MIT create factory roll-out Graphene

If you read the article, they've proved that you can roll it out factory style and the production isn't all that difficult. It's a matter of time.

I miss the space elevator threads.

big if true

Sven maybe there is a way to use this technology to save the Swedish race?

Political?

Attached: 1516302576438.jpg (2000x1641, 525K)

can someone explain to a brainlet like me what is it and how can be useful? I know NOTHING.

replace silicon? what does silicon even do? I know its in hardware, but what makes this better than silicon? what even is this shit?

Attached: GROG.jpg (226x223, 4K)

That's great, now if we could have an energy revolution to support it we could have another boom like with coal and oil.
>Memecars recharging in minutes, less heavy so even less energy consumed
>lighter rockets
>faster pcs and internet
Sounds gr8 to me

>Let's just hope that China doesn't get this stuff.
They will.

What kind of pollutants can we expect from discarded graphene?

I am glad the SE Asian will have this technology to conquer space while we will regress in tribalistic wars.

You can make graphene in your blender at home. Jewtube it.

Reeeee no, Graphene is a British invention get off it, it's ours

Thanks, swedecuck, for showing us all how much of a fucking meme this whole thing is.

Carbonfags are as bad as the weedfags.

I still know some graphene mines.

Get them now or lose the chance.

graphene is a useless gimmick, stop shilling this crap

transistors in computers allow you to do 1s and 0s
the smaller transistors get, the closer they get to their limit in how much power can be concentrated and still have gains

graphene can handle much more energy and heat, thus it can be miniaturized further and it will be basically more effective all around
tl;dr your computers will become retardedly fast and the materials to do it will be extremely cheap

like other user said, until a factory actually goes and produces something useful with it, its all just talk and hopeful thinking

>that flag
>that id

but can i fuck it?

>Structural
Absolutely terrible for structural. While it may be strong, it is not tough. It is not ductile and is very brittle. It can easily fail via buckling. We never got into even into fatigue and crack growth.

It's a wonder material for its electronic properties and its use in batteries. But definitely is not useful in structural applications.

Thats exactly what a globalist would say

Attached: 1507250928503.png (360x140, 6K)

it's a one atom tall chain of carbon
instead of a comparatively large amount of silicon, it would just be a small amount of carbon in electronics instead
with less material, there's less places for electrons to escape and go to waste

me too, /ptg/ chased him away

I have carbon nanotube underwear. The fibers are so tight I can shart in Mart with no worries of unsightly stains.

sorry to burst your tiny bubble, le faggote

its carbon.

Can't wait for graphene processing chips. That shit is going to be dope.

yes but does it kill niggers?

On its own, it's not particularly great in construction. But you still have carbon nanotubes and its ability to aid other structures. Put it alongside glass

>tl;dr your computers will become retardedly fast and the materials to do it will be extremely cheap
If we can still make such advancements, imagine how advanced must be (potential) aliens. I truly believe we live in a simulation run by someone who made this graphene discovery a looong time before us.

The quality is key for it to have any kindof real applications

You will never make anything worthwhile at your house

You can also stack 3D Integrated Circuits along with graphene transistors and thus create an even more capable computer.

Except these benefits will be rolled out at a snail's pace over the next 1000 years, by [Battery/Processor/Fiber] maker, all the while the glow niggers will have it 2 months ago

Stock market. How do I invest in companies that will profit off this maximizing my ROI?

Oi mate, do you have a loicense for that graphene?

Don't be a ween
Bin that graphene.

Kinda makes you wonder, perhaps they willingly all isolated themselves and went to live in their respective simulations, which is why we never hear of them

You'd be better off investing in canadian weed companies

Big deal.

Soon we'll have Ready Player One tier technology on the market. Every day we get closer to a real life Holodeck.

youtube.com/watch?v=fvu5FxKuqdQ

Attached: Star Trek Pepe.jpg (628x617, 66K)

Attached: neat.jpg (465x377, 30K)

only if the maker has a monopoly

>light invisible glass

you mean transparent ?

given MIT (possibly glowie funded niggers?) have cracked this for the first time in the public sphere, does that mean the cat is out of the bag and no kikes can patent this shit?

so graphing cpu when.
1k for a 1080ti is fucking retarded

another British invention. Rest of the world, are you even trying ?

The governments would never allow you to have superfast computers that can crack their encryption.

It's always controlled before hitting the market, all the companies are like a social fragment of one larger monopoly

You can rot in the holodeck but above you, the stars will belong to us who have apply ourselves in the real world.

Attached: 1507770975506.gif (300x287, 1.51M)

I have to read more into amorphous materials, but I do know that if you scatter them as particles within a crystalline material, you can increase the toughness of the overall material through dislocation pinning. That being said, it isn't unique to graphene; you can use Sodium atoms, or any sort of particle that warps the lattice. Thus for crystalline materials, using carbon nanotubes by itself has no advantage, just hype. But for glasses, I'd have to read more into it because their properties are more different than that of crystalline materials.

only if illuminati and hollow earth is real m8

You're aware that's coding and sensors, right?
They'd be aided massively in performance by mass produced graphene, it's far more relevant to it than you might think.

TRIP O TRUTH!
saving this one for the future

Watch me you failed demoralizing kike. I will create a graphene sword and pierce your demon heart.

globalists want only one type of industry in one place, i want all industries everywhere, i'm an anit-globalist!

>it doesn't take much resources
Don't mean to be /sci/ here but it looks like it's being made in a really hot oven. Graphene roll probably consumes plenty of energy to produce, of which we have plenty of.

It's nice though, it appears to look like a variant of vapor deposition given its extreme heat. It's a very common technology too, which should help with addressing the scalability issue.

>probably consumes plenty of energy to produce
DVDrom, tape and Activated charcoal.
For large production they want vacuum seal so that will cost more than the manufacturing part or the feedstock

Sweet, a better filter.
Now where the fuck are my carbon-carbon composites that I can use on larger and more practical things?

British invent many things but don't really take the time to perfect it.

You don't understand encryption, just FYI

They could always just update the encryption algorithm to something that was overkill before graphene

True. Also, getting the production process consistent, reliable, and cheap are probably the biggest issues at the moment.

Nah dude, we need to reduce our carbon footprint, not build it up. Global warming. Less carbon, more oxygen, gnomesayin dawg?

Carbon-Carbon exists in aerospace application and spooky glowy things. Very good as thermal insulation.

This.
It's not quantum computing, it's just extremely capable.

But the real question it, can graphene help us kill Jews faster?

I said practical.

It is practical, it's just really expensive.

scott pls go

>Expensive
Still not. Do you not understand English?

Poland asking the hard questions

Ok, so what is your angle Shlomo?

BTW I hate graphene now.

Attached: homer.jpg (785x590, 35K)

Why aren't these "engineers" researching something useful like a process for universal nuclear transmutation factories?

Only cowards fight
Bin that graphite

The material itself isn't. the manufacturing process will be improved and scaled to become cheaper to be used more practically

Jow Forums doesn't talk about it much because it's not a political subject (y'know, what the board is about), and Nuclear, Fossil and Renewable energy is a topic that can be discussed in broad and non-technical swathes.

The sort of techno-idolatry and wanking that springs up around this sort of thing is reddit tier though, and demonstrative of a lack of actual rigor in relevant disciplines. By people like you.
>Stronger than steel
A tensile strength, greater than steel. In an IDEAL form, which it will never reach in practical reality - material defects will always exist, neverminding formability and machining, rigidity, wear, crack and fatigue resistance to just begin.
This doesn't make it a shoe-in to replace steel, and in the very same way, none of the predicted applications
t. engineer
>Could make computers thousands times faster while running on a 100th the power!!!!!
Just listen to yourself
You have been deluded by popsci technomagic.

ps. Bulk quantities of Carbon Nanotubes have so few economic and profitable applications that its fucking laughable. The most prominent is to replace regular carbon fibre reinforced fibreglass boat hulls. The sort used on yachts. Really special huh.

Autonomous AI will do their job for them now that graphene will put a data center in your pocket.

Fuck both of you. That space elevator faggot was a communist dog.
"No one will have to work and we can pay all our debt with the billions we make from mining meteors"
Fucking retards even suggest UBI in the infograph about it

youtube.com/watch?v=qL4KbLmUTvU
I only see what amounts to a 'bench top' production. Get back to me when they build a pilot plant. Let me guess, only '5 years away' as usual

It just simply technological advancement, and that's always good. It leads to more paths of innovation. Like for example our battery technology is really old and maybe the mass production is going to enable us to create a more efficient batteries.

>if

If you read the article, ten meters per four hours is jack shit. Not fast enough and that was the longest they went, meaning the equipment may not have any longevity. This has a long way to go before mass production.

The internet from 1995 to 2015 was a worldwide transformation. The start of something groundbreaking is always cool unless you're old.

Lets not and say we did.
Letting the Jews jack into your brain is probably not the best of ideas.

I'm too cynical in my old age, yes. But life is just so full of disappointment.

>Graphene roll probably consumes plenty of energy to produce
I imagine it's still less than aluminium.

>1995 to 2015 was a worldwide transformation
It was neat in the late 80's in the form of BBS, IRC and muds. It was cool in 1995 through 2000-03 maybe, then the jews showed up and ruined it right on queue.

You'd only have to worry if you're committing wrongthink. Even if you are, we got an app for that.

>This stuff can be produced with carbon
>You can replace transistors with graphene
How to spot a complete technology illiterate...

>Nuclear vs Fossil vs Green energy, but why nothing about graphene?
What has current graphene research to do with energy production?

> thus it can be miniaturized further
We are already at a low nanometer lithography limit, it won't get much smaller in the near future.

I give, just hurts to read further...

Neat

You don't know how slow the government is at doing anything. 0 day hacks would bring everything down before they implemented changes.

Well shit

Attached: 28055791_10155524552194007_1718274138096224966_n.jpg (259x194, 8K)

No, but we can discuss graphene while casually killing Jews.

Graphene is old tech. Nazis were using the carbon from dead Jews back in the 40's. Pic related is the first industrial graphene production oven.

Attached: kremaioven2005.jpg (335x504, 42K)

Me too buddy.