There's no reason why you need one of these.
The Second Amendment is outdated and needs to be abolished.
>B-BUT MUH CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT
No, it's an Amendment i.e. it was ADDED to the Constitution. Because the Constitution isn't perfect and needs to be updated and changed, exactly what our forefathers had in mind.
It's why we have an Amendment giving women and minorities the right to vote and why we abolished the Amendment that banned alcohol.
You don't need it.
There's no reason why you need one of these
DO NOT REPLY TO LOW QUALITY BAIT
Mutt
>mutts are too dumb to understand this
Why do the police need them then?
The police are held to the legal standard of conduct known as reasonable force. Thusly AR's are classified under the law as a reasonable means of the use of force.
The second amendment doesn't specify what types of arms for a reason. It is not a right to a specific type of weapon or arm and sets no limitation on a person's right to the use of force. This is not an accident.
The problem with your argument boils down to the state having the right to wield force over the people without a reasonable means of recourse.
Question one. Do I have the right to self defence?
question two. If I have the right to self defence how can I exercise that right without the equivalent means?
Question three. If this particular weapon is so deadly and evil. What makes it acceptable in enforcing the will of the state against the people, but extraordinary and unacceptable in the hands of the people for their own defence?
The second amendment is more than the right to guns. It is the right to the self determination of the use of force by the people. Your end goal is to subjugate that and that is unacceptable and simply wrong. That is why they shall not be infringed.
fuck off
STFU
Because I can!!!!!
I literally just took possession of one today, and there is nothing you can do about it, you cuckolded betrayer to your ancestors.
Thanks OP we have you added to the die first list now.
enjoy your day and thanks again
So much this