>study industrial revolution
>become unabomber
has anybody else taken the kaczynski pill?
>study industrial revolution
>become unabomber
has anybody else taken the kaczynski pill?
Other urls found in this thread:
I agree with his ideas but his tactics were objectively stupid. Should have gone the Gandhi route. Then again nothing will stop global capitalist mechanization until it collapses under its own weight
Kaczynski was right in his diagnosis but I don't agree with the treatment. There's no need to go back to caveman tier. We can sustain a healthy civilization without destroying the earth and trivializing human life. As far as I know he wasn't spiritual either. Survival for the sake of survival makes no sense to me, there has to be a greater goal.
The question is if so many people would have heard of him if he did that.
Going back to caveman tier is pretty retarded when everyone else and their uncle is investing in modern technology. We don't live in a vacuum. Fallowing KaczyĆski's ideas would lead us to become the next Abos.
>Should have gone the Gandhi route.
>t.Boomer
Yeah, pretty much. Anarcho-Primitivism would require some sort of cataclysmic event where everyone is magically wiped out and for some reason no one attempts to rebuild. The vast majority of all humans would have to die and the rest would have to agree to not rebuild and destroy any remaining knowledge whole not sharing any they might personally remember.
Clearly this isn't a realistic scenario, but even if it worked what would it actually lead up to? Survival for the sake of survival. Simply existing without any clear goal. Preoccupied with mundane matters of food and shelter. If one has a purely materialist worldview antinatalism is a much more logical conclusion.
he was unquestionable correct but bombing some random niglets was not the solution
sadly he was before the time of hitlerpill
Tedpill is a tough swallow but I forced it down.
given his iq and how he is right about almost everything, something bugs me a lot:why didn't he name the jew influence?is he not aware of it, or just avoids it to keep some credibility and instead substitute it for "system"?
He's generally not redpilled on race unfortunately
none of you have actually read kaczynski
READ THE MANIFESTO
Ghandi was successful in the end. Mussolini got dragged behind a truck.
psyop
Ghandi was a piece of shit hippie lesbian Pajeet
>muh race redpill
You guys are retarded as fuck. Why would he name the jew and have all of his work branded as anti-semitic and forgotten? Also, as much as you want race to matter so much, even a dog can be trained to do things, why would african american niggers and sand niggers be any different? Except for abos, they are too unevolved unfortunately, they are literally 9000-20000BC behind.
You should read Pentti Linkola he's Finnish writer.
I agree i am just interested in the possibility of nonviolent resistance
"bash my head in i dare you!"
OUCH OUCH OUCH
thats basically how it goes, keep walking until they stop or they kill you.
no, ghandi was a genocide inducing mob boss
Don't fall for the Boomer narrative of the peaceful little manlet. He knew what he was doing and hated the jews and pakis as much everybody else. Fan of Hitler btw
His work has already been "branded" as "crazy" and "terrorist" so why the fuck would he care for the "anti-semitic" label? He wouldn't. It's just that he is not redpilled on race and the JQ, read his letters from the prison and some of his work you dumb fuck
Manlets. When will they learn?
Every single "peaceful" movement succeeded because there was a parallel violent movement. The perception of a peaceful movement allows the current powers to save face while acquiescing to the demands of the violent movement.
Also you should analyze your own thinking patterns. Why do you think civil disobedience is a successful strategy? Because you were taught it was in school. Public schools. A government has extreme incentive to teach ineffective strategies for influencing things that matter. Funny enough, Ted talks about this in his manifesto. All of these would be agents for social change get swept up in some predefined movement purposely designed by the people in power to fulfill their psychological desires rather than actually cause any change.
>flaggot
>lost his temper
>JQ
>no good argument
>doesn't understand how much damage branding something anti-semitic as opposed to crazy or terrorist does.
Obviously underage. Need a B&
kys gypsy.
It was a great argument. You obviously haven't read Ted
Linkola is a great mind and a hard man
You've got a point there
hi alexandru, how are your gypsies doing?I bet you trained them to do a lot of useful shit and they contribute nicely to your advanced society and are no burden at all...they are very mild and peacuful people, right?right?kek
he didn't do the bombings to make the system fall, retards
he did it purely for his manifesto to get published
you can't have a cake and eat it, so destroying whole technology is the only solution, there are no middle-solutions and lesser evils
science is redundant too