>"Right now in Syria, we're in the most aggressive EW [electronic warfare] environment on the planet from our adversaries," Thomas said. "They're testing us every day, knocking our communications down, disabling our AC-130s, etc"
knocking out US communications? disabling our AC-130s? >B...but i thought Murica number 1? Russia denies involvement. So either US is being BTFO by a 3rd world nation. OR..... The KIKES are string up trouble, trying to start a conflict.
Jamming comms is actually really simple annon. The tech has existed since the beginning of radio transmission.
Austin Hall
We haven’t had a real war in 60 years, all military tech is untested and aimed at killing goatfuckers
Aiden Lopez
ok but what about disabling AC-130s? What are they doing to those aircraft? blinding their radar? messing up their data link? GPS jamming?
Gabriel Clark
>russia denies involvement
Oh, ok then.
Oliver Perry
FUGGIN ALIENS M8
HOLY SHITNIGGERS
Daniel Wright
probably all of the above. if you want to look into I, I suggest you look up what a spark gap is.
Juan Hernandez
Kind of a dumb move on the Russian's part. Now the U.S. is just going to adapt while holding back our new plane tech. The only F35's that might see combat in Syria are lower versioned planes sold to U.S. allies and not the latest R&D.
Noah Brooks
Who else would we kill?
There is no such thing as conventional war against a nuclear power. If the enemy has nukes, you use nukes on day one. There's no reason to use conventional weapons against them because they'll inevitably nuke you if they're losing the war.
