I'm putting an end to this age old argument once and for all. Here's why i'm against circumcision.
FAQ: >"why do you care about other guys dicks so much" I don't, I just don't want you to mutilate your kids. Once they're 18 they can choose to be circumcised. If they have a medical condition which requires them to be cut that's fine too.
>"Dick cheese, lint dick, etc" Yes, we uncircumcised people do something magical called washing and bathing. We wash under our foreskin and we can pull it all the way back to wash our dick.
>"It looks ugly anyway" Not really, we can pull our skin back to make it look like we're circumcised anyway. Also, looks don't matter if you don't get pussy cutfag.
We didn't evolve as humans for millennia just so jews could cut off our kids foreskins and sell them. All your arguments are stupid, the "dick cheese" argument being the worst. "I have ear wax so let me cut my ears off" "my belly button gets dirty so let me cut it off" that's how stupid you cut fags sound.
should have added that circumcision was start because of the old testament, which was compiled by rabbis who were the only ones allowed to do the circumcision. so catholic priests are genetically predisposed to molest children.
there's no argument. I have a whole dick, you have a mutilated dick because of schlomo.
Nolan Reyes
there were no rabbis in the old testament you retarded fuck moses wrote the pentateuch and would have murdered any faggot rabbis trying to subvert his shit that shit came after the talmudic time in babylon the kabbalah and the talmud are satanic evil and are what modern judaism seems to be all about
Camden Lewis
>the old testament was never compiled or written by man oh you stupid sheeple
Me again. I'm against circumcision, but I'm entirely for autocircumcision. It's far safer, it's natural, and a Jew doesn't slurp your foreskin. I'm working on it now, should be ready in a few weeks.
it's never really caused me any problems, but a few times when i've tried to have sex with girls and they were tight it caused my foreskin to pull back over my glans, with pretty painful results. i can usually lose my hard on pretty easily once i get all nervous about that and fix it, but it's still a persistent issue in my life. also, i've found that recently it's been getting a little bit worse... slowly closing in on my urethral orifice. also also, i've recently felt a little something under my foreskin... doesn't seem like a big deal and it doesn't hurt... probably just a little smegma or something.
what do? i really hate the idea of forced adult circumcision.
Fuck off back to /b/ and /soc/ you degenerate dick pic sharing mutt. Btw your shit looks dry as fuck nigga. I feel bad for cut niggas because yall have to use lotion to jerk off.
Tbf uncut is at greater risk of hiv. So that is one argument in favor of getting cut.
Jayden Phillips
The study you're getting your 'facts' from are from a study carried out in a third world country (AFRICA). The study was a highly unfair test that's not even remotely true. If you think im wrong please source me a reliable study carried out in the west.
Didn't even read the thread. Ignorant amerimutt #42. Congrats.
Brandon Ross
How was it unfair? Africa seems like the perfect place to do the study since it is like one big ball of aids.
Lincoln Mitchell
Why is that? does anyone know?
Dylan Perez
It's always fascinating to me that americans think that circumcised and uncircumcised dicks look exactly the same when they're hard.
It's very rare for people with uncircumcised dicks to have foreskin over the glans when hard.
You can't compare Africa to America when it comes to sex in general (contraception, how much they wash compared to us, etc). It being one big ball of aids is true, most of the males are also uncircumcised. It's like if most of the males were circumcised then the study would be flipped. They just happened to pick apart of africa where most men are uncut
That's not the reason , I'm uncut and I can tell that the first times you may bleed depending on how hard you fuck and this happens to a lot of uncut people, so an open wound has a higher chance of getting HIV because it is fluid transmitted, but unless you're fucking well-known sluts, you're gay or you fuck prostitutes, HIV should be pretty much irrelevant.
I am so sorry for all you burger bros who got your manhood mutilated by the Jew while you were too small to defend yourselves. That shit is so unfair and wrong. Yours is an anger at an unwitting mother's betrayal that I am grateful I will never know.
James Robinson
Consider the following: >Majority of men who are adults and uncircumcised have the option for circumcision but choose not to do it unless it's a health issue thing. >Most of the people defending circumcision were circumcised at infancy.
It's obvious that uncircumcised dick is preferable, but cutfags live in denial.
Phimosis is entirely preventable and treatable without need of circumcision. There is no legitimate medical or moral reason to cut off functional body parts.
