ABORTION BAD

>ABORTION BAD
>DEATH PENALTY GOOD
REPUBLICANS???

Attached: 467554281.jpg (612x420, 48K)

>killing a baby that literally dindunuffin is the same as killing a criminal
SAGE GOES IN THE OPTIONS FIELD

So, Op wants to kill innocent babies but not murderers.
Really, share blue pays you too fucking much.

Attached: Stupid Post sage it.png (851x721, 231K)

Kill neither. Dipshits. Centrist life.

>Image says to respond to bait treads

kill yourself newshit

Both are good in certain cases.

Nobody is making you execute criminals, retard.
You can continue being a useless centrist and it's not republicans who will force a change on you.
Now go pay reparations and bake that faggot a cake.
sage

Republicans: give them a chance to be good people.
Democrats: no. Kill em before they hit the ground.

the baby can be taught
the criminal cannot

What the fuck are you talking about? I am executing criminals with my god damn tax dollars, you fucking idiot, do you really think they do it without using money coming out of my pocket? I'm against it and they are making me fund it.
>Now go pay reparations and bake that faggot a cake.
Nice strawman, do something better with your life than this, kid.

both for nogs
\?

Reverse it for true hypocrisy, shill.

KYS.

fpbp
logic of the leafs
beacon of free world

>reverse it
But there are no democrats here.

GET IN HERE YOU FAGGOTS

What race is it?

both are good
abortion kills more niggers than anything and the only problem with capital punishment is the appeals process in open and shut cases.

Both are bad, you shouldn't kill people unless you have to.

I am in favor of both abortion and death penalty, and more of both.
Being anti-abortion does not mean that you must be anti-death penalty. The purpose of the death penalty, in my opinion, is to get rid of irredeemable criminals, so that they cannot commit more crime and so that they will not be a burden to society while locked up in prison. Fetuses are innocent, so it would be wrong to kill one in most cases.

>killing innocent unborn babies because people get knocked up and take no responsibility in their actions
>Holding murderers accountable for their actions
Democrats???

babies are innocent life. murderers are not.

Playing God with people's lives is not right, build a wall around them so they can't hurt others but don't assume that you're the Lord himself and can take lives as it conveniences you.

Yes. Kill people for being a menace, not for being in the way of a career.

>A criminal has brought justice upon themselves
>lmao chad forgot to pull out RIP in peace lmao

These things are the same in your bait.

get better bait.

Attached: bait.webm (1075x600, 2.9M)

muh playing God

Fetis innocent, criminal guilty.

Yes of course. Both are life affirming actually. Opposing abortion saves a life. That’s pretty obvious. The death penalty puts a very high price on the act of taking a life hence putting a value of your life on the cost a taking another’s life. Your argument is invalid.

Attached: B88797FF-8E20-4F86-B880-127DC042367F.jpg (405x421, 32K)

Killing either is bad. Centrists > Bloodthirsty Republicans and Lecherous Democrats.

God tells you to execute criminals, you moron.

if the baby is a dindu then it is the same.

Attached: cant.jpg (504x415, 27K)

Killing to show killing is bad doesn't ring a bell at all to you? Don't you see the problem with "tagging" people into who deserves or not to die?

Abortion is an evil attempt to selfishly remove consequence from choice

Death penalty is supposed to be a consequence for selfishly choosing evil

I am for both
it mostly target niggeres anyway

Attached: 1523947472740.png (600x332, 53K)

so you're saying you want to be lenient on psychopathic killers who committed the most heinous crimes, but that condemning the innocent to death before they're born is A-OK...

>thinking that it's that simple

Both are bad.

if you can't see and understand the difference between a mature person guilty of murder and an unborn baby innocent of any crime then you should probably self abort now.

>Ha ha, killing an innocent child is the same as executing a murderer or rapist, stupid republicans!
Unironically neck yourself.

The only difference between the fetus who would grow up to become the murderer and the murderer is time. You should kill neither.

I would much rather kill communists than babies.

Attached: tet execution.jpg (1024x739, 161K)

>Killing innocent unborn children
>killing mass murderers, child molesters and other criminals
OP thinks theyre the same

this is pretty stupid. Death penalty is good since tax dollars will not go to feeding bad criminals since most criminals will not get to become better people. Some do but the people who can get the death penalty are in a bad enough state that they cannot change.

Abortion is killing someone before they even have the possibility to do any good or bad. I do agree if the baby is going to die shortly after, it's going to be in giant pain for the rest of it's life or if the mother is going to die becuase of the baby.

One punishes a person for decisions they've made, the other punishes a person for the decisions someone else made.

>killing innocents is worse than killing criminals
Yeah that's right, what's the problem faggot?

>t. 13 yr old

op confirmed retard

>Not aborting the kids of murders

Your logic ain't taken to their natural consequences.

I don't think they are, I only know that all life is sacred and should only be ended in self-defense. We don't have to kill fetuses or prisoners.

>killing is bad in all circumstances!

I was going to write a well thought out response, but you're probably just a troll.

Your mother's a whore.

Shut the fuck up you boomer cunt.

Yeah?
And?

>Centrist
2nd worst political ideology there is. It's absolutely retarded.

In British India, Indians used to burn women alive if their husband had died. It was called Sati.

Did the British allow this happen because it was part of their culture and politics? No. They said "We don't do this in the civilized world." and they literally killed anyone attempting it. They took a radical stance against something because they knew it was wrong, regardless of what the other side of the spectrum believes. A centralist view would have maybe tried to lower the amount of wife burning, or only allow for certain cases.

Nothing is inertly good or correct just because it is not a hard stance into a specific political spectrum, in fact, a lot of the time it is objectively inferior.

Attached: centrist.jpg (549x403, 73K)

>babies do not deserve to live
>murderers lives are infinitely valuable and must be protected

Attached: 4027FAE4-3DEC-49D9-B468-9654DCA77767.gif (480x264, 1.54M)

Babies aren't criminals.

Never heard of murderers having a 'murder' gene

I believe in the chance to fuck up. If said person is a fuckup, they get what's coming to them. However, some are only destined to be fuckups, so that's what abortion is for.

Those who take another innocent life unlawfully must be put to death. That is just and a responsible act by any duly constitited authority. It insures that the value of innocent life is never diluted and removes the murderer from among the people .. once you have murdered you are like a corrosive cancer and you invariably, inevitably infect anyone with whom you interact.

Killing niggers is always good.

You wanna know how I know you have below average cognition, OP?

Centrist doesn't necessarily mean you fall victim to the middle ground fallacy or that you don't take radical stances, only that the ground you stand on isn't a slave to one ideology. I agree that they did the right thing in trying to put a stop to that completely but unless there was no other way to stop these people except by killing them then they should've imprisoned them instead.

Moreover, centrist is a pretty shitty description for what it actually means -- a person who thinks for themselves. There's no better term for that when speaking politics, unfortunately.

Because I don't conclude that just because someone believes one stance is wrong that they must believe in the opposite?

You actually do something to earn the death penalty shit for brains.

Killing an innocent baby in its mothers womb is the most evil thing that routinely happens these days thanks to globalist, satanist cannibal kikes.

Killing proven muslim murderer pieces of shit like the one in the photograph is doing Gods work.

Attached: 1517004957254.jpg (779x694, 85K)

>a fetus and a convicted murder are the same thing

He has to be trolling

>killing someone who’s made decisions which warrant death

vs

>killing an unborn child

Being this dumb you probably think people have free will too

Killing a murderer still makes you a murderer

There is a logical failure in people
Who support state sanctioned murder

You don’t live in reality...your idealism is that of a teenager.

>There is no difference between killing a human that has done nothing wrong and killing a human that doesn't deserve life.

Hmmmm, what did you mean by this ?

IQ

I support both abortion and the death penalty.

Eugenics FTW!

Attached: 1518108232998.png (338x331, 111K)

>Abortions are bad
>Implying it's not more cruel to actually give birth to a child in this timeline we live in.

Attached: schnipp.jpg (300x168, 8K)

>killing innocent babies good
>killing murders bad
DEMOCRATS?????

Attached: 1509110763576.jpg (1920x1080, 161K)

>being born is a violent crime
>all life is equal

168871154
Get sick of cancer, braindead tool.

>Hypothetical.
Pregnant mother is on death row, because her unborn baby bit a guys tip off, and he bled to death, she was wrongfully convicted as the 'bell-end chomper of Belair'.

>Scenario one - She convinces the courts that its all a mistake and that it was the her baby that should be aborted.
or
>Scenario two - they both get aborted/executed.
or
Scenario three - she gives birth to Satan and is then the mother is executed..

Feel free to expand hypothetical if you have IQ over 9000.

>killing criminals who "dindu nuffin" is bad
>aborting mostly the type of people who dindu nuffin before they can actually dindu nuffin is okay

Attached: 1512996940759.gif (256x256, 352K)

In the first case, the baby is a growing parasite inside the mother
In the second case, it is an adult and self-aware human supposed to be protected by the state regardless of his behaviours

You're too much of a fuss to do it your self, so they do it for you, you also might disagree with it, but it's not like you'd know better about consequences of keeping murderers alive and not getting rid of theirs murderous gene pool, you'd wine and dine them while sitting in prison their whole life? Also knowing there's a death sentence it also serves as example for anyone willing to do outrageous crimes, there's a reason why in fact cleaning up the gene pool works, too bad US is stuck with niggers so that solution will take ages to to make a progress, if at all. I'd agree with you though, using all those special ways, electric chair, lethal injection, or w/e, they should be executed swiftly, like its done in China, bullet in the back of the head.

P.S. Earth doesn't revolve around you. And that cake wont be make it self dummy.

humans are born "innocent." Christians believe in original sin but this is besides the point; the child has no agency yet.

the death penalty is for adults (not minors) who have complete control of their actions yet CHOOSE to commit great injustice against fellow man.

there is no logical disconnect here

Everyone gets a shot at life, ending it before it begins is cutting corners and degenerate.

Killing the nigger criminals before they're born though is more of an insurance policy to make sure the everyday Tax-payer is still paying and doesn't die.

The crime wave of the late 20th century was cured by abortion and more than likely kept the system of law and order from completely collapsing.

Imagine a world where the crack-crime epidemic never ended and expanded into the 21st century. This is why they keep it legal. We may not all agree but this is the truth.

Attached: 1520480293890.png (757x632, 349K)

Baby did nothing.
Criminals did something deserving.
T. Brainlet