Why are you against a wealth tax Jow Forums?

They are already paying 50% of all taxes, do you want to take away all their wealth? Have fun living in Venezuela. I would much rather be poor in the west than rich in Africa

>we vote to the top 1% funded politicians so they can tax the top 1%
Alright.

the people who you'd hit the hardest would be people who worked hard their whole lives and retired
most rich people don't exactly have liquid assets, which means you can't tax them, it's simply not possible
something like a tax on luxury goods would probably be the easiest way to tax the rich, but then you're putting entire sectors of the economy at risk

Kill yourself, soiboi.

Attached: CommunismVsRichPeople.jpg (878x603, 91K)

i don't think you understand, just tax net worth over say 10 million. if you don't pay your asset is confiscated.

>They are already paying 50% of all taxes
>he believes in this
Retard

>Have fun living in Venezuela.
Even more retard

>I would much rather be poor in the west than rich in Africa
ITT 16 year old just finished reading Atlas Shrugged and thinks he's an economist now.

>the goys are onto me

The greatest argument against capitalism is to show the ethnic make up of the top 0.1%.

No more surefire way to get them to leave your country than force them to gain as much money every year than they lose via taxes.

You just want a system that disincentivizes earning money, so everyone is equally just barely surviving.

I am super conservative and about as right wing as you can get about every single issue except this one.

the 1% are a big fucking problem. I dont begrudge anyone their success and I think the 1% probably in most cases deserve to be in the 1%. BUT the 1% is simply too rich. they own literally everything.

If I were in charge I would make a law stating that the highest paid employee at any company or conglomerate can only make 25X what the lowest paid employee makes. including bonuses and anything else.

that way if you lowest paid employee only makes 15k per year then your top paid employee can only make 375K. CEO wants a raise? well then you better figure out how to raise the wages of your workers.

you're a dumbass if you truly believe this. Most of these richfaggots have their money on offshore banks for that purpose exactly, to avoid taxing

they can leave the country but they can't take the asset with them

It's more like 90%. Almost half of amerimutts have a negative tax rate

This is basically property tax on everything you own (above say first 10 million). It doesn't matter if you leave the country, you still owe property tax every year.

you idiot - USA could easily make the superrich pay up

>Jow Forums: FUCKING JEWS RUN HOLLYWOOD AND THE MEDIA ALL THE NETWORK CEOS AND PERSONALITIES ARE JEWISH THE FED IS CONTROLLED BY JEWS ALL THE FOREIGN WARS ARE INSTIGATED BY THE JEWS GASS THE KIKES RACE WAR NOW
>yeah, they also control two-third of the world's wealth
>Jow Forums: yeah, but they've earned that by working hard. It would be wrong to punish them for their success. Taxation is theft, you know...

The world is run by a cult of like 30-40 families or so. What makes you think you're going to pass any kind of tax that would actually effect them?

Any kind of tax like this would only effect some Oil company CEOs at best, and then the (((media))) would pretend like this is some major victory. Meanwhile the real problem remains the same as always. As long as the real hidden powers are still alive there's not going to be much of a change. This is like the goofy people that think that all we got to do is audit the FED and then the world would just fix itself. Goofballs!

Increase property taxes out the ass if they leave the country.

>ein verdammtes Blatt
pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/04/13/high-income-americans-pay-most-income-taxes-but-enough-to-be-fair/

Attached: py1dloX.jpg (800x800, 173K)

An excellent way to make fortune 500 companies move their headquarters overseas.

They will just have management as employees and everyone else is an outside contractor. Easily exploitable.

Don't worry the one paying the lion share of taxes is your white dad's cuck white ass slaving away for 120k a year being all proud of being the bestest scheckel slave in the office.

Then at the end of the year he pays half of it to the government leaving him with 60k barely enough to fund the car's insurance and housing taxes while sustaining his family on GMO soii enhanced nutriments.

To cope he imagines that he owns his boss Larry Schickelsneezer for paying so much taxes to the state out of his million paycheck. Unbeknownst to him Larry has a personal full time accountant and lawyer, a trust fund and established tax dodging routine. Growing bigger every year and buying more revenue enhancing investment until his dynasty will join the high powered Jewish aristocratic circles and directly participate in the law making process

This is your fate goy. Accept it. Be grateful. Go get in a street fight with those commie bastards and fuel our sensational newspaper narratives about rising radicalism.

Attached: 1524104182326.jpg (1024x806, 85K)

>We must tax the rich so the rich people in the government have more money!

Leftists are such retards, holy shit

Attached: medieval leftists we need to pay more taxes.png (563x515, 281K)

that might work for certain financial companies but if they do any business in the United States I would tax them at that rate anyway.

if they want to play ball in the US it would be under those rules or not at all.

The point is that they make way too much fucking money. they are greedy kikes that care absolutley nothing for their fellow man. this makes them a shit person. as a shit person i dont care about their rights whatsoever.

contractors would be considered employees under the law.

the law wouldnt be one sentence long. all loopholes would be closed.

its a shortsighted plan. sure you screw some rich people at the beginning, but then they would never move money into the country again.

Don't try to constantly control the tax rate, by that time it's gotten to it's destination.

Try to control instead the flow of the money and expand the middle class, ensuring a better distribution of the money that people can get by working and making a life for themselves.

Attached: 1511987421588.png (773x768, 544K)

because it never really affect the (((1%))). that would be antisemitic

And then they are no longer wealthy, everyone starves. Welcome to socialism 101.

most of that money is invested though. it doesn't make sense to have more than a few million in cash.

>100k isn't even an extravagant amount anymore
No it really isn't in fact it's kind of the "benchmark of success" if that makes sense.

you are making an argument against taxes
yet a few posts back you imply it is bad that people arent paying enough taxes?

Because it wont work, it will be used only on the middle and working class instead and then the money will be given to the top 1% through government subsidies.

these endless articles about the 1% are basically just triumphant boasting by rich cunts disguised as the voice of the common man. we can't do anything about it, because they control every army in the world. shit's fucked.

>Germany
Shouldn't you be attending your mandatory anal service session by Syrian refugees? Merkel needs more Aryan babies sacrifice to maintain her 20 year 'totally not a dictatorship' reign.

>pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/04/13/high-income-americans-pay-most-income-taxes-but-enough-to-be-fair/
>"""""""high income"""""""""
That's what you call a goy workaholic that earns 300 grands a year

>be top 0.01%
>pay 10% of total profits through dodging routines
>get public contract to provide a service for 2 times the regular price
The ultimate state of Goys

Attached: 1520541603840.png (979x735, 555K)

If you are making 6figgy, you doing ok. Unless you are in metro areas like NYC LA DC. Then you are still poor as fuck.

yeah lets tax the cartels heroin while were at it
wait how do we find the cartels heroin to start taxing them

>trump and his base wish to return to the glory days of 1950s america
>1950s (fuck yeah america)
>the corporate tax rate was 50%
>2018 (hellscape)
>the corporate tax rate is 20%
>many top corporations pay 0% trough tax havens, effectively stealing from their country of origin, usa
>BRO IF YOU WANT TO RAISE TAXES ON THE CORPORATIONS, ROBBER BARONS OR ULTRA-WEALTHY YOU'RE A FUCKIN' COMMUNIST ONLY GOOD COMMIE IS A DEAD COMMIE
>happymerchant.jpg

Attached: 1521559376872.png (506x575, 342K)

that's such a plebeian mindset. net worth means their entire value. it's broken up into the entities they hold stakes in.

it would be kind of complicated to tax jeff bezos net worth because you'd have to start skimming shit off of entities he has control or interest in and that starts affecting those entities and how the fuck does that even work?

"... 81.91 million shares of Amazon, just over 17% of the firm" do they start selling off his shares against his or the company's best interest? then the government controls them and resells them? that doesn't seem safe at all. does that affect his standing with his control in the company? jeff bezos doesn't have a quadrillion dollars. he has a quadrillion dollars in shit in weird places. you don't just get him to pay a dollar tax, he'd have to start selling off his assets which changes the businesses which may affect how they're run and employees etc etc

>tax the rich
>there is less incentive to make businesses
>taxing the rich only gives money to the government which is already literally taxing anything and everything if there is a money transaction associated with it
Yeah right lmao, that’s pussy talk “durr I’m at the bottom so why can’t rich people be at the bottom durrr”

>the corporate tax rate was 50%
no it wasnt?

Attached: nobodytax.png (974x730, 692K)

Prescriptions on the rich have never worked out well for anyone in all of history.

what if all of the people pull out all of their money from the banks at once?
obviously the banks dont't have that money so the whole system will collapse people will riot and we will get rid of this jewish system.

Attached: 1511715721486.png (645x729, 58K)

Sometimes I wonder if it'd be worth allowing for a few years of revolutionary chaos so we can just clear the slate and destroy the dynasties that currently rule the world

If you increase taxes on the wealthy in one country or one state, they will just move their assets to where they don't. Before long your tax base will have shrunk and you will have less gov't revenue.

Unless you can implement a global tax these "lets tax the rich" schemes will never work long term in a global market.

>can't even use google

I'm making the argument that ethnic Jews and those that are spiritual Jews are earning most of what society produces without themselves being responsible for or the key to that production (replaceable and nepotistic).

Even if they paid 90% of their revenues in taxes (which they don't) they would still be pocketing an unwarranted amount of money.

At the end of the day, they barely pay any taxes thanks to the power of having enough money to make more money than anyone else. The one who will end up producing the majority of the wealth and pay the majority of taxes is you if you get out of your basement and achieve a successful career. Slaving away for a pittance pay while someone more powerful than you pockets what you worked for. The eternal goy.

1950s meme can't happen because the world is more connected now. If you had any kind of large tax then the rich would just gtfo of your country and you get nothing from them.

And what makes you think that those dynasties wont survive the chaos stronger than before?

Sounds like a black person blaming white people for their problems.

>if I just edit this meme then facts and numbers will suddenly become meaningless

oops they moved and took all their shit with them. hmm

So . When taxes on net wealth transfer wealth to you, do you get taxed on that wealth too since you know you have wealth too now.

>Not realizing they can just offshore and the high taxes only affect smaller business, thus leaving even less competition for the Jews.
You literally don't even understand an inkling of the argument

How do you tax net worth when asset classes are taxed far more than anything non asset holders are taxed for?

Exactly. 100k is a solid income for anyone in the upper middle class.
My mum, dad, and stepdad make about 100k with their own respective businesses(my dad's a local sports radio/tv host, my mum has a PR agency, and my stepfather is a military contractor), they're all solid and wouldn't strike you as obstensibly wealthy either.

And that's assuming there's no debt involved. My mother, who makes just under 100k, drives a 10 year old subaru outback. I'm 19 and am on track to do about 60k this year and can afford better.

Bro. So what you're saying is that the people of a nation shouldn't starve, should have access to basic healthcare and have opportunities to climb out of their current class? What are you a fucking communist? You know what I do when my blood relations ask me for money? Go get a job you fucking commies. No such thing as a free lunch, unless you're born into general wealth built from exploiting the poor in the early 20th century. Israel has the right to defend itself.

But when the CEO’s decisions bring in 5 million extra corporate profits and the lowest paid employee’s descisions create no real profits. Why should he get a raise?

nice try, commie.

>you're a dumbass if you truly believe this
I didn't even state anything about what I believe. Work on reading comprehension.

Dumb.

The "world is more connected now" is just a meme my friend. Another narrative to keep the proles from rebelling against their masters. Find someone over the age of 70 and ask them if they think the world is "more connected" now.

Rich families are good at being rich. You will never, ever get them to redistribute their wealth. They are inherently more powerful, influential, and educated.

I think this entire thread is a paradox. Its a fantasy of imposing rules on the people who have majority holding of the thing that is used to make and impose rules.

I know right? Fuck those honest hardworking people who just want to live their life and provide for their family. No such thing as a free lunch for honest hardworking people. Fucking commies. Only good commie is a dead commie is what I say.

>Exactly. 100k is a solid income for anyone in the upper middle class.
Kek. These goys. Also that's 55k. Because u gotta pay ur taxes and not burden the rich too much k?

>I'm 19 and am on track to do about 60k this year
getaloadofthisgoy.jpg

Is no one willing to address real issue in which majority wealth which sits at the top remains at the top immobile. It's not so much matter that wealth is flowing ever upwards it is that inordinate amount remains there.

Attached: George Gissing.jpg (1181x1625, 795K)

>The greatest argument against capitalism is to show the ethnic make up of the top 0.1%.
That's not anti-capitalism, its anti-jewish. Jews made up the top 1% in communist systems too.

I honestly think that neither real capitalism and real communism haven't been tried because jews have gotten in the way of both each and every time to their own benefit.
It doesn't matter what type of organism you have, its not healthy if it has a parasite; and jews are a huge parasite draining the health of every possible organization of a society.
Ovens first. And then we can find out honestly which is better between communism/capitalism.

I like the idea of having higher property tax for foreign investors/owners. Could make a nice counter to Obamas policies allowing them to buy out the bottom of the crash.

These.

Time to wrap this up boys. The Jews are in control of your society and nothing you do or say will change this fact. Pay your taxes and defend lowering them for the top 1% because that may encourage David Wolff the Job creator to create one extra part time job for your business school graduated cousin.

>This is like the goofy people that think that all we got to do is audit the FED and then the world would just fix itself.
It would reveal the scope and enormity of the problem, document it, and make it public. So its an obvious first step

We print the money out of thin air user. Hell we could invalidate the money the rich holds if we wish.

Here, read the Nazi economic plan. They literally print money out of thin air to create jobs.

Attached: 1505609109314.png (1680x1970, 266K)

evil

Real asset can not be moved, if you don't pay you can not own any American assets. You can not make any money off of America.

(((1%)))

Attached: 1523252410765.jpg (900x900, 156K)

Owning companies is also a form of property, tax those as well. Without asset the rich can not make money at all.

The only thing I'm against regarding wealth, is stagnant wealth.

Money pooled that isn't flowing. The entire purpose of a currency is in its movement. I don't care if the rich are spending it on expensive yachts etc, ship builders are still being employed from it, people are hired to maintain it, etc, etc.

But money that stagnates has no value to the world. Move it. Invest it. Spend it. I don't give a fuck what you do with it, just keep it moving!

One caveat though... don't fucking give it to charities. That shit kills local economies that are trying to get back on their feet.

That's a brilliant way of getting a lot of money today and absolutely nothing in the next decade.

well with american taxes and a couple of well placed foreign accounts tax can be all but eliminated on all income except for your salaried job.

For example, in high school I had a job at a landscaping company - whichw as taxable income - however the money I made dropshipping and such was kept entirely out of the country(I'm a dual irish citizen).

It's REALLY not that hard user. In 2018 you HAVE to have more than one revenue stream to be successful. Try digital marketing, the shit people teach in those scamcourses, when applied, can actually work well. Just don't buy anything to get started

Sure, they we tax them via tarrif.

Just because America is the biggest market and everyone wants to make money off you doesn't mean it will stay that way over the years regardless of what decisions you make.

See but part of the problem is savings is good for the individual despite it being bad for the macroeconomy

>The top 1% of athletes are on track to control two-thirds of the world's olympic medicals by 2030

>Jews made up the top 1% in communist systems too.
Yeah because they're the ones who started and controlled the revolution while being paid by the capitalistic Germans (gee I wonder who was behind the decisions made in Berlin).

>real capitalism
We have real capitalism. It's the real deal. Money is power. Allow people to accumulate money and you allow them to directly accumulate power with which they secure more money and more power until a top 0.1% rises above the others.
Jews will always be better than non Jews at getting to that 0.1% but even if they didn't exist you would get the closest equivalent to a kike running your country.

If you don't put a soft cap on wealth you will run into the same troubles over and over.

And the nazi economy would have collapsed on its own weight in a couple of years if the war hadn't started, so what is your point?

So what state do you live in, and what race are you?

You sound like the hispanics from California.

>cate-berg institute
0/10
>axes go up and quality of life goes down
ah this explains europe

Attached: 1213954383245.gif (4692x2568, 2.71M)

That's unequivocal and you know it.

1. THEY WON'T PAY
2. the governments will set it at some limit that we'll all hit in 20 years, thus taking more of our shit
3. THE NEVER PAY

I'm not, stop acting like pol is one person with one set of ideals faggot

Attached: do the evolution.gif (500x279, 522K)