GORSUCH CUCKS TRUMP

businessinsider.com/gorsuch-supreme-court-votes-immigration-case-2018-4

1 NOTHING WRONG WITH ME

Attached: gorsuck.png (2042x1183, 924K)

Other urls found in this thread:

businessinsider.com/gorsuch-supreme-court-votes-immigration-case-2018-4
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Good, Trump has turned on his voterbase and now the last remaining original MAGAmen are in full revolt

Attached: 1499728311376.jpg (732x763, 72K)

inb4
>4D chess ghuyzseee!

The decision was about whether or not a burglary can be considered a "violent crime".

>article states the Obama administration argued the same issue
>durr loss for Trump

>shilling this hard

XDDDDD

Awoooo

Attached: 1523683852338.jpg (687x517, 33K)

Credit president with "achievement" by appointing supreme court judge that was going to be ultraconservative.

>Cucked again

Did you know melania follows only 5 people? One of them is BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA

>I only read sensationalist headlines

W-we can still meme him into another 4 year term, rite gais?

seems like a non issue

Cucked by his own side.!!!!

Attached: cruzdrac.jpg (684x513, 64K)

Attached: lowiq.png (2287x1136, 251K)

Gorsuch was always suspect to me because the Dems didn't fight him at all and now he's shown his true colors also exposing Trump as a NY Libshit

The American people have spoken. We are SICK TO DEATH of immigration (which in the 21st century simply means “more shitskins”) and it WILL end, if not through the courts then by whatever means remain available to us.

Attached: 12737A7F-02B0-4501-9679-CD052482E262.jpg (588x361, 76K)

Oh, the kikery! This case pertains to a law which is applicable to LEGAL IMMIGRANTS.

Are you implying that isnt sensationalist? You must be young.

It's time to delete /ptg/ now

These cancerous kikes are destroying this board.

oh look, sensationalist kike being a sensationalist kike again!

fucking hivemind

I'm implying that conservatives are being shit on every day from every direction and I love it.

Nice!
That means we can impeach him now right?
Fuck yeah!
It was her turn!
President Hillary!
War on Russia soon!

>Memeflag
>straight up lying
Yeah checks out

Jow Forums is now a Democratic Party board
Death to Trump
Hillary Queen for life

At this point, Trump is no different than Hillary Clinton.

Attached: 1497149176848.jpg (700x467, 23K)

Trump is finished! He's done! Chickens are back in the oven!

Attached: 1490389755520.png (411x600, 109K)

>SCOTUS justices should be loyal
Why don't you move to China or Russia. You'll find your home there.

Attached: 1508801019581.jpg (400x386, 27K)

Um no Hillary is in the refuse bin of politics. Trump is still president. Slight difference

This.

I mean, Trump has pretty much turned his back on his base though.

Pretty much this

>1994 law
>2010 case

DRUMPF BTFO

CRRAAWWWWWWLLLLLIIING IN MY SKINNNNNNNNN

Attached: images(36).jpg (262x192, 9K)

>LOL

Gonna be tough when he beats your liberal ass again. This case is not Trumps case no matter what the headline says. 2010 who was President? who was head of Dept of Justice in 2010? I'll wait for your answer

this is how liberals think, like the law is team sports or something

what now drumpfkins?

its over

I'm not liberal. Kill yourself, retard.

liberal judges always vote according the party line

BULL 2 THE SHIT anyone with the audacity to speak ill about BASED GEOTUS is a fucking lefty larry libhitter.

Fuck off.

That's fucking stupid though, because conservatives aren't the international bankers who ruined our society.

decision affects affluent Californian whites who get burglered by spics and niggers.

Open season on San Francisco, Marin County, Malibu, Manhattan.

Law about deporting violent illegal aliens is too vague to be enforced. Jesus Christ... what is Gorsuch thinking?

Is the dude still a papist?

>Law about deporting violent illegal aliens is too vague to be enforced. Jesus Christ... what is Gorsuch thinking?

no.... it is about a vague law regarding LEGAL IMMIGRANTS committing non-violent crimes

You mean he interpreted the law and not side with politics ? You mean he did what he was supposed to do ?
Are all media matters/sharia blue employees this retarded?

this decision may come back to bite Gorsuch in the ass if a terrorist who could have gotten deported for "shoplifting" ends up committing a terrorist act on US soil.

He wants the law to outright spell out "felony?"

>businessinsider.com/gorsuch-supreme-court-votes-immigration-case-2018-4
First off, this dude came here illegaly at 13
second, they were trying to deport him for burglary, saying burglary is a violent crime
a appeals court in sanfransickos said "muh vagueness on what violent means"
if you think burglary isnt a violent crime, well come try to steal my shit. see how violent i get.
so now this nigger wont be deported. god bless america

We are basically a walk-in McDonalds nation at this point I guess. Just a big melting pot of 3rd world genes and high fructose corn syrup.

Gorcuch is a papist?
Are there any Protestants on the Supreme Court or is it all Cathocucks and Kikes?

god these people are so stupid man, it really hurts every day to know these people are supporting their own deaths.
Were turning into serfs real fucking quick.
The overpopulation and abundance of low skilled workers is going to turn this country into a socialist hell hole. what the fuck is wrong with this country

They’re used to be brainwashed by media. They think democrats are team good, and r team nazi.

They are mildly functional retards

SOMETHING TAKES A PART OF ME

Attached: 1508470792128.png (808x805, 817K)

to be fair tho he is right, gorsuch probably just has legal autism

Trump will lose. It's pretty much mathematical certainty. He has lost a lot of voters and will not gain any new voters. Democrat turnout will be up. His margins in 2016 were razor thin and he could not afford to fuck up as badly as he has.

>Trump
>choosing great people
Even a blind could see the (((neocon))) in Gorsuch

i could just imagine the liberal butthurt and shouts for removal of gorsuch if he 'sided' with trump on anything. he's supposed to be unbiased so it's no surprise that he didn't 'side' with anyone really just did his job. there's probably a good reason he made this decision

No, there isn't a good reason. If there had been a good reason, /our nigger/ Clarence Thomas would have taken that side.

>will not gain any new voters.
>100% of voters voted in 2016
You are special.

We have to start fighting as dirty as the libs if we're ever going to accomplish anything. Being "principled conservatives" is what got us in this mess to begin with.

they claimed it was too vague, and that it had to be removed. they'll just rewrite it. i'm actually more surprised that all 4 conservative judges voted to uphold it.

No significant number of people who did not vote for Trump in 2016 will decide to come out and vote for him in 2020. It's a nonsensical idea.

>mfw a liberal judge will NEVER vote pro-2A
>mfw conservative judges vote liberal all the time

I’m ready to push the reset button

>if you think burglary isnt a violent crime, well come try to steal my shit. see how violent i get.
Rural retard detected, burglary implies there’s no violence. If you break into an empty house that’s burglary, doing it to an occupied home is robbery

>is what got us in this mess to begin with
No. Allowing Bolshevik juden to form neoconservatism and supplant ethno-nationalism as the philosphic basis of all American "conservatism" is what got us into this fucking mess. Not working with libshits on regulating banks got us into this mess. We allowed ourselves to be led like cattle and this is our reward.

It's because liberal judges always vote for what's right.

Doesn't that make him a cuck if he's weak on immigration?