Where will we be in 30 Years?

Okay, so I'm largely going to focus on the impending civilizational collapse as that's far more likely than dystopia in my mind. I want to go over this in broad strokes without too much focus on specificity for the sake of length, but if there's something that you want elaboration on, just ask and I'll go a little more in-depth.

I say collapse is more likely than dystopia at this point because we've checked a number of boxes that have, in every other instance in human history, resulted in civilizational collapse. What you're seeing now isn't new, it's the same script, on a different stage with different actors. Francis Fukuyama and other Whig Historians are wrong, this isn't the end of history. Neoliberalism has, thus far, been pretty successful in using technology to apply Band-Aid fixes to unsustainable issues, but the structure of civilization is already cracking, and things haven't really gotten bad at all yet.

Before I start outlining collapse, though, I want to break things up into "Historical Period Shifts" and "Civilizational Arcs." While those two things can coincide, they are two separate phenomena that aren't necessarily intertwined to one another.

genetic engineering tech will be on a huge upswing, it'll be as big of a deal as computing has been for the last thirty years.

I wouldn't be surprised if there was a major depression and a major war.

I’ll be in a “United Ireland” rather. Corrected that for you. Still don’t know how I’ll feel about a English refugees washing up on Irish shores seeking asylum from the Sharia nightmare state formerly known as the UK.....

>Where will we be in 30 Years?
In non-White, third world hellholes with the Jews ruling over us with an iron fist.

You'll all love living in shit-hole nursing homes being taken care of non-caring, dirty, diversity appointed non-Whites who will report you to the police for every politically incorrect thing you say or simply just putting you to sleep under the Senior Citizens Quality of Life act.

All because you refuse to stop shitposting and start actually doing something right now.

look to the fall of rome if you want to have any idea what civilizational collapse could look like here. not actually very chaotic, over a slow period of time, and many government institutions being relatively upheld by the populace or replaced by other institutions(i.e. the catholic church replacing many aspects of the roman government).

you really think LDS is gonna let Salt Lake City become anarchic? no, they're going to build a theocracy around it and model many aspects after the collapsed US government.

I don't even think civilizational collapse is going to happen in the first place though. I don't see any realistic way in which it could happen.

Fascinating - do continue!

White people will be a minority. Society will be on the verge of collapse. Attempts to form a white ethnostate will be met with violence. Protests are abandoned - it's just mindless mob rule shit, now. We can barely feed ourselves and grocery stores are either robbed or burned.

Jow Forums will become a transhumanist board

Attached: pol transhumanist.png (600x600, 126K)

>implying Jow Forums will be allowed to exist once the hate crime laws are created.

i'm trying to find the most durable clothing I can let's just put it that way I need antiodor undies NOW!!!!!!!

The first thing I'll go into is historical period shifts. Now, I'm obviously going to be talking only about Western civilization here. For starters, my education was very Eurocentric, beyond that other parts of the world have significantly different cultural understandings of the world, which makes extrapolation of, say, East Asian history onto Western Civilization pointless.

So you can largely slice up historical periods into infinitely smaller categories, (Victorian, Edwardian, etc.), but those smaller distinctions are largely unimportant. In shifts such as those, not a lot changed in terms of the big picture. The oncoming historical period shift is going to see reevaluations in:
>Identity
>Economic systems
>Government systems
>Class dynamics
>Information
etc.

This puts it on a level with three other, very broad, historical "ages." They are as follows:
>Antiquity: Early Human Civilization-476AD
>Middle Ages: 476AD-~1650AD
>Modernity: ~1650AD-20??AD

The transition from Antiquity to the Middle Ages was, of course, brought on by the fall of the Roman Empire. Civilizational Collapse, in that case, did trigger a period shift. However, the transition from the Middle Ages to Modernity didn't see such civilizational collapse. Arguably, the transition began around the mid-1400s with the invention of the printing press and concluded in 1648 with the end of the Thirty Years' War. During this ~200 year period, which historically isn't that long, we saw:
.

Virtual countries become more wealthy and powerful than legacy countries. See my flag.

>The Printing Press and the decentralization of information which empowered both the crown and the wealthy at the expense of the church
>The early stages of the Atlantic Slave Trade, which began to shape economies and geopolitics in Europe
>The Agricultural Revolution which put the final nail in the coffin of Feudalism
>The Thirty Years' War and the Peace of Westphalia which mainstreamed concepts like self-determination and saw "National/Ethnic identity" supplant Religious identity (Obviously religion was only the defining factor among and between whites)
etc.

In this transition into Modernity we saw changes in political structures (Absolutism and eventually Constitutionalism), economic systems, geopolitics, national economies, class dynamics, and the way in which people identified. These changes weren't brought about by civilizational collapse, but by social, cultural and technological advancements.

In more recent times we've seen/will definitely see:
>The Internet, which further decentralizes the spread of information, this time empowering common people at expense of national authorities and the cultural industry
>"The Pacific System" where manufacturing jobs are shipped to SEA cesspits by the wealthy.
>Automation which will, from what we've seen thus far, destroy giant sectors of employment that haven't been ravaged by offshoring
>Globalism, Pan-continentalism, etc. beginning to take root following WWII.
etc.

The internet obviously disrupts existing power structures in both culture and politics. "The Pacific System" alongside automation could very well force a crisis for late-Capitalism the same way the Atlantic System alongside the Agricultural Revolution killed late-Feudalism. Globalism and pan-continentalism have and will continue to change the way we define ourselves. Some are beginning to see themselves as "Humans," others are latching onto religion (Islam) or race (WNs), while even more still try to shore up the defenses on a besieged national identity. Paradoxically, "Europeanism" is a valid concept among both race-blind Brussels bureaucrats and ardent nationalists who want to halt the transformation into "Eurabia." Typically nationalists have been opposed to one another on the basis of national identity obviously, now (as Sam Huntington noted with Kin Country theory in "Clash of Civilizations") nationalists, and people more in general, are starting to see some value in their overarching civilization

It's worth noting that social changes and developments happen much more quickly now. While the previous period shift required ~200 years from start to finish, I don't believe this one will take very long. Look at the Arab Spring, and compare it to other, similar revolutionary periods throughout history (18th and 19th centuries for example). Sure, I know the Arab Spring had (((help))), but the rapid exchange of ideas and information through the internet, as well as a general feeling of complete dissatisfaction with life the world over seems to be a very volatile concoction that inspires rapid changes.

Any reading material you might be so kind as to recommend? Profound thanks for your contribution.

If I'm not dead by then I expect some socialist hellhole filled with people whose gender you can't immediately discern. Their entire consumption pattern as far as goods go will be totally dependent on what media they are beaming into their heads. All old cultures will die and everyone will be autistic beyond belief. It'll be a disgusting shithole because infastructure will break down because people will stop leaving home more and more. Sit down resturaunts will either die or be reserved for the very rich. Everything will be artificial. Human to human contact will have broken down.
I'm shooting to be dead or close to it by 40. 19 years

What things look like in the coming period, I can't say. We could see "our guys" lose, and get beat out by either neoliberals or real leftists. I've seen a number of people put forward the idea of "neo-medievalism" in which economic inequality soars, national authority diminishes and is checked by NGOs, supranational unions, international organizations and multinational corporations, in a similar manner to how the crown used to be kept in check by both the Church and the aristocracy. I can't say that's a future that's particularly bright, but it's one of the more credible ideas I've seen.

I feel I've covered most of the subjects of interest regarding historical period shifts, so rather than getting into the weeds, obsessing over minutiae, or transposing my own personal historical parallels and rationalizations, I can pretty safely move on to actual civilizational collapse, which I believe will coincide with this shift in historical periods.

I will be, character limits are slowing things down, though.

I'll outline it here in a moment, maybe I can sell you on the collapse cult. I don't think we'll see anarchy and blood in the streets though. I do think we'll see a failure of existing states, drastic changes in political theory, and a healthy degree of political violence and even balkanization. Not outright anarchy, but a hyper-exaggerated Weimar Germany

Imagine a world without jews! No jewish tricks for 3 decades, we could accomplish anything!

Attached: beautiful-future-wallpaper-1.jpg (1920x1080, 433K)

>Weimerica
>Balkanization
This is the future I see. It’s the only temporary peaceful option.

As far as books go, and I'll be mentioning a few here and there in the collapse section of this, I'd really recommend above anything else College European History books. It seems dumb and obvious, but if you go to, for example, Cornell's site and look at required texts you can find pretty good overviews of history there (Mind you, since it's modern academia, aim for the dry ones and look into the authors so that you can be aware of potential biases). They're actually pretty good and go far more in-depth than, say, Wikipedia.

Beyond that, I'd recommend J.D. Unwin's works (He wrote extensively on sexuality and its role in civilization), Sam Huntington's "Clash of Civilizations," Spengler's "The Decline of the West," "Reflections on the Revolution in France" by Edmund Burke. Those for me gave some pretty interesting insights.

Beyond specific books though, I'd recommend reading through Neoreactionary blogs and columns by Political Science professors focused on geopolitics. Both of those tend to be filled with anecdotes and are written predominantly through the view of civilizational arcs, more over, they typically name drop books right and left that are at least worth reading the summary of.

I'll probably reference for authors and specific books in the rest of my posts, but just off the top of my head those are either insightful books, or pretty good places to get recommendations of insightful books from.

Sadly, I don't think we will live to see it.
BUT we might be able to bring the fight to the kikes and get a few good hits in before passing the torch to the ones that will.

Attached: 14.jpg (970x606, 193K)

Okay, onto civilizational collapse now. The broad go-to book for this is Sir John Glubb's "Fate of Empires" (Pic related). It's a fantastic historical overview of civilizational arcs and lifespans that does a pretty good job of extrapolating useful information from a compilation of historical anecdotes. Carroll Quigley's "The Evolution of Civilizations" is fairly good as well, although I'd recommend Glubb over Quigley if you're going to commit yourself to just one book.

I'm really just going to give myself a rough outline in this post, but I'll be touching on:
>Sexual degeneracy
>Collapse of coherent gender roles
>Abysmal Male-Female gender ratios
>Race & Immigration
>Cultural baseness
>The failure of contemporary political thought
>Disenchantment with existing political institutions
>Centralization of power, the Unipolar world and American hegemony
>Modern geopolitics
>Late Capitalism, income inequality and the paradoxical importance and unimportance of money in spurring social change

Attached: CivilizationalCycles.png (778x826, 35K)

A major economic catastrophy in the U.S. for sure, how we come out of it will depend on both (((them))) and us

are we in the beggining of decadence? i dont see any intellect at all to be honest if you ask me

Alright let's start with sexual degeneracy since I practically know this topic by heart. Before going into the importance of monogamy and "traditional" sexual values in terms of fostering a productive civilization, I want to go ahead and debunk a few persistent myths about sexuality that seem to wax and wane on Jow Forums:

>Myth #1 Sexual degeneracy has more or less always existed. It seems prevalent now because the internet and our own base instincts not only magnifies this behavior but incentivizes us to focus on it.

Attached: 1481366851197.jpg (4920x4161, 2.69M)

I'd say we're firmly in decadence, but the end of the Age of Intellectuals typically sees a rise in navel-gazing academics that get lost in absurd theories and naval gazing (ie, modern academia). Smart, well read scholars are the norm only for the beginning of and peak of the Age of Intellectuals. Even then, it's worth noting that Glubb personally considered the Age of Intellectuals to be the beginning of the end, as society doesn't NEED them to survive.

This is completely false. Sexual degeneracy has waxed and waned throughout history and has typically become bad right before civilizational decline/collapse (More on that later). Limiting ourselves to just modern times, let's look at modern "sexology" data. Sexology kicked off in the mid-late 40s and was pioneered by a guy named Alfred C. Kinsey. You might recognize him from the Kinsey scale (Which asserts that most people are neither exclusively homo or heterosexual), he's also the source for the "10% of people are homosexuals" statistic. His main works were "Sexuality in the Human Male," "Sexuality in the Human Female" and "The Kinsey Reports." Kinsey's data caught national attention because it claimed to show a society that was far more promiscuous than anyone thought. Kinsey held such a position in the field that sexology studies up until the late 70s drew specifically from his data. His work was also the intellectual foundation (alongside Trotskyist, post-modernist and feminist theory) of the modern sexual revolution of the 1960s. Even using Kinsey's data as the starting point, society has become far more promiscuous recently than it was prior (inb4 the "Millennials are having less sex than ever!" meme study, that's a bad study and the peddlers of articles regarding that study chose not to do their due diligence as journalist to get clickbait headlines).

. Now typically people will claim that "people lied back then," but upon closer inspection, that myth falls apart. Kinsey's studies had a number of faults, here are a few:
>Marriage was redefined as "A person living with a member of the opposite gender for over 1 year," which led to a few instances of literal prostitutes being knowingly passed off as housewives.
>Oversampling of homosexuals, sexual abuse victims and criminals convicted for sex crimes (all more promiscuous than average)
>Complete reliance on volunteers (A later Stanford study found that volunteers for sex studies are ~2-4 times more promiscuous than average).
etc.

Kinsey's work was skewed to show society as being more promiscuous than it actually was, and yet society has still become more sexually degenerate even as we've corrected our methodology. It is inarguable at this point that sexual degeneracy waxes and wanes, and the internet isn't putting a magnifying glass over it.

>Myth #2: Only insecure people care about sexual history.
This is false, sexual promiscuity causes civilizational decline, as I'll lay out later. On the individual level, a woman's prior partner count is highly predictive of:
>Likelihood to cheat
>Likelihood to divorce
>Lower perceived relationship quality
>Higher rates of reported marital instability
>Lower reported marital happiness
>Higher rates of reported depression
etc.

Additionally, there are some studies coming in now which suggest that promiscuity in monogamous mammals results in an erosion of one's ability to pair bond at the neurochemical level. In layman's terms, diminishing returns applied to dopamine and oxytocin.

Given this, marrying a virgin is objectively the optimal situation for both civilization and personal relationship security. Incurring higher risk for less reward makes no sense and if we were talking finances, you'd be laughed out of the synagogue.

>Myth #3: Strong men can just be alpha and "make" a good woman.
Wrong, see above explanation and data to come.

>Myth #4 Sexual degeneracy only happens because men get weak
Wrong. Historically male weakness is predated by a loosening of sexual mores. This was noted by J.D. Unwin in a number of his works. What happens is the state gains power, chooses not to exercise it, alongside female emancipation, thus men find themselves increasingly marginalized.

Here are some of the relevant studies:
>Feldman SS, Cauffman E. Your cheatin’ heart: Attitudes, behaviors, and correlates of sexual betrayal in late adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 1999;9:227–252

>Treas J, Giesen D. Sexual infidelity among married and cohabiting Americans. Journal of Marriage & the Family. 2000;62:48–60.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3407304/#!po=11.1386
>"Having more prior sex partners predicted a higher likelihood of future ESI"

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00444.x/abstract
>Teachman study correlating number of sexual/cohabitational partners with divorce, using 1995 National Survey of Family Growth

psycnet.apa.org/journals/senpai/24/6/766/
>"Both structural equation and group comparison analyses demonstrated that sexual restraint was associated with better relationship outcomes, even when controlling for education, the number of sexual partners, religiosity, and relationship length."

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00996.x/abstract
>Sexual restraint in relationship correlated with better relationship quality

If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a straight white male face.

Forever.

I get that this seems like a tangent, but there are two monumentally important takeaways from that:
>Abstinence until marriage to another virgin is objectively the best form of romantic organization
>Promiscuity inherently erodes family stability

Hopefully the second one should give you some clue of how this ties into civilizational health and inevitable collapse.

I mentioned the Sexual Revolution earlier, so it's probably a good time to get into that now. In our current civilization it's already happened, it happened in the 1960s. Glubb, in "Fate of Empires" notes that there's a correlation between sexual liberation and civilizational failure; however, Oxford-educated Anthropologist (Before the field devolved into a circlejerk over Franz Boas) explicitly linked the two. In Unwin's works, he notes that sexual liberation, in every case in human history, has seen civilizational collapse or severe waning happen shortly after. Unwin notes that, in cases where civilization simply wanes, the most likely result is conquest by a more chaste and virile foreign power.

It's been nearly a century since Unwin died and not one person has managed to provide an academic refutation of his work. He was fairly significant in his field (Aldous Huxley, author of "Brave New World" even wrote the introduction of a posthumous book featuring compiled notes and essays from Unwin), and modern anthropologists have every incentive to do so.

There has been one exception to his rule that sexual liberation inevitably causes civilizational collapse/waning, and it's worth pointing out before we get into Unwin's arguments:

Ironically it was those Godless Communists in the USSR.
tl;dr:
>Lenin & Trotsky denounce the family and traditional morality as being bourgeois concepts
>Trotsky pushes Lenin to repeal all laws relating to sodomy, fornication etc.
>Divorce is as easy as one party within a marriage submitting a signed certificate of divorce at a local party office
>Naturally degeneracy begins seeping into society and social problems quickly arise
>Stalin seizes control of the USSR and repeals Trotskyist legislation early on
>Stalin pushes an almost puritanical morality into the party and onto society
>Things get better until Stalin's reforms are undone following his death.

Sexual Revolution in the USSR was an anomaly. In every other instance, it's happened culturally first, and legislation changes once the political will to enforce proper behavior evaporates. In the USSR it was done legislatively first and had barely begun to seep into culture. Even with that, it took an absolutist autocrat to turn things around.

To sum up Unwin's arguments regarding monogamy as a condition of Social Energy:

Civilization itself arises when humans move past the tribal, quasi-nomadic lifestyle and begin to congregate in a single area and build lasting things. Prior to the first cities, the cost of child-rearing was effectively socialized, paternity didn't matter, etc.

This created a situation where intertribal competition for females leeched a lot of "energy" and male investment in the tribe wasn't as high. After all, not every man got to reproduce, seeing as we all have far more unique female ancestors than male ones. Additionally, the ones that did get to reproduce spent absurd amounts of time doing so.

It's no coincidence that civilization arises when sexual regulations are imposed curbing female hypergamy and tendancy towards harems. In a certain sense, civilization isn't built by "alphas" but is a contract between "alphas" and "betas" that roughly ensures every man gets a genetic stake in society.

Costs of raising children are privatized, paternity becomes highly important, and men spend far less time competing for mates thus freeing them to actually advance beyond tribal society.

As marriage, or something analogous to marriage, arises, so to does "marriage technology." Marital vows become important as does chastity. Societies which don't value chastity (ie, Mosuo Chinese) typically don't advance very far beyond the tribal stage, while their more traditional counterparts elsewhere begin to fluorish.

ASH...much much ash.

Attached: Nuke 1.webm (1024x576, 2.93M)

So what happens when society does away with "marital technology?" We are of course living in an age without it.

Men begin to spend far more time competing for mates, paternity becomes fuzzy, and the cost of raising children becomes socialized (And hey look at how much single mothers grow the welfare state).

On the male end, we've historically seen men opt out of marriage. Such was the case in the late Roman Empire when (ineffective) bachelor taxes were imposed on men avoiding marriage. Without guaranteed genetic investment and access to a woman, male attention shifts away from productivity and onto other pursuits, whether it's mindless hedonism or pursuing women. No matter what any individual man's preferred outlet is, production begins to decline, and the social fabric begins to tear apart. Violence and crime also go up; however, that seems to be more a result of single motherhood than a reversion to pre-civilizational sexual habits, as children raised by single mothers (even when controlling for race) are significantly more likely to:
>be criminals
>perform poorly academically
>report mental health issues
>abuse illegal substances
etc.

Now, look at where we are in the West right now. We're as promiscuous as ever and we're seeing men begin opting out. I'm not necessarily talking about MGTOW here, but rather what I refer to as "unconscious MGTOWs." Instead of obese fedora-clad incels and bitter divorcees, the unconscious MGTOW is a semi-successful young man who may or may not have had sexual success with women. He just doesn't bother with it that much and prefers to go out and drink, or bowl, or stay in and play CoD with "the lads." If you spend any time reading sociopolitical/lifestyle blogs targeted towards career women in their late 20s and early 30s you'll see a huge swathe of articles decrying this specific type of guy. The fact that it's so seemingly widespread seems to suggest that once again, just as in late Rome, men are opting out.

Aside from the "commitment-shy" man, let's look at the Left's assault on traditional values:
>Divorce has been made easy
>LGBTQIA+ now part of school curriculum and wielding state power (Laws are now being discussed about slapping child abuse charges on parents who refuse to let young children begin to transition should they "decide" to be transgender), etc.

We're in the beginning stages of this now, but I've noted a few articles regarding and movies from the culture industry featuring polyamory.

I know a lot of people assumed they'd push pedophilia next, but aside from special rules for Muslims, I don't think that's likely. Early feminists were the ones who pushed AoC laws, I doubt they'll backtrack on that. Expect more normalization of youth degeneracy and early sex-positivity at most.

Back onto polyamory though, they're already beginning to push it. Once they successfully legalize and destigmatize that, you're going to see the complete breakdown of society's "sexual fabric." We're already at the point of no return, but them winning that battle is going to accelerate things faster than you can imagine.

Semi-related and worth looking into is the Calhoun Mouse Experiment/Mouse Utopia/Behavioral Sink. I'm far too tired to get into the specifics of it right now, but it has some pretty interesting implications, and it's worth a read.

Additionally, while a novelist, Michel Houellebecq's work is fantastic, and he accurately describes the modern sexual dichotomy. It's only semi-relevant to this, but his books are worth looking into, even if you just read the reviews.

It’s a bad idea to opt out right now. Men need to be preparing for when Gen X is on their death beds with millennials and gen Z in full control of the country. That’s when things are going to go from bad to worse and we need to be well positioned and stable.

Alright, so at this point, I've written a pretty large amount about sexuality here. The reason for this is because from everything I've read it's far more important than most people, even those concerned about culture, give it credit for, and because it seems to be a somewhat contentious issue on Jow Forums, elsewhere I won't be spending as much time on things, simply because, in some cases, there are fewer things to be pointed out and elsewhere, like gender roles, Jow Forums is pretty much on the same page.

Onto gender roles, I don't think it's particularly controversial to note that feminism (all feminism, not just third-wave feminism) has been an absolute disaster both sociologically and economically. Feminism has blessed us with:
>Women having financial independence from their husbands, either through income of their own or ineffective and wasteful redistribution programs
>Women entering the workplace and being given preferential treatment both in academia and the hiring/promotion process
>Sexual liberation and no-fault divorce
>Women's suffrage
etc.

I'm trying very hard right now to avoid outright endorsing any particular program of action, and instead focus on things that I can pretty safely assume are just objective reality or extraordinarily likely possibilities and consequences. On this subject though, I'm largely split. I don't feel like there's really much to be gained from opting-in, and I consistently find myself flirting with Varg-tier accelerationism. On the other hand, I absolutely loathe rank and file MGTOWs, and genuinely believe that worthwhile men need to be bracing themselves for the oncoming disasters.

Life, at this point, is specifically tailored to women. School curriculum is centered entirely around female learning styles (and consequently male performance has dropped), women are the biggest beneficiaries of affirmative action and receive preferential treatment in both college admissions and scholarships. Not only is school tailored to women, nor does it end at women having an easier time getting into and paying for school. No, after higher education, women are again given preferential treatment in the hiring process and in promotions. All of this creates women who are completely financially independent from men. As a result, we're beginning to see the rise of "female breadwinners," in some sense. These women aren't providing for families, but have enough income to rule a good chunk of men out of their potential marriage pool. Women typically don't marry down, economically. Those that somehow fail in this system and become single mothers still fall back on generous government benefits (disproportionally paid by men) which burns money without investing in the welfare of the citizenry.

Aside from the beginnings of matriarchy, where child-rearing is socialized, women are holding more dominant positions in society, and regulations on sexuality, which are necessary for civilization, are being actively undermined, we're also seeing a pretty horrific gender imbalance.

This gender imbalance is, of course, that there are more men than women in a number of Western Countries at the moment (Even some of those with overall averages suggesting things skewed towards females instead skew towards males once you look specifically at people from 18-mid30s).

Even assuming sexual morality was in place, this is actually pretty bad, because there's not enough women to go around. Some guys are getting left out. Typically war has gotten rid of those "expendable males," but war between major powers has become increasingly unlikely.

This has only been exacerbated by the male-dominated refugee crisis in 2015. Once you factor in refugee gender ratios in Sweden or Germany, for example, their M:F ratio goes from "normal-bad, but not a big deal" to levels rivaling China during the height of the one child policy.

>genuinely believe that worthwhile men need to be bracing themselves for the oncoming disasters
This is why opting-in now is a better idea. The incentives are extremely low right now but will give options for the future. Worthwhile men need to be ready and that will take years of work. Start now because this problem isn’t going away anytime soon.

Speaking of refugees, it's time to talk about race. Obviously 99% of us are on the same page here, but there are a few things to note:
>Diversity+Proximity=Conflict
>Impact of race on politics (Racial voting)
>Crime
>IQ (The Flynn effect [Bad meme which should be taken with a grain of salt] has stopped coincidentally around the time immigration from nonwhite countries increased. IQ in France has actually gone down)
All pretty obvious
>Racial diversity obliterates social trust and cohesion
Robert Putnam's study "Bowling Alone" notes this. Putnam is an Ivy League Liberal who sat on the results of the study for half a decade, and then published his results. He tried citing other studies showing that diversity was a positive, but the studies he used to debunk his own were only looking at economic diversity.

Keep in mind, we have a few more refugee crises coming. Africa's population is projected to explode by billions in the near future, and North Africa is far from stabilized. Considering current polling suggests high interest in moving abroad, we're due for another refugee crisis from Africa specifically once their population explodes and climate change takes a toll on their environment.

Beyond that, Middle Eastern conflicts are extraordinarily likely to continue. The region is practically primed for conflict between Saudi Arabia and Iran, and this is on top of the ongoing spat between the Saudis and Yemenis that's already displacing quite a few people.

Guess where all of these people are going to go?

The situation in America mirrors many aspects of Germany in 1918.
>Armistice from wars not in our favor
>the loss of manufacturing jobs and devaluing currency
>Jews and Marxists openly revolting

The next phase of history I suspect will go like this.
>2020-29
With back to back Republican presidents and both houses under control, many aspects of American society get good for a while.

There are jobs, culture gets more degenerate, and Marxists keep shilling about "the end of Capitalism"
While this is going on, race relations get worse and worse, however this is not due to demographic change, but due to many illegals being deported, the end of welfare, and with Whites reaching a majority again.

During this period, the Jews will gaslight many black and Hispanic radical groups, using "reparations" for slavery and the Azaltan movement. These will be ignored or protected by the minority liberal cities, and they will eventually overstep their bounds.

>2030-45
Faced with a Republican stronghold, the Jews crash the economy, trying to force them out.

This completely backfires, with the loss of the good times completely breaks the illusion, the Marxist groups overstep their handlers and try a Spartacus. The groups attack and cause much damage, but White Freikorps have prepared for decades for this.

With the loss of the economy, fighting in the streets, and the Republicans being very hesitant to break up the fighting, a new party emerges.

This party is called the RECLAMATION Party. This party pulls no punches, forcing complete reclamation of jobs lost to China, completely forcing illegals out, destroying colleges and crime infested cities.

They win a narrow lead in 2030, freaking the rest of the world out, the Jews go into turbo damage control.
With the internet available, the crimes of the Jews are brought to light, with many Jews fleeing to Israel or Europe.

The U.N. tries to push sanctions on the U.S. but this fails miserably, only renewing faith in the party.

>With back to back Republican presidents and both houses under control
You're delusional if you think this is going to happen

>Thinking the Republican Party and Jews are opposed
Lol. You'll learn

well i will be 76, and lucky to be still alive. So....if we go by national averages. I will be dead. LOL

I'm actually exhausted so I want to finish things up pretty quickly, then I'll hang around for a short while if anyone has questions.

>Cultural baseness
Look at modern culture and the types of fashion trends, music and patterns of behavior that are currently promoted. None of this is good, and as noted by Sir John Glubb in "Fate of Empires," typically the "Age of Decadence" sees actors, and musicians be held up as cultural influencers and role models.

>Failure of contemporary political thought
tl;dr: Neoliberalism is responsible for many of the current problems, the people who try to claim "cultural Marxism" are well intentioned but inaccurate (If the Far Right actually bothered reading Frankfurt School writings, they'd find a couple of worthwhile observations.) Currently, we see Neoliberalism's biggest opposition in Right-wing Populism and Social Democracy which, from a Duginist lense, are certain neutered forms of Communism and Fascism that have reconciled themselves with the underpinnings of liberalism and act within the liberal system. As a result, they're fundamentally incapable of actually addressing the root causes of both right and left-wing grievances with society. The failure of both is going to make political disenchantment worse.

>Political disenchantment
Already well underway. People have largely lost faith in existing institutions. Even those not prone to political extremism have become cynics regarding government. Conspiracy theories (scrutiny is warranted and everything should be investigated, but not everything is a conspiracy) run rampant and if you look at approval ratings for politicians as well as branches of government, they're pretty low. Increasing polarization as well as the inability for neoliberalism's rivals to remedy societal woes are only going to worsen this.

great thread. keep posting, very interesting stuff you talk about. also seems quite sound

Attached: C__Data_Users_DefApps_AppData_INTERNETEXPLORER_Temp_Saved Images_1501824128611m.jpg (833x1024, 107K)

>American hegemony
American hegemony is collapsing, our navy is in a dismal state, aircraft carriers are expensive and easy to sink, the petrodollar is on borrowed time, Pakistan is trading in the Yuan now and the Russians and Chinese are doing everything they can to undermine the USD. In a certain sense, America=Rome, and the collapse of the American hegemony is going to be similar in scale to the fall of the Roman Empire.

>Money is and isn't important
tl;dr: We're at gilded age levels of income inequality right now, things are slated to get worse as the middle class in America is collapsing and its European counterpart is overtaxed. Fiscal issues don't typically act as catalysts for civilizational collapse unlike what Molymeme would tell you, but they are a match to the powder keg of social issues. We survived the Great Depression when things were largely good (Assuming you weren't German), I don't think we survive a second Great Depression.

Currently there are a number of ways the global economy could go under, but here are a few:
>Any Eurozone country leaving the EU
V4 countries are already getting on poorly with Brussels and another refugee crisis, which is inevitable, poorly handled could drive Euroskepticism in Hungary or Poland high enough to get a referendum. Aside from that, any country that's not Britain leaving the EU is going to undermine the EUs credibility and spur Euroskepticism elsewhere
>PIGS debt crisis.
Greece is far from out of the woods regarding debt, and the other Mediterranean countries could very well see similar issues in the near future
>Petrodollar failure
Largely already covered
>Explosion of the Chinese Yuan
Pakistan made the switch sometime last year, the rise of the Yuan is going to negatively impact both the Dollar and the Euro.
etc.

nothing will have changed. in fact everything will be as it is today since cycles repeat every 25-30 years. remember that and invest wisely.

Alright, I think that largely finishes up what I wanted to get across. I get that post quality declined from my initial posts but it's pretty late and I've been busy all day.

I'll be around for a little while longer and will try to respond to people, but I'd encourage you to scrutinize this the way you do anything else. I've been wrong/misinformed about plenty of things before so don't "take my word for it," I've made numerous references to books and studies throughout this so look into them yourselves and see if you find them and the points brought up here to be credible and without a compelling refutation

I think the difference between our thinking here is that you want to convince people to opt-in so that they can begin the work of carving out lives for themselves in spite of the system which will allow them to more easily rebuild society. Personally, I think this is a waste, just because there's very little incentive to opt in, it's becoming increasingly difficult to carve out a satisfying life in spite of the system, and most importantly, I really don't think we can get around to rebuilding until collapse happens. The soonest I can see that happening is around ~40 years, though it could be longer than that.

It must take a (((rather big nose))) to shove into his ass like that.

Butt to be halfway serious..

It will become more common for ayys to try to visit earth. Whoever contacted them is unknown. Being human, we'll shoot them down and send in recovery teams to get rid of evidence.

Time travel tourism becomes more popular in the 2030s to 2040s decade, until someone ruins it for everybody else and it gets banned for a while. Probably a nigger who wanted to steal himself a pair of Air Jordans and sell it for a mint.

USA will have already gone through civil war and racewar at the same time, thanks to meme efforts due to /po/, not Jow Forums because this is a board of peace. There is rampant racism and anti-semitism as it got memed and proves to be difficult to brainwash out of people because Jow Forums made all sorts of -isms funny. Hard to forget funny stuff.

There will be a Nordic Union as the Europeens assrapes them over and over again with bad deals. This event starts because muslims end up going full retard and end up bombing an entire city. They revert back to 1980's demographics. Diversity people are social pariahs are beyond hated and they turn towards turboautistic eurocanadian ways.

Australia's perpetual malaise makes them open to Chinese infiltration as their white leaders sell out their country for some extra gibs and bribes. They still fight over upgrading their copper cable internet.

India is constantly hampered in their attempts to become a superpower because they still won't poo in loo.

Africa gets fully ransacked by the Chinese. Africans are keen on the Chinese way but cannot play racism like they did with whitey that they kicked out. China just doesn't give a shit.

People are still debating global warming as the grand solar minimum drops temperatures globally. It's climate change of course. Can't admit wrongs.

OP is still a faggot. Tragically attitudes towards homosexuul stuff reversed along with the SJW movement. The pendulum swung back HARD.

>2040-50
With sanctions failing the U.N. has no choice but to unify all of Europe (now a complete 3rd World hell hole) Middle East and Africa, and China aganst the U.S.

This war goes extremely well for the U.S. at first, with our greater technology and war material we defeat the U.N. Army time and time again. However, things start to turn as the natural resources from Africa and the Middle East start to swamp the U.S.

The U.N. armies make a fatal mistake, and the Jews force the U.N. to attack Russia. With the Chinese forcing into Russian territory and the EU/AfroArabs pushing through Mexico into the Southern U.S. the war turns bad.

The Russians flip the switch, and nukes start flying.

China gets devastated by nuclear weapons, and with the loss of the U.N. manufacturing base, their armies grind to a halt. The U.S. counterattacks, completely routing the South American U.N. Army, the scattered survivors turning into petty bandits.

With the South Front secure, the U.S. moves into the European theatre.

The U.N. force is on the brink of collapse, the crusade aganst American "imperialism" is falling apart, the Arab majority Europeans have begun purging Jews in Europe, forcing more into Israel.

The U.S. invades Europe, liberating it from the EU. The U.N. completely collapses.

The Middle East, flush with retreating Arab and African soldiers and possessing much of the hardware they were equipped with, attack Israel, blaming them for the loss of the war aganst America.

These combat hardened units crush the IDF, and the Arabs take all of Israel within days. They rape, pillage, and slaughter every Jew in Israel, easily surpassing the Holocaust.

The Second Diaspora happens, with the Jews scattered around the world.

The U.S. is totally supreme, with no other bloc standing aganst it, and with the Zionists nothing but a memory, a second Golden age begins.

However, with the ecological damage from WWIII and lack of resources, The Second Space Race begins.

>I really don't think we can get around to rebuilding until collapse happens. The soonest I can see that happening is around ~40 years
Do we have to collapse though? I used to think so but what's stopping the US from simply fading and falling into third world status with a dwindling, childless elite and a few breakoff nations?

Europe I can see though.

>Sexual liberation undermining the traditional family, forcing men to divert attention from contribution to attracting a mate, an increase in single motherhood and the horrible children raised by them as well as unsustainable Welfare spending
>Existing and rising income inequality, crises facing capitalism and a very fragile modern economy where a single stock market crash is capable of sending the world into another outright depression
etc.

I covered most of this in my posts, but there are a number of things we've done that have, in every other circumstance, resulted in civilizational collapse.

>The soonest I can see that happening is around ~40 years, though it could be longer than that
You don’t think there will be many battles fought during that time? Key positions, financial stability, networking, lobbying, decentralization, technology advances, etc... I doubt I’ll be alive when society will be rebuilt, but I’ll be alive long enough for most of the long war and I don’t see a point in guaranteeing a loss by doing nothing. Some things are bigger than yourself.

Wow, do you think I'll actually be able to do that one day? Things really are getting better!

not an argument

Fascist revolution or complete collapse of civilization followed by a race war. We win either way

Don't let shills discourage you with muh outnumbered by shitskins.

It's literally always been that way. Has it ever been a threat before? No, not even close

How is the Republican Party going to reverse civilizational decline by slightly cutting taxes?

In paradise, if we only will it.

Our struggle is life and death, "To be or not to be"

____________________________
youtube.com/watch?v=FdMyWqTVVFY&t=1s
youtube.com/watch?v=Ointb2ppd_4
____________________________

youtube.com/watch?v=WAb4ZkeStOE&t=8s

youtube.com/watch?v=2Pr7ANP_nzY&t=5s

youtube.com/watch?v=MBgzs1UbavI&t=2s

youtube.com/watch?v=HS4KBMTxEok

youtube.com/watch?v=mGzj9KEx8bg

youtube.com/watch?v=VIXtzlQ4bDU

youtube.com/watch?v=PCEO7s1x7mQ

youtube.com/watch?v=A-g2hTC7-lA

youtube.com/watch?v=IxfYi0iBoTw

youtube.com/watch?v=LayLQGgrsoE

youtube.com/watch?v=TY6hfi5XzFs

youtube.com/watch?v=qnvGftH7beY&t=3s

youtube.com/watch?v=_oFyI5vlkec

Attached: LetsDoThis.jpg (341x500, 45K)

Tbh senpai idk

If you'd have read my posts and not gone full stormnigger you'd have read between the lines, the Republican party makes the economy boom, which takes eyes off of bad things happening, and due to deportation and elimination of welfare (created by LBJ) the niggers lose their lifeline.

Thanks for your posts, interesting stuff.

I can imagine plenty of people opting-out of society as the incentives decline, but because humans are social animals they will form societies online/inside VR with like-minded people around the world.

I wonder how e-citizen projects like Estonia's will affect competition between governments for taxpayers - especially if cryptocurrencies make it harder to collect taxes. Paying taxes might become more like membership fees for enjoying a government's services.

4 u

Attached: uk.jpg (852x1371, 1.02M)

Autonomous car jams