>support the Constitution of the United States at all costs
>believe a purely non denominational, race blind, natural meritocratic, laissez fair, free society within its borders
>acknowledge the right of this nation to protect itself by any means
>also support the right of all other people to self organize in whatever way they see, at any size and form, with little to no intervention
>except the globalist commies, they can suck my wrinkled cock
Anyone else know this feel?
>support the right of all other people to self organize in whatever way they see, at any size and form
So if people wanted a one world govt then you'd be okay with that too?
Can you explain to me what's wrong with a one world govt?
>Can you explain to me what's wrong with a one world govt?
Nothing, but at this stage, it's not going to work. We need a space fairing society for that to work.
Maybe you're putting the cart before the horse. Maybe we need a one world govt before we can become a space fairing society.
One should know that the Yankee race is truly the most superior race of men to have ever lived. None other than the Yankee could have molded such a society, one that harnesses potential to new heights. Wherefore are our United States the destination for those who seek to fulfill their craft and ambition? When such a nation possesses in it the fortitude and ability to craft itself into the biggest of powerbrokers, that nation makes herself a target. The Yankee had made himself the primest of targets— to those predators who wish to blood-let him of his will. These demons of rootless origin whisper a sweet poison into Yankish ears. The lies told by such avaricious vampires go as such: “None is the Yankee”, “Lost is your history, your struggle”, “Succumb yourself to sirens; the feeling is divine”. Liars weave their lies into the fabric of truth, thereby weakening the conscious spirit of those who fall under their spell. Our spirit, the spirit of the Yankee people, has been deliberately subverted and misguided so to weaken our resolve. The coveted gem of the ocean, fair Columbia lie abused and discarded. It is the duty of all her sons to take up arms with the fiery zealotry of a preacher. In her defense, and for her restoration the rootless and their cohorts will feel the divine judgement that awaits them. They guise themselves as lambs speaking nothing but sugary benevolence. But identify him for what he is— and watch his horns emerge, his scales protrude, as he spits a fearsome flame which makes the mightiest of men tremble at the mere sight. If we are to overcome such a two-faced dragon, then we need men with hearts of gold and wills of iron to stand before them— unfettered and unafraid. Let this be the Yankee’s creed: “NEVER SHALL WE GIVE IN, FOREVER ARE WE UNITED AND FREE”
did you miss the last one? Or the one before acknowledging the right of the United States to defend itself?
If I could add anything, it would be that I also support the ability of communities of any size to self organize. But their ability to do so is not at the will or mercy of the United States.
who said this?
I did
You are 100% incorrect. Wrong. This has been the approach and it is invalid. The technology drives the societal changes, not the other way around. Facts of history. Symbiosis with our tools. Mars technology transforms deserts on Earth.
Maybe some of us shouldn’t be. The people who think this is putting the cart before the horse should walk into the ocean.
Yes but you don't speak on behalf of the entire population of the US. What if most Americans at some point in the future decide that they want a one-world government?
if you can escape earth's gravity, you can be space fairing. The ability to do so is dependant on nothing but willpower and energy. I don't see how a singular government has anything to do with space travel.
Well it seems like the advancement in technology is leading more and more towards a globalist society. So either way I predict that we're heading towards a one world government.
>I don't see how a singular government has anything to do with space travel.
You realise that space travel would never have been possible without the government right? Who do you think funds NASA?
>race blind
please user, honestly ask yourself this question.
America was nearly 100% white when the Constituion was drafted, a common animal at zoo’s in england at the time were african tribesmen, do you REALLY think the framers were thinking of blacks when they wrote “all men are created equal”?
A one-world government will be decentralized. A confederation of localized semi-autonomous states. A common bill of human rights.
It simply cannot work any other way given our evolutionary history, our biology and neurology; and it needn’t work any other way. Information has decentralized; energy must decentralize; governments are decentralizing through acts of commerce. The one-world government will emerge naturally, but meddling impatient ego-maniacs want it on their terms. It cannot be on their terms by its very nature. Humans are not blank slates; cows are not chickens.
That would involve the entire world being the United States, voluntarily. Or a suspension of the Constitution.
Of course we are, see above.
Yes, one nations, not one world government. And today its not inconceivable one man with enough money and rockets couldn't do the same on his own. What is your point.
Benjamin Franklin wrote that he dreamed of the day that he could step anywhere in the world and call it his country. Perhaps one day the rest of the world will be so enlightened. As needs are met and opportunities are made available, differences look less important. This doesn’t negate that there are differences, but we’re only starting to understand the complexity of the interactions of our genes. Designer babies, artificial intelligence, automated farming, decentralization, and entertainment all enable individuals to pursue goals. This foolish concept that the state must be a unifying force is nonsensical and contrary to universal human nature. A global society will continue to evolve and will emerge naturally, regardless of the infantile meddling of those who think they’re causing it or will have input on some final form.
I'm inclined to agree with you. We already kinda have that with the UN. I think that a one-world govt would ultimately be beneficial to humanity and I actually think that the laws and the constitution should be based on Anglo-American values.
>That would involve the entire world being the United States
Is that a bad thing?
this is a prediction, the OP was not.
I support self determination, I do not see it as an inevitability.
Okay well I see closer international relations, globalism and ultimately a one-world govt as something we should strive towards. Just my opinion though.
eh, current years is where the govt become religions, people tends to believe a words of mortal men (laws) and how to exploit the law than the words of God (law), it used to be God law first, human law second but now it's the opposite
I completely agree. Whatever emerges must continue to evolve right along with us. We need to fight against something, and space presents that opportunity. There are quadrillions of dollars worth of precious metals in near Earth asteroids. This would prop up the global competing economic exchanges of this organic one-world system for hundreds of years. It will.
Non-whites and small government don't mix. You libertarians are absolutely deluded retards and the world will be a better place when the Mestizos you let into the country have chopped you into bits and feed you to their kids.
Some sort of universal basic income solves this problem. People cause trouble when they are bored or lack a sense of meaning and purpose, and thus they will need goals suggested to them (based on personality and aspirations) by the AI managing their local confederations. As long as initial needs are met through the efficiency of automation and people are able to deal with their impulses appropriately through available resources and ritual, such an organic one-world system will emerge over hundreds of years and be harmonious enough to push us to the next level.
>Is that a bad thing?
It's nearly impossible to believe every group of people on this planet would support the exact rules and definitions and ideals in the Constitution.
I wouldn't agree with any effort to convince them otherwise.
Specifically, I support hereditary monarchism and other forms of absolutism outside of the United States, and find intervention in the name of freedom to be a total fabrication.
those are intrinsically white values
I think if you and twelve other people want to live in peace by yourselves and ask for nothing, you shouldn't have to answer to anyone.
Expand that number to any size community, I will feel the same.
those are intrinsically white values