Explain this, Truthers

The issue is less about what it's made out of, but rather proof that it's quite possible for a tall building to collapse totally into its own footprint.
Truthers say it's impossible and the Towers should have fallen over like felled trees

>Brazil
>abandoned decommissioned building
>full of hobos
Nothing of value was lost.

>Why do the beams need to be melted in order to break?
They don't. However, once the building has come down, you can see whether beams have melted or broken.

Attached: download.jpg (480x321, 50K)

I see glowing metal. Why does it have to be steel? Are there no other kinds of metal in a building?

>there was no other combustion ingredient than iron/steele

>no other substance was present

>it was just steel and jet fuel calm and still in the open air

you do realize that image is imbecilic and laughable, right?

>There were combustables there that burn hotter than jet fuel
You do realize your argument is retarded, right?

It wasnt made of wood, it was made of concrete and steel, but the homeless who invaded made barracks of wood inside, which started the fire

Pic is definitely steel.

Attached: meteorite.jpg (600x500, 78K)

Wow, those bars really look melted down entirely.

McCormick place was a steel building, had a fire and collapsed

Attached: ct-per-flash-mccormickplacefire-0205-20120205.jpg (600x500, 106K)

>melted down entirely
Yeah.. Cause the twin towers were burning for days, not hours..
Fucking leaf education.

so moronic. It was so calm up there in the sky. No impact at all at the structure, too.

lool

In this picture we can see the aftermath of the Windsor Tower in Madrid

all the steel has melted away. only the concrete support structure remains.

WTC did not have this design, it relied on the steel.

Attached: madrid1.jpg (600x800, 125K)

Fact 1: Wood charcoal burns at 1100 degrees
Fact 2: Iron melts at 1500 degrees

The Iron Age is a myth! People never forged iron until recently!

>McCormick place
>A convention center, built to have massive halls is the same as a skyscraper, built to have a relatively small footprint.
Do you really think that's the only steel BUILDING to ever have collapsed?

90% of that building was on fire, only 5% of the Twin Towers were on fire, and building 7 wasn't hit by a plane. And 45 minutes after the 2nd Tower was hit by a plane, the government ALLOWED a plane to enter DC airspace. They knew we were under attack and allowed another plane into the most heavily guarded airspace in Human history.

>Impact leads to melting
Wut?

What are bellows? What does adding oxygen do to a flame?

Attached: download (1).jpg (800x800, 136K)

>It's impossible for steel beams to melt from burning jetfuel.

of course things in the building catch fire and fire is sustained.

so, not melting with only jet fuel is a nice fact, but it means nothing.

>Yeah and the entire building was on fire for God knows how long, it wasn't a fire at the very top, like 9/11.

It also wasn't hit by a jumbo jet

(((WTC7)))

>Paper, drywall & seat cushions burn hotter than jet fuel
kys retard.

You say that as if a single proponent of the official story claimed that the steel beams melted.

I'll repeat it for the idiots: They buckled, after having been heated up and softened, then snapped under the weight of the upper floors. The images of melted/cut steel beams in the aftermath were of work done by first responders to remove debris.

Attached: 1518525440168.png (190x266, 11K)

Wait, are you suggesting that the raw burn temp of a material doesn't represent its max burn temp?
You must be a Jew to suggest such a thing!

Wood can't melt iron ore!

>And 45 minutes after the 2nd Tower was hit by a plane, the government ALLOWED a plane to enter DC airspace.

because the alternative was to shoot down a fully boarded civilian plane.

controlled demolition

Larry Silverstein owned that one, too.

Why are people using this to argue about 9/11? Jesus Christ...

the steel never "melted". It got soft.

And the jet fuel was not required to do all of this, since the offices burned as well.

>skyscraper
>26 store
Pls.
>shitty building
>it's on fire starting form first floor and 'till the last
>at the start collapsed only one part on the side
And we have way more real skyscrapers who survived much worse than WTC.

>because the alternative was to shoot down a fully boarded civilian plane.
1 plane: 300-500 people
1 skyscraper 1000-3000 people
>alternative
>the offices burned as well
Again: drywall & paper doesn't burn hotter than jet fuel, retard.

>Again: drywall & paper doesn't burn hotter than jet fuel, retard
again, the steel never melted, retard.

Hello Shlomo

9/11 led to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. It led to the Department of Homland Security and the TSA. The false flag 9/11 was used to strip us of more freedom and privacy than any event you can name. (((They))) made it happen. 9/11 is the genesis of the refugee crisis that is flooding (only) western nations with 3rd world scum.

1 plane: 300-500 people are dead

you are responsible for the death of 300-500 people.

Yes, the terrorists surprise attacked New York. It happened, get over it.

Fucking hell why is it the fucking leaf making sense

do you really think ((they)) would pass this opportunity if it presented itself? the fact they exploited it does not prove they did it

>all the steel melted away
>steel beams still clearly visible

Wow.

>Five of the witnesses reporting melted steel were PhDs. One was a professor of structural engineering at Berkeley, one was a professor of engineering at MIT, one was a science writer for the New York Times, one was the president of Notre Dame University, and one was a scientist from Johns Hopkins University.
youtube.com/watch?v=DF4C6qtU_Fc 1:18

the majority of them is hanging down as you can see. You think if most of them fell off due to their own weight, they could have supported the tower?

The alternative is that 20 sand niggers left their desert, came to America without an iota of suspicion, and carried out the most convoluted, logic defying, physics defying terrorist attack ever.

"it lasted 1-2 hours, and then steel melts"

what he means is that it will be soft and deform

only ghouls lived over there

it could be another cianigger disinfo

>brazilian quality

go back to televiv kIIIIKE

>came to America without an iota of suspicion, and carried out the most convoluted, logic defying, physics defying terrorist attack ever.
uh, not at all.

They were clever. Used that bombing car scenario, but with planes.

All they needed was basic flight lessons, the ability to take over the cockpit and the determination to complete the plan.

Also, they were associated with AlQaeda, so they had a support network spanning hundreds of people. They were not lone wolves.

wood boards melt steel beams

Brazil has very different building standards and codes than does the US.

The fucking Twin Towers were very thick, heavy steel, on the entire outside of the building. The structure of the Twin Towers was closer to a fucking steel battleship, than to a normal, modern, steel and concrete building.

I'm sorry, 100 sand niggers helped them. The fact remains, the bottom 60+% of both twin towers were COMPLETELY UNDAMAGED, and instead of the top portions falling off to one side, the undamaged portions of the towers fell at free fall speed. Not to mention building 7 which was 95% intact when it fell at free fall speed.

the problem with the WTC was that the parts were only tacked together, and they loosened before the tower collapsed

Attached: trident2.jpg (640x480, 63K)

With the length of the steel throughout, your telling me the energy created from the blast/fire was enough to weaken the steel entirely, allowing it to fall? The steel near the blast would of course be comped, but all the way to the base? Low enough to give in completely? 102 minutes until the collapse from upper floor damage. The thermal conductivity of steel is low. Yeaaah not buyin it.

Is that poor little building with the steeple alright?

wtc7 had the same flawed design

Attached: 54cfbbb69918b_-_wtc-nist-lg.jpg (480x228, 21K)

>bestest steel
you fags can't even build a proper wall

no the collapse happened because of the bad design where they were basically "hanging" floors into the tower

The first floors broke down because of the blast and fire and it was a domino effect from there on. The upper floors also fell down when everything under them collapsed

Attached: e1ab1387eea7cc5323cb548590bce1b4.jpg (609x750, 113K)

I never understood why people are compelled to cite non-falsifiable hypotheses to conjure a conspiracy.

>9/11 highjackers were reported Saudis.

>So the US invades afghan and Iraq and goes to war for 17 years and imposes wanton changes to US law.

None of that is refuted, and it's automatically a criminal conspiracy by definition, you don't need to add anything else to prove it.

youtu.be/FzF1KySHmUA

Explain this then

>It's impossible for steel beams to melt from burning jetfuel.

But steel doesn't need to melt to collapse a structure. Also jet fuel wasn't the only thing burning in the structure.

this. OP is a literal faggot

Attached: 1490666289978.png (1313x1440, 131K)

>"Melted steel"

Actually shows zero melted steel. An entire burning building collapsed onto itself. It seems reasonable there should be bent and misshapen blocks of compressed metal in such an event, doesn't it?

DC didn't have that much air space restriction back before 9/11, just like the TSA didn't exist beforehand.

the WTC had been attacked like 600 times by then, it had to fall down sometime

Forging by definition doesn't use molten metal you dumbfuck

It's not that hard to believe really, just get a few flying lessons and then don't miss the 100 story building that's fucking huge. It was a hellva lot easier to get weapons and anything else on board a plane than it is today and taking over a cockpit required breaking a small lock on the door, not the reinforced one you have today. And until then most plane hijackings were done for ransoms or a political message, not suicide missions.

But how can you move metal if it isn't molten?
Metal retains its strength perfectly until it falls into a puddle.
Everyone knows that.

and WTC was forged. It doesn't need molten metal to fall

You said they melted away, I called you out on that and you admitted that yes, they are still there but sagging. So what is it, did they melt or are they just hanging there and their weight is making the steel beams bend?

Let me answer that for you. Your shits all messed up and makes no sense, you're so fucking blinded by your own stupidity that you refuse to admit your own fault.

Damn, and with that quick demonstration, he just wrecked 17 years of conspiracy.

Wooden stuff cannot melt steel beams

it had to be micro nuclear thermite warheads.

Anyway it's obvious 9/11 was inside job cause u can see explosives going off as it collapses

This structure was an abandon tower in shitehole brazil compared to a marvel of modern engineering designed to withstand multiple plane inpacts.
Also, as you can see the fire is at the BASE of this structure, unlike the top or middle as in the case of the twin towers.

Yet there are videos of molten metal spewing out of the tower

explosion means expulsion of matter

this can be because of burning of black powder, or because of compression

maybe it wasn't steel? are we sure it was even metal?

Only muslims believe jet fuel can't melt steel beams lol
cuz they are retarded
I been melting some it with blow torch

>20-story building
>skyscraper
>probably not even made of steel
I guess I live in a skyscraper by your standard.

Let's see those blueprints, faggot.

Wait, you're onto something there!
First we need to rule out other sources of metal.
Like aluminum, which melts at a low 600 degrees.

Do we know if any aluminum was present at the impact site?

Keep in mind, these abandoned buildings occupied by mongrels and leftists are completely pillaged, and they smash the walls looking for wires and pipes to sell.

Also, things that are funny about this:
>the homeless squatters were paying rent to a due of commies
>the building was locked at 7pm with steel chains and a huge lock because they didn't want to spend a minimum wage on a janitor
>yeah, worth repeating, the mega retarded mongrels were paying rent in an abandoned property where they were locked in every day

Attached: chrome_2018-05-01_13-55-16.png (738x595, 663K)

And again, unless some poor pet died, nothing of value was lost.