Motives

When Muslims drive trucks packed with explosives into crowds of people killing hundreds each year, the media are quick to say that this behavior has nothing to do with religious belief. It happened because the man lacked good opportunities in life and was driven to violence in response to oppressive imperialism.

Yet when some sexually frustrated headcase commits a crime like this, they have no problem identifying what motivated him. It was misogyny, and an obsession with Chad&Stacey memes. Obviously.

We would never expect the media to say "This has nothing to do with misogyny, or red pill philosophy. This man was driven to violence in response to male-o-phobia, and an oppressive society which afforded him no opportunities in life."

So why is this?

Attached: svet.jpg (768x960, 78K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=5AkAGc5nOXw
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Is that a?...my god

And you know why

the Left , (Which the mainstream media and most internet media and the government are all part of) does not believe in PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY.
of any kind, whatsoever. So when someone commits a crime they look for excuses , because if they admitted it was the guy's own fault and he killed people of his own accord, they'd be admitting there's such a thing as personal responsibility and then their whole worldview would come crashing down like a Jenga tower.

Hot Grill and yes the media are hypocritical hyper leftists.

Attached: giphy (6).gif (331x197, 1.71M)

so why is it that they are selective when it comes to holding people accountable for their actions? why, in their view, are white males responsible for their actions but basically no one else is, and why do they call people who clearly are not white, white? (guy in charlottesville was a jew, toronto guy is armenian).

also, with islam specifically it seems they truly believe that if we don't do anything to provoke them the problem will just go away in a few generations as they assimilate into post-western degenerate consumer (((culture))), which may actually be true, to the extent that it possibly can be true. they want muslims to meld into the western proletariat sphere so they have access to larger demographics to sell things to.

Attached: 1515860238243.png (1191x767, 667K)

#NotAllIncels

That's a very interesting question, and it's ubiquitous in Spain. As a matter of fact, the very same day the Islamic attack in Barcelona, the media hurried up to differentiate Islam from Jihad. "Islam is a Religion of Peace" is their mantra.

But people are not believing it anymore.

See, for instance, this analysis by a Muslim woman who escaped from her country:
Ayaan Hirsi Ali. youtube.com/watch?v=5AkAGc5nOXw

Historically, Muhammad was nothing but a warlord who wanted to legitimize his conquests using a brand new religion he founded. Those who didn't believe in his delusional absurdities were mercilessly executed or enslaved (look for the treatment fo Kafir, the 'infidels': kill the men and enslave women and children). Thus, Muhammad was no different from any other feudal lord with his ambitions.

Moreover, by any means was he morally respectable: he had 13 wives, including little Aisha, of 6 years old, and with whom he consummated the marriage when she was 9 years old. Doesn't it sound like pedophilia, which is actually a common practice in Muslim countries?

In the end, Islam is still a religion of 7th century, revolving around violence and war (Jihad againts infidels and pagans is one os the 6 Pillars of Islam). Unlike Chrstendom, they haven't had Renaissance, Baroque, Scientici Revolution or the Enlightenment. Muslims are still medieval people with medieval lifestyles and medieval beliefs.

If this wasn't true, why Muslim countries are mere sh*tholes, with traditions such as genital mutilation? Or the Islamic veil?

They aren't compatible with us. Islam doesn't belong in Europe!

Attached: Islam Out of Europe.jpg (720x596, 45K)

>"It happened because the United states, Britain, and Israel have a network of internationalist jewish bankers that create a layer of executive intelligence agencies that then move around money between NGOs to fund the creation of terrorism"

I fixed it

here's my opinion on the matter:

You can use one-sided responsibilities and overblowing events and the likes simply to weave a narrative that more easily fits your viewpoints. If you can convince the viewership/readership/whatevership that your viewpoints are valid by overblowing events and putting responsibility onto an entire field, you have an easier time discrediting the opposition.

Problem with that is, anyone who actually uses critical thinking sees past these attempts, either by consulting other media, trying to view this from several perspectives or whatever, which is also why the trust towards mainstream media is at an alltime low.

I may be talking out of my ass here, not like that's something new from a hans, and on that statement, pic related

Attached: 3-format2403.jpg (1920x1301, 221K)

Interesting points you make user, people seem to be cottoning on now to what Muhammad got up to, as it's easily accessible by reading the Hadith(s).
The thing that people don't seem to get, is that Allah frequently states in scripture that Muhammad was the ideal muslim and that muslims should do their best to emulate his actions.

Given that, when i hear things on this board like:
>"Islam keeps women in line and give you muh freedoms"
>"We should work together with muslims to fight degeneracy in the west!"
It makes me think that some of you are either grossly uninformed or just shills when I see this stuff really.

Take note also, that because of his marriage and consummation to Aisha, marrying girls of that age will always be acceptable and canon to muslims who actually follow the faith. Maybe some of you in the west are fine with having your daughters willingly exposed to people that believe this...
But I'm not.
Islam and its implications for non-muslims is truly terrifying stuff lads.

yes, the question naturally leads to one conclusion. it's a marxist narrative. everyone who is not a white male lashing out=oppressed victim. white male lashing out=oppressor who is frustrated at his lack of power.

this sort of dialectic is infectious to dim people because it's very easy to understand and so (falsely) empowering. it gives you a clear enemy (whites) and justifies your failures for you so you don't have to take any responsibility.

>So why is this?
Why is (((this)))?
ftfy!

Protip: muslims who suicide/gung ho or try to are usually also incels. In muslim society, there are a number of requirements one must meet, depending on the severity of the sharia's enforcement in any given place. So, say you come from a moderate country, have a decent job at a relative's shop, and some band of faggots comes in and overthrows that. At the same time, they confiscate and copulate with the women in the area, taking as many brides and concubines as they want. Meanwhile, the girl you were going to marry is now off-limits, because you are not mujahedin and your job is not sufficient ownership or position to be allowed to breed. The sponsor of the local psychotic fucktard Wahhabist movement comes in and gives out favors, praises the scumbag soldiers and then carts off all of the relatively eligible remaining virgins as spoils.

Get caught talking to a woman, much less fucking her while not being allow, and you die. Join the local psychotic boyfucker no-homo Caliphate movement, and you get a chance to pass on your genes with some 5/10 harelipped hambeast before you are sent off to blow yourself up, or, if you are "devout enough", maybe to refugee yourself to a Western country, get some paid, diseased pussy for a little while, then die. Or just stay celibate.

It's all incel shit. Only completely unmanly cunts do this shit, and usually because they bow down in humiliation to sexless lives they refuse to fix. Islamists just use it as one element of their overall approach to creating suffering and compliance.

*Shrug* Fuck if I care.

Very true. Many people, not only on Jow Forums, but actually respectable politicians, believe that Islam should be an ally of the West in order to "fight degeneracy". They think Muslims are mere conservatives, eager to collaborate with us.

But that couldn't be more naïve. Muslims are not conservatives, but plainly medieval. And I'm very sceptical of their willingness to collaborate with Europeans, mainly because of their hatred towards us, the 'Kafir'.

'Submission', by Michel Houellebecq is a good depiction of such a dichotomy.


It's worth having in mind the essential diferences between Christian culture and Islam:

-Islam is heavily political, and laicism isn't even contemplated. Thus, any country with a Muslim majority will eventually get rid of any kind of minority, including Christians. That's what Allah told Muhammad and his followers to do.

-Christianism is embraced by free individuals with free wills. It's a religion (and subsequently, a culture) that believes in the freedom and dignity of man. On the opposite, Islam is imposed via submission; it's a religion of war in which the individual is not free, but as slave of the religion.

Attached: islamno.jpg (502x335, 27K)

Side note: as a proof of Islam being a religion of slaves, there's the punishment against apostasy: anyone who turns his back on Islam is sentenced to death.

You can enter but not leave. How is that a religion of "peace and freedom"?

Boomers.

very very nice

Now you're starting to understand

Don't fight it user, keep prying for the truth

Attached: 1518630375822.jpg (600x461, 66K)

>You can enter but not leave. How is that a religion of "peace and freedom"?
It's mostly media misinformation and also a result of taqiyah (ex: Yassmin Abdel-Magied), and insistence that Islam is blameless and peaceful by nature, with a few "bad eggs" ruining it for the majority.

If I remember correctly, apostasy was punished by death only when you were of pubescent age or above.

Christianity is the only way to fight degeneracy in the west, but its name is offensive these days due to the actions of men and the many psyops throughout time to discredit it.
The fact alone, that you have to accept that you've done wrong and need Christ's help and pardon from your crimes doesn't rub well against man's pride; so it's not popular and attractive looking from the outside in.

The biggest difference between Islam/Christianity is that Christianity desires people willingly coming to know God personally and desires no conquest or force for that to happen, as Islam is almost a polar opposite.

Hate or love God, we'll all be standing before him and giving an account of his actions one day. Best get ready; because "I was a good person" isn't going to cut it, and he asks so little and gives so much to those that love him.
Consider this a sobering warning...

well said user
> render unto caesar
> my kingdom is not of this world
christianity truly allows separation of Church and State
islam is a political ideology larping as religion

so it's better to identified as christian, and mental illness than a terrorist?

the coverup is to put distance between the crimes and the religion and skin color, and the incel narrative are the middle ground that "accepted" by both sides, just be grateful for that.

who is this matress enchantress

...

Attached: MassShootingIslamPerCap.png (972x1108, 34K)

Attached: Religion of Pieces - Album on Imgur(21).png (1456x2923, 1.24M)

Attached: 3ZlsP5l.jpg (1753x2975, 888K)

Attached: average muslim views.png (727x669, 51K)

Attached: 1469080804368.png (1500x1200, 1.21M)

Attached: Religion of Pieces - Album on Imgur(1).jpg (919x1892, 523K)

Attached: Religion of Pieces - Album on Imgur(22).jpg (700x900, 477K)

Google “misandry” pls

we need a spokesman to defend us in media
that bullshit they make up is hilarious

Pretty easy actually. There is a saying I heard once, and it went like this:” people see some things from the eyes of a mother, and some things from the eyes of a stepmother”.
Basically we want to justify a particular group because we like them and belittle another group when we don’t like them, when they do the exact same fucking thing