UK drones firing organ-destroying ‘vacuum bombs’ in Syria

Rule Britannia

kek

They just mean the Thermobaric Hellfire

Nothing special about it. Fuel air explosive.

bad goy. damascus needs to be destroyed so sayeth the space jew. zod will not be pleased with your impudent remarks

UK is becoming the new pupet of Israel, after they lost USA cause of Trump

>rt.com
Odds are against it being even remotely true. RT had to register as a foreign agent (a hostile government entity with an agenda against the American people)

So why doesn't AIPAC have to do the same?

Attached: sketch-1525439185412.png (387x854, 384K)

Oh you're defending ISIS now? I've already reported you to the FBI, they said they would raid your house shortly.

>Organ destroying.

Its a fucking bomb mate, no matter what your getting bombed with its going to be petty fucking organ destroying.

yes, he's being jews' bitch and not following through on any of his campaign promises.

>oi it's racist to not want to live in a Muslim area
>proceeds to bomb peace-loving muslims
Really makes you think

Yeah he shouldn't have done that.

Indeed. Bombs are brutal killing machines, it's what their made for. Maybe in the future we may have a bomb that plays you soothing music, strokes your forehead, as you relax in a comfy chair, as a beautiful woman injects you with morphine as you drift off in the fuzzy warm glow of the brown snow of the east.

I like the way you think leaf

>shoot a man in the head
>"ok lol do you want a medal or something lmfao"
>blow a man up
>"WHAT THE FUCK THIS IS AN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS CRISIS, GENOCIDE ALL BRITONS NOW"

Our they could just drop a huge amount of xenon gas or something to create a giant out-door exit bag. I hear that's a pretty OK way to go.

Attached: uk ruled 3 world.png (460x500, 213K)

>Nothing special about it
But barrel bombs were so horrible, that Assad had to go?

I like my idea better, but each to their own.

>Buying safety-first TBA munitions that use cucked PTFE stabilising agent

>Not choosing superior Soviet oxirane for higher effectiveness and bonus toxicity

"Waah, its too poisonous! There might be an accident! I'm scared" - t. homosexual NATO procurement agencies

that is not how FAE works at all.

>Oh you're defending ISIS now?
are the west bombing ISIS?

Now where is the proof of that?

Attached: at least I....jpg (1024x683, 124K)

I don't like needles tho. Perhaps they could diffuse heroin in very fine power form that you would wind up inhaling?

>we may call it picking but to them it's GENOCIDE!
poor flowers, they have no defense against horrible humans

Team Russia is the enemy.

>Russia
Russia kills people on British soil with impunity, hacks our democracies, hacks our hospitals, props up Assad, invaded and occupies Ukraine, cheats at sports and is mean to gay and trans people
>Iran
Iran is the biggest state sponsor of terror. Also the Iran deal was a terrible deal!
>Syria
Assad gasses the beautiful little babies, he uses barrel bombs. He uses the skills he developed in his training and practice as an eye surgeon in London to personally carry out horrific surgical torture of select prisoners of war in his palace basement. They don't call him 'The Butcher of Syria' for nothing.
>North Korea
North Korea is malnourished and brainwashed. And they don't have trans people or rap music. We're allowed to have nukes but they're not. That's why we have to bomb them.

Team Russia (Russia, Iran, Syria and NK) are the bad guys.
I stand with the good guys; Britain, America and Israel.

How many democracies does Britain have?

well maybe that is how it should work? then the jews can't steal the kidneys

At this point, it's clear to see that the west are nothing but murderous bullies. Mother Russia either does not care, or they are scared. Syria, Iran, NK, and Russia are all bark and no bite. What will it take for Putin to actually retaliate?

Why would you want Putin to retaliate?

Fuck em. There Muslims. Death is too good for them.

>two shekels have been deposited into your account.

Why aren't they dropping bombs which tickle people??
This is a fucking outrage!

Set a precedent. I'd at least like to see retaliation in self-defence.
You're right though, thin line between retaliation and nuclear warfare.

You would need to smoke it for it to work by inhalation. Ok, pipe it is, I can go with that!

Putin has already retaliated, e.g. by securing Crimea, and that caused endless buttrage. Russia knows damn well the Synagogue of Satin Talmudic Trotskyite Neocons are doing everything they can think of to bait him into WWIII so Israel can move forward with the Greater Israel and 2nd coming projects.

>RT
The Guardian would never write this. There're no pakis or pajeets in Britain, there're "Asians".

*trumpshekels

usatoday.com/story/news/world/2017/01/04/crimean-essay-soviet-union-collapse-25th-anniversary-russia/95419178/

>Crimeans back Russian takeover: If they try to take it back, ‘I will fight’

It's so we can get them all bunched up in the same place.

Attached: smugiavelli.png (255x265, 105K)

Of course. Russia's not going to let go of its ports and the whole post-USSR setup allowed for Russia to continue de facto to operate out of Crimea. I don't understand how such stupid people got to running the US government.

Zionist shill

>they can think of to bait him into WWIII so Israel can move forward with the Greater Israel and 2nd coming projects.
Once WWIII happens, it doesn't matter who provoked it. Information will not be borderless at that point, hence it would be easy for any nation to point the finger at whichever nation it pleases.
In all likelihood, Russia is not retaliating because they cannot retaliate.

>organ destroying bomb
Is this different from an organ exploding bomb?

What would they gain by retaliating? Has everybody been so reprogrammed by the Talmudvision that they forgot what a "rational actor" is?

Weapons of war have truly become too effective. What's the point of being a footsoldier when the enemy can just send some drone with a missile that ruptures your internal organs. At least in WW2 they had to send Stukas armed with 50kg bombs that could be shot down by a soldier with a machine gun.

Again, precedent. Cause trouble for us, we'll cause trouble for you. Currently it's "yes pls bully".

Could a drone controlled AC-130 beat an F-35?

It could make inhuman maneuvers and fire that 105mm cannon towards incoming missiles....

I don't think so. What I see is a relatively consistent positioning of only slowly walking back from an open offer to resolve things more sensibly combined with a high willingness to poke at the West where they can't as easily throw hysterical blame around, like doing loopty-loops around our planes, or showing things on RT or RUPTLY that the kike media tries to black out, or making it difficult to proove what exactly the "little green men" or the "white helmets" are without the other side having to reveal its own underhanded activities.

They've really done a deft job of keeping us in check as it stands. Why would they bother when China can grandstand economically and NK can start shooting rockets everywhere instead?

But then how are jews going to harvest their organs? Is UK antisemitic?

Have we got cool stuff? Oh good.

Jews love to harvest organs, we're preventing them from doing so

>Bombs destroy organs
Who knew?
>RT
lmao

Are you saying this is a powerplay against Soros?

>RT
>meanwhile the Russians literally invented and currently use thermobaric weapons as well as incendiaries
Opinion discarded.

When Britain is free, I wonder if the trials should be conducted in Hague or Nuremberg.

The bombs are not illegal.

How come it's legal if Britain drops bombs but I'm not allowed to do the bombing?

>Britain is allowed to bomb other countries without declaring war.
>British Citizen arrested if they own a plastic knife.

Attached: really makes you think.jpg (720x720, 246K)

A gimballed chain gun turret above and below the centre fuselage as part of a goalkeeper type system might actually work for a Hercules.

>people in the blast radius die from intense air pressure
>this is somehow different to normal bombs
I normally like RT but Jesus, this article is retarded.

You don't know what you are talking about.

What you personally???

Yeah, me personally. Like what if I bought a plane and flew it over and dropped a bomb? I'd be like the latest incel nazi terrorist or something.

Vacuum bomb = Thermobaric, i.e. more than just your organs would be eliminated.

Attached: vacuumbomb1 (1).webm (450x360, 1.59M)

Because as a individual, you are not governed and protected by international conventions that allow you to. Nation states are.

What legitimacy do these international "conventions" have? Has there been international protection for dropping these bombs? As far as I understand, the international convention is that it's an international war crime.

That type of bomb is used by every major military power. They are not prohibited.

Alright, so what if I used an IED instead? I'm not talking about the type of weapon. I'm talking about an act of war.

Do you simply not understand the difference between individuals and countries or what?
This is the stupidest line of questioning I've seen in this courtroom
user, you better be going somewhere with this

If nations are sovereign, then what does international protection matter?

Fuck I hate stories like this.

You think getting shot in the guts or blown up by artillery isn't fucking horrible?
I'd rather have a vacuum bomb drop next to me, or be gassed by Sarin than have either of the other two. Gas especially since it'll preserve the body and you can have an open casket funeral.

Try that with the artillery.

People fucking die in wars and the Russians are world leaders in thermobaric weapons anyway.

You're on thin ice user, get to the point

Attached: oi.jpg (1920x1080, 98K)

> Gas bombs - Prohibited

> Nightmare bombs that collapse internal organs - allowed

WTF kind of world is this? At least with certain gas bombs you can survive with a mask, how the hell do I survive a vacuum bomb?

I just want to know why "international protection" justifies an act of war. In the US, we're supposed to do the old fashioned business of declaring war before committing acts of war, and that predates any kind of "international protection" given that the US was set up as a sovereign nation-state.

My question is simple. What justification is there for the UK as a nation-state dropping bombs on a foreign country any more than I would have to do the same myself? Is it just that I don't work for the government corporation?

youtube.com/watch?v=ovuWJQrwpIw

Vacuum bombs... the feminist are gonna be pissed..

I don't think you're meant to survive, it's not about having a fair fight.

I'm pretty sure the UK are dropping or will drop these things on civilian centres or cities.

thermobaric weapons have been around for decades, this is nothing new

I'll allow it
The justification stems from you not being allowed to, the government has made it illegal
But they've made it legal for themselves, so that checks out
Also some gassed kids or something?

b-but not the kidneys
they bring money for weapons, ammo and food

>gassed kids
First of all, proofs. Second of all, the R2P (responsibility to protect) doctrine is a load of war criminal trotskyite talmudic neocon bullshit. Thirdly, if there were proofs then it should have been easy, at least in the case of the US, to declare war.

But none of these things happened. I don't know what process the UK wants to adhere to, but dropping a bomb on a foreign country is an act of war whether it's been declared or not. The resolute lack of justification for their actions speaks volumes.

>Manufactured by US arms giant Lockheed Martin, the company boasts that over 21,000 units of the missile have been delivered to the US Air Force and over 13 of Washington’s international partners, including the UK.
Of course, you're not actually American, so I can see why you'd overlook this.

We should start with Montreal

Always wondered why Europeans always have no problem bombing sand niggers in the Middle East but don't deal with the sand niggers at home?

Attached: 1523581941752.jpg (255x220, 7K)

Yes. I believe the military term is collateral damage. War is hell.

>if there were proofs then it should have been easy, at least in the case of the US, to declare war
that sounds like a terrible idea regardless of truths
For what it's worth, I agree with you, that whole war has been a clusterfuck of bullshit kike meddling since it's inception
Assad didn't bow down to muh arab spring so the cia jews got involved
But might makes right
You can't bomb aleppo because fuck you
The government bombing aleppo isn't an act of war because fuck you

That's not very sporting user.

Those drones look like a robotic tranny laying on its back

The Russians either gave thermobaric weapons to the SAA, or used them in conjunction with the SAA. Regardless, they have already been used, although by infantry instead of via drones, afaik