Is Einstein's theory of moral relativity a Jewish science?

I think what you're referring to is entanglement, not relativity.

Black holes don't exist.

Entanglement is an extension of more basic cause and effect. Cause and effect isn't jewish.

thanks bro, l33t science mastery

karma is the spiritual jew, my friend.

Extending the hindu/buddhist metaphor, nirvana is partly defined as the transcending of samsara, the wheel of dukkha and the karma that results..

the fathers of quantum mechanics, heisenberg, schrodinger, pauli -- those guys weren't jews. (okay maybe pauli was half jew but raised catholic, heisenberg and schrodinger were lutherans).

the nazis were very happy with heisenberg, in fact, he was the head of their nuke research program. so if anybody got problems with quantum mechanics, then you're out of luck on the antisemitism card

I become more and more convinced that consciousness directly influences reality - quantum theories already show this - but the more people who believe in a certain idea, and believe it to be real, the more likely this idea becomes real.

So if more and more people start believing that there are no scientific absolutes in reality, then absolutes start fading away in all areas of human life.

what the fuck are you going on about...you sound angry about something.

btw korean ctr exposed

btw korean ctr exposed

btw korean ctr exposed

I never said anything about karma. That has nothing to do with cause and effect and neither does entanglement.

> acceleration is indistinguishable from gravity

FUCKING KIKES

maybe i'm a little pissed that /poltards can jump from not understanding physics to "therefore, jews=bad"

happy to talk about physics though.

I'm not buying it, Shlomo.

Fuck I wish we would've had won WWI. Wilhelm financed many scientists for the advancement of Germany

Jews are bad tho.

oy vey, vat a fakakta schmuck!
some motzoh ball soup would really make me feel better about these meshuggana poltards!

;-)

What's your ancestry?

You didn't say anything about karma, i did because you said cause and effect isn't jewish; what OP is calling "moral relativity" is not related to general or special relativity.

It's more akin to entanglement applied to spirituality and ethics as a whole; Einstein referred to it as "spooky action at a distance" hence my relating it to karma and nirvana transcending both.
I was implying that the understanding of what, exactly, entanglement implies on the atomic level is what leads to mental liberation from what OP is mistakenly calling moral relativity when applied to the world as a whole; it's not all your fault, basically.

Yes, Tesla knew he was a fraud

>entanglement implies

*entanglement explains

Yeah but cause and effect is not a karma idea. It's based in western philosophy. It translates more to responsibility and accountability than it does to karma.

karma is literally spiritual cause and effect which is why I used it in this example.

Attached: truth of pol.png (999x442, 200K)

It's not just spiritual cause and effect. It has an extra layer of explanation needed which is to say it tells us that you cannot do something bad without something bad happening to you. This is more like Newton's 2nd law or maybe even better, the 2nd law of thermodynamics that would say you cannot take something good out without giving something good, and you cannot give something bad out without taking something bad, ie conservation of goodness in the world.

>spiritual cause and effect

That's not the logic of cause and effect. That's adding more than cause and effect. Spiritual cause and effect would simply mean that one spirit's actions can affect another spirit or that a spirit's state can change from an action. Or are you claiming that all spiritual interaction can be reduced to karma? I don't believe that even if I did believe in karma. I believe in spiritual truth and the harmony with that truth more than anything else which could also includes cause and effect logic.

guys, quantum mechanics has nothing to do with karma. this is the other end of the "me no understand physics, but let me babble on nonsensibly anyway" spectrum from the "einstein was pushing jewish morality!"

if you want to know about how entanglement works, you should study electrons and photons harder. they have nothing to do with karma.

>Is Einstein's theory of moral relativity a Jewish science?
no, the people who made this video are retarded, and many non-Jews made important contributions to (special and general) relativity like Poincare, Minkowski, Hilbert (Hilbert would've probably developed GR if Einstein had not), etc.

That's what I'm trying to say. Entanglement has more to do with the logic of cause and effect. Karma is just a special case of cause and effect, so I reject karma being entanglement. This guy is arguing backwards against a point I made against him.

special relativity was not discovered by Einstein, blacks discovered it first

Attached: sheeit.png (389x292, 184K)

>spiritual truth

elaborate, please.

>mathematician detected
maybe hilbert would have discovered GR, sort of a long shot, but to take credit away from einstein for SR is mathematician delusions. minkowski showed Einstein a few equations but he had no idea of how it related to the real universe

God is spiritual truth and the universe is structured on his truth like the prime numbers and other peculiar mathematical beauty we've uncovered over thousands of years. The fact that our brains can find these beauties is telling me that we are evolving along god's plan and our brains contain spiritual truth as well.

Ugh a black hole is just a very dense space coal that doesn't let light escape. Its not some mathmatical construct. This is what is so tiresome about Discover magazine science. Its sensationalism. Same with quantum mechanics...

Attached: 1517531232159.jpg (1325x1000, 431K)

>numerical cause and effect

in all seriousness, though, I know what you're saying. I was just poking fun in the past few posts hehe

Attached: shivapepe.jpg (1600x900, 404K)

What I mean here is that relativity would've been developed by other figures eventually, it's hardly a Jewish conspiracy.
>muh Judenphysik
this is the sort of thing controlled opposition would say, which redice probably is.

Do you think mathematics has a spiritual component to it? I think physics is only as enlightening as it opens our mathematical knowledge of the universe. Everything else is just perception and context.

agreed, that's how science works though, the guy who gets it first gets all the glory.

pretty sure we'd have classical mechanics by now even if newton got a brick dropped on his head instead of an apple, right?

well being as though there hasn't been any direct observation of a black hole, i can't say for certain anything about 'real black holes'

what i can say for certain is that black holes (the kind hawking and susskind and others have studied for decades) are a thing predicted by General Relativity, and in that theory, they definitely don't look like "space coal" at all. they're more like a sinkhole in space

i cant find the video right now , but there's one where an interviewer is asking christopher hitchens something to the effect that whether relativity was a jewish subversion intention, and he was like "most certainly"

to weigh in on the nonsense-babblers convo:
>Do you think mathematics has a spiritual component to it?
I think any "beautiful" thing, like art or music or seeing the eclipse or the milky way or a small child or pretty woman, has a "spiritual" component to it. mathematics has a very subtle and intricate beauty all its own

oh here it is :

2:30
youtube.com/watch?v=1nfbp4DPcfQ

yes.

do you practice johrei?

Yes but I think mathematics is the true fabric of existence. All beauty can be made possible with mathematics.

Ever heard of heinrich lorentz?

Attached: 1507413584003.jpg (1024x1024, 248K)

no idea what johrei is :-/

Ah, a big part of it is appreciating beauty in all of its forms.

lorentz was good, i admit, but i feel like he was similar to minkowski in that he provided mathematical inspiration / fleshed out the equations... otoh einstein had the physical insight they didn't have (but subsequently adopted). it takes a real physical genius to reinterpret what space and time mean; minkowski and lorentz were good at math but didn't have the intuition for the real physical interpretion of "space" and "time" that einstein did

everything from the east is either unoriginal or delusional

Bellagio Sampler's newest video about the strike in Syria and what it means for the SPIRITUAL WAR we are all a part of. ...
>the divide between good and evil is widening
The "middle class" of good vs evil is disappearing and people are choosing either GOOD OR EVIL
>and not between
The leaks are coming, WE all know THEIR evil deeds and GOD has chosen YOU to deliver this message to fellow mankind
>the message is I AM is coming to destroy the VILE PEOPLE!!! make sure you are not one of them!!!!
>clean your room!!!
Clean your minds and join The King who is returning for his creation!!!!!

Jews did 9/++ and worship YaldaBoath
>say these words to defeat JDIF
youtu.be/3UW-EXS0eZE

I disagree with you on the false dichotomy regurgitated about Lorentz not having physical insight. The one thing about Einstein that baffles me and makes me think he was the real deal is how he had so many discoveries in separate areas of physics with his brownian motion and photoelectric effect theories. Either he was really good and lucky at ripping other geniuses off or he really did have the intuition you mention.

Is the Bohr model of ethical atom a Jewish science?

One of the things my physics professor pointed out is that we can interpret Einstein's equivalence postulate in two ways (a la Einstein's elevator). In the first way I assign the gravity vector to space and it points inward toward the center of the Earth. In the second way I assign the gravity vector to *matter* and point it *outward* from the center of the Earth. These are equivalent interpretations. The first gives me a curved space interpretation and the second gives me a Euclidean interpretation where I can solve general relativity problems using only basic algebra (no tensor calculus, no curved space). I can arrive at all the same answers using only algebra and a Euclidean field. I can even switch the vector at the beginning, do the math the easy way, and then right at the end flip the vector back and deliver my answer in the form of a curved-space interpretation.
Even PBS has talked about this idea (@5m40s): youtube.com/watch?v=NblR01hHK6U#t=5m40s

Tesla's aether is just the ambient photon field. All bodies are perpetually recycling the ambient photon field. Spherical bodies pull in photons at the poles and they emit those photons at the equator. All spinning spheres do this. Like a spinning lawn sprinkler. What is the emitted charge (recycled ambient photons) from a proton? 1.602 x 10^-19 C. Measure the proton again 30 seconds later or 1000 years later and it will still be emitting 1.602 x 10^-19 C. It's perpetual. Constantly recycling the ambient field.
All bodies do this.

Attached: charge channel.png (2152x634, 978K)

true, nobody knows for sure whether special relativity was mostly einstein or if he only supplied a key piece of it. if you think lorentz did equal work, so be it, who honestly cares about the scientists when the real thing is the science

wrt einstein contributing to all different kinds of physics, A+, 100% correct. relativity, cosmology, statistical mechanics, he even really provided the spark for quantum mechanics. (and in that example he only provided one tiny clue that set off a big explosion: the photoelectric effect. after his work on the photoelectric effect, he rejected quantum mechanics and fought against it for years and years. then again, he ended up winning his nobel for the photoelectric effect and _not_ SR or GR, those being his main accomplishments)

kek. good post

not quite following you here.

anyhow one of the first pieces of evidence that GR was correct and newtonian gravity wasn't, was that GR was able to correctly predict the precession of the perihelion of Mercury. this is something astronomers since Kepler noted, and unfortunately Newtonian's theory could not reconcile it. it took GR to introduce the higher-order effects that cause mercury's orbit to precess rather than stay fixed. try doing that with whatever "algebra-based" classical gravity you used. (even in undergrad, i was using calculus to figure out orbital mechanics problems -- not sure how you can get away with algebra alone...)

Unironically Mach's principals are the basis of how the DoD does all their cool shit.
>What is Zel'Dovich requirements for conjugate time reversal in a non-linear medium

i fucking hate being a brainlet and not understanding what’s going on here

what DoD cool shit? i don't work on weapons, I work on collider physics

I won't even bother with your jargon shitposting since i suspect a shitposter; prove me otherwise

the version of mach's principle which i argue has been proved false goes like such: "if i am alone in the universe, and there is nothing around me, then i can't tell if i'm rotating or not. therefore being in a rotating reference frame only occurs as a result of me rotating relative to some external object, and rotation requires there to be something out there for me to rotate relative to"
this version contradicts general relativity and is false. you prove me wrong on that one tough guy

Attached: kek1.png (540x641, 205K)

The point of Einstein's equivalence postulate and that PBS video are that a theory of gravity which posits curved space and attraction yields the same mathematical results as a theory of gravity which posits that all bodies are expanding (apparent attraction). Einstein's equivalence postulate can be taken in that way. I'm not dismissing relativity. I'm saying you can interpret GR in a way which doesn't involve curved space at all and it makes the math a lot easier to do.

Attached: tennis ball.jpg (1170x701, 551K)

I thought about posting in this thread if the conversation was good. However seeing the discussion, it isn't but anyways enjoyed the video at least.

einstein was not only a kike thief, but he stole shit that was wrong. e=mc(bullshit)

Relativity isn't a moral theory wtf
If anything it preaches a universal undeniable truth: the speed of light is the same for everyone wherever you are and whatever you are doing

Also if Einstein didn't do this then someone else would have spesh rel isn't even that hard

Photoelectric effect was more important work from him

On a side-note anyone have the picture of raven and starfire's ass, both of them holding each others cheeks? Not usually an ass man, but I do like these two characters.

good post

We are In a rotating universe, homie. Once you can assume that, the possibility for inertial reduction due to frame dragging is very real. I would invite you to look at some of the work in superfluidity in neutron stars. DoD uses the fun tricks from folks like Zel'Dovich and Mach for things like laser beam correction (photon time reversal), propulsion (inertial shielding using a rapidly rotating BEC), and quantum comms (phase conjugation/entanglement).

mfw gravity is just another jewish larp

Attached: 1521438789259.png (500x522, 127K)

>all scientists today believe in einstein's theories
>Please ignore the fact that he stole them from Poincare and Hilbert.

>collider physics
>No really, I'm a physicist.
>collider physics
>Honestly, I'm a physicist!
Kill yourself.

>nobody knows for sure whether special relativity was mostly einstein or if he only supplied a key piece of it
Um, excuse me for interrupting your bullshit, but Einstein ENTIRELY stole special relativity from Poincare, and he provided NO KEY PIECES at all.

ok fine,
in any case SR and GR are (basically) true
> case rested?

Attached: 1523837519707s.jpg (125x82, 3K)