We could only hope

epic, simply epic.

If... Sasha Grey said... blow jobs for everyone if we have good gun control... then XD all the virgins would... fix this by the end of tomorrow ROFLCOPTER

Unlikely...and thank God for that...

>This who will save Yuropoors from the coming Islamic conquest.
Feels good to be an American

>nerd start a war for movies about fictional war
poetic

fuck this liberal sṏy bṏy

Well, in truth if he said that he would be fired within seconds and disney would blackball him from hollywood.

Is the joke here jj is afraid of being shot by star wars fans?

And that's a good thing

There's no better feeling.

Attached: Hmmm.jpg (894x982, 208K)

Ehrlich is the most insufferable dork, even other film critics hate him.

Attached: 1430634088251.jpg (960x524, 65K)

Just like they made sure it was "Her Turn" right? Get bent, not enough people like Star Wars more than guns.

the fallacy in this image is equating gun ownership with self defense and preservation of life. guns are not used to protect, they are used to kill.

this is not my opinion, this is a fact. this is why home owner's insurance costs more for gun owners than for normal people. insurance underwriters have calculated that any benefit a gun provides its owner is more than offset by the increased danger posed to the owner and those around them.

>guns are not used to protect, they are used to kill.
Your fallacy is stating that killing someone is not a way to protect yourself. So you can go fuck yourself.

>two decisions following each other with no activity between
Worst flowchart I've ever seen

gun ownership is not the same thing as self defense. and the data shows that gun ownership is a net negative in terms of personal safety. the gun industry already knows this, which is why they banned government research into gun crime. the gun industry does not want the public to know the truth about guns.

aren't nerds pro gun-control to begin with? don't nerds tend to be left wing beta males?

"competent gun control" means "only police should have guns." Those same "white supremacist police" who are "murdering poor innocent coloreds all day every day." From the same geniuses who brought you "flooding our nation with low skilled workers will only have a positive impact!"

Gun ownership is a form of self defense and in most cases the best form. Let's say someone is a 5'0" 110 pound girl, what is she going to do to defend herself from a 6'2" 250 pound Giga Nigger?

mace

Coloreds don't rape, user. Besides, that woman (likely white, as black women are morbidly obese) should check her privilege. Besides, that poor innocent colored may have come from a third world shithole. Wouldn't want to send him back there, would you?

Star wars nerds can't even get them to make a good star wars movie and yet they would somehow get the 2nd amendment repealed?

"No one needs a gun to defend themselves" he tweets from his house with a security system, which is behind a locked privacy fence, which is located in a gated community, that has it's own private security force, which is located in an all white part of town.

HURR DURR HOMES WITH GUNS IN DEM MORE LIKELY TO HAVE AN ACCIDENT INBOLBING A GUNN

Wow so this is the power of retardation

You are more like to die from water if you have a bathtub in your home. Ban water IMO.

>t. 56% mutt

eat shit and die spic cumsock

That post is 100% accurate, stay mad.

I'm pro gun but that chart is the most retarded thing ever

first off, notice how this gun owner (read: idiot) injects race into a hypothetical self defense scenario? and in doing so exposes his feelings about guns. this "person" does not own guns in order to prevent crimes, but to commit them against minorities.

secondly, let's the racial component this "person" was compelled to inject and looking at this scenario on it's face. how would a small person defend themselves from a large person? literally anything else. tazer, pepper spray, or a knife would perform the same in terms of self defense while posing less overall risk to the owner.

>i can't refute it so i'll post back a generic leftypol image

Attached: briaghth.jpg (442x381, 22K)

>being an NRA cuck

Attached: 1407533297692.jpg (900x948, 260K)

>Tazers and mace will stop a person just as well as a gun

Attached: 1278.jpg (998x894, 53K)

>tazers
>pepper spray
often ineffective
>knife
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

t. reddit

except guns are supposed to protect homes, and reduce damages/losses from crimes. at least, that is the argument gun owners (idiots) claim.

and it is false. insurance companies have concluded that the danger from owning a gun exceeds any safety it could provide.

those are just nerds who haven't given up on their desire to be socially accepted or people who aren't actually nerds but chose nerdy hobbies out of beta-ness

Attached: 1513843036374.jpg (1245x447, 196K)

Using a knife to fight, when you don't know how to use a knife to fight, is a good way to end up getting stabbed.

Insurance companies will use any excuse to charge people more or payout less. That doesn't prove anything.

wow the gun owners (idiots) got really mad when i started posting. do they hate reality and objective truth that much?

yes

“competent gun control”

t. reddit

these people is too stupid for their own good
when will it end?

Attached: 103082dz.gif (500x250, 498K)

>gun control measures are put in place but people can own pepper spray and tazers
>tfw I just attack people wearing goggles and a heavy jacket that a tazer won't penetrate

>nerds
>doing anything

SHALL

He does realize that literally everyone in Star Wars has some sort of blaster by their side, right?

pic related, it u

Attached: 22539990_10154763193102273_4028581911289038899_n.jpg (960x960, 59K)

JJ has the best life.

tr

Every bad thing that has happened in the world is because of guns.

Attached: 1473786627110.png (980x4398, 883K)

Except shootings in Europe are rare as fuck even by Islamic terrorist, they attack with speeding trucks and cars and even when they get shot multiple times the inertia still causes many casualties

insurance companies give discounts to home owners for putting in safety devices such as alarms and earthquake braces. insurance companies like these things because they reduce the losses from crimes and injuries from disasters, which means the insurance company pays out less.

if guns provided a net increase in safety, insurance companies would give discounts to gun owners because insurance companies would be paying out less on their claims. gun owners get charged extra because they cause more damage and loss. because guns are a net negative in safety.

The ONIONS is strong with this idea.

>it's hard for me to keep the pounds off
More than anything else that faggot wrote, using this phrase suggests he's low test

NOT

Attached: gun qt.gif (275x293, 3.31M)

You can't shoot or stab an earthquake silly.

U should ban cars

No robber breaks into that insurance company building and starts stealing from them with intent to kill whoever they come across. That's what home invasion is. They would definitely see it the other way if they had a semblance of being able to empthaize, putting yourself in a hypothetical situation where "da police will be here any second"

S--O---Y

probably will in like 20 years

giv guns gf

Attached: giv.png (778x512, 45K)

I'm not a burger but aren't the majority of firearm homicides committed by non-whites? So if you pass 'competent' gun control, you'll likely only be disarming non-violent, law abiding whites and leaving them open to predation by minorities?

Also ban grenades

Over 50% of all homicides are committed by Basketball-American males despite making up less than 15% of the population.

>implying beta nerds own guns

Onions

>you should give up your rights because insurance companies say they're bad
Why are amerifats brainwashed to put the interest of corporations over their own?

but you can mitigate the damage and injuries an earthquake could cause.

>"hey what about this made up scenario?? see, a gun would be really useful in this made-up scenario right???"
kek
that situation is exceedingly rare. injuries from guns are far more common. which means, in aggregate, guns are a net negative in terms of safety.

And a gun can mitigate a nigger trying to steal my shit. I don't give a fuck what the insurance company says.

The way SW is right now that´s a good thing.

lets see, which would you rather have
A) inalienable rights
B) only rights considered a safe bet by the profit algorithm of insurance company

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

what in the goddamn

Attached: doesn'tk.jpg (279x413, 39K)

Gun ownership isn't inalienable anyway

t. reddit

Shh user you can't mention race you have to call violent niggers "larger persons".

Wouldn't be sufficient bait to get me off my couch now.

literally unable to make political arguments without star wars and harry potter references

Breech loaded

>it's always people who tell us to live in harmony
Yeah like George Wallace?

I don't see what's reddit about knowing the definition of inalienable

Except it literally is.

t. reddit

I don't get what's so confusing to you. It's a break action bolt action no bolt no action implausible stock assault rifle.

>Breech loaded
The Mannlicher–Carcano was NOT breech loaded

Attached: Carcano-Operation.jpg (650x373, 48K)

Just try and alien it soiboi.

>film twitter thinks nerds still like SW after Disney's clusterfuck

(((david ehrlich)))

Attached: ooga.jpg (640x410, 46K)

Gun grabbers never learn.
I wish these faggots would try something.

Attached: faggotlibs.jpg (475x742, 84K)

>no more star wars until we have competent gun controls
>gun controls are never implemented since nuWars is shit and nobody cares if they never make another

Sounds good to me