Ukraine

Why would they do it? They already profit from sucking Ukraine dry, and don't have to deal with hohols chimpouts. Keeping Ukraine that way is a win-win situation.

Estonia unlike you cucks managed to stay white for hundreds of years and it will always stay white, they even kept their original demographics under Soviet Union. So take your wikileaks alt right bs and shove it up your ass, dumb fuck.

>they even kept their original demographics under Soviet Union
Nigger, Estonia got 30% SLAVD under Soviet union. Literally went from 95% estonian to 70% now

Even according to the russian MoD this isn't true. Provide literally any proof of one being shot down.

Slavs are white just like the Estonians and other Balts.

Because the EU would shit itself and use it as an excuse to invade Russia and spread Diversity™ and Multiculturalism™ in the name of Angela Marxel.

>american calling me a cuck for not being white enough
like pottery

>Why doesn't Russia take back its rightful clay?

because nobody actually wants Ukraine

Go and be twelve years old somewhere else.
Its not rightfully Russian, however, the Ukrainians should stop murdering ethnic Russians on behalf of the United States in order to destabilize the region and threaten Russia.
Ukraine must relieve itself of it's US-puppet state position, mentality and label!

why do Russophiles treat their annexation of Crimea and possibly eastern Ukraine as some sort of glorious empire building?
what exactly IS the long-term geopolitical goal of Russia?

>Even according to the russian MoD this isn't true. Provide literally any proof of one being shot down.

the fact that nobody but an insane person could think the US fired 76 missiles at one small target consisting of 3 connected buildings

You really are a race of mongrels, a stud farm for mulattoes.

Why not let the West fund disastrous military ventures, pick their resources clean, destroy their culture, etc? All paid for by George Soros. They will become collectively helpless and surrender without a shot.

>the fact that nobody but an insane person could think the US fired 76 missiles at one small target consisting of 3 connected buildings
>I don't think they did, therefore it didn't happen
Funny, I seem to recall asking for proof.

>Why would they do it? They already profit from sucking Ukraine dry,

sucking it dry of what? there's nothing there

Ukraine is closer to Austria than to moscow

>Funny, I seem to recall asking for proof.

try and think rationally.

the US claims it fired 76 missiles at one small target where maybe 5, max 10 would have doen the job.

this doesnt make any sense.

things that dont make sense arent true unless there is insanity involved.

the US is not insane. it's just lying.

i rest my case.

Here, asshole who can't google....

rt.com/news/425120-russia-shows-downed-missiles-syria/

Plenty of hawt chix there.

Austin is closer to Mexico City than to Washington D.C

And Austin used to be Mexican

There is no reason Ukraine should belong to Moscow

>There is no reason Ukraine should belong to Moscow

dont worry, Ukraine is your tar baby.

Too many Ukrainians to deal with. Raising living standards in Crimea was hard enough on economy. Trying to pull it in all of ukraine is probably beyond Russia's current economy capability..

>the US claims it fired 76 missiles at one small target where maybe 5, max 10 would have doen the job.
They fired at three separate targets, only 2 were close-around 7KM from each other. So I'm not sure where you're getting this 1 target thing from.
Also if you're shooting at a facility that produces chemical weapons you'd want to make sure to completely destroy it to prevent leakage, that could cause collateral damage. Maybe they thought that the Russians would fire back, and launched extra weapons. My point here is that you don't just launch the minimum needed to do something, especially if there's a chance some of your missiles won't reach the target.

>Too many Ukrainians to deal with. Raising living standards in Crimea was hard enough on economy. Trying to pull it in all of ukraine is probably beyond Russia's current economy capability..

pouring money into ukraine is too expensive for anyone since the money is just embezzled and nothing changes

It isn't worth the effort.

I mean, risking ww3 for europes little africa?

Attached: ukraine.png (1260x2396, 739K)

So your argument boils down to "who won the last war"?

Also, Austin is pretty close to being mexian once more by ethnic data. At least Ukraine, for all its faults, is still Ukrainian.

I personally hope Belarus and Ukraine will decide to join us someday as a republics or something like that
But it should be their choice
Crimea was another case and i can't explain exactly why since i'm really bad at geopolitics and history and pretty much everything this board about

Attached: 5YjYpra.jpg (1000x800, 56K)

Well they are doing with Crimea, Donbass and probably Odessa. West is purely ukrainian and russians have nothing to do there.

>They fired at three separate targets, only 2 were close-around 7KM from each other. So I'm not sure where you're getting this 1 target thing from

i didnt say there was one target, i said they claimed to have fired 76 missiles at one target which is absurd and not credible.

by the way they missed one of the other supposed '3 targets' (ha ha) completely with only one crater

It tried but they fight back.

uk.reuters.com/article/uk-ukraine-crisis-russia-casualties/exclusive-over-100-russian-soldiers-killed-in-single-ukraine-battle-russian-rights-activists-idUKKBN0GS20H20140828

Attached: 1516131837831.jpg (640x360, 19K)

>Also if you're shooting at a facility that produces chemical weapons you'd want to make sure to completely destroy it to prevent leakage

seems the OPCW have confirmed there were no chemical weapons there

>i didnt say there was one target, i said they claimed to have fired 76 missiles at one target which is absurd and not credible.
Why? If you think that the enemy is going to fire back, why not overwhelm their defenses with missiles , especially seeing as the site in Damascus was the most heavily defended.

And you are wondering why nobody wants to see EU army.

>tfw Ukrainian

Attached: orangutanrelax.jpg (107x125, 2K)

Wish I could take over Spain, I would invade Ukraine and annex it, recruit population in army and defensive posistions and improve the economy, toss out all the Shaloms.

>Why? If you think that the enemy is going to fire back, why not overwhelm their defenses with missiles , especially seeing as the site in Damascus was the most heavily defended.

the target itself had no defences because it was an empty building. come on, dont be ridiculous.

76 missiles on one target has never happened before, they are just trying to cover up for all the missiles that failed or were shot down

>the target itself had no defences because it was an empty building. come on, dont be ridiculous.
The site was in Damascus. Damascus is surrounded by AA batteries and SAM sites.

Have a strong base to fuck up russia.

Here you have it, faggot.
veteranstoday.com/2018/04/25/trump-fail-russia-shows-tomahawk-missiles-shot-down-over-syria/
Your systems suck, your missiles suck and your army is a bunch of transfaggots and niggers. Thats why you lost literally every war.

+15

Attached: 1415580151125.jpg (225x225, 27K)

says hanz as his bleeding out grandfather watches the red army ukie rape his wife

press f to pay respects for the post ww2 german gene pool

Attached: sdgw454545.jpg (638x359, 27K)

That article is directly from Sputnik news you goddamn moron.

>veteranstoday
Well known Russian front.

Brain drain and cheap labour plus selling overpriced gas.

>The site was in Damascus. Damascus is surrounded by AA batteries and SAM sites.

the target had no point defence unlike other sites. its not surrounded by anything, its on the outskirts.

now fuck off and eat a hamburger you American cunt

>Brain drain and cheap labour plus selling overpriced gas.

i dont think theres much demand for ukrainian brains. as for the gas, if ukraine doesnt like it, its a free market, right?

Found the ukrainian, guys!

Attached: 1515934213873.jpg (507x563, 93K)

>The site had no air defense
>They shot down 70 missiles
pick one, brainlet.

Same reason the yanks don't take us, it's a bad idea to invade people who can pass as locals and don't want you, unless you like random explosions.

>And you are wondering why nobody wants to see EU army.
I don't want one.

Did you fall for the german pro EU bait?

They really fucked up with the war in Ukraine. Now they won't be able to take it as too many Ukrainians straight up hate Russia now after the bloody conflict.

Just like Northern Ireland will never be Irish.

Putin should have just taken Crimea by the vote and then funneled money into Ukraine in order to get Ukraine to slowly side more and more with Russia than the EU.

Attached: 1430088815865.jpg (160x160, 18K)

So you would rather have an article from CNN? ABC? CBS? FOX?
You are a bunch of morons, honestly. Just face it, you have been humilated by an ancient s200-system and this is why US and coalition didn't have the balls to continue with their attacks.

>>The site had no air defense
>>They shot down 70 missiles
>pick one, brainlet.

easy. america is lying about targeting that site with 76 missiles.

didnt i say that earlier? several times? are you retarded?

Russia could conquer all of Europe if the US wasn't involved.

>they fucked up
this is true

Attached: mdiw9.jpg (428x624, 79K)

youtube.com/watch?v=YXzMCNWiouo
With shrapnel as proofs.

about 75% of your missiles got shut down by soviet-aged weapons LMAO

Yeah, they are buying even more expensive gas from us, and we get it from Qatar. The shipping costs alone are insane.

yeah, one of the wealthy austro empire ones whos grandparents were smart enough to BTFO'd out of ukraine before the Leninists grabbed our land

also half german so WHAT NOW HANZ WE COULD BE COUSINS

pic related

Attached: NEWEUROPE2050.png (1200x1200, 67K)

Bullshit, they had an ancient soviet s200-system that humilated you big league. kek

Those bombs cost a goddamned fortune

>attack a building in syria
>fire 70 fucking bombs at it instead of one big one
wtf I hate trump

>Yeah, they are buying even more expensive gas from us, and we get it from Qatar. The shipping costs alone are insane.

they dont buy gas from Poland.

>after two weeks we show a bunch of fragments from the different missiles
>we shot down 100 tomahawks
>it's tomahawks because we put stickers on these pieces of old junk
>don't ask questions because we're rt
>Americans are all stupid
>Russia Stronk
Ahahaha dumb fucking russians. You really think someone with a brain will ever buy your bullshit?

Spain could conquer russia.

I asked you to provide proof that any of the missiles were shot down. For some reason, you seem to think that it's outrageous that the U.S. would fire a large amount of cruise missiles at one target(that's heavily defended) and that constitutes proof that they were shot down.
Remember, these are the "people" that literally copied a model of the stinger from Battlefield 3 as "proof" of U.S. weapons in Ukraine.

>Ahahaha dumb fucking russians. You really think someone with a brain will ever buy your bullshit?

do you think anyone is going to buy that you fired 76 missiles at one small target?

No retard, they shot down 70% of all missiles shot at Syria and the shrapnel proves that. I know it hurts but you should be used to it considering you fucked up last time you tried to bomb Syria. Just face it, the russians have a better army and much better systems than your rusty old junk despite them using ancient soviet systems. One can only imagine what humiliation they would cause you if you went to war with them during the cold war era. lel

>I asked you to provide proof that any of the missiles were shot down.

and i provided simple logical analysis that americas story makes zero sense.

>Spain could conquer russia.
Hola, Pablo.

>For some reason, you seem to think that it's outrageous that the U.S. would fire a large amount of cruise missiles at one target(that's heavily defended)

the target was an undefended empty building. hitting it with 76 missles makes no sense at all.

northern ireland will be 60% catholic in 2021

now fuck off with your bullshit

Hola, Spain could mobilize 400 million troops from Latin America with Spanish pesos.

I trust generals Mattis and Dunford. Not a single one got shut down.

cant be more of a meme army than present day us welfare army where women, fags trannies and mentally ill can serve and where bars are lovered each year so tykesha jackson and pedro gonzalez can pass

Except it does if you think that the Syrians are going to try and shoot down your missiles.

They do now. We are even building a brand new pipeline to sell them even more overpriced gas. It's a completely retarded situation. Russia continuous to their main supplier but we are getting there.

Attached: gas emipre 2.png (604x596, 106K)

>Except it does if you think that the Syrians are going to try and shoot down your missiles.
how could they when the building is undefended

So they didn't shoot any down? Or did they?

They just couldn't stomach the carnage.

youtube.com/watch?v=m3lF2qEA2cw

Attached: Anoa depressicornis0.jpg (300x202, 16K)

No one in Latin America would fight for Spain.

>no one in Latin America would fight for Spain
It’s called the mother country in all Latin America, Latin American families come from Spain and we all speak same language and have same blood.

>So they didn't shoot any down? Or did they?

looks like they shot quite a few down. almost certainaly the US accounted for this by pretending they were only striking 3 meaningless targets with 103 missiles.

one of the 3 targets is lterally just a hut and they missed it lol

Of course they did. They have collected pieces of tomahawk missiles and out them out on display in Moscow.
youtube.com/watch?v=YXzMCNWiouo

everything west of dnieper is polish

400 million Latinos in 3 days could be transported organized in Spain, Venezuelan oil would be sent to European Hispanic territory for refinement and use in motorized airforve and armor divisions.

you just cant argue with american cretins. they think their 1970s era missiles cant be shot down

And what would these troops do? Mow lawns? Housekeeping or maybe steal car-radios?

>t.nigger