How come no one can out debate Johnny olive?

he is a propagandist, not a debater

Attached: john oliver .jpg (1200x531, 195K)

he has people to do his research, dumbass
preparation is key

Where

Whoever made that post sounds like a pretty dumb psychologist, operant conditioning and mechanistic stimulus response models were discredited in the 60s.

Interesting that you saved that image, perhaps you liked the idea so much that you didn't ask yourself any critical questions about it. It's reasons like this that alt-right weenies have no response to educated people. You're ignorant enough not to know your own ignorant and educated people can run rings around you.

Because he tells the truth.

>I hate that guy so much I abuse real bongs over him.

They're not sending their best folks

Attached: 1515652093248.gif (163x118, 422K)

does he even have guests on his show?

He doesn't debate or argue he just spouts
It's like trying to argue on Jow Forums after saying ''as a black man'' and getting 900 posts calling you nigger

Why would you want to debate a retard?

post scientific studies showing the discrediting please

Attached: 1502769973016.jpg (320x338, 24K)

> (OP)
>Crowder is the man.

luke warm at best

like him

but I can literally see the X's that he sharpies on the outsides of his hands, high school choir levels of cool

because all Oliver needs to do is to back up his opinions with fact beforehand and then point at them during the debate

the opposition with the go "b-but muh fake news"

I didn't realise he started doing debates with some of the best right wing voices he could find, where do I find the show?

Attached: John Oliver BTFO.png (1944x588, 245K)

we deserve the abuse more for James Corden desu

They're your cunts now

I can confirm that watching his show did make me feel uneasy every time he quoted let's say one of Trump's arguments and then the audience laughed like it was completely retarded, when in fact it made sense. they do this with everyone on the right. Ann Coulter says "hispanic immigration is hurting black people"

*audience laughs like hyenas*

"Oi, uryah raysis o samtin m8?"

*audience laughs like hyenas*

In fact, most left wing shows do this. They usually put a right winger into a room full of left wing speakers with a completely left wing audience and make right wingers' opinions seem irrational or silly.

One of the things I always liked about Milo Yiannopoulos is that he always allowed leftists to interupt him or ask him questions and he would roast them in front of a right wing audience, something you don't get to see very often.

I'm curious to see how operant conditioning was discredited.

I'm seeing the term "discredited" used to say that it doesn't cover the entire range of human learning. Which seems like a pretty weak use of the word.

Attached: 1507345845385.jpg (1200x949, 87K)

>positive and negative reinforcement don't exist
You sound like someone who is desperate to be seen as intelligent so you contrive straw men to denigrate

nah man, he's gonna come back with those studies any minute now...

Attached: sam.jpg (29x33, 1K)

Yea - this - Crowder seems nice and all but I haven't heard anything original out of him, besides his comedy sketches which, imo are usually not very good, or even original when I think about it).

Gavin is the shit - not sure he's good a debating or not lol

Unironically Shapiro. He deconstructs them quite well. I mean as long as there is no criticism of Israel or foreign wars he's ok.

>you're just ignorant and stupid

Attached: 1519899575567.png (500x457, 258K)

Gavin was my favorite when he was doing TGMS.
He sold out big time for his new show.
That greasy bastard belongs on an uncensored medium.

I haven't watched his new show much, but he would often bring new points of view - that I often disagreed with but at least they were new. How much is his new show censored?

>"Debate"
>Opponent makes an argument
>Its *current year*!
>You cant be serious cant you? Your ideas dont give everyone rainbows and candy? Do you hate people or something?
>Opposotion refutes that hisnideology doesnt do that either, and is more likely to fail and make things worse
>HAHAHAHA You think Im here to argue FOR anything? Im just a SATIRIST you racist! I dont have to come up with alternatives
Same as Trevor "Kill the Bo-ah" Noah. They cant argue, because they cant hold a stance, which means they can be refuted. That or they speak in dumb, naive platitiudes.
>Everyone is equal
>Acrually, people are diverse and inherently unequal in ability and capacity
>AAH THIS GUY SAYS WERE NOT EQUAL, BOO HIM!

>how come no one can out debate Johnny olive?

When has "Current Year" Oliver ever debated anyone? All I seen him do is give a one sided view of things on his show, then HBO turns on the laugh track and viola~! Instant propaganda easily digestible for the stupid. Socialism doused with chocolate covered humor to mask the underlying bitterness and group-think.

Attached: e4628587f0810da1b2987d144cb5ec04e925feac7746f238ffd45e73144dd53a_1.jpg (549x818, 55K)

Also Gavin's 2nd appearance on JRE is pretty hilarious (I don't remember the first much). He's basically trolling the entire time and Joe can't figure him out.

Also when he did that interview with Tucker on whatever show that was. "who's watching this?!?" - that may be the best of Tucker and Gavin that there is on the web, imo

>pretending to be this disconnected

His influence has been steadily growing amongst normies, HBO keeps increasing his budget to let him pursue more of his retarded ideas in response

He doesn't actually make the "current year" argument, it's just a dumb strawman. He does however argue from the radical demoliberal position, and there is nothing wrong with that per se.

Because other people are just con-artists, shills and retards. At least he is a smart shill.

Pavlov’s dogs bongnigger

>Doesn't actually debate face to face
>Makes carefully crafted comedic bullshit liberal story that lasts 20 minutes and takes tons of things out of context, then adds some loud yelling/funny part to make it seem legit.
>People post of Facebook, thinking comedian is all knowing
>Even if his shit is debunked "Whatev, I'm just a comedian"

>were discredited in the 60s.
Discredited because of political inconvenience, or discredited by the scientific method? It's actually impossible to have a reasonable conversion with you people because you have no grasp on reality and no interest in an honest dialectic. You are the peak dunning-Kruger demographic--people with average to slightly above average IQ's that don't know what you don't know.

dailycaller.com/2016/10/07/hacked-emails-tie-hbos-john-oliver-directly-to-clinton-foundation-video/

I never meant it as an actual point, I was making the point that his shows basis in comedy is a cop out for saying all his failings are "satire" yet still allows him to throw criticisms out left and right. He dances around his rral views so that he is spared from refutation.

>Crowder is a basedboy
FTFY

If you don't have cable, chances are that you don't he's still on the air. What are his ratings nowadays?

Scroll to the top of the page, click the image in the sticky

There have the foundation for his entire show

You didn't ask me, and I don't know about his TV ratings, but they throw a lot of those segments up on youtube now and they get millions of views.

kek, that black dude thought he was a jew but was smart enough not to say it. I did too but undoubtedly he's not. oh well.