Steven Crowder getting whipped by a kid and getting triggered by the word autistic is priceless. Just made my day

Steven Crowder getting whipped by a kid and getting triggered by the word autistic is priceless. Just made my day

Btw, he's the same man that made free speech rallies kek

youtube.com/watch?v=xF2lFGyADtM

Attached: stevecrowder-e1515599162821.jpg (1064x800, 80K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/eMaPjOLPFMA
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

I'm not watching the whole thing fucking meatball

The kid is arguing like he is on Jow Forums..that was he big mistake. Crowder is coming from a place of arguing with marxist and leftest normies not you autistic...ah

it's the first debate, it's 25 minutes, but basically he gets trigerred because the kid used the terms autistic and shills which where not even directed to him as a way to distract the public from the fact that he was getting schooled.

he just used it once. he was calm and rational thorugh all the debate

the real reason why steven behaved that way is because he can only debate with sjws and that's something everyone could do it

Haha

Notice how Crowder only had one microphone which he held allowing him to control the conversation. Whenever that kid started to make a good point Crowder would simply take the microphone away and change the topic. Also notice that the kid didn't bring up the economic systems of Scandinavia. Crowder brought that up and once the kid was no longer present to defend himself, Crowder then played it off as if he predicted the whole thing. And so what if the kid use the terms "shill" or "autistic"? Crowder needled him a bit during the exchange as well. And there is a reason that libertarianism has never gotten far out of the dorm room. Libertarians go through the same "awakening" as so many SJW's when they turn 25, their parents cut them off financially, and they have to fend for themselves. Suddenly that 60 page rant in The Fountainhead doesn't seem to be as applicable to real life as it once did.

I watched it, he's becoming very faggy in his debating. Also getting very close to the guy as if trying to intimidate. Cringe worthy. But he still won the debate.

This Blue Wave Psy-Op is an obvious Blue Wave Psy-Op. It was obvious from day one because nobody gives a shit about Crowder's videos. Weeks later, still trying to do this same psy-op on an out dated video?

It's hard to lose a debate when you hold the only microphone, constantly interrupt your opponent whenever he begins to make a decent point, and change the subject at your own whim.

An autistic kid from Jow Forums acts autistic by calling Crowder autistic and a shill and you're acting like this kid is the best socialist debater ever?

this guy looks so low test it is not even funny

Spotted the shill autist

OP, this is why you're a retard: real life isn't the internet. In real life debates, you don't say things like "Well that argument is something an autistic person would say". If you say that, you lost the debate. And that's what happened - the kid couldn't articulate any of his points without resulting to insults and thus lost the debate.

Attached: 1493985457330.jpg (1064x800, 722K)

>if you say x you lost the debate
Only retarded people say stuff like this.

This thread again.... The kid was a fag and Steven is a bigger fag.

No he did not. I do not like crowder but the kid has no idea how economics works in 2018. You cant have a progressive tax in a globalism.

Attached: 1522899332055.jpg (508x558, 37K)

I don't know why getting close like he did was supposed to intimidate, it was honestly just kind of gay.

I fucking hate this niggerfaggot. He likes to act smart and condensending but it's obvious he's a fucking retard. I hope he kills himself.

Crowder was just trying to use moral grand standing tactics.

he didnt' call him autistic, watch the debate, he called the libertarian views autistic

you can see crowder nervous though the debate, he was embarassed by the fact he was getting beaten by a kid
>Notice how Crowder only had one microphone which he held allowing him to control the conversation. Whenever that kid started to make a good point Crowder would simply take the microphone away and change the topic.
exactly
he never let him talk, that's not how a debate works
t. someone who didn't watch the debate

>the police is socialism
Nice Jon Stewart logic there, sport. There are real shitlords out there that pull that argument and think they are really smart.

Attached: 1491783129166.png (645x773, 71K)

>Nice Jon Stewart logic there, sport. There are real shitlords out there that pull that argument and think they are really smart.
he said it was redistribution of wealth, which it is. therefore socialism is inherently bad because it enables redistribution of wealth, brainlet

isn't

The police is a public service. Also public service only takes up about 3 percent of our national budget,

This user is right. Jon Stewart logic indeed. I'm a mainstream center-left non sjw liberal. It kills me when I hear people on my side describe any and all public services financed through taxation as being socialism. First of all it's not true and second it's a shity defense of your precious defunct philosophy.

>public service
payed by taxes
taxes= redistribution of wealth

You should look up the definition. A public good is not socialism just because it involves taxation.

Look at the USA budget. We dont consider those programs redistribution of wealth

Education and police only takes up about 5 percent. This should be a state issue not federal BTW.

ecelebs are worse than real celebs

the argument was:
1.tax are a form of redistribution of wealth
2.socialism foster the redistribuition of wealth
3.the thesis is 'socialism is evil' because is redistribuition of wealth
4. you are ok with taxes so you are in favor of a form of redistribution of wealth
5. therefore socialism is not evil

is that simple enough for you?

>We dont consider those programs redistribution of wealth
it doesn't care what you consider them, they're a form of redistribution of wealth

Indeed. A public good is just that because it is non rivalrous.

Look at the American budget. If all I have to pay for is none SS and medicare id be so happy.

Also they provide a service I do not want to do. Police officers are not leeches.

You type like you're in the dorm room and loving it. Every political and economic system the human race has so far devised calls for a public sector of some kind. The definition of a public good...a public good is a good that is both non-excludable and non-rivalrous in that individuals cannot be effectively excluded from use and where use by one individual does not reduce availability to others... There is a difference between public goods and services and economic productivity.

You know meatballs are swedish and we don't put them anywhere near pasta right?

Crowder owned that commie. What are you talking about?

>The definition of a public good...a public good is a good that is both non-excludable and non-rivalrous
but not everyone contributes to it in the same way since rich people pay more taxes. also it is a service the you pay because you are costrained to. it's still a form of violent redistribution of wealth, whether you can still benefit from it or not.

When Americans say redistribution of wealth we are talking about leaches who dont put back into the system.

>When Americans say redistribution of wealth we are talking about leaches who dont put back into the system.
then amermutts are wrong. basic economics tell us that you 'put back into the system' just by spending.
also, you can't put anything else if you don't have the means to start a business

This is one of those moments where I pull my dick out and slap you across the face with it. I'm actually right about this. In both practical and academic terms. Public goods are not the same thing as productivity for the reasons mentioned in the previous definition.

you pay taxes based on your productivity, so you share your productivity with society brainlet
you may now put your 4 '' penis back where it was

The police may redistribute wealth in the sense that if you "use" it a lot, and another taxpayer doesn't, he may be "paying" it for you. But that is just a stupid notion because you don't have to use the police to benefit from it, like another service, since even if you have no direct contact to it, you are receiving the benefits of living in a policed environment.
Also, if there is any nature of wealth redistribution in police, it would be from the poor TO the wealthy, who owns more propriety and benefits more from a safe society.

Attached: a62.png (680x661, 262K)

>dude everythings is the left fault

is there a more retarded political position

81/2 up your mother's hairy ass.

But I am right though. From the realm of insular and consequence-free Academia to the world of practical reality where things actually get done, I'm right.

>The police may redistribute wealth in the sense that if you "use" it a lot, and another taxpayer doesn't, he may be "paying" it for you. But that is just a stupid notion because you don't have to use the police to benefit from it, like another service, since even if you have no direct contact to it, you are receiving the benefits of living in a policed environment.
bill gates pays much more than you for police but he gets the same benefit from it, do you now see what i mean?
i'm right because i'm right

crowder got fucking destroyed by that dude. Its actually hilarious that the moment someone who has any ability at all in the public forum steps in that crowder gets BTFOd.

>I'm losing so you don't get to have the microphone
>you talk in long paragraphs despite the fact that if you tally the total seconds each person spent talking that I have 3 times as much time as you
>this conversation isn't going anywhere because I am definition mongering

I really liked some of the other change my mind stuff - but this was just disgraceful by crowder.

I usually like these change my mind videos but this was the worst one by far, Crowder is the type of guy everybody knows where you get along with them perfectly well when it's just you and them but introduce a small gathering/crowd and he turns up the douchebag mode to 11 because of the attention

I'm right because your mother's hairy ass is so damn good. We're getting along great. She loves it when I take her to dinner, stare into her eyes, stroke her hair and cheeks, and whisper sweet nothings into her ear. Your mother's a wild cave woman in the sack. She's never heard the word "stop" or "condom."

I know a guy like that. Public changes him and so do girls.

>crowder got fucking destroyed by that dude. Its actually hilarious that the moment someone who has any ability at all in the public forum steps in that crowder gets BTFOd.
the reason why those people are famous is because they 'destroy' SJWs.
i'm not often incline to use that word, but this is real cringe

I pretty right wing, but that part where Crowder said that all races except 100% aryans should be shot in the head regardless of age was a little much for me.

I listen to Prouder with Crowder pretty often, but he needs to tone down the genocide talk its bad optics.

Attached: crowder.png (704x459, 638K)

it's free speech baby, now go back to your safe spaces whiny little bitches

Nick Fuentes interviewed Yousef on his show. The kid is basically a NatSoc. It's no wonder why he was wrecking Crowder's libertarian narrative.

youtu.be/eMaPjOLPFMA

crowder is insufferable

people are legitimately doing the same thing the socialist kids in the video are doing. it's not whether it's good or not, it's whether the premise of it is moral.

the police are paid for by taxes, and the collection of taxes is enforced by the state. whether it's good or not or what its classification is doesn't matter, but is the premise of it moral or not. well, is it? i have a detailed answer but i wanna hear other anons'.

>meatball
>originating from one and only one region
Europeans truly are retarded

Attached: 1503274877883.jpg (1242x2208, 545K)

>Now look im not saying jews can't have opinions ok? Im just saying they shouldn't exist. It is proven wherever they go and whatever they do they take advantage of our civilization, they take advantage of us, they hijack our culture, they completely ruin every place they go to I mean why do you think they have been kicked out of so many places? I mean come on do you think they were kicked out over and over because we were all just anti-semites? For no reason? Are you kidding me? We are anti-semitic because they are satan. Now I know what you might be thinking oh oh Krowder thats too mean thats too nasty. Well yeah sorry it has to be kinda mean otherwise how are we going to cleanse these vermin from our lands, you think you are just going to walk up to a jew and say "oh mr schlomogerblattstein uh could you please stop being a parasite". Now look look. I wish the world worked that, but look it is not like that. You have to use the ovens, you have to round them up. No kicking them out because they are just going to be coming back, you have to get the ovens, you have to shove them in the oven, many at a time, 616 degrees. Don't you think if there was something a little more effective we would have figured it out by now? But look if you think you have a better solution yeah feel free to run it by me but until you do and until you figure that out and you have a plan shown to work im gonna stick to what I know works, the ovens, 616, gas chambers, lampshades, the works. And see this kinda persistent carnage is why im the kaisar of this movement and why you are just a pawn in my scheme, so please why don't you just relax for a second before I throw you into an oven myself.

Fucking based