The British Government practically killed a child. How do you bongs feel? You should be ashamed of yourself

The British Government practically killed a child. How do you bongs feel? You should be ashamed of yourself.

Attached: Capture-13-690x450.jpg (690x450, 44K)

>implying the british populace doesn't encourage white childrens deaths

Amerimutt education.

Was he raped to death?

He's braindead. 100% confirmed. Not even alive anymore unless you count the body as being conscious. If so then when we amputate limbs should we hook them up to life support too so they don't "die".

>practically

>a child

Attached: efwegfw.jpg (194x260, 8K)

seen it b4

Attached: ptg BTFO.png (656x474, 614K)

Attached: Ted Heath.jpg (900x500, 119K)

no, this wasn't in London

i figured the muzzies got him

only one child?

*record maintained*

Attached: Jimmy-Savile-011.jpg (640x360, 46K)

Can I get a rundown? I want another reason to hate bongs

Attached: ALWAYS SMILING2.png (610x536, 515K)

Better a child than an adult.
It only takes 8 years to make an 8yo. It takes 30 years to make a 30yo.

Attached: 1494002343263.png (498x710, 390K)

Couldn't give a shit, theres too many of the fuckers anyway.

A 30 year old has already used a good bit of their life. This kid lost any years that would have existed between a natural death and now. Children are always worth more then adults.

>This kid lost any years that would have existed between a natural death and now.
Not necessarily.
>Children are always worth more then adults.
Children cannot support themselves or society, and do not take as long to manufacture. By all logic, they are worth less than adults.

Now fuck off. Think of the children is bullshit.

The baby is still alive

Nobody checked these trips.
Jow Forums is overrun with Jew loving Christfags.

>killed a child
so what, what's wrong with killing children if they've got genes that go against your interests?

Idk if it is another one but the kid is clinically braindead and the family is unwilling to unplug the thing.
So authorities were like: "Bin that baby"

Sucking up money like a slut sucking dick.
Once nature runs its course, everyone will be a lot better off. Just imagine how much of their lives the parents are wasting caring for a defect. Try again. Maybe the next one won't be hobgobbled.

checked
was the babys name mohammed?

Use to be that it was more common to lose a child in childbirth and the following weeks, now its actually a massive deal when a brain dead child cannot be kept alive.

Someone should kill his retarded parents and their mentalist supporters

SAVE A PENNY
BIN THAT BABY

Attached: 8713_600.jpg (600x421, 53K)

Attached: clinton-yeltsin-P.jpg (1038x539, 354K)

It reminds me of Jeb Bush of the Royal Family. with regard to Terry Schiavo.

Attached: Reptoid laughing.jpg (199x253, 4K)

Attached: 140326_orourke_amicus_souza.jpg (1160x629, 142K)

can't have that diversity budget sucked dry

Attached: 4914.jpg (865x992, 288K)

Every second some kid starves to death. Every second an adult dies. And yet more people were born in this moment than people died. A fuckload of people.

We have intellect for a reason, yid. We can use our brains for more than subverting nations and creating more efficient foreskin removal techniques.

You really need to kill these people

Attached: uk.jpg (852x1371, 1.02M)

averages to 17, and by 17 they're probably already paying taxes and jizya. 8 yr old has up to 15 years more potential than the 30 yr old to fund the interracial breeding camps

looks awfully dark complected. need sauce before giving shit.

Jow Forums pagans are the equivalent of youtube fedora atheists these days, shit.

>France is beating Japan and Australia, combined
W E W LA D
E W L A D
W L A D
L A D
A D
D

Attached: 1523941627448.jpg (960x940, 116K)

Who gives a shit
America France Israel and japan is new alliance
England Germany and Syria can kill all the white babies they want

No one can hate on bongs like frogs can. They've been practicing for a thousand years.

>The British Government practically killed a child.
Wouldn't be the first and probably wont be the last.

i think its much more likely that the user you responded to is atheist than pagan, user

oh I know, 99.9% of them are larpagans.

>The British Government practically killed a child. How do you bongs feel? You should be ashamed of yourself.

>The British Government practically fucked a child. How do you bongs feel? You should be ashamed of yourself.

The state of Jow Forums and its competition of virtue signaling

Attached: 1518834766309.jpg (406x406, 19K)

Swap out Israel with Ireland or Australia and you got a deal

>dat Norman history tho
Salam xîao fōng goadarchi bô mò po saleel sawarim chandrasekhar neeve nana lào chî chèng shī dāwlat alhamdullilah.

Kek

>paying for a vegetable
for what purpose?

Feels good man

They didn’t have a baby licence.

Attached: 1471663569540.png (473x500, 8K)

OI YOU GAWT A LOICENSE FOR DAT SHITPOST MOI8

Attached: 1523386347155.jpg (1084x625, 608K)

>a natural death

A natural death for this child would have been immediate.

He was already dead.

Braindead kid isn't allowed to be used as a guinea pig in some guy's experiment. The end. Faggot.

>the mayor has the power to open and close religious buildings

Ok Billybob

First of all - it's a child, who gives a shit? Even worse - with the current rate of brain degeneration, it's practically a vegetable. Northern European healthcare favours quality of live over quantity of live and considering that the degeneration is rapidly taking away what little time the child has, considering that the measures to keep it alive are (under normal circumstances) quite painful. Sure it's a lump of cells only fulfilling basic functions, but that's besides the point. Either way you do it, it'd be wrong in the eyes of someone. However, considering that there's basically no way of "healing" or "curing" the state of this being, atleast in my opinion, it's the right choice. Not only does this treatment prolong a live that'll go by unnoticed, it also siphons off resources used otherwise.

And the debate about just turning off the machines or not, or keeping the child in there or not is an absolute non-issue for me. Either just let the family do whatever the heck they feel like, but don't support them in any way (money, facilities) when it comes to their child. Or just stick with what's currently going on.

Why do all these 'pro life' faggots come out of the woodworks when Brit kids with terminal illnesses die?

These same people don't want universal healthcare, are pro gun ownership and pro death penalty.
Seems youre happy for your own people to die but not one white Brit kid to pass away naturally if there is enough of a media story to latch on to

>Muh enn haitch ess is a death panel

Hans you miss the point entirely, alonng with 90% of edgelord mutts. The parents should decide the medical treatment for their child, not the fucking state. This isn't a case of someone trying to cut little Timmy's dick off and start hormone therapy at the age of 5, this is a hospital and court not allowing free movement of a patient to a facility that is willing to actually give care. Charlie Gard all over again.

>We should just hand our dying babies over the Catholic church

you mean africans

Alfie is such a werkin class name. He deserved it.

Public Order Act 1986. Sections 1(1) to (5). Know your own laws bong.

Wasting fucking human life in the name of bureaucracy is the most bullshit thing ever anyways; but in addition to that, they wasted the chance at figuring out a cure by trying to help this kid.

Would achmed have been better you stupid cunt?

I agree but the family wanted to move the child to an Italian hospital which was willing to take him and the British government refused even this. That is my issue with the whole matter.

Defintely not but werkin class idiots (like his father in pic related) should NOT be reproducing.

Attached: nintchdbpict000401305930-e1524603058479.jpg (960x733, 68K)

The Catholic Church directly manages over a quarter of the world's hospitals you fucking prottie degenerate.

Attached: 1523935476514.png (1224x978, 117K)

Duty of care. Hospitals and doctors have an obligation to avoid causing any unnecessary suffering to a patient, even when the family demands it. It's the same in your country.

This child was brain-dead. It was utterly hopeless. The Italians were just virtue signalling for their God.

Yeah but did you see what Drumpf did?!

No the NHS took curiosity of him away from his parents because some doctors determined that the kid didn't deserve to be helped anymore because he was in pain. It's complete bullshit and everyone knows it, but the leftist faggots have to defend their retarded socialized healthcare at all cost. There was an Italian doctor willing to try an experimental procedure on him for free, but the NHS refused to allow him to leave the hospitable alive. Even the communist pope gave him Italian citizenship to try to get him to Italy, but the socialist healthcare bureaucrats refused. It's pretty much a repeat of the last kid that this happened to in the NHS. I'm surprised some parent hasn't tried to rescue their kid from the NHS with guns yet.

Well, if I miss the point, so be it. But I also fail to see the point to take on the travel to a facility that "gives care" when there's no reason to do so, considering that it's still a veggie, won't have much time left to begin with and it may or may not even survive the trip.

And on the topic of parents giving decisions about medical treatment: I'm not too fond of the idea of letting people with no medical education give some guesses as to what's best for the topic at hand.

Figuring out a way to "cure" a disease, requires that disease to be properly diagnosed to begin with, which is the problem. If you cannot figure out a dianosis, for what reason whatsoever, no cure could even take place

>White people literally dying out and being replaced on our island
>"Yeah we definitely got time for eugenics tho bro"

He was braindead.

90% Jeremy Kyle Britain VS 90% Paki Britain

Just nuke us

Thanks for the upgrades.

So he was the property of the state then? What the fuck is wrong with you. Don't you have individual rights there?!

The jewiest post I ever saw. /pols getting weak. Nobody told this bitch princess Hogg impersonator to take its Adderall and go be fag elsewhere.

If he was brain-dead how could he be suffering?

The UK is an authoritarian state with an authoritarian population. They trust government more than they trust themselves, and that will never change no matter how many are marked for death by the government.

Remember, their own population let themselves be shipped to death camps for extermination. Americans just can't understand how anyone could do that, Europeans just can't understand why anyone could not.

You're not allowed to beat your children in America, either. Child abuse is wrong.

He's still legally a child.

I remember this story from a while back. Wasn't the family wanting to take the baby to America to trial a completely experimental treatment on him?

This
Why not let someone else try something if it isn't hurting anyone. Who knows, that other doctor could have learned something important from trying to help this kid. You fuckers are a screwed up bunch to be defending shit like this. There is zero justification for this bullshit and you know it.

So letting a kid die because of neglect is not abuse there?

Where's the neglect? He's braindead and we don't want to subject them to medical experimentation. If you want to advance science, offer up braindead Americans children but not ours.

subject him*
braindead American children*

And you believe this morally justifies what was done? Regardless of what he legally may have been, he was either braindead, in which case he could not suffer and there was no justification not to send him to Italy, or he was not braindead and there was no justification to remove him from life support. As I understood it we were debating this from a moral, rather than legal perspective.

Fuck up, christfaggots, only homophiles want to keep mentally incapacitated vegetables alive.

Attached: image.jpg (340x600, 59K)

>shitty justification for your bullshit system
So if he was brain-dead and not an individual person any more (according to you) then why do you care what happens to his former body?

Would it be ethical to keep him alive forever? Or until the first experiment fails? But there will always be a wonder drug or therapy that some doctor would want to try. I think it is ethical to kill him now rather than let him be subject to experimentation that would not improve his life.

>I'm so concerned with vegetables
>wrings hands
>eyes dart from side to side
>licks lips

We still have standards. Just because he's braindead doesn't mean punching him is okay.

So instead you just let him suffocate in a hospitable bed away from his family. Nice!

>How do you bongs feel?
I support aktion T-4.

He's dead already. Cases like this happen somewhat reguarly but don't make the news because the parents don't throw a fit like these ones.

The way they are acting is digusting. Protesting outside a childrens hospital, trying to storm the hospital, putting up donkey rides and bouncy castles outside (yes). There are other sick children in there.

They're stupid, entitled working class cunts who think the world revolves around them.

The father robbed someone at knife point a few years back

>ethical to kill him now
So you admit that he wasn't braindead, in which case he should not have been removed from life support.

Ælfred is not a working class name