Capitalism is a good syst-

>Capitalism is a good syst-

Attached: nice system.png (879x2364, 253K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knik_Arm_Bridge
investopedia.com/terms/l/lossleader.asp
nytimes.com/1993/08/24/business/wal-mart-on-trial-on-predatory-pricing-charges.html
huffingtonpost.com/al-norman/wal-mart-not-crying-over_b_120684.html
articles.latimes.com/1993-10-13/business/fi-45290_1_predatory-pricing
theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/air-canada-charged-with-predatory-pricing/article1178833/
twice.com/product/whirlpool-charges-samsung-lg-predatory-pricing-59789
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Capitalism usually works far, far better than any commie shit that's founded on 19th century assumptions that are objectively incorrect but you need a government running with the nation's interests at heart so they fuck people up in this kind of situation. That's why you should be a fascist user.

T H I R D x P O S I T I O N

>infrastructure
>in capitalist hands
Also
>any monopolies
>not backed and created by govt

Sage when posting.

Attached: milton.jpg (393x500, 106K)

memes aside, what we need is a new hybrid philosophy, something alike nat-social democracy.
A breed between nationalism and the scandinavian system, where you pay lots of taxes (up to 60-70%) but you live in a literal heaven and everyone has everything, everyone is smart and educated, everyone is rich, despite/ or thanks to/ the high taxes. One thing scandinavia got wrong is the immigration. They just don't get that their system only works for their own people, smart and educated.

Attached: wae.png (1000x705, 1.83M)

>says capitalism doesnt work
>uses socialism as example
yes, businesses work on a principle of sole proprietorship

Attached: 084.png (600x512, 298K)

Fascism is the answer. Allow private individuals to build the bridge, but only if there is a net benefit to the people.

Third position is the answer. Neither communism nor capitalism, but National Socialism.

Attached: a972d7882968d4834710e2c18022156cd0194b71.jpg (829x722, 70K)

>bridge and road are public utilities
>bridge collapses
>forced to use the road again
>road is now impassable because of how easy the bridge has made it that now the road isn't really maintained anymore
>prohibitive to get to work at all until the bridge is rebuilt

Let me tell you the real life story of the city where I live.

>be city of 300K, with another city of 100K 40 miles away and a city of 10K halfway between them
>state builds a freeway between the cities because of increased commuter traffic between the two large cities who don't stop in the third city but are forced through it otherwise
>the third city could also be bypassed by building a bridge across the channel a la Golden Gate and building another road up that side of the channel
>the state considers this in the 90s but wastes time and money "researching" before finally shelving the project in 2016
>so there's only one road between a city of 300K and 100K, no possible detours except where the freeway passes through the city of 10K
>be march 2018
>eighteen-wheeler takes out an overpass
>all traffic is forced through two-lane roads in the city of 10K
>suddenly a 10-mile drive takes 70 minutes
>I literally saw a guy get out and walk and he was moving faster than traffic
If that bridge had the possibility of being privately owned it would have been built thirty years ago and the problem would never have occurred.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knik_Arm_Bridge

this

What's the point in posting this? There's only a small handful of delusional people here that actually think anarcho-capitalism is a viable option.
>flag
Just because capitalism has its flaws doesn't mean communism is the antidote. That's the fundamental fallacy that you Marxists can't seem to recognize: Option A may suck in some aspects, but that doesn't make Option B the only alternative.

>communism isnt retard-
>OP

Communism is necessary.

Attached: Hammer.png (2000x2000, 36K)

>>Capitalism is a good syst-
Capitalism is just as Jewish and anti-White as Communism.

>Communism is necessary.
Communism is Jewish.

For your self esteem

The western European and Scandinavian systems of regulated capitalism have been the best ever invented. By far! They just don't work anymore because of immigration. It only works as an entity that protects its borders. A bridge being built as a public utility is NOT communism, and it does NOT mean capitalism cannot exist alongside such public provisions. You should see our infrastructure and living standards here. We had this shit all figured out until we decided we had to obligation to share it with the entire world and bring in people who do not understand this, who now vote.

Except there hasn't ever been a recorded case of predatory price cutting.

>(((Goldenfold)))
Probably changed his name after surviving 6 gorillion death camps.

Attached: 1523225855768.jpg (500x632, 37K)

I want one fucking example of a company actually slashing its prices (e.g. taking losses) just to outdo competition.

*i.e.

Walmart

how is that socialism?

Source?

Just build a tunnel. Problem solved.

>the person who constructs the bridge somehow goes into debt at the end instead of selling the labor and materials for the bridge to the town
>and then some random third person is somehow also unable to manage a toll bridge
>and then this first person somehow gains more money by the second person filling for bankruptcy
Your infographic is logically disconnected here. You demonstrated a complete lack of understanding of how a capitalistic system works even in the single scope. Though for a marxist I'm not surprised.

Attached: 354.png (1798x1616, 1.46M)

>-em.
What you just described is First Mover's Advantage.

Attached: 2raunchyfor4chan.png (591x459, 408K)

investopedia.com/terms/l/lossleader.asp
It's done, but more often than not, companies just split the territory. One of famous example of the latter would be big grocery stores in UK.

Fucking retard.

nytimes.com/1993/08/24/business/wal-mart-on-trial-on-predatory-pricing-charges.html

huffingtonpost.com/al-norman/wal-mart-not-crying-over_b_120684.html

articles.latimes.com/1993-10-13/business/fi-45290_1_predatory-pricing

theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/air-canada-charged-with-predatory-pricing/article1178833/

twice.com/product/whirlpool-charges-samsung-lg-predatory-pricing-59789

That's a good manga, leaf.

If not being gouged was important to the town's people why didn't they specify so in the contract to construct the bridge, or write it into their law? Or buy the road themselves when the operator went under and undercut the bridge operator's prices?

That's an illegal practice in every country. Not that it stops businesses from doing so.
You forget that people could just take their shits in the ravine, building their own bridge by crapatalism.

>Implying that government wouldn't charge Monopoly prices

/Thread

Attached: 1523390290851.jpg (300x192, 18K)

Wow we built a bunch of infrastructure what a travesty. Didn't the road owner have a monopoly before either of the bridges was built? Why didn't the townspeople choose to collectively purchase the second bridge so that they would stop getting price gouged?

You can implement VOLUNTARY socialist policy within a capitalist framework, stop trying to steal people's hard earned money.

Can someone explain to me what exactly is wrong with the monopoly in OP's pic?

If the bridge owner is providing a perfectly good quality bridge, then what exactly is wrong with the monopoly?

The only incentive people would have to spend their money elsewhere is if the current business isn't providing a good enough product, and the other one is. That clearly wasn't the case here tho, because the people stuck with the big mogul. Slashing his prices wouldn't affect the quality.

If this is how you think Capitalism in the west works, you are spastically retarded mutt and should unironically kill yourself.

Looks lke capitalism is like communism - idealistic, but unobtainable.

Capitalismy evolved into corporationalism, which is fucking sick

Under communism the government will just fill up the ravine with the bodies of the population it murders.

>enterprising jew builds Amphibious Vehicle Co
>thermites bridge and blames it on Taliban Co

We have all been taught to think of ourselves of victims of Goldenfold, while in reality we can all become Goldenfold.

ECONOMIC CALCULATION PROBLEM

He makes it super expensive... That's the point... And no the customers cannot go anywhere else because there's no other roads, and the picture also describes what happens if anyone tries to build a competing road.

If you think unrestricted capitalism is a perfect system you are, frankly, retarded. Things like roads need to be public.

He builds a new road rather than a bridge? Lol fucking shit example commie.

>unrestricted capitalism

the english word is anarchy

>anarchy
>property rights

ok, sure

To write out a giant post is not worth it because the thread would probably die by the time I finish it and I would get little to no responses.

Instead of this.. take the real world examples of things happening than hypotheticals. There

You're right, capitalism is shit. So is communism. Both are instruments of the jews

Attached: swastika.png (602x376, 224K)

Source?

>town on other side of ravine
>problem solved

woooow

SPBP

Attached: 1522602038822.jpg (540x636, 47K)

>Contracting work with a man with no self worth.
>Here why caputalims is bad

Attached: 1515970087141.jpg (1200x798, 257K)

This. Scandi socialism is based. Could do without the society destroying progressiveness though. Wait a second. +Nationalism +European Socialism -Degeneracy. I think we both know what were talking about here.