Marxist revisionism

>argues against a claim that literally nobody made ever
>thinks its wrong to resettle an abandoned settlement for literally no reason
>thinks it matters to make fun of how settlers ate foreign foods for the first time
>consistently focuses on bad behaviors of Europeans while neglecting the bad behaviors of indigenous peoples (like human sacrifice)
It's stupid brainwashing programs like this that make white people hate themselves instead of coming to terms with the brutal but interesting history of our species. Really disgusting desu.

>Native Americans
>fields
Yeah let's just pretend

Also NO ONE said that America was abandoned

Attached: 1523818228168.jpg (431x322, 27K)

I mean empty not abandoned

OK, now I'm pissed. this is pure anti-American hate.

We're fucked. IF this is what American adults let their kids watch and learn, then we are literally fucked as a civilization.

you mean Neocons?

>the pilgrims were commies, then saved themselves by turning capitalist

The only Jew here is you, friend.

They actually employed typical neocolonial politics from the beginning.
1. Start buying some shit, that is mined/fished/hunted on territory disputed by tribes. Preferably something what you actually need.
2. Each tribe wants european technological goods, especially guns and quality steel. Do not let them accumulate gunpowder tho.
3. They start war and kill each other, while colony roots for the underdog.
4. Part of losers lands go to colony and the winner tribe, that was weaker to begin with is even more weakened.
5. Stop buying shit from p.1
6. Repeat 1-5, until you have enough lands and people to wipe out the weakened winners.
7. Wipe out weakened winners warriors, allow others to have some lands in reservation.

IDK what neocommies say on that low quality propaganda show (watched some episodes to have the impression), but If they said my points, they said the actual true history.

Attached: 1078-tfb.jpg (900x191, 17K)

Read history, and not the history written by Jews. They said it themselves.

It's a show called Adam Ruins Everything on TruTV

>believing in the false dichotomy of communism vs capitalism
>applying it to a time before either actually existed

That goes without saying. Quit reading into my words and listen to my point.

This guy is the definition of a beta faggot

Most of that didn't happened until after the trail of tears, as native americans were to busy dying of the plague to stat attacking each other for the remaining lands.

By using their words, you've already bought into their premise and therefore already lost. Both of those ideologies are Jewish solutions to Jewish problems.

Didn't this guy make this same videos for Cracked before they collapsed under their own anti-western, anti-white hate? (i.e. people stopped watching)

Why on Earth would you take the cancer that killed somebody and give it to yourself?

Attached: 1512561314528.jpg (1018x728, 141K)

Is that Chris Parnell doing the narration? Fuck I'm mad now.

>pre-built homes
yeah but did they have agriculture in any form? How about irrigation? It makes sense that they would take advantage of the abandoned village as it likely was in a strategic place close to fresh water.
>they ate corn and beans that Indians had buried years earlier
Yeah, why wouldn't they take advantage of this? The Indians are dead remember?

this guy is such a fucking faggot. Here's alt-hype completely deconstructing his bullshit video about the Suburbs and how horribly racist they are:
youtube.com/watch?v=D7E_Ss5OwWQ

>Dichotomy is a jewish word

>did they have agriculture in any form? How about irrigation?

Yep and plenty more, but pilgrims literally took anything valuable from their shallow graves.

Attached: Indian-Farm.jpg (600x816, 168K)

I wonder how it feels to be as pathetic as a communist
Finding tiny bits of socialism related actions to claim communism is at hand and natural
They must have orgasms when they hear about someone lending pencils in gender studies class.

>cherrypicking the only non Jewish word there

Capitalism and communism originally were both identified and defined by Karl Marx

youtube.com/watch?v=k8PQXiJiLOY

Attached: 1522569242173.jpg (716x516, 236K)

Oh, is this image supposed the one time where settlers tried to establish communism, but it ended up in starvation?

>He thinks Karl Marx invented any of that

He stole the definitions from school textbooks.

>Adam ruins everything
Adam ruins everything Adam ruins everything Adam ruins everything Adam ruins everything Adam ruins everything Adam ruins everything Adam ruins everything Adam ruins everything Adam ruins everything Adam ruins everything Adam ruins everything Adam ruins everything Adam ruins everything Adam ruins everything Adam ruins everything Adam ruins everything Adam ruins everything Adam ruins everything Adam ruins everything Adam ruins everything Adam ruins everything Adam ruins everything Adam ruins everything Adam ruins everything Adam ruins everything Adam ruins everything

The name of the show, is self-evident

He ruins his own show.
The man is literally unlikable.
I don't see how people watch it.
Usually the "suit makes the man" but he's so bad that even dressing well does nothing. He's one of those people who jack off in the morning, something looks way off and uncharismatic and low energy about him and that would explain it. Even his wig looks worse than him being actually bald.
There is nothing you can do to make him NOT ruin a thing.

>He's one of those people who jack off in the morning
???

One job.

This is his idea of a roadmap to "making it in LA"

Just ponder how fucking pathetic that is. His grand plan is a late-night comedy talk show to parrot Democrat Party lines, guaranteed. Because those are in demand.

this guy needs to invest in better recording asap if he wants to really go anywhere, clear audit puts you on the scene for real

You can just tell whenever someone does it before work, or class, they come in, are anti-social. they have a weak voice. never focus. You need to explain something to them more than once.

From the comments:

>The settlers almost starved. They didn't know how to survive in New England winter. This harrowing experience illustrated the need for slaves and thus began the Atlantic slave trade. America was founded on genocide and sustained by slavery. Hard truth. It doesn't make you personally responsible but it does mellow down you a lot.

This is what's being taught in American colleges no doubt.

That photo was taken in 1904, and about 2500 miles from the Plymouth region.

Nothing in this case is wrong.

>Chilean education

You ever read "Law of Success"?
The author mentions this too somewhere in it about how it gets rid of charisma.

If you're asking if Indians farmed, they obviously did.

>They didn't know how to survive in New England winter
How is a New England winter different to an English or European winter, in that in requires advanced Winter Skills?

Except for the fact that he's saying it was wrong for people to take advantage of an abandoned village. Why exactly was it wrong for the pilgrims to do so?

>Incapable of reading a 243 page book.

Some groups of Natives did, I don't believe there was evidence of New England agricultural systems.

You're kidding right? Half of the justification for colonization was that the land was empty anyway.

The other half was to spread Christianity.

Didn't they all end up dying of disease and starvation anyway? The Plymouth colony anyway, right?

It would be more accurate to say, that it has happened from day one, rather than after ToT meme.

As for turkeys and thanksgivings - having a gun you can hunt a bird, that has never seen a gun en masse. People around freshly built GULAG where hunting birds and eating very well, this is documented.

First meetings has likely ocured around the hunting and gun deals. That was also the way to spread eueopean diseases directly to local nomad elite and thus - quickly gain the upper hand on the west coast.

Interestingly enough - there where no pandemies in Russian America. There where also no expansionist wars, only trade deals and defending the tribes working for the trade companies.

The story of the pilgrims and first settlers of America is an amazing story of tenacity, will, strength, and hope. It is a story that would interest and inspire any schoolkid, but until we end the Jewish domination of academia, no one will ever learn it. Our children are being deprived of their history.

How come native Americans and Australian aboriginals and Africans didn't colonise Europe/Asia instead? How could equal civilisations be mistaken for savages, since they were equal?

They did farm. That's why they had sedentary settlements. They cultuvated corns, beans, and squash.

Most people would see it as disrespectful if you flat out rob graves.

Like 100 million Indians died from being exposed to European diseases, biggest non-extinction event I know of.

We have the diaries of the pilgrims were they opnely admit to rob graves and to peacefully deal with indians, but somehow "history" is like your western movies.

I'm talking about the pilgrims themselves. Judging by the OP subject, I was thinking this video would be about how the Pilgrims were communists or some shit.

You stay away from my cartoons.

Attached: 72B8B398-1EA5-4FC2-9992-C2B048A180E0.jpg (500x372, 42K)

That's like asking why China didn't. Circumstances are different. For one seafaring peoples did spread across the islands of the Pacific.

I never said they were technological equals though. Just that it wasn't empty.

All leftists should be made to watch their children be fed to hyenas before being hanged. If we did this once, we'd only have to kill about 40% of the population and it would resolve every problem in our society.

Attached: Mussolini_Stellaris.jpg (1366x728, 123K)

It's over retard, nature isn't fair.
Stop crying.
Vae victis
Doesn't matter what they did. They were more advanced and prevailed. This is the way of nature.

>asking why China didn't
Are you suggesting Chinese people didn't spread and colonise?

They were too busy holding hand being one with nature.

They believed all the land belonged to everybody, which is why they had "warrior" as a societal role, because they were such peace-loving communists who shared all of their land and food with each other.

Great Grandfather told me so.

Attached: captured.jpg (325x499, 56K)

Not really. They conquered new land, but that's like saying Rome colonized Syria. It doesn't fit the definition. That's just empire building.

You can at most say that they colonized Taiwan, but that's it.

Who you are are weak, cultureless people, and what you do is tirelessly fight on behalf of the kikes to help them ruin more culture and destroy more civilization.

Period. There is no ambiguity here. What you THINK you do doesn't make a lick of difference to anyone. What you do in fact is self-evident. You're a footsoldier for the Establishment, end of discussion.

College Humor, but yeah same thing

Oh and there I thought the first white settlers just spawned pylons by channeling their white privilege for 30 seconds!

Literally fabricating a myth on top of "myth busting" a strawman. Classic jewry.

Clear audit?
Explain please leaf, Im very interested in recording stuff.

>Adam ruins everything

We need ruin human consciousness and make existence un-enjoyable for everybody.

>nature isn't fair.
>Pilgrims would have died without food or shelter

>You dont understand Marxslam kafir

Onions is an acronym now?

Yeah (((peacfully))).
> We just sold you guns in exchange solely for that beaver heads you hunted on disputed lands. Din du nuffin.

I bet glass beads meme comes from some deal, when they sold locals painted glass instead of bullets.

But we have to consider, that locals where dumbasses. Fighting with each other, instead of uniting to withstand the gun dealer.
Or fighting companies, that where defended by Russian trade companies with guns and no deals to undermining partners economy, instead of uniting under their command and protection and have productive trade relationships, that will allow them to at least defend their western boarder.

It is not like some anglo or jews entered their ranks and made them take these decisions.

> nature isn't fair
Say it to yourself, when someone does something unfair to you.

>First pilgrims had guns to sell.

True. Europeans often used tribal rivalries to their benefit. Kind of like how France often intervened in the squabbling of the Italian principalities for their own benefit.

It's not that big of a deal, it just inculcates a false sense of superiority and security within our enemies and allows us to obliterate them more easily in arguments.
History is one area where we fucking crush the progressives all the time. Watching their spastic eyes glaze over when they know they are being totally outclassed is also so fucking priceless.

>sermonizing
>reddit spacing
Why do you ruin everything.

You sound fairly convinced of your revisionist version were savage injuns killed each other.

youtube.com/watch?v=oT7B6m8fKKA

Attached: hippies.jpg (618x480, 107K)

Why are swastikas always backwards?

That's the native american symbol.

Attached: edgygranny.jpg (540x763, 89K)

Personal conduct and cooperation is essential for survival.
There is a difference between conflict over the course of time and treating someone within he society in question with respect.

>Most people would see it as disrespectful if you flat out rob graves.
Yeah I was speaking about the "using abandoned village" part, which he seems to treat as equally bad. Nobody supports grave robbing but that doesn't mean the Pilgrims were unanimously evil like he implies.

Do you honestly think the people who constructed ships to sail across 3000 miles of ocean with the intention of settling in a wilderness couldn't have constructed fucking basic lodging? Like they did in Roanoke and Jamestown?

You had.... one job.

Adam ruins the Holocaust when?

>Communist don't believe in private property
>Bitch about Pilgrims taking property

not really revisionist but some of the choices are really weird

take the wedding ring one for example. Anyone with a brain knows that a wedding ring isnt "NEEDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" like they try to pass off as it is. Its called tradition. How they are that blind to it is beyond me.

I want to see "Adam Ruins Martin Luther King"
>hey guys, so MLK was a civil rights leader and obviously one of the greatest men ever right? Well, what if I told you that he was an avowed communist who was controlled by Jewish handlers that wouldn't let him take a shit without consulting them first?
>Oh, and did you know that he plagiarized more than half of his senior thesis at Boston College? Just took it directly from another author, not even subtle in the slightest. But that's OK because he was officially forgiven of this transgression by BC decades after his death
>Oh yeah he also fucked prostitutes in huge orgies, fathering at least 2 children with them out of wedlock

so is what he said in the video true? They did not build their own colony? Did others actually build their own colony?

It was empty compared to Europe. Ultimately all that matters is that the Indians couldn't keep their land theirs, so they lost it. The same principle applies to every nation, ethnicity, and state.

Why didn't the pilgrims get wiped out by dirty, smelly savage diseases?
Something about population density?
Genuinely curious and too hungover to think for myself.
Spoon-feed me.

Use this argument against Israel taking Palestinian's land.
"Well, you did it, so why can't we?"

Gradually, I began to hate them.

*indian
There fixed it for you.

Natives had no immunity to the diseases the europeans brought over before pilgrims got there

The ultimate redpill is that both sides are horrible and they both deserve to be wiped out because the land belongs to Christians.

The first thanksgiving in the New World with natives was almost 60 years before the pilgrims. It was the Spanish in St. Augustine Florida

Attached: 0da926286e63a654cf74e0503dc1e02f.jpg (940x492, 108K)

Palestine was no where near empty as the Americas

Attached: 0woSEMB.jpg (640x640, 69K)

The Spanish were the fucking worst, when it came to treatment of the Indians.