The only philosophy of atheism is rejecting philosophy

The only philosophy of atheism is rejecting philosophy.

Attached: quote-why-are-we-here-where-do-we-come-from-traditionally-these-are-questions-for-philosophy-stephen (850x400, 63K)

This is 100% true, all atheists are philistine dogs.

>The only philosophy of atheism is rejecting philosophy.

Hawking is right.

Philosophy comes undone once hard data takes its place.

>This is 100% true, all atheists are philistine dogs.

Nanny nanny boo boo stick your head in doo doo

philosophy isn't dead, he is

>Philosophy comes undone once hard data takes its place.
Philosophical questions don't have answers, you nit.

'Philosophy must indeed recognize the possibility that the people rise to it, but must not lower itself to the people.'
- Georg Hegel

Attached: 1338758599270.gif (300x309, 23K)

Philosophy is good in general, but if science contradicts some philosophy, then that philosophy is wrong.

>Philosophical questions don't have answers, you nit.

Exactly. Science provides actual answers rendering endless philosophical pontification obsolete.

Answering philosophical questions is dividing by zero.

Can science divide by zero?

Attached: 1452014221405.jpg (1280x1124, 161K)

Science is just applied philosophy. There are all kind of Philosophers of science who give contributions to science, such as the guy who came up with the 5', 3' nomenclature for directions on DNA strands. Philosophy and science not in conflict, Stephen Hawking was just a brainlet when it came to philosophy.

>Answering philosophical questions is dividing by zero.
>Can science divide by zero?

I love philosophy. I truly do. But you have to let go of old philosophical notions in the face of new scientific discoveries is all.

>Stephen Hawking was just a brainlet when it came to philosophy.

No he really wasn't. He was hitting on something that many philosophers didn't want to admit, because they were interested in defending their academic territory.

Have you read The Grand Design?

Give me one example.

Attached: MastraCustom1430725649.jpg (1125x1500, 423K)

Mindlessly throwing around a word as evidence is unscientific, brainlets.

>Give me one example.

“... almost all of us must sometimes wonder: Why are we here? Where do we come from? Traditionally, these are questions for philosophy, but philosophy is dead. Philosophers have not kept up with modern developments in science. Particularly physics.”

Stephen Hawking

Are you fucking retarded? or just avin a giggle?

Attached: BzsApfPCMAAZvB6.jpg large.jpg (780x1000, 76K)

>Are you fucking retarded? or just avin a giggle?

No I'm serious.

Questions about origins were once the realm of philosophy before evolution and cosmology took their place.

And now the field of ethics is under attack with advances in A.I.

All philosophy becomes hard science eventually.

scientism (advanced materialism) is a philosophy

Then tell me how Physics say why we exist, you filthy infidel!

Attached: download (51).jpg (225x224, 11K)

No, that is just a hypothesis

It doesn't, like I said all atheist are philistine dogs, they can't even distinguish between material causes and the question of being.

>Then tell me how Physics say why we exist, you filthy infidel!

I'd say the 'why' question is actually a how question.

Oh you mean the is-ought gap will be solved by hard science someday.

>if I change the question, then I have the answer!

Attached: 1481133632401.jpg (1920x1080, 239K)

>Oh you mean the is-ought gap will be solved by hard science someday.

I think the is-ought gap is an illusion.

If we had a complete description of the way the universe 'is', this would necessarily include information about what an agent 'ought' to do.

Attached: download (4).jpg (203x249, 12K)

this

You sure present little evidence for a supposed man of science.

'The realization that life is absurd and cannot be an end, but only a beginning. This is a truth nearly all great minds have taken as their starting point. It is not this discovery that is interesting, but the consequences and rules of action drawn from it.'

Attached: 1525005427975.jpg (346x960, 77K)

Stop posting cute anime girls right now

Attached: 1498736008036.png (400x416, 41K)

Attached: 1453248908089.png (1595x1467, 597K)

U wot?

Attached: 1524451855326.png (1026x583, 509K)

By that logic, cannibalism is okay for survival

You mean math that can be substantiated in any meaningful way the same people who think there are 5,736 genders yeah very enlightening

Attached: 5C0E154B-6840-46C6-98B2-FB1E44CC4A1D.png (620x581, 16K)

WTF is wrong with your mind?

In Christianity that's is arguably still true.

It's nice to see Christians tacitly admitting that they're just navel gazing morons like everyone else

>Philosophical questions don't have answers

Then you are completely useless. You are a waste of time like theologists and con artist psychics.

You mean like "faith".

>hawking
>philosophy

Jow Forums you're embarrassing yourselves again