Who else here enjoys watching Tucker destroy libs
San Fagcisco resident here.
I like tucker well enough but i've seen two separate youths watching his show on their phone while riding caltrain in the last few weeks.
I think his staunch stance against the Syrian war really made an impact.
He only invites easy targets. If I was on, I would destroy him; much like I'd destroy any of you and your stupid views.
>much like I'd destroy any of you and your stupid views
Fine, give me one of your dumb right wing opinions and I'll dissemble it like your life has since being on Jow Forums.
Fuck off cunt, Id rim your Ass for days blud, fuk up cuz innit
One of the only things I can count on in life...
>dissemble
oh christ
There should be national voter identification. Please use a counter other than 'poor black people can't afford an id'
No, it's up to the district's electors to vote how they want to vote. If they want to vote based on a bunch of fradulent votes, then take it up with the electors of your local election methods. Not a federal issue.
Notice how he hasn't been on after his red pills on Syria.
Funny how every far-left neocon extremist your side sends gets eviscerated on live TV, Tucker isn't even that smart.
If they remove tucker ill boycot fox forever and cancel my satellite radio service.
>your side sends
We don't pick them. His producers do. Easy targets to make idiots feel like they have sound and valid reasoning.
me hi fren!
based!
Let's go bitch, pic an issue. I'll fuck you up.
So you're basically admitting that your side if full of easy targets that collapse with a little bit of scrutiny? lel, no wonder you leftist neocons ONLY thrive in highly censored hugboxes like reddit and facebook.
Tucker is the last person on television who speaks the truth. They are trying so hard to shut him down, the only voice, because all they want is pure poison. 24/7 poison. TV, News, Every single fucking website on the internet. All they want is the world to be poison and destroyed. It's gotten to a point where we're reaching a precipice and something has to happen soon. Indictments, IG report, TRUTH OF ANY KIND. I'm sick of this shit.
He could be better.
>full
Qualify how I said it's full of easy targets instead of a select few; hand picked by Tucker's producers.
>can't defend his own invalid positions so asks to go on offense against mine
typical. Defend your invalid positions or fuck off.
Someone has redpilled Tucker to the point of no return
I wonder how long till he names the J
I don't even watch for the owning of libs anymore, I genuinely enjoy his commentary. He's an actual American Nationalist, an ideological Trumpist even when Trump himself goes astray. I can't imagine the mass redpilling in normie conservative households that this guy is causing.
Ehhhhhhh. Dumb pov.
A stats as large as cali, which can turn federal elections, should be forced to prove the votes arent fraudulent. Ie illegally imported spics voting for more gibs.
Not a single one has eviscerated back Tucker. that really says a lot. Time to send your intellectual lefty heavyweights like Bill Kristol and Alan Dershowitz.
Same, he's the only person on fox that I trust.
Dunning–Kruger syndrome is so common among libtards. Always a pleasure to witness.
>should be forced to prove the votes arent fraudulent
wow so much wrong in just a few words. "should be forced" -- why? If the state government decides to validate a vote, then your issue is with the state government. Take it up with them.
"prove the votes aren't fraudulent" -- proving innocence is not how it works here, bud.
ad hominem is not an arguement
next
San Fagcisco checking in here too, brother.
Hang in there.
Yeah, even I can forgive the lefty civnat shit he says from time to time, that stuff is like catnip for boomers.
Requiringa voter ID would prove the vote isnt fraudulent. Solving the concerns of a nation. Allowing the slow takeover of your nation is the issue here. A few getting power in just a few states could start slowly putting people in offics that werent honestly voted in. How you can argue against this makes me believe you hate America (and yourself).
>I don't have any original thoughts, so I have to stall for time, on a fucking message board.
The absolute state of liberals.
Libtards are slaughtered everyday here. None of your idiotic ideas are defensible, unless you can intimidate or censor your opponents. But its not a argument in your favor.
>Requiring voter ID would prove the vote isn't fraudulent. Solving the concerns of a nation. Allowing the slow takeover of your nation is the issue here. A few getting power in just a few states could start slowly putting people in offices that weren't honestly voted in. How you can argue against this makes me believe you hate America (and yourself).
I'm simply saying that your qualm is with the rogue state you're talking about. They are the ones certifying the vote. If you don't want this state in the union, then have a convention of the states and kick them out. It's not up to the federal government to babysit an individual state's voting process. The electors vote in the federal elections. If they decide to go along with a fraudulent vote, then take it up with the state. The federal government has no jurisdiction. I get your concern, but you have no jurisdiction telling a state's electors how to vote. If they want to vote based on a flimsy likely fraudulent popular vote, then that's their right. Get rid of the state if you can't stand it.
They are upset they could wrong, which implies they arent as smart as their parents told them they were. Liberals often are very emotional, like children are. Even liberals grow up and settle down. Most older liberals become sour and spiteful to everyone. Look at old kikes. Always angry and unhappy. Liberals and lefties are very similar.
Natsoc is natural. Nature always wins in the end.
Most of the time, but he is still just a man, so faults in detail sometimes. At least he is not simply an actor, like most MSM was bread to be.
He is more intelligent than you or any of the left media. Plus he prepares like no other. Get fucked shill cuckboy
>Libtards are slaughtered everyday here. None of your idiotic ideas are defensible, unless you can intimidate or censor your opponents. But its not a argument in your favor.
Can't fine an argument in there. Keep trying, you'll get there.
For me, it's Laura Ingraham.
Federal voter id for federal elections. Im not talking about electing Main Street Joe for town hall.
Tucker is based.
>Fine, give me one of your dumb right wing opinions and I'll dissemble it
God hates fags
>a wall of text failing to answer the basic logic of voting fraud prevention and a complete non sequitur
Such intellectual power. I am amazed.
this
>I genuinely enjoy his commentary. He's an actual American Nationalist, an ideological Trumpist even when Trump himself goes astray.
Well put.
not an argument
So far I've been right. No arguments to be found, just butthurt. You have no valid positions. Can't even attempt to propose one. Hilarious.
>hurr durr i am smug (but deeply butthurt)
Yeah, i enjoy tormenting arrogant idiots.
He has elected Democratic congress people on all the time. You're right, they are easy targets.
So far you deflected the question.
>Federal voter id for federal elections.
That's what I'm talking about to. Federal elections use the elector college. Electors cast their votes from each state. These electors are choosing to cast their vote however they wish. If it's a fraudulent election, and they cast their vote for the fraudulent outcome, then your issue is with the state and it's electors. The federal government has no jurisdiction. This is a republic not a democracy.
He makes a lot of assertions that don't necessarily stem from causation. He's better than most anchors though.
It ends up being a federal issue if every blue district does it. Dumbass.
how so? use logic. Explain what I proposed and how it is invalid or unsound.
>inb4 no valid response
>So far you deflected the question.
Which was?
I only watch rachael madcow show on Msnbc, he talk sense
If the vote is not backed by proven citizenship, aka id, then its meaningless.
Pilpul wont work here you know.
>It ends up being a federal issue if every blue district does it. Dumbass.
You mean it becomes a federal concern. I'm no disagreeing; which is why I suggested you kick said state out. Voter ID by the federal government has no jurisdiction.
Any vote require citizenship. To prove citizenship, you need an id.
If you cannot provide an id, you cannot prove you are a citizen and have a right to vote.
End of story.
I love Tucker but almost can’t watch him anymore, but not for the reason you might think:
His ultra left wing guests are so far out to lunch that they don’t even blink, are totally unphased (almost as if they’ve been completely brainwashed), after he destroys them
Saw one recently where he had a Univ professor on who was taking about her schools policy of using only gender neutral pronouns. Tucker asked her, “How would I say: Did she enjoy herself at the party?” His guest replied “did zhe enjoy zerself at the party”, with a completely straight face.
He made that expression he always does and the left wing college proof just started at him, quiet and dead serious.
I love Tucker but his guests really cement that America is doomed.
>If the vote is not backed by proven citizenship, aka id, then its meaningless.
Incorrect. If a state elector says it's meaningful to how they vote, then it has a lot of meaning. It makes them vote how they vote. If you have an issue with it, take it up with the state elector/state. States are allowed to vote how they want; even based on fraudulent state elections regarding federal issues.
>government has no jurisdiction
Lolwut ?
He's unironically based.
>Any vote require citizenship
Yes the citizenship of an elector in the electoral college should be checked. I assure you, all electors in the electoral college are citizens. And if they choose to vote based on the preference of non citizens, it is well within their right.
LOL okay faggot. You obviously are too scared.
Can't cucc the tucc
federal government. You're not familiar with the difference between state government and the federal government? You have some back ground learning to do before taking part in a discussion regarding american politics. I can't argue with the uninformed.
Thats not how it works.
Vote is based on citizenship.
If you have no proof of being a citizen, you could be anyone. A mexican for example. Its a question of sovereignty.
Ad hominem is not an argument.
next
>I'd destroy any of you and your stupid views
What's it like living in sanfran? I feel like the only way you can live there is if you're a rich liberal, anything else makes you want to kill yourself, or at the least try to set yourself on fire in the middle of a college.
Why white women loves the BBC in 2018?
Government is government. Pilpul doesnt work, i told you.
What does your card says ? Us citizen.
Stop deflecting, pilpul and ad hominem.it wont work.
Lol yeah dont discuss with anyone besides a politician, because fags like me are too scared to debate
You don't seem to understand what the electoral college is. They vote in the president. Each federal election for president; each state sends electors. They vote for the president. They can, but don't have to, vote based on what the people in their states voted for. If they choose to vote for what a bunch of undocumented people want, it's the prerogative. This is a republic, not a democracy. I recommend familiarizing yourself with what the american electoral college is before trying to have a debate on the subject.
next?
You and I both know a state leaving/getting the boot wouldn't happen. If Texas hasn't done it by now, it will never.
You dont seem to understand what is a citizen, a vote, sovereignty and a government. Next ?
>You dont seem to understand what is a citizen, a vote, sovereignty and a government. Next ?
I do. Show me you understand what the electoral college is before we proceed because you're not making any sense. Go ahead.
Well thats just the Illuminati
You're basically giving a pass for states that want to stuff the ballot with illegals and others from other states. There is no reason against voter ID except it demoralizing people who don't have a driver's license in that state, who more than likely are already a waste of space in the country to begin with
Should non citizens be allowed to vote on policy made for citizens then? In large enough numbers their say could over turn what the actual citizens want.
You say that the electors can choose to vote that way but they’re basically forced to vote how the state government wants based on the popular vote of that area, they can’t make the decision on their own opinion. This means that fucking illegals can shift actual policy being made for citizens it would affect
I love the Tucker face followed by a sudden burst of laughter
>I'm sorry - just - thanks for coming. You're welcome anytime baka
>You and I both know a state leaving/getting the boot wouldn't happen.
Probably not. But just because you're between a rock and a hard place with this issue doesn't mean you can justifiably over reach with the federal government. Not how the constitution works, or our system of federal election. You will need to have a convention of the states to amend the constitution. Good luck, but federal voter ID is DOA.
Only citizens should get to vote and technically it should be restricted to landowners or property tax paying citizens at that.
Stop responding to that pretentious pinkfaggot, anons. It worth an entire thread.
No you dont. The fact that some of your regions go rogue just mean they go rogue. And they are not states, just regions with a different name. To be a state you need sovereignty, an army, a currency and citizenship mr us citizen.
Your states will be states if they leave the union.
Next.
>You're basically giving a pass for states that want to stuff the ballot with illegals and others from other states.
I'm not giving a pass. The constitution is giving them a pass. Kick the state out if you can't stand it. Good luck. You're simply not a fan of a republic.
i'm bored, are you libertarian or what? what right wing positions do you consider ill-conceived?
Technically the United States is exactly what it the name implies chum. It's been altered a bit since the ACW though even if through illegal unconstitutional means.
Anyway, I'm a nationalist and right wing. I recommend you people learn how to argue as a lefty faggot too. Otherwise you won't be able to destroy them. Honestly, no one should be allowed to vote unless they can argue validly from the other side convincingly.
well mister trips, its all due to the sexual revolution and media degeneracy. Both feed off of each other and both, of course, created by das juden.
I take a shower and come back to you dancing around everybody's arguments, you're a waste of time.
And your attacking me ad hominem, I invited you to pick a topic, you coward, and you attacked ME.
And you misused the term "ad hominem" fucking brainlet
Same.
Oh, thats why you didn't wanna pick a topic. Fair enough, I went to a far-left arts school and enjoy doing this myself.
>Honestly, no one should be allowed to vote unless they can argue validly from the other side convincingly.
Nah. Landowning tax paying (property taxes) should be the bar.
Technically, the united state is a malformed state with strong regional powers and flawed laws. Which makes the lawyers fat and happy since its full of loopholes.
Fact is, the definition of citizenship, voting rights and sovereignty are not changed suddently because the us has a retarded law. Its common sense for any non burger.
>Nah. Landowning tax paying (property taxes) should be the bar.
Yeah probably. And repeal the 17th.
>>federal election
>>not the federal governments responsibility to ensure its integrity
Why bother having a federal government at all then?