Does the state own our children?
nobody owns people, you nigger
the state owns all
and who owns the state?
who pays the fiddler calls the tune
You know, I have to wonder, if these were the children of brown Muslim immigrants, would the UK be withdrawing life support against the parents' will?
nope, and if the parents were trannies or faggots they wouldnt either
and its not even just withdrawing life support, it's forbbiding them (police involved and all) to even take him home or to an italian hospital that agreed to pursue further treatment options
google ashya king for a previous case, were the judges said kids was gonna die, parents took him to the continent for treatment and the government started an itnernational manhunt to arrest the parents for taking their own kid to a fucking hospital. kid is still alive today
>Italy has sent a military plane to Britain to transport Alfie to Rome if the courts allow it. Alfie has also been granted Italian citizenship to facilitate his arrival and transport.
Wtf britain
They’re all Italian citizens, so unless they can renounce their UK citizenship, they’re hostages basically
Anyone talking about this incident will be arrested in the UK
>da peopl own da sdate
its a police state, literal 1984 tier shithole, yet they cant stop 1400 kids being raped
Why are you opposing the Courts ruling?
stfu ultra brainlet.
drop the memeflag britcuck
>Kekistani
>Calling anyone a brainlet
I don't understand British, what is the logic behind them doing this? I am seriously asking because I can't begin to understand who benefits from telling people they can't take their kids to a hospital.
Yes.
Now crawl for me, slave.
well, on the last thread about it they defended it in the name of eugenics, not using taxpayers' money (which they werent gonna use in italy anyway), and "its the courts decision", aka bootlicking
That nonsense aside, what does the British gov. get out of preventing the family from going to another country eager to pay for it?
control over kids
some theories is that they wont be ashamed like in the ashya king case again, in case the kid lives, or that they want to sell the organs, or that they just want to keep their power over others because fuck freedom, or that they want to hide some fuckup they did, or that they're eugenists
officially its because "its in the better interests of the kid to die in the UK because he's gonna die anyway and otherwise might suffer", but ofc he must die in the hospital, not at home or whatever
selling organs is hysterical, no one actually believes that do they?
The suffer thing seems very illogical in this case, given that the kid is already brain dead as far as I've hear, the judge even specifically stated he can't feel pain.
>does the state own our children?
the state owns everything when the people are disarmed
anc*ps are subhuman
The dictatorship of the proletariat, right comrade?
dunno if they do, but they said this hospital did this before so who knows, not like you can trust bongistan instittutions to not fuck up children
and I agree, his argument is inconsistent, faggot just wants to play god and tell parents what they do