Perfect. Europe

in your opinion

Fine with me.

You'd be doing the Danes a favor by parting them from it. Greenland is full of Inuit dindus who leech off their government.

Looks kinda like the risk game on /qst/

Attached: 3A5C9EA7-3AD9-4061-9ADB-FCCEA007B467.png (4959x3440, 1.02M)

Why does pol love throwing vast amounts of peoples with different languages and cultures into the same nation?

You guys talk about hating globalist but them your ideal vision of the world is to Anschluss everyone into one nation.

Portuguese, Basque, Catalans, Galicians, Castilians, Andalusians, and Occitanians don't deserve their own seperate nations?

Why are you going to group them all into the one nation?

You drew out an uber Germany when in reality half of it is ethnically and historically Slavic.

Danish, Norwegian, Swedish, Sami, and Finnish don't deserve their own individual countries?

You have Russia owning everything as usual when in reality there are/were many different ethnicities.

Russia itself could easily be split into many different countries.

>i fucking hate globalists
>let's make an arbitary european superstate

Attached: 1523739077562.jpg (1362x1499, 547K)

>France
We're not a fake country like you Müller.

>Falling for the Alsace-Lorraine meme
Alsatians and Lorrainers litteraly hated Germans during the Occupation, the region is as part of their Lebensraum than it is part of my backyard.
And I won't talk about the affront of adding Savoy to italian clay. I will just assume you are too uneducated to know that there are the Alps separating Italy and France.

Why not just give every province it's own country then?

Portugal is a fucking meme Gran Iberia now.

>that middle east
literally why

>Separates the holiest sites in Islam from the oil fields and takes both away from Saudi Arabia
>Unites the Maghrebi region, giving Libya acess to Algerian oil fields, which means
>Cultrally distinct eatern Libya can join Egypt, giving it some stabilising oil revenue
>Iraq & the lower levant have borders that reflect the dominant culture, the more secular upper crescent is one region that can fight the Turks/ Commies/ ISIS remnants easier
>Armenia & Georgia & Iran retake rightful clay
>No Israel
Literally why not?

>Separates the holiest sites in Islam from the oil fields and takes both away from Saudi Arabia
The Saudis are at least stable and trade oil with us, something much worse could take over.
Libyan partition is fine, but blobbing all those different ethnicities and religions together in the upper crescent/iraq+kuwait+oil fields/israel+jordan is just asking for trouble imo.
Greece looks like it'll get demographically swamped by Turks and end up just becoming Ottoman Empire 2.0.
overall, pretty gud

Attached: map2.jpg (1509x1173, 247K)

is this a psyop?

Attached: Europe20XX.png (2430x2655, 309K)

>The Saudis are at least stable
Yes, thanks to their monopolisation on Islamic thought & the massive oil revenue. And they use that money & influence to create & finance terrorism around the world.
The coasts would be fine, they'd go to the emirates. The bottom corner would go to Yemen. Anything else... doesn't matter how unstable the desert is, there's nothing there to damage.

There is no israel on that map, and why is putting all the eatern Shi'a people in one country desstablising exactly?

Syria i understand, but it's a marriage of convenience. At the very least, putting it all together like that, to give he different minorities some space to move around, will make the separation much more clean when it comes.

Oh- and there are no Turks in the Greek territories.

Don't make me mad Günther or you'll get slapped again .

Attached: krauts bfto 1923_1923.webm (718x404, 1.9M)