Jow Forums has a serious russian propaganda and idiot problem.
>US says there were 3 targets, chem weapon r&d labs, production facilities and storage bunkers >says nothing was intercepted and that russian defenses were not used >shows sattelite footage of completely annihilated targets
>According to the Russian Defense Minisry, US-led strike was aimed at the following targets: >Four missiles were launched at the area of the Damascus International Airport. All these missiles were intercepted. >12 missiles were launched at the Al-Dumayr Military Airport. All these missiles were intercepted. >18 missiles were launched at the Baly Military Airport. All these missiles were intercepted. >12 missiles were launched at the Shayarat Military Airport. All these missiles were intercepted. >9 missiles were launched at the Mezzeh Military Airport. Five of them were intercepted. >16 missiles were launched at the Homs Military Airport. 13 of them were intercepted. >30 missiles were launched at targets in the areas of Barzah and Jaramani. Seven missiles were intercepted >zero evidence provided
and there are actually people dumb enough to take anything russia says seriously
meanwhile: >footage of chemical attack >footage of chemical container which looks exactly like those used by Assad many times in the past >rebels had no aircraft and were surrounded so they had no capability of gassing themselves >hours after the gas attack the rebels surrender and hand over all their weapons to russian military >russia says the chemical attack did not happen and if it happened it was staged by the UK >all the sub 50 IQ nu-right idiots actually believe russia
>''OY VEY, DON'T FALL FOR RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA, GOY!'' >''YOU'RE BETTER OFF FALLING FOR ISRAEL AND NATO PROPAGANDA, WE WOULD NEVER LIE TO YOU TO JUSTIFY A MILITARY ACTION IN FAVOUR OF ISRAEL!'' yeah, fuck right off, boyo
Yes, there are Russian shills here but even more sceptics. We don't know anything for certain so we're not willing to say anything for certain, this is why it seems the Russian shills are beating us here.
Colton Ross
Even though I despise Pootin's regime, it does at least one good thing by making merchant say "Oy" so much.
Matthew Thomas
They just don't realise that Putin's Stalinist cronies are as bad as Israel.
Jason Cooper
>You mean the evidence of the white helmets killing civilians? The same group that gave you the gas bullshit?
Caleb Mitchell
>shoot over 100 missiles at 3 targets
You do realize that's what they're claiming they did?
I doubt about 73 but congrats if it was that much, can confirm ww2 tech can down amerifat tomahawks, even have a piece of the f-117 bomber that mysteriously "broke down". Don't know if it's more embarrassing that billions worth of equipment breaks down on it's own or gets shot down by 50 year old technology.
Also the rebels are a non-entity at this point, try again.
Bentley Howard
The intercept lie doesn't matter cause rebel forces got intel from CIA after the attacks. The chemical weapon questioning is just Russia hitting a vulnerability of distrust regarding precurspr to the Iraq war. It's not like it even went fat, normies wanted Syria bombed as soon as the video came out.
However, Jow Forums has become fun again after a year of being dull as fuck. You can see Russian shills changing the narrative and going after Trump now that he actually smacked Assad in the face. There's all these different groups on Jow Forums pushing their agenda and it's like a free-for-all at the moment. The only thing I cam say is CIA, step up your online banter. You have a black budget from selling drugs and you fucks can't even win over the useful idiots from Russia's grasp?
Camden Flores
to be fair, that nighthawk only got shot down because of pilot error and lazyness. kept the bomb bay doors open for no reason and repeatedly flew the same route to targets making it easy for the serbs to site and target SAM's nearby
Cooper Thompson
>France presents the evidence >It's twitter posts
Christian Young
From what I remember reading, they used a modified radar system that had issues with clutter and back scattering to pull off the shot in Yugoslavia
Jason Davis
This
We blew up nothing and many of our missiles got intercepted
Woop dee doo
Levi Stewart
If it's in the sky, all you have to do is hit it hard enough and it will fall
Jack Brown
and yet >evidence vs no evidence kys stupid /sg/nigger
>remove assad based on fake story about killing children in hospital >terrorism in iraq going wild >remove Gaddafi based on "threat to world economics" >now you can buy niggers for less than monthly salary in Libya >repeat the same shit to Egypt, Afganistan, Syria etc
so why are we supposed to keep beliving those lies again?
Andrew Moore
I like this. If the world thinks our tech sucks, next war they're in for a vicious surprise. Again.
Landon Price
Every time the USA is about to pull out of syria, Assad just always keeps gassing his own people for no reason, god wish he would stop.
Connor Hernandez
fuck off, you just call everything objective or reasonable propaganda
What's the downside of old, shitty US technology at this point? Maybe when the US realizes it's a paper tiger they'll stop fighting useless wars with shitty materiel, in order to finance the black money bottomless pit making a lot of war hawks and fat cats even fatter. The technology we possess may only be a deterrent to those who want to make US soil their own
Connor Morgan
>footage of chemical attack Where is the fucking footage? WHERE IS IT?
>footage of chemical container which looks exactly like those used by Assad many times in the past You realize like 80% of syria was rebel held at some point right? Both sides have chemical weapons
>rebels had no aircraft and were surrounded so they had no capability of gassing themselves You can gas with mortars for fucks sake, it's really simple. This is where you lose all credibility.
>hours after the gas attack the rebels surrender and hand over all their weapons to russian military Sort of, like other surrendering rebels they were allowed to leave.
And tell me why assad would gas a surrounded enemy on the brink of collapse and risk a western response less than a week after the US said it was withdrawing troops?
Kayden Sanchez
yeah everyone is a russian agent you fuckin schizo go to bed wake up without the state brainwashing
Op, what is pic related ? Why i can find hundreds of similar stories ? If you believe in (((western))) medias and politicians, you are a brainlet. End of story.
>footage of chemical attack False >>footage of chemical container which looks exactly like those used by Assad many times in the past Doublt false >>rebels had no aircraft and were surrounded so they had no capability of gassing themselves You dont need aircraft for a gas attack, its simply for convenience >>hours after the gas attack the rebels surrender and hand over all their weapons to russian military It was an attack on "civilians" not "rebels" >>russia says the chemical attack did not happen and if it happened it was staged by the UK It probably didnt happen >>all the sub 50 IQ nu-right idiots actually believe russia No, they just don't believe zog and the rest of the globalists.
>all this /sg/ damage control you should be deported to leftypol
Noah Powell
you notice you're talking about Russia? And I'm in your Russian thread? And everybody is pretty much not talking about anything but Russia? Gosh that is so odd aint it?
