White are recessive and blacks are dominant

it's pure science black people especially (lgbo) are more dominant genetically than whites added to the fact they have a higher iq on average than whites..

Attached: main-qimg-4a7c95e9793c1b2ba7d1501cb9e854c2.png (602x773, 154K)

Other urls found in this thread:

foxnews.com/story/2008/02/22/whites-genetically-weaker-than-blacks-study-finds.html
nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/blacks-arent-human/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_world_records_in_Olympic_weightlifting
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Dominant != superior

Why are the ugliest traits dominant?

The prettier ones are newer.

True beauty is a delicate balance, it must be protected.

Attached: WASP.png (440x458, 15K)

because whites are naturally weak

whites are pussy's,beta,weak,dumb and have high amounts of estrogen notice how the white race is dying? when a black and white race mix the offspring come out mostly looking black.it takes 5-7 gens of whites to break that pattern but with blacks it only takes 3 maybe 2

Attached: 6a00e54ece46d18833017d3db81db0970c.jpg (700x873, 620K)

Being straight is a dominant genetic trait yet there are countless groups and people who want to protect degenerates and allow their faggy behavior. Whites are a global minority and must be allowed to stand up for themselves and fight for their future.

>Higher iq on average
Let me guess: you compared a study of Igbo immigrants/University students to a study of all white people?

Huntingtons Disease is dominant, too.

beauty... anyway take this guy he is clearly 60% white but his black genetic still overwrite that BLACK=dominant
THIS
foxnews.com/story/2008/02/22/whites-genetically-weaker-than-blacks-study-finds.html

Attached: 1443119752117.jpg (540x690, 60K)

So why do 90% of mulattos have white grand children? Whites are dominant where it matters.

In a European or European descendant nation a Mulatto looks like a Negro with a handful of European traits.
In an African nation a Mulatto looks like a "White" with a handful of Negro traits.

Attached: white genese.jpg (980x979, 144K)

in genreal 65% of lgbo have a higher iq on average than whites and asians

Attached: birthday cake white guy asian girl megaman tshirt.jpg (720x540, 66K)

All that will ever matter is that Europeans and their descendants can push aside your incompetent brothas and sistas like play things. Remember you will always speak a European language. Remember that you will always be using technology created by Europeans and their descendants. Remember that Africa will never be relevant unless whites are at the helm.

Attached: south africa.jpg (551x400, 113K)

thats where your wrongs friends even after 3 gens most mulatto and white offspring still have noticable black traits take this family clearly a 100% white and a mulatto dad see how to offspring is still

Attached: family-against-fence-smiling.jpg (650x433, 47K)

Freckles are dominant? I dont think so

That's literally two generations deep not three you ape, the child is a third generation black-white admixture but three generations have not passed since an black and a white created a mulatto. Never forget that you are a piece of genetic trash.

Attached: are-you-equal.jpg (1000x4500, 1.32M)

still want proof you cum monkey take this guy his genetics say he is 70% white but look how noticeable his black traits are some white try diffirent hair style and make make up but its all there and excellent example of this is britney vennti she looks white but her blackness is quite noticeable

Attached: blog120210_pete.jpg (600x400, 49K)

Yes, like high IQ is less dominant in society. What's your point Jew?

Niggers are an ugly race. Whites are a beautiful race. It is easy to spot the ugliness even if the person tries to hide it. Ever wonder why people who only have a small amount of black ancestry try to hide that fact? Maybe it is because they are ashamed about being related to the most revolting group of people on this planet.

Attached: black male white female.jpg (662x617, 84K)

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease
Machado-Joseph Disease
Marfan syndrome
MODY diabetes
Otosclerosis
X-linked Dominant Genetic Diseases
Coffin-Lowry syndrome
Incontinentia Pigmenti

Dominate = better

here's a list of diseases that only need 1 parent for expression.

Are these superior too?

Seriously though, there's a bunch of fucking retards on both sides of the fence in this thread.

>genetics are that simple
Woah you really blew my mind there you stupid fucking nigger

So all my family is 100% Swedish all the way to mid 1600s where we can't connect more folk registries. I from the top to bottom have:
No Cleft
No Widow's Peak
No Dimples
Brown Hair (Born blonde but darkened over time)
No Freckles
Gray-Blue eyes
Free Earlobe

What kind of meme is this picture anyways?

Attached: karolin svettas.jpg (2271x2380, 992K)

This guy is not black he's a fucking jew

They aren't even a race
nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/blacks-arent-human/

This is the only response anyone in this thread needs to read.

swedish genes
> take all the beautiful people from england
> kill all the ones who complain
you're descended from slaves and your genes are worthless.

Stockholm syndrome only works in sweden and only because literally everybody got kidnapped on their way there

Is that picture real?

Blacks are physically stronger, but whites had to overcome challenges intellectually, that couldn't be faced with strength.

While you fought lions, we kept inventing new weapons and tools. Your dominant strength will be useless against a nuke, combat tactics, genetical virus or whatever fancy idea we come up with if you overstep the line

Show me this study of Igbos having a higher IQ than whites. Not some bullshit of Igbo students vs poor whites. General population vs General population

About the eye colour.
Explain this chart bong

Attached: depositphotos_111509628-stock-illustration-baby-eye-color-predictor-chart.jpg (877x1023, 93K)

>60% white but his black genetic still overwrite that BLACK=dominant
hes not even black

Nobody fights a lion and blacks are not physically stronger you huge retard.
Blacks are the best runners and do better in warm climates because of their long limbs and low body fat. But that's literally all. Literally all.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_world_records_in_Olympic_weightlifting

requirements
> a country with winter
> willing to use PED

What a fucking retard.

Blacks are human v1.0

White's are Human v3.4

So of course older genes are Dominant, which does not mean they are superior.

Niggers = MS-DOS can just about be useful but now outclassed in everyway.

Attached: 1523911961999.jpg (552x263, 34K)

I thought this too but it turns out that Africa is the most diverse group of people because of genetic variations (they claim). Also, the first humans were supposedly white and not black and according to the new theory of human origin the first humans were white but then magically through evolution became able to make melanin and have black skin and all the whites died out and then only Africa was populated with its negro population which left Africa and somehow evolved into becoming whites and chinks. That's literally the new dominant theory of human origins. So niggers are not the most ancient humans.

>they have a higher iq on average than whites
That's why they come to our coast paddling on plastic boats

Attached: screenshot-cdn.drawception.com-2018-04-20-12-38-05.png (298x247, 53K)

LOL! Tfw somebody doesn't understand basic genetics. Tfw x 2 every response its by idiots who also don't understand the concept of dominant and receive traits. Educate yourselves fuck wits

My question is why? And is it always constant like that? Is it possible for an interracial couple to have a child with more European features than African?

>Niggers = MS-DOS
kek

Genes are more complicated then that, i have seen mutts with one black parent and one white parent, look as a average european, it is rarer yes but it still happens

This!

checked

In nature, dumb and ugly is always easy. It is beauty that is rare. Weeds are easy. Roses are hard.

>tfw i have all the recessive features despite my family mixing with meds for centuries

Feels good

>it's pure science black people especially (lgbo) are more dominant genetically than whites
Which is the main reason why whites are against breeding outside of your race.
>added to the fact they have a higher iq on average than whites..
Even intelligent anti racists know this isn't true. They know that blacks have lower average IQ, but blame it on systematic oppression, a shit tier education system, and bad nutrition.

>whites have higher IQs on average
>haha niggers BTFO, we're the superior race
>niggers have stronger and more dominant genetics and traits
>Doesn't mean anything.

Get your mental gymnastics out of here.

>beautiful people
>england
Nice try Cletus

Left - Chad

Right - soyboy

Yes, if the African parent have some European ancestor and/or assuming that not all the European traits are recessive.

Because genes are not dominant and recessive, the alleles are.
Dominant means it PRODUCES something.
Recessive means IT DOES NOT.
Also alleles coexist, be they dominant or recessive. So you are fucking retarded.
But what else could you be, you're a nigger in britbongistan, and everyone knows niggers have alleles that are recessive in regards to brain matter.

Attached: 1509014772329.png (403x448, 53K)

Basically this

Perfection is fragile. Once you reach the mountain top, all paths lead down.

Not to mention english slaves barely existed in Sweden because we went east/south east to Kurland, Miklagård and Gårdarike

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

No one ever listens to me but pic related is really how things work.

Attached: Whiteness is spiritual; a measure of purity.png (775x805, 57K)

Attached: 69134_01_lg.jpg (1140x1513, 254K)

>dominant genes are a good thing
Tell that to people with genetic diseases, lmao

When a gene is said to be dominant, that just means it is more likely to be expressed if passed on. That doesn't mean it is a better or worse trait to have. That's high school genetics.

For example,

>higher iq on average

How many "exceptions" and affirmative action adjustments did you have to make to come to this point, nig nog?

>intelligence is less important than some genetic traits
i'm glad ignoring the last 100,000 years of human history in reaching top of the food chain works out for you

>t. Marxist

Yo I was researching Jewish genetic diseases and some of them are literally called "hemophilic" or "blood loving", for the brainlets. They are all under pic related, Factor XI deficiency. Porphyria is one you might have heard of. The treatment, though hard to find (because they're scared of what we will discover if we start down that trail), was drinking blood.

It's too much to go into but they're literally the origin of vampire mythology. Bram Stoker's Dracula=Jew. Elizabteth Bathory (Bar-Tolmay) was a Jew. You can escape a vampire by dropping a coin on the ground. When Jews migrated to Eastern the myth of vampirism arose. Jews are nocturnal.

Jews are vampires.

Attached: hemophilia means blood loving.png (856x770, 118K)

That's like saying higher IQ ultimately means nothing.

>The usefulness of detached ear lobes (dominant gene) on a par with high intelligence

How?

>coexist
reeeeeeeeeeeeeee

that's god's way of helping us filter shit out of the gene pool

>Is the dominant gene
>Literally every race that doesn't have it is superior

That dominant gene sure as shit ain't helping them. Sounds to me like you're suggesting we get rid of them all to stop this dominant gene spreading.

Replace white with Aryan and it'll make sense

Phenotype and genotype are two different things

>This is why white parents can raise the IQ of a black child
Black children grow up to have similar IQ as their biological parents.

I do believe that if blacks (and gypsies) weren't so ugly I wouldn't be a racist.

In my opinion, the strength and dominance of weeds is beautiful. Roses are little faggots.

No, nigger. Not today. Saged.

Attached: 36795d904c1c78b95b3278c83713000b3a642c5106b483617d268d95f8709ec3.jpg (236x349, 15K)

>that pic
so basically everything ugly is dominant?

He is an Arab none of him is the slightest bit black or white you moron.

>Traits
>Dominant
Yeah, no.

Attached: 1507644413208.jpg (400x289, 16K)

>Freckles*

Arabs are not black.

Freckles aren’t dominant

Both charts are simplifications

Recessive genes are pure you idiot. Do some fucking research. Dominant doesn't mean what you think it means. It could have easily been called "pure" for recessive and "common or mixed" for dominant.

this chart is fucking bullshit, eye color genetics in humans are so damn complicated because theres a shit ton of genes involved that act together in ways that we don't know yet.
also it depends on your ancestors too, 2 brown eyed africans mating will not produce a light eyed child because none in their family tree usually has light eyes. 2 brown eyed europeans can produce a light eyed child, if both have the genes in their family tree (which is very likely considering they're in europe)

it just makes it easier for us to tell when people have nigger blood, so we can ostracize them.

>and blacks are not physically stronger

I would say on average that African Americans are - probably because of selective breeding during slavery. The sub-saharan black is not stronger.

African Americans actually have on average 20% white DNA - again because of slavery.

No way that's his biological kids. A white father creates much whiter kids than that.

>The sub-saharan black is not stronger.

Most of them are actually much weaker than whites on average.

So in your mind something which is more visible is better? So following your logic shit must be better than water as even a tiny smear of shit can contaminate an entire otherwise clean water supply. Why are you not drinking the "superior" 8 glasses of shit per day OP?

>Dominant means it PRODUCES something.
>Recessive means IT DOES NOT.
So how can loss of function mutations be dominant?

They're a cryptic-species at best.
They merely resemble humans.

No. at least (((scholarly))) studies will at most boast is half the gap. So there is merit to black children raised by whites being more intelligent than their black raised peers. However, the white child average raised by blacks will still outperform black children average regardless of what raises them.


Nurture is important, but it's less than half as much as choosing a smart woman.

Because if the gene is part of a signaling pathway it will lead to a decrease in that signaling pathway's mediator, and the embryo/fetus will not develop properly.
Another such case is if the loss of function is in a gene responsible for clearance enzymes for example, leading to build-up of certain by-products in cells that eventually lead to disease. In this case, a possessor of 2 such dominant alleles dies in the first years of its life or in utero. A possessor of only 1 copy will either be quasinormal or start developing a disease later in life (20-40 years usually).

The science behind it is in the name. Wanting to change it because it offends you is pretty feminazi-like

If a repressor is lost then the gene it represses will become expressed. Insulators can also be lost making larger chromatin loops so that enhancers make all genes in the loop get expressed. IRC regions can be lost so that the DNA can no longer be condensed by methylation. DNA is more complicated than people think. Cells change expression of their genes depending on their environment. Chemical factors to the cells shape can change its gene expression.

>Igbo
You mean the Easterners in Nigeria?

Hahaha, you forgot to switch flags hahaha

Attached: 1522658926283.jpg (600x567, 109K)

Also, if the protein has its sequence modified and is involved in a complex, then it can affect the activity of the entire complex by changing its conformation.

Degenerative traits are always dominant, why do you think incest creates downies even if you take the most genetically superior people to create the offspring?

personal vocabulary limit reached