All the sexual revolution did was make the sexual market more efficient...

All the sexual revolution did was make the sexual market more efficient. Men who are comparatively more attractive to women should be the ones fucking them. Meanwhile the rest of you who had your sexual access diminished and are currently seeking the equivalent of sexual welfare simply need to accept that the pussy you would have had years ago is not coming back. You need to work on filling a new niche in the market like lopping your dick off and being a woman yourself, becoming gay, or maybe being the emotional support or providing some other non-sexual service for women. The free market will place you where you belong and if you aren't at the top, it's because you are meant to be somewhere else. Embrace it.

Attached: 1522858804557.jpg (755x553, 72K)

Other urls found in this thread:

arhiva.dalje.com/en-world/video--wife-leaves-disfigured-us-hero-ziegel/150202
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyler_Ziegel
streamable.com/ij5bk
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>Makes the sexual market more efficient
According to that infographic less people are having sex now.

So...rape?

>should
there is no should polanon. There is the way things are

if you want to 'fill a niche in the market' as you put it your best bet is to become a criminal, violent criminal if you have the balls

Someone post the picture where all the men without women turn into wizards and summon a demon with their fearsome wizard powers.

How do the chads quell the inevitable incel uprising?

The eugenicist in me agrees to an extent. At the same time civilization can not exist with current system of female sexual selection.

start hitting the gym you bitter autist

Of course its Itali-bro who comes to the rescue with this, the final solution.

Attached: brock.gif (621x413, 95K)

Fewer

Attached: 1502317730668.jpg (900x429, 100K)

Attached: 1503770331651.jpg (503x644, 38K)

do you want more van rentals? this is how you get more van rentals.

Attached: Ryder_even_better.png (460x109, 6K)

>tfw i have 4 girls lined up to fuck me
lol shits easy brahs, bleach em and dump em

Your best bet is to build yourself into a successful, independent person in your 30s and go after younger women in their late teens/early 20s with far less baggage. Men don't reach their professional prime until their 40s or 50s and their peak SMV is in their late 30s

Cultivate yourself so you have the pick of the litter. Then you don't have to settle for a whore your age

Attached: 1517815481103.png (1150x556, 50K)

MGTOW here. For the last time, I have zero interest in your beef flaps.

>Top men mate with low tier women in addition to high tier women
>Genetic crossover+Low quality women=many low quality sons
>Nothing changes except now the loser men fuck off to play video games since they can't get gfs

Good plan.

enjoy your "vibrant" and "dynamic" civilisation were a majority of productive men are disenfranchised and ready to give you the middle finger at the first opportunity.

Attached: 1524693767683.jpg (755x553, 99K)

What happens to that diagram when you draw the resulting children in?

Get your English grammar right jailbird, your sovereign is still an old English lady

Attached: 1524454819055.jpg (672x509, 38K)

>The free market will place you where you belong and if you aren't at the top

It's not the top tier phd men who get the women
its the illiterate niggers

Attached: 1497469808289.jpg (212x206, 8K)

>How do the chads quell the inevitable incel uprising?
They don't. Getting gassed in the camps for their degenerate behavior is their destiny.

>talking to this 40+ year old lady
>she mentions that shitty TV show sister wives
>try to explain to her why polygamy and hypergamy are bad
>use muslim world as example
>if 1 guy has 4 wives then that means 3 men will never get married
>they know they won't get married
>they have no motivation to succeed in life, have a stable job,etc because they are locked out of the sexual market
>this is why they rape
>society breaks down when men stop contributing to it, which is happening now since a lot of guys give up today
I saw the wheels turn in her head, but I think 5 minutes later she forgot everything and kept her dumb slut opinion

Attached: 1283923310906.jpg (375x282, 13K)

Men do not become rapists simply because they can't get a wife or get laid, they might become unmotivated or sad but not turn into rapists

You tradcucks use so many feminist "arguments" I can't even tell the difference.

Yeah, and celibacy has nothing to do with why priests fuck kids.

Unless you can prove to me that celibacy causes a man to become a pedophile, then you can stop talking shit out of your ass.

Most priests are already effeminate, so the theory that they are already pedos before makes just as much sense, if not more. Homosexuals are a lot more likely to be pedophiles than straight men.

Attached: homosexuals are pedophiles.png (793x505, 50K)

low quality woman + high quality man = medium quality son, certainly better than LQ woman + LQ man's son.

slowly the most degenerate genes would be sliced off generation by generation, or at least improved.

Attached: 1380380507086.jpg (3268x553, 417K)

I can't see how sexual frustration has nothing to do with sexual crime

the illiterate niggers are banging illiterate niggers. every person with a PhD making bookoo bucks has either a trophy wife or a genius wife. intelligence/education correlate with wealth, wealth and intelligence put you higher on the totem pole. good luck fren

Or we can just drop out of society, play videogames all day and fap to 2D girls. It's much more fun.

Attached: 107cb1e048d0822605ef3427691adbec.jpg (800x1119, 824K)

It is efficient, Only the best ones gets to lay.

Those who do get multiple. This system rewards positive traits and heavily penalizes negatives.

No, it rewards dumb bimbos who will raise their children as welfare queens.

You "can't see" but you can't prove any of this, you just made this stupid path in your mind: Men has no sex -> men rape

To me, a girl not wanting to fuck me is the thing that makes my dick the most soft, nothing turns me off more than a girl not into it, even if I spent 1 year without sex and never touching my dick, it would not make me want to rape women

The "sexual frustration turn men into rapists" is a bullshit feminist argument and like any other has no basis in reality.

positive traits its not what you think user

Where's Lisa Ann?

You haven't posted a single thing to prove my thought pattern incorrect. And not once did I claim "it makes all men rapists" just that is a contributing factor.
>1 year without sex and never touching my dick, it would not make me want to rape women
Because you have access to sex in form of prostitutes. You know you can get it anytime you want even if you are a loser.

>the illiterate niggers are banging illiterate niggers. every person with a PhD making bookoo bucks has either a trophy wife or a genius wife.
What a meme
would be nice if it wasn't reversed because of social justice.

Attached: 1504817156318.jpg (800x803, 106K)

>Prove to me why I'm wrong!!

That's not how science works, if you make bold claims like "men rape when they don't have sex" then you have the burden of proof. You are just another feminist retard who claims all men are "potential rapists"

cool ifunny pepe!
if you think social justice penetrates that deep, ur a cuck lol xd whites are the least likely to marry other races. if you want to talk about banging, telegony, mirochimerism, whatever i'd love to see statistics about premarital sex partners by race, but until then, beautiful white women will always have rich white men as their targeted husbands of choice.

Attached: me.png (900x900, 1.34M)

Not much really changed with the sexual revolution. High ranking men get more sex than low ranking ones. But low ranking women get more sex than high ranking ones. So who are Chads screwing? All the sluts.

Attached: DatingHierarchy.png (256x391, 72K)

The traits women are selecting is based on prehistoric criteria. We aren't living in the stone age, we are living in the information age. We need to breed for intelligence, not things like height, muscle mass, and aggression.

listen you god damn pathetic losers. not all men got the women. just like the animal kingdom, alpha males dominate the females. don't blame women for being autistic or having a micropenis. that's how the animal kingdom works. beta's aren't meant to procreate.

Attached: 2357938469834.jpg (1000x1000, 133K)

why not both? i don't think intelligence and physical beauty are mutually exclusive, you probably wouldnt either. would you prefer a very intelligent ugly person over a mildly intelligent attractive person (for breeding)?

Attached: 1524545293928.jpg (1280x960, 134K)

Excuse me.

White men worked to provide all the nice things women enjoy.

They rewarded us for this by fucking their fellow parasites instead.

We kept our end of the bargain. They did not keep theirs.

They want to sleep with Merchants and niggers, gas then and throw them in the same mass grave, and they can sleep with them there.

White men are sick of being fucked over by people who would still be living in caves except for us.

The day the artificial uterus is perfected is the day the gender war begins in earnest. And the cunts will LOSE.

The point of a sexual market is to produce healthy and competent children. This one is failing.

You're less likely to find someone with both brains and beauty. The Tinder stats show women go for a small pool of "hot guys." The guys who have harems these days aren't all intelligent millionaires, they're just good looking brainlets. It would be better to breed for intelligence, and use surgery to aid beauty, until we can do gene editing to fix height, eye/hair/skin color etc. Gene editing for intelligence will be much harder because there is no single gene for it.

Attached: oh really is that why, styx.jpg (1200x827, 126K)

That's also true. Children raised by single mothers are worse in every statistical category. Unless you are going to force polygamous marriages and have these Chads pay for their entire harem (good luck in the modern economy) then it will end up with childless men subsidizing those single mothers through the state.

what is your plan for convincing Jow Forums, or regular people, to breed with jews and asians for maximum intelligence desu senpai

Attached: nastywoman.png (900x900, 1.48M)

>if you think social justice penetrates that deep, ur a cuck
I'm a cuck for pointing out that niggers are the ones fucking white chicks ?

I'm not a cuck but you are obviously a lying sack of commie shit if you're trying to obfuscate the problem here.

Not him, I'd say makeup for men.

They should breed with their own kind. I support ethno-states. We need to reduce the size of government and stop subsidizing women for their poor choices. Once women have to put a greater emphasis on their partners earning potential, then it's inevitable that intelligence will win out due to the fact that higher IQ correlates with higher earnings.

Imagine believing that niggers are out-competing you in the sexual marketplace.

>intelligence/education correlate with wealth
No it doesnt, it would in a perfect fucking world, but we dont live in a perfect world do we.

We live in a world where you controlled by lefty social justice advocates. Quotas everywhere.
You obviously dont have any experience trying to apply for a job after many years of education or you would know this, unless you're either a nigger or a feminist.
Which would make you a hypocrite.

>Imagine believing that niggers are out-competing you in the sexual marketplace.

They're fucking you half breeds aren't they?

>bookoo
Beaucoup. It's beaucoup. You illiterate hick.

IQ is a greater predictor of lifetime earnings than any other measure. But yes, you are correct that current government policies and our culture at large have been fucking with that setup. Women no longer need to worry about paying for bastards and the stigma associated with them, so they can fuck the guy who turns on the primitive part of her brain, and ignore how she is going to care for any potential children. We built civilization by giving women the incentive to choose partners more carefully for the ability to provide. In the modern economy the ability to provide is much more dependent on intelligence than brute strength and size. If we stop subsidizing women with the state and stop the progressive social engineering we can go back to our civilizations roots.

A man of culture.

Attached: 1516799950997.png (300x300, 96K)

this. I'm 31 and get lots more attention from women than I used to. stop giving a shit, get a job, get your own place, do your own stuff, and women will just fall in line. they have no idea what they want and just latch onto men who do.

thanks. this is why i clicked dis

I became less interested in women after I got redpilled about how they aren't really capable of loving in the same way as men are. I always thought you're meant to bond with a spiritual, emotional, moral, counterpart - the kind of thing you see in an Disney movie. But chances of that happening are very, very unlikely because those qualities in women, if they have them at all, don't come close to what a man possesses. And there's probably an evolutionary explanation for that; men die in war, get eaten by predators while hunting, etc., so being able to easily detach from a bond and move on to the next guy is a beneficial adaptation. Therefore, if I'm not with a woman, the only real thing I'm missing out on is sex. I'm not denying myself some profound, meaningful, devoted relationship with a soulmate because that's not genuinely possible in most cases. And sex, at the end of the day, isn't that important once you've experienced it a few times. If anything, if you're not doing specifically for procreation, it's actually a distraction from doing other more important things.

Attached: scbok17l1qs01.jpg (2208x1242, 176K)

lol,

truth be told I'm genuinely surprised society isn't based around ignoring all the whims of women and just raping them when you feel like it. It would be the easiest way to structure it.

The polish cuckhold shows his true face, kill yourself, faggot

Good one, stealing it.

Attached: howcanIdieforyou.jpg (483x768, 99K)

I feel the urge to save this pic and I fucking made the original one

Attached: 0la.jpg (800x804, 56K)

That's so fucked up it has to be real

the four women I had sex with were all better than me - financially, aesthetically, morally. it's all chaos. market rules don't apply to the sexual market because it's all too random.

Attached: goku high.jpg (279x280, 18K)

DUUDE WEED LMAO
Right, lets all view & plan our existence through your fucking anecdotal platitudes, because fuck statistics and collective perspective.

Do you think scientific institutions should also take your shitty life experiences into account before they officially confirm/disprove a theory?

Attached: 1500481295398.gif (200x232, 881K)

>Right, lets all view & plan our existence through your fucking anecdotal platitudes
I never told anyone how to live their lives. people need to find their own way of life.

>because fuck statistics and collective perspective.
OP provided zero source on the image. where's the research on that statistic?

>Do you think scientific institutions should also take your shitty life experiences into account before they officially confirm/disprove a theory?
I never said they should. you're fighting windmills dude. all I'm saying is that you should go out and get experience first hand, instead of basing your views on different genders by looking at Jow Forums jpgs.

>more efficient
That's now how "efficiency" works brainlet, that's why western birthrates are plummeting. Governments realized too late that turning +60% of the population into childless deviants was probably bad for population demographics, but at the same time they are too vain to admit they were wrong. Hence mass immigration to make up for the population steadily declining. Importing people from, mind you, places that don't share the same social "progress" of the place they are being imported and therefore having many children and their own "proven" family structures; to replace the hobbled and crippled one they ended up ultimately making through "progress".

arhiva.dalje.com/en-world/video--wife-leaves-disfigured-us-hero-ziegel/150202
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyler_Ziegel
>On October 7, 2006, shortly after discharge from the hospital, Tyler Ziegel married Renée Kline, whom he met before being sent to Iraq. They got engaged during Ty's short vacation, when Renée's father died in an accident. Ty and Renée's wedding was widely reported by the press in the United States. Their marriage day was declared a holiday in Illinois.[2] The wedding was attended by American photographer Nina Berman. She took a series of shots, one of which won First Prize among portraits on World Press Photo.[5][6] A year after the wedding Ziegel and Kline divorced. The reason for the divorce, according to them, was the haste with which they were married, and ill-considered decision to marry.[2]

>After the tragedy Ziegel tried to live a socially active life. He was not able to work and United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) paid him benefits.[2] However in 2007 Ziegel had to start a dispute with VA over the size of the monthly compensation.[7] Instead of the expected $4000, initially he was awarded $2700, which, according to Ty, was not enough to comfortably raise a family.

>In early May 2013, after an investigation of Ziegel's death, Peoria County Coroner Johnna Ingersoll said that death was caused by alcohol and drug intoxication, not by the fall.[13][14][15][16][17] The analysis showed that Ziegel had a blood alcohol level of .123 and a level of morphine indicating the presence of heroin was 540 ng/ml. None of these values are lethal in themselves. The cause of death, according to Ingersoll, was the combination of these substances.

Attached: y172169758677342.jpg (400x300, 17K)

so now instead of every man and women having 8 children we get manchildren cat ladies and the top 2 couples having 1 or 2 children?
Nice "efficiency."

What ? It's just Pareto Principal. 20% of men get 80% of women. 80% of men want 20% of women. It's natural law. I feel bad for those in the 80%.

Jews sure, since they're mostly European. Asians would cause biological issues with your son.

>market rules don't apply to the sexual market
I'm not gonna argue semantics with you, your overall message shits on both pattern extraction and generalizations that help us make sense of the world.

Not like I give a fuck either way, I just dislike half-truths and dishonest deflections.

Attached: 1503673936281.gif (336x335, 2.56M)

I see what you are doing there

>Calum von Moger
his long-term gf (a 6/10 with 10/10 body) dumped him and moved on with another guy 72 hours after he got seriously injured.
streamable.com/ij5bk

Attached: 1231766415.jpg (750x750, 111K)

Lots of guys on Jow Forums love the idea of hierarchy and social Darwinism... until they realize that they're not at the top of the hierarchy in some way. So you end up having people who believe in a weird mix of meritocracy and socialism.

>your overall message shits on both pattern extraction and generalizations that help us make sense of the world.

yeah, my overall message "go out and experience things on your own" truly shits on real life experience. bro are you really saying that people should trust Jow Forums posts more than real life experience? because that's what I'm saying, go out and find out what women are like in real life, instead of listening to autists here on Jow Forums

It's objectively inefficient as borne out by the birthrates.

100% agreed.
Women are a fun distraction, nothing else. I'm old enough to remember life before internet porn, women had way more value back then. On the other side of the coin, men are now just props to show off on social media.
These days people have deeper relationships with their electronic devices than real interactions with actual humans.

This. Home work out. Get your weight up.

Quality > quantity. The low birthrates are only a problem because immigration policies are what they are, not in their own right.

>efficient
Naturalistic fallacy. Next.

It has been too few years since monogamous order of society was gone, and moral laws of it are still present. Just give some more decades, and you have even more rapes, chimpouts and social collapses than you might possibly want until it goes town altogether and we'll be back to situation that forced rulers of men to instill monogamy in society in first place.

I'm fat, unattractive and a manlet to boot, and still I've fucked over a dozen women all way above my league. If the sexual 'revolution' did anything, it was making it easier for people like me to get one nighters.

>hurr durr getting fucked by a jacked dude also means that he will stay and take care of his offspring

The current situation is just the side effect of socialism. In the past women had to settle with the nice guy because he actually has the empathy and work ethics to feed a family, raise kids and not run off with the next bitch.

Since we have socialism these ancient rules of common sense don't apply and women can fuck who they want and later get society to pay for and raise their children via neetbux, public schools, redditors and whatnot.

So whites dying out and letting ugly beaners and muslims outbreed them is a good thing? Cause that's what you promote.

>Hence mass immigration to make up for the population steadily declining
>He actually buys this

Yeah because just look what polygamy has done for Africa. SAGE

Attached: brainlet1.png (550x543, 18K)

Normal, non-sociopathic men don't want to rape women. A society structured based around raping women would be ISIS-tier.

Do not support welfare system. Educate everyone you know to not support welfare system. Even if you arent good enough to sabotage it with your own efforts (most people arent natural born revolutionaries), become dead weight on it - it'll hurt it too as it's designed around white males supporting it. In a meanwhile, spend your free time to attain good physical form and practice on growing your own food.

This 100%. The sexual revolution made it easier for relatively unattractive men to get laid, not harder.

First of all you have to understand that women were always attracted to money and fame simply from a biological reproductive standpoint.
The problem we have today is that they've been given rights/benefits which were never earned or deserved on their part which created an unnatural balance and hostility between the sexes.

I'm not going to deny it happening, it's just much slower and less detrimental than they claim. It's probably not even a "problem" that needs fixing, which is why they make such a huge fucking deal about it before it's blatantly a lie that can't be pushed.

By various estimates from 50% to 80% of all men are look undesirable to women. But you are not supposed to think about what woman thinks, you are supposed to fulfill your biological imperative, and if woman arent okay with it you subjugate it, that's why nature granted you superior strength and wits. Rape is as natural as breathing. Woman are just a resource you're supposed to claim, your real rival is other man who also want this resource.
Here we come to monogamy being pact among men who decide to evenly share limited resource to avoid fighting and focus on common good, but this is another story.

Attached: 1502018390232.png (933x626, 96K)

bookoo is a valid spelling of it in hickland, but I'll start using beaucoup just feur yeaux, beaux beaux.