R/K theory

>humans are not animals
>I concur

Californian progressives allowed legislature to reduce the penalty for giving people AIDS from prison time to a $1000 fine.
>Fucking Yes.

>it's true for animal species
>but applying it to human beings is a rather loose analogy at best
But humans are animals. We're not above them just because we can shitpost online and they can't.

Humans also have an extremely wide spectrum of behaviors that seem to show that they can be inherited as well. Having heritable r/K traits would definitely be not just a possibility, but a certainty.

Not at all. When you break it down what's left is selective pressures. Adversity molds the character of the individual and consequently the group as a whole. No adversity no character. Hey....is there any adversity that results from handouts? For generations? Hmmmmmmmmm

>Is it for real?
No.
1) Wolves don't fucking compete, they work together (within a social hierarchy). In huge groups, sometimes.

2) Conservatives tend to have larger families, at least traditionally.

3) It's an oversimplification, when applied to nation-scale politics. Unlike the wolf and rabbit, who have different problems associated with their lifestyles, every political ideology has the same inherently human problems to solve. A socialist party can't convince wolves to eat the more readily-available grass, because wolves don't eat grass.

A better analogy is a solitary tiger versus a wolf pack. Both animals require meat, which is in limited supply, but their strategies are different. Tigers are completely self-reliant - only the strongest and most cunning tigers get to eat. Wolves rely on the pack - they share the spoils, and everyone gets some meat. Of course, it's not perfect that way either: conservatives aren't completely averse to working together, and wolves are smart enough to cull members of the pack who don't pull their own weight.

Of course, this is all irrelevant, because this image is just a "virgin vs chad"-tier excuse to compare yourself to a strong animal and your opposition to a pathetic one. So go ahead and continue to post it if it makes you feel better.

My gut says no, it seems like cuckservative nonsense when applied to humans

Rabbits are monogamous too.
I had a pair when i was a kid and they were always having sex

epigenetics is the biggest meme.
Americans aren't born with tans after 400 years
South Africans not born with tans after 350 years
Epigentitics claims organism change to suit environment after 2 or 3 generations

Attached: 1307970306943s.jpg (191x251, 6K)

No, it's a complete garbage theory because of the amount of people saved and cured through our medical system. Millions of kids and adults wouldn't exist today if not for our hospital system and they reproduce, creating lines of people who wouldn't exist.

hmmm

Attached: nigger-boat.jpg (3000x1800, 1.25M)

It's not a theory, it's a categorical observation.

Also, the amount of kids and adults kept on a constant life support of pills and nurse aid or surgeries, we as a modern people have completely taken out whatever comparison of actual harsh survival of the fittest scenarios.

Note that in your pic, there are two differenct species.
Also, humans are r. Historically, all human populations had tons of kids.
Stop acting as if the current infertile state of white peopler was in any way natural.

Wolves compete in captivity wherein resources are limited and access to females is restricted.
Humans within civilisation are, effectively in captivity.

it's too simplistic.
those are credible strategies, but every human can play both, depending on his circumstances or environment.
also it's not scientific, if it is not testable.

dude, I'm not saying it's true, but your argument is garbage. The main selection took place thousands of years ago, when there were no hospitals and shit like that.
it's probably bullshit and the differences are all due to IQ tho

Bunbuns are cute

that's stupid

>wolf would be consevative politically
>rabbit would be liberal politically

Don't fool yourself, sheep.

Modern medicine was a mistake fag. It allowed degenerates to survive against natures wishes.

Nature doesn't "want" anything. Ascribing some kind of design or will to something like natural selection is stupid, it's just a fact that it'll reward adaptations that make creatures more likely to survive in any given environment by having those creatures, you know, not die.

Hospitals are a part of the environment as far as nature is concerned. If you manage to father offspring, you're an evolutionary success, regardless of what anyone thinks natural selection should be about.

Its some beta stormfagger bullshit. Just moralfagging of the alt-right. "Look how alpha I am man!" t. some lonely beta who doesnt get any/pulls shit women.

>My team is wolves. Their team is rabbits. My team rocks man! Theirs is like literally a puncha pussies.

Attached: 1516600105498.jpg (227x250, 4K)

but I like bunnies, OP damn

Yeah it is.

I remember back at uni learning about r/K and scribbling down notes about how this could apply politically.
With out contraception all the sexual degeneracy liberals engage in it would mean huge levels of babies born out of wedlock.
Liberals are also not loyal at all. They legit side with Muslims/Jews/foreigners constantly. (Pic related, they mostly about about care/harm)
Liberals also have sex at an earlier age.
Conservative put more time into raising their children.

So yeah, 95% true. The 5% incorrect is due to conception and religious people having more children.

Attached: morality-for-liberals-and-conservatives-500.jpg (500x500, 57K)

If they're in captivity the captors provide for them you fucking retard.
Wolves do compete but not amongst themselves but against all the other predators.

>babby's first dysgenics pill

African babies are born 1-2 weeks earlier then Europeans. And Europeans born before Asians.
They reach puberty 1-2 years earlier then Europeans (a 14 year old African is equivalent to a 16 year old European). And btw, this is why they are selected for sport at rates above European males.
A fully grown European stands taller then a full grown African.
Europeans have a longer life span then Africans within income brackets.

Doesn't matter. They all still exist no matter how advanced humans become, since they based on selection.

Science is about condensing complex ideas and data down into it's simplest form.
This.
Just about everyone is wrong about epigenetics, they think it is some magic, like living next to a Europeans magically makes Africans less African.
The only people who understand are people who have taken the time to study what it really is.

Attached: Africans in their natural state.webm (266x400, 2.94M)

Attached: Diversity + cat.webm (720x404, 1.2M)

WHO CARES get in here fags

die alone beta stormfagger

Attached: fritzel.jpg (620x368, 62K)

Ahaha hahahah nice RPing faggot

Attached: IMG_2959.png (586x578, 37K)

Dude I've seen wolves myself compete for food in zoos. One might want the bigger piece - or multiple pieces. Maybe they're bored. I don't fucking know.

I've seen a whole place full of free food/supplies get raided by fighting Mexicans and niggers in Los Angeles and they're all being provided for "your fucking retard".

I'm sure smelling a bitch all of the time in a different unit doesn't help them either. Or that smell of white independence that doesn't rely on handouts and teaches their kids not to be violent kikes?

Sorry, got a little off course.

Just saying, I've seen it.

Rabbits are literally gypsies but they smell better and are less of a vermin

>animal species
>human
>mutually exclusive
Are you fucking retarded?

Attached: African and cats.gif (180x135, 1.31M)

>African babies are born 1-2 weeks earlier then Europeans. And Europeans born before Asians.
>They reach puberty 1-2 years earlier then Europeans (a 14 year old African is equivalent to a 16 year old European). And btw, this is why they are selected for sport at rates above European males.
>A fully grown European stands taller then a full grown African.
>Europeans have a longer life span then Africans within income brackets.

what? sources fagot?

it's a theory to describe phenomena in nature there might be more accurate theories now but in general R/k is true just not very precise

1 week shorter gestation.
academic.oup.com/ije/article/33/1/107/668109

>1 week shorter gestation.

and the puberty?

very intresting user, this should be added to our charts of redpills. also I have heard you can tell race by the shape of the brain

Dumbest shit I've read so far today.

Attached: IMG_20180415_185541.jpg (1024x946, 77K)

>Boys are entering puberty at an average age of 10 among whites and Hispanics, and at an average age of 9 among African-Americans.

webmd.com/children/news/20121020/earlier-puberty-age-9-10-average-us-boy#1

(life span and age adulthood is reached)

harbornet.com/folks/theedrich/JP_Rushton/Race.htm

>you can tell my their skulls

Of course.

Attached: skeleton kiss.png (498x688, 376K)

Dont see blacks shooting animals for sport and hanging their heads on walls at home. Sociopaths.

You have to go back to r/K cursed plebbitor

Attached: It's (You).jpg (171x194, 8K)

Fitter offspring?

That reminds me of that story where they built a civilisation in Antarctica and people would go into the woods with a mate for a year to pair bond. Yet wouldn't breed until their 50s because they were living to 200

We are talking about humans (Europeans) vs subhuman niggers here, not conservatives vs liberals

You fucking dumbass

youtu.be/gJz2Tgt3jvs

niggers not even once

Please don't compare wolves to cuckservatives. A cuckservative will do anything for money. A wolf would never betray their pack.

>when autistic kissless virgins who waste their days venting their sexual frustration onto minorities and sharing kewl frog memes think that they are k-selected
I CAN'T

>If you manage to father healthy,smart and strong offspring and make them survive you're an evolutionary succes
ftfy
cuz to call a retarded dude an evolutionary success because he raped somebody and got her pregnant sounds weird.

You do you identify with in this video?

Attached: Sweden in 2070 Africa.webm (320x426, 2.88M)

Autism.

No. It is obvious fucking bullshit. To even greater extent than the evolution theory in general. Even though the latter is littered with "it's magic, ain't gonna explain shit" parts, it is still (probably) not daring enough to explain what sudden change occurred in Europe's genetic selection model around 18th century, and how it turned the majority of population from wolves to rabbits in 5-6 generations.

Wolves are going extinct, bunnies aren't.

Sorry, Wolfman! You really are like a big majestic wolf alpha male, drawing faggoty ass memes and sharing them with your fellow autistic incel friends. Pathetic fucking basedcunt. LOL.
Maybe once you get actual 3d friends and touch a girl, you won't waste your life hating black people on a faggy internet forum.

t.r selected slavshit commie

Industrialization and feminism are primarily responsible.

>would be conservative politically

Attached: lolfuck.jpg (1374x1031, 120K)

Trips of truth.

Read OP's image.

>Hey....is there any adversity that results from handouts? For generations? Hmmmmmmmmm
>handouts absolutely prevent adversity
Wrong. You literally have autism or are one of the most sheltered babelings. Life is more complex than that.

Wolves were the only animals able to keep up with humans and worthy to become our companions.
They aren't dying out, they changed, it's how evolution works.
>inb4 cats
Cute but useless critters
>inb4 domestication isn't evolution
Lmao
Humans are part of nature so is domestication, the same goes for ants herding and breeding other insects.

absolutely

In the wild ?
Yes. Kind of an over-simplification on what make a species successful, but still useful.

Applying it to politics is kinda far-fetched tho.
"r" strategy is :
- shit as much children as possible
- eat as many different shit as possible
"K" strategy is :
- shit only a few children but take great care of them
- be super effective a eating one or two different stuff
"r" strategist have high casualty and will get bullied by everything, but the specie itself will always survive somewhere - no matter how shit the conditions become.
"k" strategist have much better lives, but their species can get destroyed super quickly if the environment change too much.
Doesn't make that much sense when applied to political parties.

Concerning your pic, I'm tempted to say that wolves are kinda "r" strategists too. They disappeared because humans wanted to get rid of them specifically, not because their strategy was bad.

That pics pretty lame. Looks like the trash Republican boomer cucks would post on facebook. Domesticated rabbits can be extremely loyal. There are alpha rabbits too, I've seen some that aren't afraid of any other animals

Im a bacteria, I kill both the wolf and rabbit for the lols and poor life sanitary decisions they make.

because its manlets that rule this world

>Wolves don't fucking compete, they work together (within a social hierarchy). In huge groups, sometimes.
Stopped reading right there
What a stupid, uneducated nigger you are.

sciencemag.org/news/2017/10/why-wolves-are-better-team-players-dogs
smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/wolves-out-score-wild-dogs-when-it-comes-cooperation-180965293/
nytimes.com/2017/11/07/science/wolves-dogs-cooperation.html
livingwithwolves.org/how-wolves-hunt/

>They disappeared because humans wanted to get rid of them specifically,
Wolves changed, they didn't disappear.
Stupid niggers in this thread.
I bet you think selection and evolution have stopped in humanity.

None of those links mean they don't compete, they mean they know how to work together.
That doesn't mean it's not a competitive environment you dumb fuck, dominance in the pack is EARNED through COMPETITION.

>they aren't dying out
Already have in Britain and Ireland. Pretty fucking weak ass wolves if you ask me. Even the emus survived the Aussies.
>they changed
By the whim of humans.
>what are wolfpacks
You know the lone wolves are just rejects (like Jow Forumssters).

what does it matter what a nigger thinks?...all we know for sure is that the third reich is no more....and thats all that matters.

See here Wolf packs are fiercely competitive inside their group, they're just not destructive.

Watch Stefan Molyneux video on r/K selection on society for all the info!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>PART 1:
youtube.com/watch?v=W8N3FF_3KvU
>PART 2
youtube.com/watch?v=HLlTW2Ie-_Y

FRIENDLY REMINDER THAT STEFAN MOLYMEME IS /OUR /GUY/ BECAUSE HE NAMES THE JEW

Attached: 1501166717418.png (852x944, 70K)

WTF is wrong with niggers? Their parents allow that?! Is this truly their culture?

Can someone explain this weird dance from an cultural perspective?

Attached: 1524500333511m.jpg (1024x655, 62K)

Attached: Welcome to Africa.webm (320x182, 2.45M)

All humans are K selected. Sorry to ruin this one on you Jow Forums.

Accidental sage sorry

Africans do better is sports because they have more muscle mass.

t. Medical text books.

If you are talking about dogs, it's not wolves who adapted to a different situation but humans who picked them for domestication.
*Very* different processes.

> Stupid niggers in this thread.
> you dumb fuck
Yeah, now I remember why I stopped trying to teach actual biology on Jow Forums

Fuck you beaner.

Niggers are literally
>muh dick: the race

Idk what you're trying to convey. You know whites used to burn each other centuries ago too.

It's a spectrum, go back to school, potatonigger.
Subgroups in a species can tend towards one side more than other subgroups.

Incorrect, all top power lifters, strongmen, etc are white, mostly slavic and Germanic
>inb4 what about this roided out nigger
Sorry, whites have more upper body strength, niggerboy.

>it's a spectrum.
Just like your sexuality right? Having 1 or 2 kids is genetic failure for a human. How many kids does the average German have?

>the science hurts my feelings!
You are pathetic.

>*Very* different processes.
Incorrect.
Domestication is a part of evolution, human actions are part of nature because humanity is part of nature.
Fuck off baguette, You're not teaching shit.

>facts hurt my feefees
Lmao
Go ahead and look up the top weight lifters and strongmen, I'll wait.
They're pretty much exclusively white.

not sure about that, considering Europeans are stronger weight for weight.
We are not comparing averages here, but potentials, so it is a bit difficult.

I know that often in sports Europeans will get overlooked because Africans develop faster. That is about it.
For example in NRL, there are quiet a number of White players who were never selected by the big teams up until they were 18 and early 20's.

They probably think it is funny.

It's not a yes or no. It's a continuum.