FUCK ALL SOCIALISTS

>nazis are socialists that makes democucks socialists lolz
dont you have an alt lite eceleb to screech about

faggots get punched

Attached: smug jew punching ssnp.png (1500x933, 2.87M)

>60 million

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Attached: Orang.png (640x480, 215K)

>When you want to kill the 1% but end up killing 50million instead

Attached: 1521063683419.jpg (963x1024, 82K)

ITT : we discuss how many people would die from ancap

>le ironic boomer posting xd

i would guess a good billion would perish

Attached: 4kqxqwlynf2z.jpg (565x657, 80K)

Hitler dindu nuffin. The holocaust isn't real, but I like Hitler because I wish it was.

Uhh, bro, they were national >>> S O C I A L I S T S

how many did the radical capitalist Leopold II kill?

I feel bad for ancaps that haven't grown out of their libertarian phase.
Post-libertarian NRx is for grown-ups.

National Socialism respected private property rights.

Attached: 1950ad.jpg (468x416, 40K)

Attached: 1507981449985.jpg (649x1024, 131K)

OP explain in full detail why you think Hitler should be compared to international-socialists and why you take the position of capitalism. Also provide us your knowledge of the subject of Capitalism and Socialism so we can have a deeper understanding of what FUCK ALL SOCIALISTS is trying to explain?

OP doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about. Don't embarrass him. National Socialism is supported private property rights among other things, the only problem was it has complete disregard for economics, economics being the reason Hitler lost the war, if he had a greater understanding of economics, then the Reich would still exist today.

Anarcho-capitalists:
>pro-degeneracy
>pro-globalism
>hates culture and tradition, stands in the way of ideal society
>hates borders
>leaders and main beneficiaries are Jews
>hates people that destroy and kill communists

Marxists:
>pro-degeneracy
>pro-globalism
>hates culture and tradition, stands in the way of the ideal society
>hates borders
>leaders and main beneficiaries are Jews
>hates people that destroy and kill communists

Can you closeted Communists go post somewhere else.

Attached: 1518035277717.jpg (600x485, 89K)

Anarcho-capitalists:
>pro-degeneracy
>pro-globalism
>hates culture and tradition, stands in the way of ideal society
>hates borders
>leaders and main beneficiaries are Jews
>hates people that destroy and kill communists

All of this is fucking wrong.

Attached: 1950sARTSKOOLDAMAGE.jpg (892x672, 127K)

Yeah because Hitler was a real local boy.

>let people do whatever they want
>assume because you're moral they are too

You're pro-degeneracy if you let people sell themselves as prostitutes on the street, which you would because you can't stop them (it would violate the NAP)

You're pro-globalism because profits don't have borders and capitalists care primarily about profits. If you put things other than profits first in your economic lives, newsflash: you're not a capitalist.

You hate culture and tradition because they, like borders, get in the way of maximum profits and you can't stop people from destroying culture and tradition because it violates the NAP

To stop all of those issues means infringing upon people's liberties and violating the NAP, which is the ultimate crime to you.

Attached: 1471820388412.png (429x410, 11K)

basedcialists

Prostitution would be frowned upon, it would be risky, bad for business to people who wanted to participate. Culturally, religiously, and economically, nothing good comes from prostitution, it would be undesirable by a society, even then, people have the freedom to participate in such acts... it is there own fault if it dooms their future.

>implying you need borders
All you need is voluntary separation of communities, which anarcho-capitalism would ultimately develop.

>If you put things other than profits first in your economic lives, newsflash: you're not a capitalist.
Being a capitalist means you own the means of production, need being greedy or plotting the destruction of a race. Fuck off.

Destroying culture and tradition violates the NAP. Borders are pointless, previously stated, they're inefficient for separation of nations, races, and peoples. Separation is voluntary in capitalist ideology.

>To stop all of those issues means infringing upon people's liberties and violating the NAP, which is the ultimate crime to you.

You don't understand anarcho-capitalism.

>>pro-degeneracy
the capitalism we have now is what is making the society to degrade , it would be even worse with no government
>>pro-globalism
>>hates borders
you would import shit tones of nigggers if you wanted
>>hates culture and tradition, stands in the way of ideal society
a lot of you ancap faggots state that culture and tradition is a form of government
>>leaders and main beneficiaries are Jews
you cant deny that
you are really pro degeneracy , i would rather live in nazbol stalin's USSR than in shitty ancapistan

Are Fascists, socialists?

mixed economy i would say

If ancaps unite, it would look to much like a government

This is all very right.

>the capitalism we have now is what is making the society to degrade , it would be even worse with no government

>you would import shit tones of nigggers if you wanted
Nobody besides the economically-left Jews want this (and their pawns).

>a lot of you ancap faggots state that culture and tradition is a form of government
I mean, I haven't seen a single AnCap say that but it is wrong. Culture and tradition will come from art and humanity, they same way it comes from any other ideology.

>leaders and main beneficiaries are Jews
There are no leaders in anarchist society.

Attached: capitalistwasteland.jpg (1600x1000, 334K)

...

>Prostitution would be frowned upon, it would be risky, bad for business to people who wanted to participate. Culturally, religiously, and economically, nothing good comes from prostitution, it would be undesirable by a society, even then, people have the freedom to participate in such acts

So you've admitted that allowing people to participate in prostitution is okay. In turn you've admitted you're pro-degeneracy.

>All you need is voluntary separation of communities, which anarcho-capitalism would ultimately develop.

Okay, what happens when a nigger moves into a white town? And then others move in too, because obviously the white town is far better. You can't remove them or restrict their rights to exist in your town unless they violate the NAP, so the one way to stop it in most cases is to blatantly violate the NAP yourself and physically remove them even if they've done nothing wrong. Utterly incoherent.

>Being a capitalist means you own the means of production, need being greedy or plotting the destruction of a race. Fuck off.

Private ownership of property or the means of production does not make you a capitalist, or your system capitalistic. Such things have existed for thousands of years. The key element that seperates Capitalism from other private-ownership structures is the key goal: whether or not the whole point of economic exchange is to pursue profits (The accumulation of Capital-CAPITALISM.

>Destroying culture and tradition violates the NAP.

No it doesn't. Culture is a group-defined issue, when groups of individuals degenerate culture, tradition and values, you're eroding the culture and YOU cannot stop them because it would violate the NAP to stop swingers parties or drug dens or other individuals moving into the public spaces and flooding everyone else with their culture.

>You don't understand anarcho-capitalism.

And you can't even describe a single element that is even remotely coherent, so neither do you.

Attached: 1473250095756.jpg (480x360, 17K)

>the capitalism we have now is what is making the society to degrade , it would be even worse with no government

Back to this point. We don't have capitalism now, we have crony capitalism, corporatism.

>MY SPECIFIC BRAND OF CAPITALISM HAS NEVER BEEN TRIED, IT WASN'T REAL CAPITALISM

You're sounding awfully communist right about now

Attached: 1502445506782.gif (318x200, 491K)

>Nobody besides the economically-left Jews want this (and their pawns).
>being this retarded
you need workforce , cheap one at that , and spics and niggers would work for pennies , and corporations wont give a single shit about thousands of whites
>I mean, I haven't seen a single AnCap say that but it is wrong. Culture and tradition will come from art and humanity, they same way it comes from any other ideology.
okay , do you think religion is a form of government ?
>There are no leaders in anarchist society.
there are no jews in the current government of USA too ,despite their clear dominance
>Back to this point. We don't have capitalism now, we have crony capitalism, corporatism.
corporations want people to consume as much as possible i.e. they want you too eat shit ton of MCdonalds , they want you to buy drugs , prostitutes .even if you dont want to buy all of that , they are going to use media to brainwash you into it .

>So you've admitted that allowing people to participate in prostitution is okay. In turn you've admitted you're pro-degeneracy.
No, if you wanna engage in that shit, go ahead, it ain't my place to tell you what to do, as long as it doesn't affect me, it is okay. Keep in mind, if you engage in prostitution, you will probably be frowned upon and resented by you're community.

>Okay, what happens when a nigger moves into a white town? And then others move in too, because obviously the white town is far better. You can't remove them or restrict their rights to exist in your town unless they violate the NAP...
If niggers come to white town and all the others move there, shit will be fine as long as they don't ruin the society, but chances are, they will... welcome to physical removal, my friend.

>Private ownership of property or the means of production does not make you a capitalist, or your system capitalistic. Such things have existed for thousands of years. The key element that seperates Capitalism from other private-ownership structures is the key goal: whether or not the whole point of economic exchange is to pursue profits (The accumulation of Capital-CAPITALISM.

Controlling the means of production privately and controlling your trade privately is capitalism, yes.

>No it doesn't. Culture is a group-defined issue, when groups of individuals degenerate culture...
If a group of individuals deems something as threatening to their culture, chances are, they'll chase the threat out. White town wouldn't want black people in white town, white town will refuse to hire blacks, and blacks would be threatened and possibly even killed in white town, nobody in white town will care if they don't like blacks all together, bringing back the point of voluntary separation.

Anarcho-capitalism has never been tried, the closest thing to it was the American Frontier.

>you need workforce , cheap one at that , and spics and niggers would work for pennies , and corporations wont give a single shit about thousands of whites
No. Races naturally dislike each other, whites will work for cheap in their own communities they same way they'd work for more in their own communities depending on their skills.

>okay , do you think religion is a form of government ?
Could be (in fundamentalism)... but ultimately, no.
>there are no jews in the current government of USA too ,despite their clear dominance
Jews are very relevant in the US government.

>corporations want people to consume as much as possible i.e. they want you too eat shit ton of MCdonalds , they want you to buy drugs , prostitutes .even if you dont want to buy all of that , they are going to use media to brainwash you into it .
Welp, have some independence, if you get brainwashed for being weak minded, then shit, sucks to be you. If somebody tries to sell you lemonade, they ain't trying to brainwash you.

Attached: wholecaust.jpg (650x630, 83K)

Attached: redflag.jpg (937x207, 75K)

Attached: socialism.jpg (600x392, 97K)

Attached: hitler-socialism.png (850x400, 144K)

Attached: RARE_rothbard-hoppe.jpg (506x213, 31K)

Prove it isn't, faggot

oh no, a billion poor parasites (lithuania) would die. how horrible

>If niggers come to white town and all the others move there, shit will be fine as long as they don't ruin the society, but chances are, they will... welcome to physical removal, my friend.
if this was true then USA would have killed all niggers hundreds of years ago , there is a reason why gang culture is being promoted in USA by kikes , consumerism , they want nogs to buy guns , drugs , prostitutes , it gives corporations profit
>If a group of individuals deems something as threatening to their culture, chances are, they'll chase the threat out. White town wouldn't want black people in white town, white town will refuse to hire blacks, and blacks would be threatened and possibly even killed in white town, nobody in white town will care if they don't like blacks all together, bringing back the point of voluntary separation.
you forget about media , in an ancap society it plays a big role but you dont want to admit it , sweden got entirely brainwashed and there are only few thousands that stand against diversity

...

Attached: hitler-socialism4.png (850x400, 166K)

No kid. His generals told him its too early to wage a war but he ignored them.

>implying this is somehow wrong
user, I think your reading abilities are those of a 10yo

wew, it's almost as if socialists don't have economic understanding xD

Retard Alert.

Op is a fully blown retard

Attached: 1523118756361.jpg (1024x878, 196K)

Sкʌm Sīкs Yts Oшn Lεvol

Sīk Hajor

Attached: ScumSeeksItsOwnLevel.png (480x640, 32K)

r-selected trailer trash. you're afraid of ancap because you would starve without all the gibs you're getting now

>it wasn't real socialism - the post
kek can't make this up. lefties are all the same

Attached: fucklefties.png (705x998, 197K)

read this retard.

>hurr Hitler wasn't against private property therefore he wasn't a socialist durr
>there's only type of socialism beyond natsoc
Retard alert indeed.

More accurate than op.

>it wasn't real socialism
kekekeke

>if this was true then USA would have killed all niggers hundreds of years ago , there is a reason why gang culture is being promoted in USA by kikes , consumerism , they want nogs to buy guns , drugs , prostitutes , it gives corporations profit
Well, yes, they would've been if we didn't have a jew problem. Blacks themselves aren't bad, it is their culture that empower them and teach them to be monsters. Black culture in the 1950s (the most capitalist years of the US), was the whitest is has been ever, amazing music, peace, little drug abuse, etc.
>you forget about media , in an ancap society it plays a big role but you dont want to admit it , sweden got entirely brainwashed and there are only few thousands that stand against diversity
You make a fair point, but keep in mind that the government protects the undesirables, in Ancapistan, threats will not be protected.

>not understanding what the nsdap flag actually stands for

Kys nupol. You're a kike useful idiot.

Globalist shill.

Attached: (((Libertarianism))).jpg (600x340, 54K)

hitler took the guns
stalin took the guns
moa took the guns
- alex jones

HItler was the last good man to lead a nation, you fucking memeflag kike.

>No. Races naturally dislike each other, whites will work for cheap in their own communities they same way they'd work for more in their own communities depending on their skills.
no , whites wont work for small wages , they have a lot of shit to maintain , and spics and nigs would only need to buy some food and pay small rent .
>Could be (in fundamentalism)... but ultimately, no.
really ? i heard some ancaps say otherwise
>Welp, have some independence, if you get brainwashed for being weak minded, then shit, sucks to be you. If somebody tries to sell you lemonade, they ain't trying to brainwash you.
you really underestimate the power of todays media and movies

All of these people (besides Rand, I think) were anti-Zionist, especially Rothbard.

the nose knows

>who needs an argument when i have a meme btfo!
You faggots are killing this board.

>You don't understand anarcho-capitalism.
Son you don't understand the world so even if that's the case I'd say he's got one up in you.

not an argument, leafscum

>Son you don't understand the world
!!! BOOMER ALERT !!!

>killing degenerate normie Capitalists is bad

Hello, Reddit!

He was a socialist lol. He made unions illegal except one and used that to make businesses follow party line.

Not a boomer but good try, Vlad.

>no , whites wont work for small wages , they have a lot of shit to maintain...
Okay, fair, but whites also work and don't participate in crime. You wouldn't wanna hire a blood thirsty nigger or a drug dealing spic, it is bad for business, and again, whites don't want them in their communities, around their children, in their neighborhoods.
>really ? i heard some ancaps say otherwise
Eh, generalization of libertarians in unwise... herding individualists is like herding cats.
>you really underestimate the power of todays media and movies
I know the power, I do, but the glory of capitalism is that you get to vote with your wallet, if a movie producer is somehow threatening a population, said population will not take from said producer.

Im saying
>not real socialism
Isnt an argument either retard

>Well, yes, they would've been if we didn't have a jew problem. Blacks themselves aren't bad, it is their culture that empower them and teach them to be monsters.
yes and you know why jews empower it ? consumerism .
> Black culture in the 1950s (the most capitalist years of the US), was the whitest is has been ever, amazing music, peace, little drug abuse, etc.
it was great for US a a whole , it started to go downhill since then . people had so much free time , liberty and money that they didnt know what to do with all of that so they started doing dumb shit , that is why we have feminism , homos ,gang culture and soon pedophilia

>grown up natsoc and bluepilled ancap
ftfy

Attached: 1510058901423.png (1000x500, 278K)

at least >50% is a baseless assumption that anarchism could work, but assuming it does, then what would what stop people from making their own forms of government?
I work user, I even been investing my earnings for the past two years. Starvation isn't a problem unless all farms stop producing and even then, I live near a forest, I could survive on squirrels and fish until my homemade farm is producing. What Hitler is saying that quote, is that the party would rather have the people, supporting those Jewish ideologies, to join them, instead of having to annihilate them for being a bunch of faggot Marxists.

>yes and you know why jews empower it ? consumerism .
True, but while the Jews can capitalize off of brainwashing blacks, whites can run their communities without blacks and Jews.
>it was great for US a a whole , it started to go downhill since then . people had so much free time , liberty and money that they didnt know what to do with all of that so they started doing dumb shit , that is why we have feminism , homos ,gang culture and soon pedophilia
Well, that liberty and money was nice, and could've been retained, this was people like Ayn Rand warned about, the pushing of an economically-left agenda, civil rights, feminism, putting people in power of people they shouldn't rule... we could've fought against this, the eternal Jew forces through, uses guilt, manipulation of government to get it's way. Thanks to the "Holocaust" and the "6mil," white guilt was easzy to capitalize off of, whites are now trained to be anti-fascist, anti-family, and anti-white, thanks to the government, emotions, and "history," Jews could abuse it to get their way.

>at least >50% is a baseless assumption that anarchism could work
I disagree. But I see no point in arguing this opinion.

>what would what stop people from making their own forms of government?
A society built on principles of freedom and individualism, if some commie wants to build a government, how is he going to gain rule? Nobody would want to sacrifice the freedoms they get in anarcho-capitalism, thus physical removal.

>Okay, fair, but whites also work and don't participate in crime. You wouldn't wanna hire a blood thirsty nigger or a drug dealing spic, it is bad for business,
as long as a nigger or a spic doesnt steal from company , the owner wont give a shit about it
>whites don't want them in their communities, around their children, in their neighborhoods.
do niggers have to live in white communities to replace
do niggers need to live in white neighborhood to work in companies ? i dont think so
>Well, that liberty and money was nice, and could've been retained, this was people like Ayn Rand warned about, the pushing of an economically-left agenda, civil rights, feminism, putting people in power of people they shouldn't rule... we could've fought against this, the eternal Jew forces through, uses guilt, manipulation of government to get it's way. Thanks to the "Holocaust" and the "6mil," white guilt was easzy to capitalize off of, whites are now trained to be anti-fascist, anti-family, and anti-white, thanks to the government, emotions, and "history," Jews could abuse it to get their way.
they could have done it without the government , owning media and hollywood was enough to stir shit up

>as long as a nigger or a spic doesnt steal from company , the owner wont give a shit about it
I beg to disagree, in a society that voluntarily disapproves of other races, hiring a spigger or whatever the hell, doesn't look good on the company, whites will vote with their wallet against the company.
>do niggers need to live in white neighborhood to work in companies ? i dont think so
Nope, but they'd have to be white to work in white companies!
>they could have done it without the government , owning media and hollywood was enough to stir shit up
Nah, people where taught in state funded schooling that Hitler was bad, the bombing of PH was justified, and that diversity is a strength, the Chinese resist movies they find insulting or whatever the hell, white communities would do the same.

>I disagree. But I see no point in arguing this opinion.
Agreed, user I'll just say this last thing, take Jow Forums as an example, we were anarchists at the beginning and worked with few people, but we soon realized we needed rules (fuck moot's tho, not his dumbass rules)

they do it with whites too , if whites would create their own community that wouldnt protect them from jewish movies and media , unless you ban them from the community but that would be against the NAP
>I know the power, I do, but the glory of capitalism is that you get to vote with your wallet, if a movie producer is somehow threatening a population, said population will not take from said producer.
you dont seem to understand how shit like MK ultra works , they dont just yell on every movie about how racemixing is good

>Agreed, user I'll just say this last thing, take Jow Forums as an example, we were anarchists at the beginning and worked with few people, but we soon realized we needed rules (fuck moot's tho, not his dumbass rules)
I like that idea user, but think of the internet as a whole as a society, the internet is very similar to anarcho-capitalism is. While the American Frontier is closest to anarcho-capitalism on the physical plain of existence, the internet is the closest thing to anarcho-capitalism on a non-physical plain, no rules, just your skills and your ability to work with others and trade knowledge, currency, or goods.

>they do it with whites too , if whites would create their own community that wouldnt protect them from jewish movies and media , unless you ban them from the community but that would be against the NAP
A landlord of a neighborhood or mall or whatever is allowed to ban Jews or niggers, chances are if that property owner was white, and trad, they'd ban.

>Nope, but they'd have to be white to work in white companies!
you are quiet optimistic about it , i have never heard of a company that wouldnt employ people who would work for lower wages

>you are quiet optimistic about it , i have never heard of a company that wouldnt employ people who would work for lower wages
Black people don't work. But in all seriousness, people wouldn't hire just for who could be paid the least (unless it is a very simple job), people hire according to skills, blacks and reds wouldn't be in positions of power in a white society, blacks won't run large businesses in white town.

okay but does that apply with media and movies ?
if a dude owns a cinema , he wont care what movies play in theaters , he wants people to pay

>if a dude owns a cinema , he wont care what movies play in theaters , he wants people to pay
Cinema would probably die out in Ancapistan due to anarcho-capiatlism being heavily digital when it comes to services. But you have to think about what people would want to see, not what people would just end up paying for. An Asian man probably doesn't wanna see Black Panther, so the cinema owner in Asia town wouldn't wanna play Black Panther.

If Nazism rises under my command, I would surely include some libertarian characteristics to it, i.e. since Nazism is meritocratic by definition, then according to your "ranking" you would have more freedoms, these would allow the government to have good control over the idiots, while the high IQ ones within a single race, would live freely, but I still don't know how would people react to this