What's the difference between National Socialism and Communism? What makes socialism different when you add nationalist to the mix compared to communism which would be? something then socialism.
What's the difference between National Socialism and Communism...
>State Capitalism
vs
>Post-scarcity economics
Guess which one exists and which one doesn't.
communists wanted to seize farm land. National socialists wanted to give land to it's citizens to farm it.
communism is a rejection of hierarchy. NS embraces hierarchy
communism was/is a internationalist ideology. NS is not.
need any more examples?
>Post-scarcity economics
Because factory output is larger than the consumer base? the only thing stopping you is paying for the item in question.
I thought by nationalizing those farms, It would be in government control.
Could you expand upon this explanation?
germany gave land to its citizens. communists seized land from it's citizens. germany didn't kick farmers off their land or plunder their harvests.
do you understand the difference?
I do.
I know for a fact that this occurred within the soviet union, however do you have any information that provides proof to this happening within Nazi Germany?
That surplus is temporary and will eventually dwindle as the population goes up. Economics cycles are not taken into account in post-scarcity economics, and neither are natural occurences that disrupt the planned economy, or unusual events that crippled a democratic republic's capacity to operate and plan ahead (because true communism is stated as being ruled by the Proletariat, ergo a democracy).
Communism, because of these real constraints not planned ahead, are forced to adopt state capitalism, and therefore are obliged to operate like a national-socialist/fascist political entity or be torn apart by their own hypocritical following of Marx's word. My example that would support this case is China (also in a lesser example Juche in North Korea), which has turned into "Communism in name only" over the past decades, and to support my view of the eventual fall of any "true" communist uprising in the long run, I'll take every other communist country ever.
get your eye fixed
That's a good question. Stalin said his ideology was "Socialism in one state," to oppose the internationalism of Trotskyism. Meanwhile, Hitler called it "Natonal Socialism" to differentiate it from Bolshevism.
This is the entire reason the horseshoe theory has so much merit at the end of the day. Both are authoritarian command economies, with incredibly draconian social stances. In fact, you could effectively argue that the Soviet Union under Stalin was actually more socially conservative/reactionary than Hitler if you look into it. The words and reasons may differ, but from the view of the common man, the man national socialism and state communism feign to represent, they are practically the same on a day to day basis.
>muh horseshoe
at the end of the day NS raised the standard of living for the average german. communism decreased the standard of living for the average russian goy
Your analysis of surplus in post-scarcity is flawed in my opinion because the concept of transporting a good to a marketplace is shortsighted. I do not advocate for communism, I just reject your concept of economic cycles as it relates to the future.
>Communism
No private property / State Planed Economy
>Socialism
Private property / Free Market
Would anyone happen to have any information that says that Nazi Germany gave land to their citizens?
Try picking up a book, faggot.
>As it relates to the future
>what is the basic use of economy
Incapable of adding anything other than projecting your own sexual preferences? Glow harder.
Shaaaaaaart-Maaaaaaart.
Missing the point I suppose. Surplus will never dwindle due to population increase because surplus will be a foreign concept. It's okay, most people didn't understand the internet either.
Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger
Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger
Neither of them are/were coherent ideologies.
NS was just state capitalism defined with racist wealth redistribution schemes.
'Communism' as Marx wrote about never existed because it's fairy tale bullshit. The Soviet Union had more of a command-economy with racist wealth redistribution schemes.
I guess the difference is the Nazis allowed more free-market mechanisms while the Soviet Union tried to eliminate that for maximum inefficiency and peasant deaths.
You live in the age of the internet. If you wanted to truly understand the differences of these 2 ideologies you would of looked into it but no you go on pol of all places
>What's the difference between National Socialism and Communism?
Entrepreneurs sense of responsibility to their people, VS, Entrepreneurs sense of responsibility to bureaucratic paper work and faggots they may or may not have anything similar with. Also why Christian Socialists can still maintain a minimum of civility in Commie countries.
OHHH SAAAAAAY CAN YOU SHAAAAAAAART, IIIIIN YOUR LOOOCAAAAL WAAAAAL-MAAAAAART
you have me confused brainlet. I'm not the OP, I've read plenty of books, and I already know the difference. Back to your troll cave nigger.
Your mother must be proud.
There's no difference
Communism=Everyone of all IQs are poor, starving, and work for bread because all the money goes to the military
Nazism=Its that but for kikes and everyone else is happy
Jews are a virus and cartman unironically spoke the truth at the intervention.
Historically they were never slaves in egypt and if moses was real the guy was a warlord.
The ancient jews were warriors who fought and genocided countless people on the word of schizophrenics trying to steal their land calling themselves gods chosen.
Frankly the fact that no one really tried to wipe them out entirely before hitler is shocking.
historically they are awful people.
>Surplus will never dwindle due to population increase because surplus will be a foreign concept.
>Surplus I produced with machines in my vicinity are foreign to me and people in my vicinity
>My population and its cravings have no effect on my economy whatsoever. It's written in my book there.
Fucking brainlet, why do I keep responding to these posts.
>What's the difference between National Socialism and Communism?
Literally everything about both ideologies is completely different. The only similarity is that both are different from the current system.
Try reading a book OP
>What's the difference between National Socialism and Communism?
Communism is based on economic identity, ie, class warfare and dictatorship of the proletariat over the state and the "means of production". National socialism rejects economic identity in favor of racial identity, ie, racial nationalism, that Aryan peoples (for example) should form states and alliances with other Aryan states. National Socialism is also comitted to the extermination of communism, which it regards as Jewish subversion of the Aryan race. Natsoc also criticized "jewish capitalism", and promoted its own form of capitalism in its place. This was called "producer centered capitalism".