time, God is forced to remove Man from his presence - God is holy, Man cannot recover from his fallen state, Man is attempting to set himself up as God, this only causes Man's destruction. That's "The Problem." Then in chapter (like) 13 of Genesis, God picks a nobody - an impotent middle-class retiree from Ur, in an age when children were the only yardstick of a man's legacy - and says, "I'm going to use YOU to bring my rescue plan about." That's the thrust of the rest of Scripture running through around Revelation chapter 3. After that is the "postscript:" "Hey by the way guys, God wins."
Letters like Romans, Hebrews, and Galatians make it clear that there's no "mark" or "curse" other than the Curse of sin and death, which falls on us equally as children of Adam, and no irredeemable sin except the blasphemy of saying to the Spirit, "you are wrong, I don't need a savior, my sin is something I can take care of myself."

>You argue a "spiritual Israel" or that the church is Israel, etc. I get it, and don't agree.
No, I don't argue that, Paul argues that. You want to disagree, that's fine, but you're disagreeing with Paul of Tarsus and the canon of Scripture.

Even John admits some sins are "to the death." Revelation lists specific sins that, practiced, proclude entry into the kingdom (murder, drugs, homosexuality, etc.)

I didn't mean "spiritual non-Israel," I meant literal descendants of the Lost Tribes. The Jews of today are mostly, I believe, descended from two tribes, the ones unconquered by Assyria: Judah, and Benjamin.

Don't confuse me with OP. All nations are welcome to salvation, I'm just suggesting Jerusalem itself is a city of Israel, not of the ethnos.

Yes, you're right. I didn't look up the verse and assumed you were trying to say the opposite of what you were trying to say.

10 tribes? There are 12 (actually 13). There is no racism. Christ came to preach to the Jews qnd left the gentiles for his disciples...Paul was given the job of sharing the mystery of the body of christ or the church with the gentiles.

The serpent seed theory as already mentioned explains any genocide in the old testament. God isntructed Joshua to annihilate the men women and children of various tribes because God knew those tribes had been infiltrated by the seed of the enemy as previously expressed in Genesis 6

KJV OR NOTHING

I live in the American south, too, in fact (an hour outside Atlanta, where I went to Uni). And yes, you avoid high-risk situations, areas, and individuals. You look both ways before you cross the street, I buckle my children into the minivan when we drive somewhere, and I carry a pistol to protect them and my wife.
Does that mean that no blacks will be in heaven? Does that mean we are not to reach out to the areas in our society that are the most broken and the most hurting? Heaven forbid we be caught eating with tax collectors and sinners! "It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick."
You are right. Black society in the USA is deeply, deeply broken. Is it irrecoverable? I don't know. But put yourself in the shoes of a Follower of the Way in the early 40s or 50s AD, and picture what your attitude would be toward Corinth. Fucking Corinth. Literally "Fucking Corinth," because that's what kind of city it was. Did God have saints from the city he wanted to call out from there? Did he have a church to establish?
You also keep using the phrase, "real life," "real facts," "real data and situations." But bear in mind, the Kingdom is more real that this ephemeral life we're living right here and now. Eternal things will last when the veil of this flesh, this corpse we live in, has been torn away. If the Spirit is indeed God, if the Gospel is indeed the Word of God and it has his power, it's enough to redeem even those who are factually the most dangerous and worst among us.

Lost Ten Tribes of the Northern Kingdom of Israel, captured and swept away by Assyria in 744 BC

>KJV OR NOTHING
disgusting. The only thing worse is the NKJV: all the poor scholarship, none of the beautiful poetic language.

Even the best of them, a man who many would deem a kind of 'modern prophet,' Dr. "King," had orgies and drunken sex parties, had a child in an extramarital relationship and disrespected the memory of the then-recently deceased John Kennedy. I'm from Atlanta too. I cannot deny that something about Blacks is irredeemable. Be it the Black Israelites stealing my and your ethnic identity, to the Yakub insanity put forth by the Nation of Islam. It just seems like it's a culture of lies, murder, rape, theft, and hypocrisy. And of course, most of the people who rally against racism are the same ones who love trans, gay, Muslim, and other people who are defiant against God, spit in His face, and turn people against Him.

Not to mention, Dr. "King" was an avid plagiarist and Communist.

That's good news for the Greeks and Jews I guess.

Even the best of me, a man who holds church office and a respectable job, had thrown away his talent and witnessing opportunities, wishes his enemies dead on a regular basis, curses and swears, is filled with rage toward his loved ones, hooked on pharmaceuticals, and spends his evenings arguing on Jow Forums. It just seems like my mind is full of lies, murder, rape, hypocrisy, and insanity. I have spit in God's face in defiance, and I'm sure the way I treated my friends in HS (I was *that Christian*) has turned people against God.
Are you saying I'm irredeemable?
Sin is sin, friend. Everyone has it. "The sins of some men are obvious, going ahead of them to judgment; but the sins of others do not surface until later." Remember that God has a different perspective on sin than you and I do. Everyone - everyone - is much, much worse than we could think or imagine. All that means is that Christ's salvation is even more incredible, if it's able to rescue a couple of assholes like you and me. Also, remember the parable of the two men praying at the temple, as referenced:

I was raised Jewish. On my mom's side, I'm ethnic Ashkenazi. On my dad's side, I'm basically a Western European combo burger. I sympathize way more with the Old Testament+Gospels+Revelation combination, leading me to believe that Jesus's purpose was seriously to bring the descendants of the Lost Jews of Israel back into the Fold via Christianity. I believe Europe and North America, at times, have exemplified the Christian ideal. When it comes to nations like Ethiopia, first off, I don't buy that they ever had the Ark of the Covenant. Ron Wyatt testified that the Ark of the Covenant still resides in Jerusalem, and on top of that, they based their entire "Solomonic Dynasty" on a meeting between Solomon and the Queen of Sheba, which doesn't even mention them having sex in the Bible at all, let alone producing a child. I just think it speaks to the thieving nature of the African peoples. God instructed the Jews to wipe out Amalek in the desert. I think the situation with non-Blacks and Blacks is a little different, but I believe the natural balance has been thrown out of whack, and they should return to the status laid out in God's designation of Canaan's descendants being the servants to servants.

"Greek" meant "non-Jew" in that context. "Gentile" is a more useful modern translation.

>Be christ
>Get killed by zionists
>2000 years later

JESUS LOVES ISRAEL¡¡¡¡

Yeah, but both men were Israelites, were they not? This speaks to profession and sin, not to ethnic identity. What do you make of Matthew 15 and Jesus' interaction with the Canaanite woman?

Do you see the connection between Ezekiel 23:14-21 and the perspective most Jow Forumstards have about miscegenation?

But bear in mind, what was the significance of the Ark? It was the place where (sometimes) the Holiness and the Presence would reside. After the Temple was rebuilt and rededicated, the Shekinah (sp) glory did NOT come down, as it did the first time. The Ark - wherever it is now - is just an old pretty box. Where does the Spirit of God live now? What is the advantage that believers after Christ have that believers before Him only had for fleeting moments in special instances?
Solomon prayed at the dedication, "Heaven and Earth cannot contain you, much less this temple I have built" - and how much LESS a sinful human individual. Yet, the scriptures attest plainly that we do in fact have the Spirit of God.

If you were a practicing Jew, but have come to believe Yeshua is Messiah, probably the best thing you can do is read the Gospels over and over - develop a real working familiarity with them - and find out what kind of man he was. Be like that guy. Best of luck to ya.

The word used is literally Hellen, you crafty liar.

It's not about the nature of the Ark, it's about the lie that has gone on and preached for CENTURIES by Ethiopians, and the Ethiopian Church. Some Church father was gonna reveal it to the world some years ago, and then suddenly changed his mind. It's not about the Holiness of the Ark today, it's about a National Lie that has been Dogma for centuries.

Don't go user, I still wanna hear more about your opinion and your thoughts on and

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-04-14 at 8.31.05 PM.png (368x132, 23K)

Not really; he's been talking for the whole passage in metaphor about Israel, anthropomorphizing the nation as a She. She has been unfaithful to her husband, the Lord. "This is a profound mystery, but I am speaking about Christ and the church."

Sorry. My brother and my dad know Greek, but I'm just a guy. How do you see that this changes the meaning of the passage?

Okay. Does telling a lie for centuries disqualify any individual human being from salvation? Has our culture remained free from any lies that we have told from generation to generation? Who gives a flying fuck about the ark anyway, when the whole point is Christ, Christ supreme, and Christ pre-eminent?

Hang on I'll see what I can see real quick.
Damn store fronts.

I mean, if a Jow Forumstard really, really wants to read that this passage is about miscegenation, he could do so. But he will miss the historic context of Isaiah, and what he was trying to tell the people about the captivity that was soon to occur. "I told you not to intermarry with them BECAUSE you would make their gods your own and leave me. And lo and behold, Solomon did exactly that, and you've all done that - some in a literal sense, some in the sense that you've actually spent my money chasing after foreign idols who are not gods at all" ("you saw a picture of them and you sent for them, b/c you wanted their sweet sweet idol cock") "and now it's coming back onto your own head."
Note that whenever New Test authors speak of marriage at all, in parable, metaphor, or literal instruction, they're consciously referencing the relationship between Christ and the Church. Christ initiates, pursues, loves, and sacrifices for the Church just as a husband is supposed to for his wife. Since God is One and is unchanging, it is easy (and correct) to see the same picture in the Old Test. That was the point of the shame and torture the Lord put Hosea through, for example. "Marry a whore. That's what it feels like to be God trying to love these people."
So, tl;dr I don't think miscegenation is a bad idea from Biblical grounds. You want to find other grounds for it, you might be able to (much like, I dunno, speed limits?), but the Scripture is talking about God and the Church (i.e., His People, i.e. "Israel").

Solomon fucked up, David fucked up, Moses fucked up. God uses metaphors for his relationship with Israel and the Church. Aren't we also literally meant to learn from these metaphors and mistakes?

And dude, Black culture worships money, drugs, violence, murder, theft. Isn't the idea that Christian or Jewish White Women (à la Daniel 12:10) involved with Black men get involved with these anti-Christian, anti-God practices? Isn't this the same as Solomon sexually 'integrating' and losing his Righteous identity?

Btw you never addressed Matthew 15

Also, please address Daniel 12:10

That's fine and we'll but doesn't say anywhere that I have to live with niggers. It's the "mixing"of the nation's that allows a world govt to form. I jest with the slur but we can be kind, compassionate and christ like without having to integrate the races. I don't hate anyone and I understand the creator gave us our differences and that denying that is denying his creation.

Daniel 12:10 is a big one

Individually everyone has the spiritual chance at eternal salvation with God based on a personal relationship. (Neither Jew nor Greek, Male or Female ect. in Christ)

However the different races were created by God and nations (ethnos) being separate was ordained by God. This is clear as far back as the tower of Babel and even lasts after the end of the world/cureent universe- all the 'nations' will come and worship God.

The sense of tribalism and dividing of humanity based on ethnos/race is very clear in the bible stories and genealogy, it's gods plan for biological beings. Of course it's the modern day Jews, whom Christ called the synagogue of Satan and said they were of there father the devil, that are destroying this natural God ordained biological order.

Not all modern day Jews are of the Synagogue of Satan, bro

>Neither Jew nor Greek
This was already debunked itt. The original Greek used the word Hellen. It's talking about literal jews and Greeks. It doesn't say jews and everyone else.

You're right about the Bible's view on ethnostates though. Blood and soil is a Biblical doctrine.

Fine, we'll exempt Brother Nathaniel.

We'll add his videos to our ethnostate's own library of congress.

Race exists, it doesn’t take a book to tell you that.

I think the story about the good sumeritan was about anti-racism

But the Bible is true, therefore it must reflect other Truths.

*Samaritan, and she might have been descended from cousins of the ancient Hebrews

Ask me anything, I will tell you what I know.

The good Samaritan gave Jesus' beat up OC free shit and returned to his home country. He didn't rape a bunch of people and explode.

What does Daniel 12:10 mean in the context of Jow Forums's rational racism?

If I can't be racist and Christian, then guess which one goes.

>protip, it's not racism

Attached: cupcake.png (630x372, 352K)

Does the Bible support racism?

No doubt the word Hellen referred to Hellenic people. But I think the NT is clear all people can receive the Gospel. Simon the Niger specifically comes to mind in the NT, he may not have actually been a SS African but he was probably some non Hellenic race. Same thing with the early Christian church in Egypt and non Hellenic Mesopotamia also.

But ethno states are biblical as you say and it fits perfectly with biblical narrative and prophecy that the same kind of Jews who killed Christ, who murdered the prophets, and who worshipped the golden calf in the desert are the ones destroying this natural order. The end times seem near in the post ww2 world.

It means eugenics works and Hitler was right as usual.

>What does Daniel 12:10 mean in the context of Jow Forums's rational racism?
It would appear "to be made White" is an ancient Israelite or Hebrew phrase meaning to make pure, that is to say to be made sinless or innocent. White in the ancient Hebrew culture seems to be an analogy for good or positive. Here is the Hebrew lexicon for Daniel 12:10
biblehub.com/lexicon/daniel/12-10.htm

The word used is:
purified וְיִֽתְלַבְּנ֤וּ ve·yit·lab·be·nu 3835a to be white a prim. root

Which has "Levan" in it, which means White.
biblehub.com/hebrew/3835a.htm

Yes. Racism is integral and a key part of the Bible and Yahweh's divine plan. Only pure blooded Nordids can be saved, i.e. the Nordic race proper, the rest are mamzers, corruptions, dilutions, hybrids, they will be destroyed by fire as a spite against their father the Devil. The parable of the Wheat and the Tares refers to this.

Attached: Nordic Ideal.jpg (187x270, 11K)

The end of Daniel deals with end time prophecy. What specific part of that is incompatible with "racism"?

In the truest sense of the word yes. God created biological diversity, god seperated the patriachs descendants, God confounded and seperated the nations at babel, and the biblical figures, and all the Christian church fathers were "race realists" up until the end of ww2. Which just so happens to correlate with muh holohoax, the creation of the State of Israel, and the general decay of society such that it seems the end times aren't far off.

If you mean racist as in is it Christian to fly over to Somalia and bash in random nigglets skulls in, then no probably not. (Although psalm 137 might disagree)

>Yes. Racism is integral and a key part of the Bible and Yahweh's divine plan. Only pure blooded Nordids can be saved, i.e. the Nordic race proper, the rest are mamzers, corruptions, dilutions, hybrids, they will be destroyed by fire as a spite against their father the Devil. The parable of the Wheat and the Tares refers to this.
Well then. What about Germanics?

Interesting how our whole world was changed by one single captivity. Interesting that the roots of the modern West lie within that Assyrian captivity of the House of Israel. Something to truly think about.

Germanics are part of the Nordid race, as are many other ancient Aryan peoples.

I know, right? Fucking fascinating.

israelite.info/thebiblestoryfiles/hebrew-celtic-connection.html

What if I have blonde hair and pale skin but green eyes, am I corrupted or will I be saved?

youtu.be/cxGdUlHYI2w

Attached: Madara_Uchiha.png (1471x1080, 999K)

You can still have those features and still have non-White blood, i.e. be a tare, impure. All corruptions will be destroyed, no matter how good they were in life, they are simply not part of God's divine order, and they certainly can not achieve salvation. I am a corruption myself, I too am passable as White but I am impure, I will be destroyed. Most people on the planet will be destroyed, most people on the planet can not achieve salvation through Jesus Christ.

Germanics are the main branch of Israelites, not Celts. Just so you know.

Source?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jutes
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danes_(Germanic_tribe)

Attached: judeawar.ab94b306.jpg (460x259, 35K)

What do u possibly base that on?

I don't see how this proves your point like my link did concerning the Celts

I haplogroup comes from the Middle East, it descend from the subclade IJ, the ancestor to both I and J haplogroups. Although the chronology as to when they split has a mainstream date of tens of thousands of years, it actually split around 4,360 years ago around the time of the flood.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Identity

On why the Jews aren't truly God's "chosen" people like they claim (i.e. the recipients of God's blessing unto Abraham), and on how the bible primarily relates the story of Adam and Eve and their descendants, which are the white races, called Caucasians after Noah's flood.
here :
youtube.com/watch?v=jWzkC1NnMIo part 1
youtube.com/watch?v=iI5x5UktXGE part 2
youtube.com/watch?v=Y49vMISVTlA&t=1s part 3
youtube.com/watch?v=SPxH6ODJoiI&t=3s part 4
youtube.com/watch?v=KriambOrj6U part 5

It's very well informed and to the point, you'll like it.

Attached: feelsgood.jpg (500x673, 43K)

Jute(Judah)
Danes(Dan)
Rest of the tribal names were lost.

it supports tribalism.

acts 17:26 And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;

>the bounds of their habitation
>the bounds of their habitation
>the bounds of their habitation

Psalm 137 is truly interesting. A true insight into the nature of God.

Wow. Good quote

Toonami will be on soon, don't want to miss Dragon Ball Super and the rest of my anime block. I shall leave you soon, so ask me questions while you still can.

"beautiful poetic language"

The Gospel doesn't exist to be form of entertainment...

Well to start off you're wrong in your assertion. But I mean this kindly, it's a common idea to read the Gospels and scratch your head at some of those verses. You could write a very long paper covering the entire Bible on just this subject alone, but I'll just try a point by point.

> I believe Jesus's Purpose was chiefly to bring the Lost Ten Tribes of Israel back into the fold.

No his purpose was to fulfill the new covenant as spoken about in Isaiah (majorly) and a big theme throughout the rest of the OT. He did this in relation to the Jews. It's actually interesting if you look at it in the logical sense.

>God is perfect
>God creates a law that is also perfect
>God holds himself to this law and fulfills it because no one else can
>Because of this fulfillment the New Covenant can be instated under Jesus who opens salvation to all if they believe in him.

I find it amazing because God basics holds himself to the same standard. There's a plethora of verses to support this notion in both Testaments, including opening salvation to all regardless of race. (Which already was a bit of a thing if you look in the books of Moses)

>I, myself, am a racist, and would like to find solid Biblical support for my perspective.

You won't find it in regards to salvation. You may be able to make a case that ethnostates are in general better because of some verse in Acts, but that's about it. Nothing in the Bible permits you to hate based on race, but I'm not saying that means you have to throw your own race out the door because of it.

>This mainly applies to those afflicted by the Curse of Ham and Canaan, those with dark skin.

Could be wrong but I believe that mostly comes from an older Talmudic concoction. The Curse of Ham and Canaan was not based on being black. That's absurd.