Hello, britbongs.
Why do you still
1) Ain't beheaded your royal family?
2) Ain't have the constitution?
3) Ain't established the republic?
4) Tolerate muslims instead of drowning them in the english channel?
5) Ain't redistributed the land in a country where old aristocracy still controls 80% of the land?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Because we are genetically predispositioned to have a high trust in authority. Also no guns
>Also no spoons
So you're genetic slaves? Did I get it right?
the manlier brits moved to places like Burgerland and Austria
>Ain't
Why are you writing like that, Maxim?
a bit tricky using our only communal potato peeler and a few thousand cricket bats
You don't need a gun to overthrow monarchy.
Because I speak American - the only non-retarded form of english.
Revolutions are for idiots who sperg out.
We play out our concerns by writing stern letters and having loud tea shop conversations.
I like the british humor, DROOG.
Look at their history: they never rebel themselves to the authority, they only switched it no matter how utterly retarded their leaders where. Why should something change now?
Triggered
How about this, Mario en.wikipedia.org
>we are genetically predispositioned to have a high trust in authority
/thread
Pretty sure the only people who use ain't like that are niggers.
user I...
The politicans are the problem, the nobels are the problem, the minorities are the problem.
NOT THE ENGLISH.
The English serf has suffered under our Goverment.
Pushed off their land that they had farmed for generations to work in factories and cities to fuel the empire. Conscripted into an army that would ship them round the world to fight in a war not of their making and choosing to enrich the (((East India Company))).
Sent to die in useless imperialist wars, to die in the trenches, to be bombed because their leaders are jewish puppets.
To never see a penny from the empire, to suffer and suffer until finally they have a good system that they all share in.
Until the politicains decide that we have to let in the non-whites and crash the system as it doesn't make enough money and locks them up for daring to critise the system.
FUCK YOU.
would be good as graffiti plastered all over the shop
Because that is what THEY want. 2 people fighting each other and leave THEM alone. We need to create a foundation of racial consciousness if we want to change anything.
It's science.
They still were a bunch of nobles against the royals.
you do understand that this turned russia into a shithole and ultimately led to the гoлoдoмop right ?
eternal serf
Not the revolution itself which was done by liberals and bourgeoisie but by reds that overthrew the provisional government.
What do you think the problem with monarchy? As long as it's not Feudal, it's fine. And kind of prestige. Damn, I wish Russian could bring Romanovs back. Or even better, Rurikids.
>Rurikids
Rurikovich's, nigger, you've played CK2 too much.
The problem is that UK's establishment is still dominated by the aristocracy and they cause all problems that's haunts that beautiful country with rich history. London is a shithole, average brit is stupid, drunk and has no political freedom. In Rashka you guys has more political rights that average brit.
History lesson for you.
Most countries had their revolutions during the chimp out Revolutionary and post WW1 eras. England had it 150 years before so republicanism hadn't really developed yet. We became a constitutional monarchy in the 1660s after the Civil Wars.
If only Cromwell installed a consitution. Could have been the GOAT
>Rurikovich's, nigger, you've played CK2 too much.
Looks like you've been paying that too, my white af Ukrainian bro. But the reason I choose "Rurikids" over "Rurikovich's" is because we speak in English.
>London is a shithole, average brit is stupid, drunk and has no political freedom
Are you sure it's because of the monarchy?
playing*
Dammit >__
And now your countries flooded with shitskins, porn is gonna be blocked, meetings are not allowed, you have to purchase the tv license, can get jailed for offensive tweets/fb posts, can be prosecuted for the same case more than one time.
You're less free than "slavshit", anglo and you don't even realize it.
A problem with Britain is it takes pride in its ability to endure, the whole “stiff upper lip”.
While it’s charming and certain has its place (ie napoleonic wars, WW1 & 2), it also means the British often just silently endure rather than enacting beneficial change.
>1) Ain't beheaded your royal family?
Degenerate.
>2) Ain't have the constitution?
Degenerate.
>3) Ain't established the republic?
Degenerate.
>4) Tolerate muslims instead of drowning them in the english channel?
Jewish brainwashing propaganda.
>5) Ain't redistributed the land in a country where old aristocracy still controls 80% of the land?
That's not even true, but basically because we are to intelligence to fall for the Jewish brainwashing propaganda that makes people do that.
Nah this is bullshit.
The english have a history of rioting in the streets civil wars cutting cunts heads off. I also unironically believe that the monarchy is waiting for the rilts to start so they can send the military in to protect the people from the cops.
Alright.
You're correct to an extent, but slow and steady has been the name of the game for centuries and it has tended to work. We only respond to crises after the event but eventually shit gets done to solve them e.g corn law repeal, electoral reform of 1832, clean air act etc. Our society is reactive but we'll get there in the end
>You're less free than "slavshit", anglo and you don't even realize it.
So why are there so many of you pigfuckers moving to my country? If it's so awful, why don't you all fuck off back to your own shitholes?
The last time you wankers had a revolution, you had to ask us to do it instead. You guys have no balls.
because faggot basedboys like this demoralise people
Aye, I admire your truth.
Would send guns.
>So why are there so many of you pigfuckers moving to my country?
You let them in.
1) We tried that once, Cromwell fucked it up and ruined what could have been a more based model for these island's government.
2) We have the Mana Carta & unwritten tradition, but most of that only applies to the Monarch, and they aren't that important these days.
3) Because having a National figurehead isn't the problem; the problem is the rightful line was subverted by an act of technicality in the '30s.
4) Said the tatar rapebaby.
5) Because one party would only do it under full communism and the other would sell the land to international interests for favour.
Also, is a dumbass. We don't have a high trust in authority, what we have is a lack of perspective. We didn't grow up on the continent; we had a moat as thick as a county at it's narrowest point protecting us from direct & heavy attack, we didn't need the same military spirit as the continental powers to stay safe. So as long as our kings didn't act like tyrants and start decreasing the quality of life, fighting for more just never occured to us.
When the quality of life DOES dip, though, you get the peasant's revolt, the wars of the three kingdoms, a ruling class so terrified of open rebellion that they exile Napoleon to an island because they're afraid of what might happen if he's incarcerated in Britain...
It takes a lot to make us Angry. But there's a reason those limits aren't tested that often.