Was classifying humans into races the biggest mistake in history of science?
Was classifying humans into races the biggest mistake in history of science?
Evan Powell
Other urls found in this thread:
Christian Gutierrez
No
Elijah Scott
That doesn't make any sense. Science observes and categorizes. People are animals like any other.
Dominic Bell
Andrew Cox
Yes it was simpler by how much money they own me.
Kayden King
Was classifying birds into species and dogs into breeds a mistake?
Aiden Barnes
Oi bruv that's a bollocks
Caleb Diaz
Only wealthy people couöld see the other side of the world.
Isaac Allen
Nope mixed race children often have several desirable traits. Over specialize and you breed in weekness.
Charles Perez
Kind off, subspecies go extinct and people says.
>who cares it was just a pigeon there's plenty of them.
You mean people in debt could.
Henry Evans
when people today say science they are usually referring to the cult of scientism
the political bias in mainstream journals. the peer review process proven not to work in peer reviewed studies. the msm twisting and distortion of facts. this incorrect notion that science is about consensus.
what the fuck is science anymore? its supposed to be a methodical system for hypthosis and evidence confirmation. and its been turned into a cult of leftie feelgood antiscientific nonsense about a million genders
here is your modern day "science" in all its glory
youtube.com
Jordan Sanchez
yes.
it makes no sense to have races. we have ethnicities.
John Thompson
>Why do tha woit man fink he betta?
Evidence
Cooper Mitchell
Naw that is logical.
Allowing feminists, sjws etc to exist is the real issue. They are the problem.
Racism was dead, feminists and sjws brought it back.
Gavin Scott
You may not heard about being productive and earning wealth. But that is reality
Angel Cooper
>Earning wealth.
You mean producing debt, the wealth it's produced after an initial capital, in a no debt system there's no wealth, just finite resources, you haven't learned anything since the days you paid people in flowers.
Gabriel Thompson
Why no?
Biologically speaking racial categories are based on subjective evaluations of the traits, there is no specific gene that can be used to determine a person's race. It's deeper than the phenotype and gene expression which is influenced by the enviroment. Humans are one race
Benjamin Foster
Funny cartoon. But hey, at least she's not wearing a niqab or getting gang raped outside cologne cathedral by your new Europeans.
Caleb Price
You must be a junkie. I do not do drugs, sorry.
Josiah Fisher
This is how civilisation will end and the world will basically be la 0% creatura slaving away for kikes. Bullshit like this.
Landon Ross
Lovely yet the only resource left for you without a meme loan.
I admire that.
Noah Edwards
Autism was a mistake.
Jason Perry
>Pointy Nipples
Wtf is this Tomb Raider on PlayStation 1? LEARN TO DRAW SHITSKIN COON.
Luke Edwards
God made us different so we can recognize our enemies
Jason Campbell
No, the biggest mistake is pretending we're all the same.
Dylan Sullivan
It was, they should have been classified into subspecies
Grayson Sanchez
nothing against asian girls. They know how to appreciate men. I am most certainly leaving the bluepilled vagina blocking junkie feminists behind me and go to east asia when the first muslim party is on the german parliament.
Bentley Carter
>Truth
Dominic Reed
Race doesn't exist. We're different subspecies.
Bentley Cooper
How do you keep your dog in without a garden wall?
Owen Cox
>Race doesn't exist.
HOW FUCKING DARE YOU! RACE BANNON WAS THE MANILEST CARTOON MAN TO EVERY WALK TV LAND!
YOU TAKE THAT BACK GOOD SIR!
Charles Edwards
Simply fuck you shill, it wasn’t a mistake since there are differences between the groups.
Ayden Allen
You're arguing that dividing animals into sub species is wrong too you know. There's literally less differences between some animal sub species than there are between races.
Jonathan Moore
>Implying something is wrong with having creatura population
If that scares you, then you I've got a bad news for you mate.
Henry Bailey
Saying "Humans are one race" is pure semantics. Then you can just say "Humans are one race/species but the species known as homosapiens has subcategories because seperate groups of humans evolved in different enviroments which greately altered specific subspecies due to the process of natural selection".
If you take a DNA sample from a random human but you don't even know their race, gender or anything about them. You can test that DNA and determine all of those things, and even much more specific things like the likeyhood of them having light hair/eye/skin. You can even determined little silly things like the chances of a person sneezing if they move from a darker enviroment to an enviroment with more light. Seriously, you can maybe deny the nebulous term "race" but you can't deny the genetic differences between several subspecies of homosapiens.
Hunter Reed
Yes, we should have just used species and made things perfectly clear.
Jayden Nelson
We all agree on that I think the issue it's simplified races.
Like how people who claims anything with a jewish last name it's genetically jewish.
Jordan Lopez
Yes, Humans should have been labeled as different Species like lions tigers panthers ect
Jason Clark
Nah it's great, Brazil is a testament to this.
Nolan Roberts
Science is still the same, they just have to throw out pseudo-science article to keep their sponsors every now and then
Logan Morris
>Biologically speaking racial categories are based on subjective evaluations of the traits, there is no specific gene that can be used to determine a person's race.
Really, last I checked it was entirely possible to tell someone’s ancestry through just spitting in a cup.
It's deeper than the phenotype and gene expression which is influenced by the enviroment. Humans are one race
Wow since you just stated that I guess you must be right.
Oh wait we can cluster humans into different races better than different bears.
Logan Russell
classifying the Jews as human was
Wyatt Perez
>Poorly administered ex colonial country with delirious of grandeur it's an example of anything.
Grayson Nelson
> We all agree on that
I think most people here would agree with that, but many people still don't want to accept that groups of the same species being seperated and living in different enviroments for tens of thausands can create substantial genetic variance. They refuse to accept this even though it's basic natural selection. It's pure emotionalism.
> I think the issue it's simplified races.
And I think you're pretty much right. It's one of the reasons I think the word "white" is too nebulous and kinda worthless. People should learn to identify phenotypes, that would probably the best option.
Liam Powell
Good enough to host the Olympics.
Jose Hernandez
You put him on a dog collar
Jaxson Bailey
>Keeping your dog all day on a leash.
You people are disgusting.
Chase Edwards
Tell him the Combine are coming.
Sebastian Myers
Fuck you, he is my pet not the other way around, filthy anarchist.
William Turner
lacking opportunity doesn't prove anything. Most of those people who just simply wrote them off are just a victims of systematic favorisim
Jaxon Lopez
Yeah course class antagonism socio economic factors blah blah blah. Give them more stuff and they'd do great.
Joseph Wright
what determines race or species? Humans are literally same. You are just focusing on phenotypes and ignoring all the other traits that makes someone a human being
Dylan Richardson
what determines race or species?
THUMBS NIGGA! DO YOU HAVE THEM?!
Angel Howard
>what determines race or species?
First of all subspecies not species.
Second of all:
Biology An interbreeding, usually geographically isolated population of organisms differing from other populations of the same species in the frequency of hereditary traits. A race that has been given formal taxonomic recognition is known as a subspecies.
>humans are literally the same.
Yes, that’s why we are all human, but there are differences that some populations share and others don’t.
>You are just focusing on the phenotypes and ignoring all the other traits that make someone a human being.
Yeah no, because that is what makes us different. Do you think biologists use this arguments when they constitute a new race.
>look this bird population is clearly different.
>(you) oh no, you are just focusing on the phenotypes, you don’t look at what makes birds birds.
Elijah Hernandez
Ian Smith
Dam! Moses Levy knew the game!
Jackson Hughes
If we're all literally the same why do I hate you so much? Why would I hate myself? I don't make myself feel physically sick.
Only Marxist parasites and their imported third world vote crop have that impact on me.
Julian Butler
gimme those tidds 4 fuckin'
Adrian Rogers
FUCKING NO.
Zachary Thomas
Jesus that's a lot of fellow white people.
Samuel Allen
Yeah just a way to discredit the actual science that goes against their beliefs
Michael Morales
>It's ok to be cruel cause that's who I am.
Blake Phillips
Asher Martin
No, au contrair
Ethan Lopez
we need 2 do it with white ppl; Europeans used 2 b greatly insulted if u refer 2 them all as 'white' as if they're 1 culture -- because its racist/ignorance 2 do so
Henry Turner
What would have been the alternative? We all just completely ignore that people who live in the same region tend to look somewhat similar? What would be our explanation for the differences between ethnicities? The only logical conclusion is that race is very much real and not unlike dog breeds. Different environment, different bodies adapted for said environment. The only difference being we forced their evolution while ours happened naturally over tens of thousands of years.
Daniel Howard
no you nigger. science doesnt care about youre jewish schemes
jews went so far as to ban the genetic research of there race because of the high ammounts of incest that was reported
sciences tells us a nigger is different to an anglo who is different to a slav who is different to a nip
you are gay and finish eat my shitter like an apple fritter
Josiah Edwards
>because that is what makes us different.
you just summed up your entire point with merely focusing on phenotypes. Genetics are more complex than just cherry picking my friend
Julian Martin
You don't think the dog will be more comfortable if he could move around the yard freely?
Ian Richardson
yes. clearly there are still different species
Gabriel Myers
Oh no I do it's just there's a saying: Freedom isn't free.
Landon Morales
>We're different subspecies.
This guy gets it.
John Bennett
It was inevitable. It was bound to happen.
Aiden Phillips
You can say it’s more complex but right now, I give examples of why we can be classed into different races and you just say that it’s more too it.
Ryder Anderson
No, Boasian anthropology was.
Asher Morgan
This.
Daniel Sullivan
Yes. The European white and the African black are two different species of human being.
William Sanchez
>there is no specific gene that can be used to determine a person's race
Nor is there one for animals. Human races are like dog breeds, they are different in. A variety of ways.
Kevin Edwards
the classification came as a manner of describing the innate tribalism we observe in humanity, so not really - it'd exist either way, we just gave it a name and some dumb asses took it too far a bunch of times throughout history via phrenology/eugenics and the rest of the pseudoscientific bunk
Dylan Foster
Yes, technically we are different species. Saged.
Andrew Cox
Well yeah but a garden wall ain't that expensive.
Specially if it's just dog sized.