Admit it. This ideology cannot be refuted

Admit it. This ideology cannot be refuted.

Attached: tmp_12683-1524277243326-2061386898.png (902x930, 832K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ZfGuYzzunq8
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>Left "Killing Radical Centrists is bad"
>Right "Killing Radical Centrists is good"

Simple example.
Where is the centre position on a Boolean choice?

Only half of us should be killed obviously

Attached: tmp_12683-1524208977648-1906394861.png (919x737, 56K)

is acceptance of and following of Christ?
no?
then it is not perfect.
simple

What a nice, polite user.

But what if there are an odd number of centrists?

We kill half of one too. Make them a paraplegic.

Also, Right says we round up and left says round down.

well i can think of a few in response to that

>killing *some group* is good or bad depending on the circumstances

>killing *some group* doesnt matter either way

>killing *some group* being good or bad is subjective

>all killing is wrong

see?

Is this a jojo thread?

Reality is objective nigga

done

Attached: 3571ea0f03a108c330c302821405bc522468344475e4204d966a91864551bf6d.png.jpg (1200x1056, 86K)

i never said otherwise

Attached: image.jpg (200x342, 34K)

then lets say it's objectively good to kill centrists and all available data agrees on this.

What if your opposition both decides you are big gay and mcvoluntarily decide to take two opposing but safe positions while the middle course is suicide.

niggers are shit
youtube.com/watch?v=ZfGuYzzunq8

I really like this image
have another nice image

Attached: Bob Ross Void.jpg (530x338, 32K)

KEKED

The basedboy ideology

>then lets say it's objectively good to kill centrists and all available data agrees on this.

no, such an assertion cannot be objectively true
so.... false premises

>What if your opposition both decides you are big gay and mcvoluntarily decide to take two opposing but safe positions while the middle course is suicide.

everyone is free to think and conclude
anything they want

That ideology is a logical fallacy.

fair enough
but which?
i think i know which, lets see if we concur